Both authors and co-authors are indexed. Please note all entries are listed alphabetically by main author only.

1. Abramowitz, Alan I., and Suzie Ishikawa. 1995. Explaining the Republican Takeover of the House of Representatives: Evidence from the 1992-94 NES Panel Survey. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

2. Ansolabehere, Stephen D., and Shanto Iyengar. 1993. Information and Electoral Attitudes: A Case of Judgment Under Uncertainty. in Explorations in Political Psychology. eds. Shanto Iyengar, and William J. McGuire, 321-37. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

3. Ansolabehere, Stephen D., Shanto Iyengar, and Adam Simon. 1999. Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout . The American Political Science Review 93, no. 4: 901-9.

4. Barnes, Samuel H., M. Kent Jennings, Ronald Inglehart, and Barbara G. Farah. 1988. Party Identification and Party Closeness in Comparative Perspective. Political Behavior 10: 215-31.

5. Granberg, Donald. 1993. Political Perception. in Explorations in Political Psychology. eds. Shanto Iyengar, and William J. McGuire, 70-112. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

6. Hofstetter, C. Richard, David C. Barker, James T. Smith, Gina M. Zari, and Thomas A. Ingrassia. 1999. Information, Misinformation, and Political Talk Radio . Political Research Quarterly 52, no. 2: 353-69.

7. Ikeda, Ken'ichi, and Sean Richey. 2005. Policy Preference and Social Networking: Comparing the United States and Japan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

8. Inglehart, Ronald. 1989. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

9. Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10. ———. 1997. Postmaterialist Values and the Erosion of Institutional Authority. in Why People Don't Trust Government. eds. Jr. Joseph S. Nye, Philip D. Zelikow, and David C. KingCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11. Inglehart, Ronald, and Avram Hochstein. 1972. Alignment and Dealignment of the Electorate in France and the United States. Comparative Political Studies 5, no. 3: 343-72.

12. Inglehart, Ronald, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1976. Party Identification, Ideological Preference, and the Left-Right Dimension among Western Mass Publics. In Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, and Dennis FarlieNew York: Wiley.

13. Ippolito, Dennis S. 1980. Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Public Policy: Group Influence in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

14. Irwin, Galen. 1974. Compulsory Voting Legislation: Impact on Voter Turnout in the Netherlands. Comparative Political Studies 7, no. 3: 292-315.

15. Irwin, Julie. 18 January 1998. Most young adults are ambivalent on abortion: Open talks haven't brought consensus. The Cincinnati Equirer, sec. News, p. A16.

16. Ishio, Yoshito. 2006. Political Independence in the United States: How Do Independent Leaners Differ From Pure Independents and Weak Partisans? Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies 21: 51-76.

17. Iyengar, Shanto. 1989. How Citizens Think About National Issues: A Matter of Responsibility. American Journal of Political Science 33, no. 4: 878-900.

18. ———. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

19. Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

20. ———. 1987. Shortcuts to Political Knowledge: The Role of Selective Attention and Accessibility. In Information and Democratic Processes. John A. Ferejohn, and James H. KuklinskiUrbana: University of Illinois Press.

21. Iyengar, Shanto. 1980. Subjective Political Efficacy as a Measure of Diffuse Support. Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 249-56.

22. Iyengar, Shanto. 1979. Television News and Issue Salience, a Reexamination of the Agenda-setting Hypothesis. American Politics Quarterly 7: 395-416.

23. Iyengar, Shanto. 1986. Whither Political Information, NES Pilot Study Report, No. nes002253.

24. Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25. Iyengar, Shanto, and Adam Simon. 1993. News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing. Communication Research 20, no. 3: 365-83.

26. ———. 1994. News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda Setting, Priming and Framing. in Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. eds. W. Lance Bennett, and David L. Paletz, 167-85. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

27. Knoke, David, and Larry Isaac. 1976. Quality of Higher Education and Sociopolitical Attitudes. Social Forces 54: 524-29.

28. Lienesch, Michael. 1998. Prophetic Neo-Populists: The New Christian Right and Party Politics in the United States. in The New Politics of the Right : Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. eds. Hans-Georg Betz, and Stefan Immerfall, 233-48. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

29. Richey, Sean, and Ken'ichi Ikeda. 2006. The influence of political discussion on policy preference: a comparison of the United States and Japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science 7, no. 3: 273-88.

30. Zaller, John. 1997. A Model of Communication Effects at the Outbreak of the Gulf War. in Do the Media Govern?: Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America. eds. Shanto Iyengar, and Richard Reeves, 296-311. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.