Version 2005-Oct-06 Codebook ---------------------------- VARIABLE DESCRIPTION FILE 2000 PRE-POST STUDY (2000.T) ============================== VERSION Process.1. ANES VERSION NUMBER OF DATA Numeric Process1. VERSION NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the 2-digit number corresponding to version of the data file. (The initial release of the raw data file is data version 01.) See the introductory section of this codebook for note on "version" and "dataset". ============================== DSETID Process.2. ANES DATASET NUMBER Character Process2. ANES DATASET NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dataset number 2000.T. See the introductory section of this codebook for note on "version" and "dataset" numbers. ============================== ICPSRNO Process.2a. ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 3131 Numeric Process2a. ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 3131 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the study number within the ICPSR archive. ============================== V000001 Process.4. Case ID Numeric Process.4. ANES 2000 CASE ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- ANES 2000 Case ID corresponds to the Pre-election ID. There are gaps in the numbering (0001-1812) ============================== V000001a Process.4a. Post ID Numeric Process.4a. POST ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- There are gaps in the numbering. 0001-1557 Pos Interviews 2001-2254 Post non-interviews ============================== V000002 Process.5. Sample weight Numeric DEC 4 Process.5. Sample weight --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A poststratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March Supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: < high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more. ============================== V000002a Process.5a. Post weight MD: EQ 0 Numeric Process.5a. Sample weight for Post variables --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. 0. No Post IW ============================== V000003 Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post Numeric Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Pre-Election and Post-Election interviews 1. Pre-Election Interview only 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1555 252 ============================== V000004 Pre.Admin.1. Mode of Pre IW Numeric Pre-Admin.1. PRE: Mode of Pre IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Personal (FTF) 5. Telephone 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1006 801 ============================== V000005a Pre.Admin.2a. Form - E section Numeric Pre-Admin.2a. PRE: Form - E section administered in Pre --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. 0. Section E not administered in Pre [Post section H V001410-V001417] 1. Section E administered in Pre [V000398-V000406] 0 1 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V000005b Pre.Admin.2b. Form - F6-F9 half sample Numeric Pre-Admin.2b. PRE: Form - F6-F9 half sample --------------------------------------------------------------------- The series of questions F6-F9 concerning "most important problem" was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the Pre 0. R not selected for F6-F9 Pre administration 1. R selected for F6-F9 Pre administration [V000431-V000438] 0 1 ----- ----- Count 902 905 ============================== V000005c Pre.Admin.2c. Form - Q1-Q11 or Q14-15 Numeric Pre-Admin.2c. PRE: Form - Clinton retrospective Q1-Q11 series or Clinton affects/traits Q14-Q15 series --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rs were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective (Q1-Q11) or the Clinton traits and affects questions (Q14-Q15 sections) in the Pre. The questions for which R was not selected for Pre administration were administered in the Post (S1-S11 and the S14-S15 sections). 1. Q1-Q11 asked in Pre [Clinton retrospective V000807-V000846] 2. Q14-Q15 sections asked in Pre [Clinton affects and traits [V000847-V000861] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005d Pre.Admin.2d. Form - G section lib-con Numeric Pre-Admin.2d. PRE: Form - G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T or G6.E-G10.E Lib/Con format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for Liberal/Conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. The standard format items are G1-G5 (FTF) and G1.T-G5.T (phone); the experimental format items are G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone). SELF PLACEMENT G1a Standard format FTF = V000439 G1a.T Standard format Ph = V000439a G6.E-G6c.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000442-445 CLINTON PLACEMENT G2 Standard format FTF = V000448 G2.T Standard format Ph = V000448a G7.E-G7b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000450-452 GORE PLACEMENT G3 Standard format FTF = V000455 G3.T Standard format Ph = V000455a G8.E-G8b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000459-461 GW BUSH PLACEMENT G4 Standard format FTF = V000465 G4.T Standard format Ph = V000465a G9.E-G9b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000469-471 BUCHANAN PLACEMENT G5 Standard format FTF = V000475 G5.T Standard format Ph = V000475a G10.E-G10b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000479-481 1. Standard format G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T (FTF/phone) 2. Experimental format G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone) 1 2 ----- ----- Count 868 939 ============================== V000005e Pre.Admin.2e. Form - H1 or H1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2e. PRE: Form - H1 or H1.E economy retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H1) or experimental (H1.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [V000488a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [V000488b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 908 899 ============================== V000005f Pre.Admin.2f. Form - H2 or H2.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2f. PRE: Form - H2 or H2.E employment retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H2) or experimental (H2.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [V000492a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [V000492b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 901 906 ============================== V000005g Pre.Admin.2g. Form - H4 or H4.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2g. PRE: Form - H4 or H4.E economy prospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H4) or experimental (H4.E) format. 1. Standard format H4 [V000496a] 2. Experimental format H4.E [V000496b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 911 896 ============================== V000005h Pre.Admin.2h. Form - H11 or H11.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2h. PRE: Form - H11 or H11.E imports format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H11) or experimental (H11.E) format. 1. Standard format H11 [V000511a] 2. Experimental format H11.E [V000511b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 910 897 ============================== V000005j Pre.Admin.2j. Form - H12 or H12.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2j. PRE: Form - H12 or H12.E isolationism format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H12) or experimental (H12.E) format. 1. Standard format H12 [V000513a] 2. Experimental format H12.E [V000513b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005k Pre.Admin.2k. Form - L3 medical insur. Numeric Pre-Admin.2k. PRE: Form - L3/L3.T or L3.E/L3.TE medical insurance format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Govt/Private Health Insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is L3a; the experimental format (with reversed scale) is L3a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2. The version 1 format is L3a; the version 2 format (with reversed coding) is L3a.E. 1. FTF Standard L3a/ Phone Version 1 L3a.T [V000608a/V000610a] 2. FTF Experimental L3a.E/ Phone Version 2 L3a.TE [V000608b/V000610b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005m Pre.Admin.2m. Form - L6 or L6.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2m. PRE: Form - L6 or L6.E affirmative action format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (L6) or experimental (L6.E) format. 1. Standard format L6 [V000671a] 2. Experimental format L6.E [V000671b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V000005n Pre.Admin.2n. Form - M4 env vs. jobs Numeric Pre-Admin.2n. PRE: Form - M4a/M4a.T or M4a.E/M4a.TE environment vs. jobs format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Environment Versus Jobs self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is M4a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is M4a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is M4a; the version 2 (without "haven't thought much" option) format is M4a.E. 1. FTF Standard M4a/ Phone Version 1 M4a.T [V000707a/V000709a] 2. FTF Experimental M4a.E/ Phone Version 2 M4a.TE [V000707b/V000709b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 875 932 ============================== V000005p Pre.Admin.2p. Form - N1 or N1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2p. PRE: Form - N1 or N1.E school voucher format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (N1) or experimental (N1.E) format. 1. Standard format N1 [V000741a] 2. Experimental format N1.E [V000741b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 882 925 ============================== V000005q Pre.Admin.2q. Form - P1 women's role Numeric Pre-Admin.2q. PRE: Form - P1/P1.T or P1.E/P1.TE women equal role format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Women's Equal Role self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is P1a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is P1a.T; the version 2 format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.TE. 1. FTF Standard P1a / Phone Version 1 P1a.T [V000754a/V000756a] 2. FTF Experimental P1a.E/Phone Version 2 P1a.TE [V000754b/V000756b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 902 905 ============================== V000006 Pre.Admin.3. Month of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.3. PRE: Month of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- Count 831 714 262 ============================== V000007 Pre.Admin.4. Day of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.4. PRE: Day of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 ============================== V000008 Pre.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) Character Pre-Admin.5. PRE: Month and day (MMDD) of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. ============================== V000009 Pre.Admin.6. No. days after election Numeric Pre-Admin.6. PRE: Number of days before election --------------------------------------------------------------------- Election day was November 7, 2000. 1-63 days ============================== V000010 Pre.Admin.7. IW length MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Admin.7. PRE: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Average Pre interview length is 68.35 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) ============================== V000011 Pre.Admin.8. IW number Numeric Pre-Admin.8. PRE: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-53 ============================== V000012 Pre.Admin.9. Date of beginning VQ file Numeric Pre-Admin.9. PRE: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 45 41 183 430 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 26 191 338 444 ============================== V000013 Pre.Admin.10. Date of ending VQ file MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.10. PRE: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 99. INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 31 34 171 426 101 6 7 8 9 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 24 196 342 471 6 ============================== V000014 Pre.Admin.11. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.11. PRE: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. NA, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 107 6 ============================== V000015 Pre.Admin.12. Advance letter sent? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.12. PRE: Advance letter sent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No advance letter sent 1. Advance letter sent 9. NA 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 335 1467 5 ============================== V000016 Pre.Admin.13. Payment amount MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.13. PRE: Payment amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 99. NA 0 20 40 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 1396 389 14 ============================== V000017 Pre.Admin.14. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.14. PRE: Payment mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 1615 169 15 ============================== V000018 Pre.Admin.15. Payment date MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.15. PRE: Payment date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; R requested no payment ============================== V000019 Pre.Admin.16. Tape recorded? Numeric Pre-Admin.16. PRE: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No 1 5 ----- ----- Count 161 1646 ============================== V000020 Pre.Admin.17. Verification Numeric Pre-Admin.17. PRE: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- Approximately 15 percent of interviews (completed or partially completed) were randomly selected and verified by field supervisors for new interviewers, and 6 percent were randomly selected and verified for SRC-experienced interviewers. Verification was attempted by phone (phone interviews) or by letter (FTF interviews) within 3 days of interview date. If no contact/ response with the respondent was made after 3 attempts, a replacement line was selected. The respondent was asked whether they were interviewed by the interviewer of record, the approximate length of the interview and whether or not the interview was interesting; in addition , 3 questions were asked about content of the interview. NOTE: for verification codes, a "don't remember" response is considered a non-match. 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1509 15 246 22 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 3 10 2 ============================== V000021 Pre.Admin.18. Evaluation Numeric Pre-Admin.18. PRE: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 1 102 10 ============================== V000022 Pre.Admin.19. Conversion indicator Numeric Pre-Admin.19. PRE: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal conversion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1534 273 ============================== V000023 Pre.Admin.20. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.20. PRE: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1716 90 1 ============================== V000024 Pre.Admin.21. Date per letter requested MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.21. PRE: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. No persuasion letter requested ============================== V000025 Pre.Admin.22. Date persuasion sent MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.22. PRE: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; INAP, no persuasion letter requested (9999 in Pre-Admin.21) ============================== V000026 Pre.Admin.23. Type of persuasion letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.23. PRE: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no persuasion letter sent (0,9 in Pre-Admin.20) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1717 33 4 23 4 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 4 3 23 ============================== V000027 Pre.Admin.24. Telephone calls Numeric Pre-Admin.24. PRE: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-42 ============================== V000028 Pre.Admin.25. FTF calls Numeric Pre-Admin.25. PRE: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-22 ============================== V000029 Pre.Admin.26. Final result Numeric Pre-Admin.26. PRE: Final result --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Interview, complete 5. Interview, partial 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1801 6 ============================== V000030 Pre.Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) Numeric Pre-Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All cases coded 1. There was a single release of the entire sample. 1. Released at start of the field period 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000031 Pre.Admin.28. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Pre-Admin.28. PRE: Language of IW (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) 1. English 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000032 Pre.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Pre-CSheet.1. PRE - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing Coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Missing coversheet 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1783 24 ============================== V000033 Pre.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.2. PRE - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF coversheets were blue or green. Telephone coversheets were yellow. GREEN COVERSHEETS: used by FTF interviewers when updating the area probability sample. Type II updates involved addition of unlisted (hidden) HUs at the selected listed address: for example, once the IWR was inside the HU, he or she may have noticed that the house was divided into separate and complete apartment units that were not apparent from outside. Each interviewer received a set of unlabeled coversheets that had a provision for adding up to three unlisted HUs discovered at the listed address. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 4. Green - FTF type II updating 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 1 2 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 984 794 5 24 ============================== V000034 Pre.CSheet.3. PH- type phone # MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.3. IF TELEPHONE RDD: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Business 2. Home 3. Both 4. Group headquarters 5. Cell phone 9. NA; Phone mode and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned FTF mode 0 1 2 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 2 735 4 44 16 ============================== V000035 Pre.CSheet.4. PH- business with residence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.4. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3a: Does anyone live there on the premises? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No. 9. NA 0. Inap, 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000036 Pre.CSheet.5. PH- bus res has personal# MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.5. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: IF SOMEONE LIVES ON THE PREMISES: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3b: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Have other 2. Use this 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.4; 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode 0 2 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000037 Pre.CSheet.6. FTF- HH listing from MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 6: Household listing obtained from: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HU member 2. Neighbor 3. Apt. manager 4. Landlord 5. Observation 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; FTF and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 980 3 1 4 7 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 17 ============================== V000038 Pre.CSheet.7. Selection table MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.7. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Selection table --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from all household members who are eligible adults.(An eligible adult is a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or older by Election Day.) The Selection Table appears on the Coversheet below the Household Listing. After a complete listing of the HH is taken, each eligible adult is assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of gender and age [beginning with the oldest male as number 1, males are numbered by increments of 1 according to descending age; females are numbered by descending age starting with the number one higher than that assigned to the youngest male]. The interviewer then uses the Selection Table to determine the "Number" of the eligible adult to be interviewed. The Selection Table itself consists of 2 parallel columns. In the first column the interviewer circles the total number of eligible adults in the household; in the second column (same row) is identified the Number" of the person who will be the respondent. There are 8 different Selection Tables used and they are randomly assigned. A summary describing all 8 Selection Tables appears below. PERSONS PERSON SELECTED (person "Number") --------------------------------- A B1 B2 C D E1 E2 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 1 2 2 2 4 3 5 5 6 or more 1 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 1. Selection table A 2. Selection table B1 3. Selection table B2 4. Selection table C 5. Selection table D 6. Selection table E1 7. Selection table E2 8. Selection table F 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 274 152 135 304 299 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 161 149 309 24 ============================== V000039 Pre.CSheet.8. Number of elig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.8. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number of eligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: In addition to completing the HH listing on the coversheet, the IWR entered a value for number of eligible respondents in CSMS. For this reason, cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable. 1-7 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 607 989 161 44 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 3 2 1 ============================== V000040 Pre.CSheet.9. Number inelig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.9. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number ineligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- These are usually adults (over 18) in the HU who are noncitizens. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 0-6 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1743 51 1 1 2 9 ============================== V000041 Pre.CSheet.10. Household composition MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-CSheet.10. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Household composition --------------------------------------------------------------------- The HH composition code is derived from information provided in the household listing. "Adults" are 18 years of age (by election day) or older; all individuals included in the HH composition codes below refer to adults. A designation of a HH member as "the householder" (HHR) describes HU member who owns or rents the home (in whose name the lease is held). Cohabiting couples are coded as married (30,40, 50-52). Roommates of opposite sex are coded 11,12,21,22; in all cases of unrelated roommates the respondent is HHR. If R identifies self as married/partnered but spouse/partner is residing elsewhere (nursing home, job requirement or other reason), R is coded as adult male HHR/adult female HHR (codes 10-22 and 60-95) and is identified as married/partnered in marital status question. In cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212,1381, 1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in V000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner in HH listing or elsewhere other than marital status question. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 10. 1 adult male HHR 11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative 12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 20. 1 adult female HHR 21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative 22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living at home are under 18 40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative 50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives 51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative 52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives 55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives 60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative 65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives 70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative 85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives 90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 95. Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR 99. NA 10 11 12 20 21 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 216 25 7 347 15 22 30 40 50 51 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 879 135 44 6 55 60 65 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 32 1 7 50 85 90 95 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 19 6 12 ============================== V000042 Pre.CSheet.11. R person number MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.11. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: R person number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. Coded 1-5 9. NA 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 617 64 12 1 6 ============================== V000043 Pre.CSheet.12. FTF- type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.12. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 38 658 47 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 35 32 30 ============================== V000044 Pre.CSheet.13. FTF- gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.13. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 36 33 876 61 ============================== V000045 Pre.CSheet.14. FTF- type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.14. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; assigned phone mode 0 1 2 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1738 15 2 47 5 ============================== V000046 Pre.CSheet.15. Resistance from contact? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.15. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 458 1322 27 ============================== V000047 Pre.CSheet.16. Contact resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 10 342 106 ============================== V000048 Pre.CSheet.17. Contact resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.17. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 20 332 106 ============================== V000049 Pre.CSheet.18. Contact resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.18. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 40 312 106 ============================== V000050 Pre.CSheet.19. Contact resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.19. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 81 271 106 ============================== V000051 Pre.CSheet.20. Contact resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.20. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 125 227 106 ============================== V000052 Pre.CSheet.21. Contact resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.21. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 15 337 106 ============================== V000053 Pre.CSheet.22. Contact resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.22. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 163 189 106 ============================== V000054 Pre.CSheet.23. R refuse initially? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.23. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 222 1530 55 ============================== V000055 Pre.CSheet.24. R break appointments MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.24. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 9. NA 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1522 200 67 18 ============================== V000056 Pre.CSheet.25. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.25. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 281 97 80 ============================== V000057 Pre.CSheet.26. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.26. SUMMARY: resistance (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 330 1450 27 ============================== V000058 Pre.CSheet.27. R resist-waste time MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 1 176 ============================== V000059 Pre.CSheet.28. R resist-too personal MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.28. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 7 170 ============================== V000060 Pre.CSheet.29. R resist-confidentiality MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.29. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 9 168 ============================== V000061 Pre.CSheet.30. R resist-not interested in politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.30. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 12 165 ============================== V000062 Pre.CSheet.31. R resist-too busy MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.31. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 21 156 ============================== V000063 Pre.CSheet.32. R resist-health MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.32. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 3 174 ============================== V000064 Pre.CSheet.33. R resist-other MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.33. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 15 162 ============================== V000065 Pre.CSheet.34. IWR est income (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 98 202 264 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 249 72 49 72 ============================== V000066 Pre.CSheet.35. IWR est race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.35. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Post equivalent of this variable in Post-CSheet.31. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 764 131 4 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 36 2 52 ============================== V000067 Pre.CSheet.36. Certainty of race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.36. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.35 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 855 915 31 6 ============================== V000068 Pre.CSheet.37. Hispanic HH? (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.37. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also V000184d, V000184e (Post version of these variables) and Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 84 863 7 52 ============================== V000069 Pre.CSheet.38. Certainty if Hisp (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.38. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 860 911 33 3 ============================== V000070 Pre.IWR.1. Interviewer of record Numeric Pre-IWR.1. PRE: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== V000071 Pre.IWR.2. Supervisor Numeric Pre-IWR.2. PRE: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== V000072 Pre.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.3. PRE: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 226 1581 ============================== V000073 Pre.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.4. PRE: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA 3 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 333 574 572 294 34 ============================== V000074 Pre.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.5. PRE: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA 1 2 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1684 100 23 ============================== V000075 Pre.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.6. PRE: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA 0 1 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1561 61 185 ============================== V000076 Pre.IWR.7. Interviewer languages MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.7. PRE: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. 0. NA 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000077 Pre.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-IWR.8. PRE: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 449 385 148 214 22 133 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 64 78 82 38 15 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 13 4 29 12 23 ============================== V000078 Pre.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.9. PRE: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 179 273 314 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 287 133 253 ============================== V000079 Pre.Sample.1. ICPSR state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.1. ICPSR state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (V000260). NEW ENGLAND 43. Florida 01. Connecticut 44. Georgia 02. Maine 45. Louisiana 03. Massachusetts 46. Mississippi 04. New Hampshire 47. North Carolina 05. Rhode Island 48. South Carolina 06. Vermont 49. Texas MIDDLE ATLANTIC BORDER STATES 11. Delaware 51. Kentucky 12. New Jersey 52. Maryland 13. New York 53. Oklahoma 14. Pennsylvania 54. Tennessee EAST NORTH CENTRAL 55. Washington DC 21. Illinois 56. West Virginia 22. Indiana MOUNTAIN STATES 23. Michigan 61. Arizona 24. Ohio 62. Colorado 25. Wisconsin 63. Idaho WEST NORTH CENTRAL 64. Montana 31. Iowa 65. Nevada 32. Kansas 66. New Mexico 33. Minnesota 67. Utah 34. Missouri 68. Wyoming 35. Nebraska PACIFIC STATES 36. North Dakota 71. California 37. South Dakota 72. Oregon SOLID SOUTH 73. Washington 40. Virginia EXTERNAL STATES 41. Alabama 81. Alaska 42. Arkansas 82. Hawaii 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== V000080 Pre.Sample.2. FIPS state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.2. FIPS state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (V000260). 01. Alabama 30. Montana 02. Alaska 31. Nebraska 04. Arizona 32. Nevada 05. Arkansas 33. New Hampshire 06. California 34. New Jersey 08. Colorado 35. New Mexico 09. Connecticut 36. New York 10. Delaware 37. North Carolina 11. Washington DC 38. North Dakota 12. Florida 39. Ohio 13. Georgia 40. Oklahoma 15. Hawaii 41. Oregon 16. Idaho 42. Pennsylvania 17. Illinois 44. Rhode Island 18. Indiana 45. South Carolina 19. Iowa 46. South Dakota 20. Kansas 47. Tennessee 21. Kentucky 48. Texas 22. Louisiana 49. Utah 23. Maine 50. Vermont 24. Maryland 51. Virginia 25. Massachusetts 53. Washington 26. Michigan 54. West Virginia 27. Minnesota 55. Wisconsin 28. Mississippi 56. Wyoming 29. Missouri 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== V000081 Pre.Sample.3. 2000 state abbr and CD Character Pre-Sample.3. 2000 state abbreviation and Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable provides the state (2-character Postal abbreviation) and congressional district number of the location of R's residence at the time of the 2000 Pre- election interview. Washington D.C. is blank in this variable. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded "9996". See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). ============================== V000082 Pre.Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state code and congresional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== V000083 Pre.Sample.5. Congressional district no. MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.5. Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-52. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 96. Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C. ============================== V000084 Pre.Sample.6. ICPSR state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.6. ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== V000085 Pre.Sample.7. Did R vote outside IW CD? MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.7. Did R vote in state and CD of interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R voted in state and CD of interview 1. R did not vote in state and CD of interview 8. NA if vote was in state/CD of interview (4 in Post C1 and 8,9,0 in Post C3) 9. INAP, R did not vote or NA/DK if voted; no Post interview; IW location misidentified in the Preload (1 in Post-Summary.24) 0 1 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1131 22 28 626 ============================== V000086 Pre.Sample.8. State/CD -vote outside CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.8. State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- The first 2 digits represent the state FIPS code, and the second 2 digits are CD number. Where the state differs but the CD number is unknown, the state will be coded in the first 2 digits but the last 2 digits will be 99. 9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview (8 in Pre-Sample.7) 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== V000087 Pre.Sample.9. FIPS state and county MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.9. FIPS state and county - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. The FIPS State code is represented in digits 1 and 2 of this variable, the FIPS County code in the last 3 digits. ============================== V000087a Pre.Sample.9a. County (alpha) Character Pre-Sample.9a. Name of County - Interview location (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. NOTE: This variable was constructed for use as preload in Post-Election C3 (variable V001243), which attempts to ascertain specific registration location of the respondent. It should be noted that, although county identification in this variable for face-to-face interviews meets normal standards for accuracy, the V000087a Post preload data for RDD cases were created by imputing area code, central office codes and similar listed numbers. ============================== V000088 Pre.Sample.10. Primary area name Character Pre-Sample.10. Primary area name - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. This is a character variable for the Primary Selection Unit (PSU) name. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. ============================== V000089 Pre.Sample.11. Primary area code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.11. Primary area code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been recoded to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. The 44 PSU codes listed below (110 through 482) have been recoded to values 1-44 in random order. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255. Columbus, GA-AL 131. Detroit, MI 257. Jacksonville, FL 132. Cleveland, OH 258. Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141. St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262. Birmingham, AL 152. Baltimore, MD 273. Waco, TX 154. Miami-Hialeh, FL 274. McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 292. Fresno, CA 181. Denver, CO 293. Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434. Saginaw, MI 191. Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464. Gardner, MA 194. Anaheim, CA 466. Decatur Co., IN 196. San Francisco, CA 470. Mower Co., MN 211. New Haven, CT 474. DeSoto Parish, LA 213. Manchester-Nashua NH 477. Chicot Co., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery Co., VA 226. Atlantic City, NJ 482. El Dorado Co., CA 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000090 Pre.Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. 3-digit code and: 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000090a Pre.Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) Character Pre-Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000091 Pre.Sample.14. Number of HH units MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.14. Number of household unit --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-5 and: 9. NA 0. Phone IW 0 1 2 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 983 2 3 1 17 ============================== V000092 Pre.Sample.15. Census region Numeric Pre-Sample.15. Census region - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT) 2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI) 3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV) 4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY) 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 316 450 657 384 ============================== V000093 Pre.Sample.16. Belt code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.16. Belt code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census and 1990 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions, 1990 Census Population reports (as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro, City and County Data book) and 1990 Census "urbanized area" (as shown in the 1994 Rand McNally Road Atlas - 70th edition. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 1. Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CMSAs), plus the 15 next largest CMSA/MSAs (population over 2,000,000) 2. Central Cities of CMSAs and MSAs with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21 largest CMSA/MSAs -- code 1) 3. Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAs and 15 next largest CMSAs/MSAs 4. Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAs 5. Adjacent Areas: includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50 miles of the central business district of a central city 6. Outlying Area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 99 185 168 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 241 264 49 ============================== V000094 Pre.Sample.17. Population in 1000s MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Pre-Sample.17. Population in 1000s - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- The actual 1990 Census Place population is coded in thousands, rounding to the nearest whole thousand (from the 1990 Population total for the city/place as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro City and County Data Book). NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. Actual population in 1000s and: 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) 9999. 9,998,500 persons or over 0000. Rural place, no defined Census Place, or Census Place with fewer than 500 persons ============================== V000095 Pre.Sample.18. Census size of place MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.18. Census size of place - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the appendix on CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census. The major objective of the Census Bureau in delineating urbanized areas is to provide a better separation of urban and rural population in the vicinity of large cities. An urbanized area consists of a central city or cities, and surrounding closely settled territory ("urban fringe"). Size of Place codes 21 and 41 include areas that are in the "urban fringe" but are not Census Places. Note for Codes 50-53: in a few cases, Non-MSA PSUs (based on the 1980 OMB SMSA definitions) contain areas which are now part of a 1990 PMSA or MSA (based on the June 1990 OMB definition). In these cases, the Size of Place Code for any SSUs (segments) within such areas are coded in the "40s" rather than in the "50s" as shown. This occurred in El Dorado county CA (the major part of the El Dorado/Alpine Co, CA PSU #82) which is now a part of the Sacramento CA MSA, and also for one SSU (segment) in the Gardner MA PSU (#64), which is now a part of the Worchester MA MSA. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. THE SIX LARGEST CMSAs PLUS THE 15 NEXT LARGEST CMSAs/ MSAs (I.e. those coded 1 or 3 [possibly 5, rarely 6] 11. Central Cities (these would have been coded 1 on the Belt Code SUBURBS OF THE 6 LARGEST CMSAs AND THE 15 NEXT LARGEST 20. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population 21. 2,500-9,999 plus other urbanized areas ("urban fringe" not in Census places) 22. 10,000-29,999 23. 30,000-49,999 24. 50,000-99,999 25. 100,000-149,999 26. 150,000-349,999 27. 350,000 and over, exclusive of cities coded 11 CMSAs/MSAs W/LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION CENTRAL CITIES IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION (2 on Belt Code): 30. Under 50,000 (identified by OMB, June 1990, as Central Cities 31. 50-000-99,999 32. 100,000-149,999 33. 150,000-349,999 34. 350,000 and over SUBURBS IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 40. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population) 41. 2,500-9,999 42. 10,000-29,999 43. 30,000-49,999 44. 50,000-99,999 45. 100,000-149,999 46. 150,000 and over "NON-CMSA/PMSA/MASs" 50. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,000,000 population) 51. 2,500-9,999 52. 10,000-29,999 53. 30,000-49,999 00. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000096 Pre.Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. 0. Enumeration district 1. Tracted 9. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000097 Pre.Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code Numeric Pre-Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Sampling documentation in this codebook. The first 2 digits contain the 200 Sampling Error Stratum code and the last digit represents the 2000 SECU or Sampling Error Computation Unit code. ============================== V000098 Pre.Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA Numeric Pre-Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 360. Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA 520. Atlanta, GA 560. Atlantic City, NJ 720. Baltimore, MD 875. Bergen-Passiac, NJ PMSA (Former code and title: 6040 Paterson-Clifton-Passaic, NJ) 1000. Birmingham, AL 1123. Boston-Lawrence-Salem-Lowell-Brockton, MA NECMA 1125. Boulder-Longmont, CO PMSA 1145. Brazoria, TX PMSA 1280. Buffalo, NY 1600. Chicago, IL 1680. Cleveland OH 1800. Columbus, GA-AL 1920. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 2000. Dayton, OH 2080. Denver-Boulder, CO 2120. Des Moines, IA 2160. Detroit, MI 2400. Eugene-Springfield, OR 2760. Fort Wayne, IN 2800. Fort Worth-Arlington TX, PMSA 2840. Fresno, CA 3000. Grand Rapids, MI 3360. Houston, TX 3600. Jacksonville, FL 3760. Kansas City, MO-KS 3840. Knoxville, TN 3965. Lake County, IL PMSA 3980. Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 4480. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 4720. Madison WI 4763. Manchester-Nashua, NH NECMA 4880. McAllen-Pharr-Edinburgh, TX 5000. Miami, FL 5015. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ PMSA (former code and title: 5460 New Brunswick-Perth Amboy-Sayreville NJ) 5080. Milwaukee, WI 5120. Minneapolis-St Paul, MN-WI 5350. Nashua, NH PMSA 5380. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 5480. New Haven-West Haven, CT 5483. New Haven-Waterbury-Meriden, CT NECMA 5600. New York, NY-NJ 5640. Newark, NJ 5700. Niagara Falls, NY PMSA 5775. Oakland, CA PMSA 6160. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 6200. Phoenix, AZ 6280. Pittsburgh, PA 6453. Portsmouth-Dover-Rochester, NH NECMA 6760. Richmond, VA 6780. Riverside-San Bernardino, Ontario, CA 6920. Sacramento, CA (1990 MSA definition) 6960. Saginaw, MI 7040. St. Louis, MO-IL 7160. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT MSA 7360. San Francisco-Oakland,CA 7600. Seattle-Everett, WA 8003. Springfield, MA NECMA 8080. Steubenville-Wierton, OH-WV 8200. Tacoma, WA 8800. Waco, TX 8840. Washington, DC-MD-VA 9000. Wheeling, WV-OH 9243. Worcester-Fitchburn-Leominster, MA NECMA 0000. INAP; location not in SMSA (MSA)/ NECMA 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000099 Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.22. 2000 CMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. The six largest CMSA's are marked with **. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 07. Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14. Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28. Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31. Dallas-Ft Worth TX (Since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34. Denver-Boulder CO (Since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added in 35. Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49. Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56. Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63. Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77. Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78. Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84. San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91. Seattle-Tacoma WA 96. Telephone sample (RDD) 00. INAP, Location not in CMSA. This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990) ============================== V000099x Pre.Sample.22x. 2000 MSA MD1: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.22x. 2000 MSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the 2000 MSA for the full sample, including the the RDD telephone component. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. Metropolitan Statistical Area code and: 00. INAP, Location not in MSA. ============================== V000100 Pre.Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000101 Pre.Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 cases corresponded to more than one Census tract. ============================== V000102 Pre.Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000103 Pre.Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 cases corresponded to more than one Census block. ============================== V000104 Pre.Sample.27. 2000 MCD MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.27. 2000 MCD - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000105 Pre.Sample.28. 2000 CDP MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Numeric Pre-Sample.28. 2000 CDP - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000106 Pre.Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000107 Pre.Summary.1. Pre timing - section A MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.1. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000108 Pre.Summary.2. Pre timing - section B MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.2. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000109 Pre.Summary.3. Pre timing - section C MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.3. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000110 Pre.Summary.4. Pre timing - section D MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.4. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000111 Pre.Summary.5. Pre timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.5. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section E selected for Post administration ============================== V000112 Pre.Summary.6. Pre timing - section F MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.6. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000113 Pre.Summary.7. Pre timing - section G MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.7. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000114 Pre.Summary.8. Pre timing - section H MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.8. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000115 Pre.Summary.9. Pre timing - section K MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.9. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000116 Pre.Summary.10. Pre timing - section L MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.10. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000117 Pre.Summary.11. Pre timing - section M MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.11. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000118 Pre.Summary.12. Pre timing - section N MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.12. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000119 Pre.Summary.13. Pre timing - section P MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.13. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000120 Pre.Summary.14. Pre timing - section Q MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.14. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000121 Pre.Summary.15. Pre timing - section R MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.15. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000122 Pre.Summary.16. Pre timing - section S MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.16. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000123 Pre.Summary.17. Pre timing - section X MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.17. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION X --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000124 Pre.Summary.18. Pre timing - section Y MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.18. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000125 Pre.Summary.19. Pre timing - section Z MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.19. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000126 Post.Admin.1. Mode of Interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.1. POST: Mode of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Post-Admin.1a. 5 cases re-assigned to phone mode in the Post were administered FTF in error; note that several of these cases, although administered FTF, used telephone logic in the interview. 1. Personal 5. Telephone 7. ADMINISTERED USING WRONG MODE: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as Personal interview 0. No post IW 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 693 857 5 ============================== V000126a Post.Admin.1a. Mode switch flag Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST - MODE SWITCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 200 FTF Pre cases were selected for reassignment to Phone administration in the Post. Of these, 168 were completed interviews. Assignment of all Post cases (interview and non-interview) are described here. 1. Assigned FTF, not switched to Phone mode 2. Assigned Phone 3. Assigned FTF, switched to Phone mode 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- Count 805 802 200 ============================== V000127a Post.Admin.2a. Form desc 1 - H in Post MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2a. POST: Form - section H administered in Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. Because assignment was set during Pre administration, this randomization was unaffected by the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. Section H not administered in Post [Pre section E V000398-V000406] 1. Section H administered in Post [V000410-V000417] 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 790 765 252 ============================== V000127b Post.Admin.2b. Form desc 2 - K format MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2b. POST: Form - K2 format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to have the K2a-K2d office recognition battery administered with or without the use of probes [V001446a-V001454]. NOTE: see item Post-Summary.124 (V000262) for description of the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. K2a-K2d administered without probes 1. K2a-K2d administered with probes 9. No post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1025 530 252 ============================== V000128 Post.Admin.3. Mo. IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.3. POST: Month of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December 00. No Post IW 0 11 12 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1147 408 ============================== V000129 Post.Admin.4. Day IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.4. POST: Day of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 and: 0. No Post IW ============================== V000130 Post.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.5. POST: Month and day (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW; '9999' indicates NA ============================== V000131 Post.Admin.6. No. days after election MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.6. POST: Number of days after election --------------------------------------------------------------------- 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA ============================== V000132 Post.Admin.7. IW bef/aft Gore concession MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.7. POST: Interview taken before or after Gore concession --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gore concession: December 13, 2000 0. Before 1. Day of concession (Dec. 13) 2. After 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1462 16 77 252 ============================== V000133 Post.Admin.8. IW length MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Post-Admin.8. POST: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. The average Post interview length is 63.76 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000134 Post.Admin.9. IW no. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.9. POST: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-44 and: 99. NA 00. INAP, no Post Interview ============================== V000135 Post.Admin.10. Date of beg VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.10. POST: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 0. No Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 140 351 13 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 201 282 568 ============================== V000136 Post.Admin.11. Date of end VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.11. POST: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 0. INAP, partial IW; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 105 352 13 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 158 318 605 ============================== V000137 Post.Admin.12. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.12. POST: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. INAP, partial IW; no post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1429 122 256 ============================== V000138 Post.Admin.13. Release MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST: Release --------------------------------------------------------------------- Because of the turnaround time needed to prepare it after the Pre interviewing was concluded, the Post sample was released in 3 releases. 1. Release 1 - November 7 2. Release 2 - November 15 3. Release 3 - November 21. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 3 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1147 319 340 1 ============================== V000139 Post.Admin.14. Payment amt MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.14. POST: Payment to R - amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA 0 20 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 1525 252 26 ============================== V000139a Post.Admin.14a. Interviewer incentive MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.14a. INTERVIEWER INCENTIVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. 0. Post interview date not in incentive period 1. Post interview date in incentive period. 9. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1236 319 252 ============================== V000140 Post.Admin.15. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.15. POST: Payment to R - mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 1511 14 278 ============================== V000141 Post.Admin.16. Payment date MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.16. POST: Payment to R - date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/ Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000142 Post.Admin.17. Tape recorded MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.17. POST: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No 0. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 78 1477 ============================== V000143 Post.Admin.18. Verification MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.18. POST: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes in Pre-Admin.17 (V000020). 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1332 55 142 18 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 4 2 254 ============================== V000144 Post.Admin.19. Evaluation MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.19. POST: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate 9. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1477 1 77 252 ============================== V000145 Post.Admin.20. Conversion ind. MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.20. POST: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal convesion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1529 26 252 ============================== V000146 Post.Admin.21. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.21. POST: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1517 95 195 ============================== V000147 Post.Admin.22. Date requested MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.22. POST: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000148 Post.Admin.23. Date sent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.23. POST: Date persuasion letter sent --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000149 Post.Admin.24. Type letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.24. POST: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1712 9 28 51 7 ============================== V000150 Post.Admin.25. Tel calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.25. POST: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== V000151 Post.Admin.26. FTF calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.26. POST: Number of Face-to-Face calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== V000152 Post.Admin.27. Final result Numeric Post-Admin.27. POST: Final result code --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 IW complete 05 IW partial 51 Refusal by R 52 Refusal by person other than R 54 Initial refusal, not reached for conversion 61 No contact 63 Noninterview, permanent reason 66 Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete 67 Noninterview, other reason 68 Could not Locate R 1 5 51 52 54 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1551 4 99 5 20 61 63 66 67 68 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 5 1 79 20 ============================== V000153 Post.Admin.28. Result date (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.28. POST: Result date (Post noninterviews) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with Post IW; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000154 Post.Admin. 29. Flag - mode switch MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.29. POST: Flag - pre/post mode switch --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V000004 and V000126. Some interviews conducted FTF in the pre were administered by phone in the Post. 1. Pre FTF and Post FTF 2. Pre phone and Post phone 3. Pre FTF and Post phone 0. INAP, no post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 698 693 164 ============================== V000155 Post.Admin.30. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Post-Admin.30. POST: Language of interview (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews were conducted entirely in English 1. English 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000156 Post.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Post-CSheet.1. POST - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing CS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Coversheet missing 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1780 27 ============================== V000157 Post.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.2. POST - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- Pink coversheets were copies of coversheets that were in transfer. NOTE: for an unknown reason, some cases assigned to FTF mode were administered using yellow (phone) coversheets. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 3. Pink 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 936 831 13 ============================== V000158 Post.CSheet.3. Item 1. R at samp addr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.3. POST - COVERSHEET Item 1: Does (NAME) still live here? R STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewers omitted filling out this box (code 9) on 227 coversheets. 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 1512 41 227 ============================== V000159 Post.CSheet.4. Item 2b. PHONE: New phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.4. IF PHONE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - PHONE COVERSHEET Item 2b: New phone number available --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Available 2. Not available 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); FTF mode 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1793 8 2 4 ============================== V000160 Post.CSheet.5. Item 2b. FTF: Addr status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.5. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - FTF COVERSHEET Item 2b: Address is: STATUS OF NEW ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Out of range 3. Within range 5. Can't find 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); Phone mode 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1780 1 17 7 2 ============================== V000161 Post.CSheet.6. FTF type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 926 26 501 31 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 106 35 24 158 ============================== V000162 Post.CSheet.7. FTF gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.7. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode 0 1 2 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 898 58 21 637 193 ============================== V000163 Post.CSheet.8. FTF type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.8. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; coversheet missing; assigned phone mode 0 1 2 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 10 2 35 32 ============================== V000164 Post.CSheet.9. Resist from contact MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.9. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 222 1454 104 ============================== V000165 Post.CSheet.10. Contct resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.10. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 10 202 10 ============================== V000166 Post.CSheet.11. Contct resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.11. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 2 210 10 ============================== V000167 Post.CSheet.12. Contct resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.12. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 1 211 10 ============================== V000168 Post.CSheet.13. Contct resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.13. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 20 192 10 ============================== V000169 Post.CSheet.14. Contct resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.14. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 91 122 9 ============================== V000170 Post.CSheet.15. Contct resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.15. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 16 196 10 ============================== V000171 Post.CSheet.16. Contct resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 111 107 4 ============================== V000172 Post.CSheet.17. R refuse initially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.17. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 98 1573 109 ============================== V000173 Post.CSheet.18. R break appts MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.18. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 8. NA 9. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1444 273 90 ============================== V000174 Post.CSheet.19. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.19. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 152 15 55 ============================== V000175 Post.CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 131 152 1454 70 ============================== V000176 Post.CSheet.21. R resist- waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.21. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000177 Post.CSheet.22. R resist- too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.22. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000178 Post.CSheet.23. R resist- confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.23. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000179 Post.CSheet.24. R resist- not interested in politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.24. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000180 Post.CSheet.25. R resist- too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.25. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000181 Post.CSheet.26. R resist- health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.26. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000182 Post.CSheet.27. R resist- other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000183 Post.CSheet.28. Ever make contact (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3: Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 12 1760 35 ============================== V000183a Post.CSheet.28a. Ever contact R (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28a. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3d: Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 1722 70 3 ============================== V000184 Post.CSheet.29. Reason no contact (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.29. IF NO CONTACT WITH HOUSEHOLD FOR POST INTERVIEW: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD4: What was the reason for no contact? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained 2. All occupants away during entire study period (i.e. long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc. 3. Nobody answered door but think somone in HU [FTF: when visits made] 4. Could not obtain access to HU 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1770 14 1 1 4 7 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 15 5 ============================== V000184a Post-CSheet.30. CSMS estimated income MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.30. IF FTF MODE: POST- COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 98 201 263 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 72 49 76 ============================== V000184b Post-CSheet.31. CSMS estimated HH race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.31. IF FTF MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Pre equivalent of this variable in Pre-CSheet.35. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 759 133 4 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 36 2 55 ============================== V000184c Post-CSheet.32. CSMS est HH race certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.32. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Post-Csheet.31 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 858 912 31 6 ============================== V000184d Post-CSheet.33. CSMS estimated Hispanic MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.33. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also V000068, V000069 (Pre version of these variables) ans Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 85 860 6 55 ============================== V000184e Post-CSheet.34. CSMS est Hispanic certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 862 908 33 4 ============================== V000185 Post.IWR.1. Interviewer of record MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.1. POST: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== V000186 Post.IWR.2. Supervisor MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.2. POST: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== V000187 Post.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.3. POST: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 200 1606 1 ============================== V000188 Post.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.4. POST: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 3 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 385 596 533 254 39 ============================== V000189 Post.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.5. POST: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 46 28 ============================== V000190 Post.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-IWR.6. POST: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1577 67 163 ============================== V000191 Post.IWR.7. Interviewer languages Numeric Post-IWR.7. POST: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000192 Post.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-IWR.8. POST: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 445 391 161 205 20 176 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 68 36 68 37 28 12 13 14 15 17 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 19 3 29 12 1 ============================== V000193 Post.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.9. POST: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 114 187 260 297 255 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 311 142 240 1 ============================== V000194 Post.Cand.1. House race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1. House race type --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC 0 12 13 14 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 632 3 111 12 21 23 24 29 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 717 9 126 8 3 32 55 65 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 25 152 3 1 ============================== V000194a Post.Cand.1a. Retiring House Repr name Character Post-Cand.1a. Retiring House Representative name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000194b Post.Cand.1b. Retiring House Repr code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1b. Retiring House Representative code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 41. Democratic Representative--retiring (district with open race) 42. Republican Representative--retiring (district with open race) 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC 0 41 42 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1626 25 152 3 1 ============================== V000194c Post.Cand.1c. Retiring House Repr gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.1c. Retiring House Representative gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No retiring House representative; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1626 141 36 3 1 ============================== V000194d Post.Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Independent/3rd party incumbent candidate 31. Democratic candidate in open race 32. Republican candidate in open race 33. Democratic incumbent 34. Republican incumbent 35. Democratic challenger 36. Republican challenger 39. Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. Washington DC 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 42 135 753 823 35 36 39 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 5 4 4 ============================== V000194e Post.Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election Numeric Post-Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race 13 Democratic Senate incumbent 14 Republican Senate incumbent 15 Democratic Senate challenger 16 Republican Senate challenger 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. No race in state; Washington CD 0 11 12 13 14 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 251 5 420 411 159 16 31 33 35 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 2 36 11 4 ============================== V000194f Post.Cand.1f. Competitiveness of respondent CD MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1f. Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. 1. Least competitive 2. 3. 4. 5. Most competitive 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1); Washington D.C. 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 375 300 361 362 401 8 ============================== V000194g Post.Cand.1g. Open seat in 2000 in respondent district? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1g. Open seat in R's district in 2000? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NO 1. YES 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) Washington D.C. 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1697 102 8 ============================== V000195 Post.Cand.2. House Democratic cand name Character Post-Cand.2. House Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000196 Post.Cand.3. House Democratic cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.3. House Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Democratic candidate; Washington DC 0 31 33 35 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 180 758 725 3 1 ============================== V000197 Post.Cand.4. House Democratic cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.4. House Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 1367 296 3 1 ============================== V000198 Post.Cand.5. House Republican cand name Character Post-Cand.5. House Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000199 Post.Cand.6. House Republican cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.6. House Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 0 32 34 36 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 178 860 644 3 1 ============================== V000200 Post.Cand.7. House Republican cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.7. House Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 1574 108 3 1 ============================== V000201 Post.Cand.8. House Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.8. House Independent/third party candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000202 Post.Cand.9. House Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.9. House Independent/third party candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 0 30 39 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1767 32 4 3 1 ============================== V000202a Post.Cand.9a. House Ind cand party Character Post-Cand.9a. House Independent/third party candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an alpha variable ============================== V000203 Post.Cand.10. House Ind cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.10. House Independent/third party candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1767 36 3 1 ============================== V000204 Post.Cand.11. Senate race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.11. Senate race type: STATES WITH SENATE RACE STATES WITHOUT SENATE RACE Arizona Alabama California Arkansas Connecticut Colorado Delaware Idaho Florida Illinois Georgia Iowa Indiana Kansas Maine Kentucky Maryland Louisiana Massachusetts New Hampshire Michigan North Carolina Minnesota Oklahoma Mississippi Oregon Missouri South Carolina Montana South Dakota Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico New York North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96 Code 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC 0 12 19 21 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 256 255 584 13 24 55 69 81 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 22 164 92 58 165 85 96 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 190 3 1 ============================== V000205 Post.Cand.12. Senate Democr cand name Character Post-Cand.12. Senate Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000206 Post.Cand.13. Senate Democr cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.13. Senate Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 11 13 15 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 452 256 511 584 3 1 ============================== V000207 Post.Cand.14. Senate Democr cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.14. Senate Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 452 924 427 3 1 ============================== V000208 Post.Cand.15. Senate Repub cand name Character Post-Cand.15. Senate Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000209 Post.Cand.16. Senate Repub cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.16. Senate Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 12 14 16 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 256 619 511 3 1 ============================== V000210 Post.Cand.17. Senate Repub cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.17. Senate Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 1245 141 3 1 ============================== V000211 Post.Cand.18. Senate Ind 1 cand name Character Post-Cand.18. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000212 Post.Cand.19. Senate Ind 1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.19. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent ** 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent ** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 10 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 360 3 1 ============================== V000212a Post.Cand.19a. Senate Ind 1 cand party Character Post-Cand.19a. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000213 Post.Cand.20. Senate Ind 1 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.20. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 109 251 3 1 ============================== V000214 Post.Cand.21. Senate Ind 2 cand name Character Post-Cand.21. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000215 Post.Cand.22. Senate Ind 2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.22. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 8 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1612 191 3 1 ============================== V000215a Post.Cand.22a. Senate Ind 2 cand party Character Post-Cand.22a. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000216 Post.Cand.23. Senate Ind 2 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.23. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1612 191 3 1 ============================== V000217 Post.Cand.24. Outside Hse Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.24. House Democratic candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000218 Post.Cand.25. Outside Hse Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.25. House Democratic candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 31 33 35 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 3 9 2 8 ============================== V000219 Post.Cand.26. Outside Hse Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.26. House Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 11 3 8 ============================== V000220 Post.Cand.27. Outside Hse Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.27. House Republican candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000221 Post.Cand.28. Outside Hse Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.28. House Republican candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 32 34 36 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 3 2 9 8 ============================== V000222 Post.Cand.29. Outside Hse Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.29. House Republican candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 11 3 8 ============================== V000223 Post.Cand.30. Outside Hse Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.30. House Independent/third party candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000224 Post.Cand.31. Outside Hse Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.31. House Independent/third party candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 96 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 14 8 ============================== V000225 Post.Cand.32. Outside Hse Ind cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.32. House Independent/third party candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 14 8 ============================== V000226 Post.Cand.33. Outside Hse race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33. House race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. Washington DC 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 12 21 55 65 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 9 2 1 2 8 ============================== V000226a Post.Cand.33a. Outside Sen race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33a. Senate race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96. Washington DC 99. R vote in another district but not another state 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 12 19 21 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 2 1 3 69 85 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 3 12 ============================== V000227 Post.Cand.34. Outside Sen Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.34. Senate Democratic candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== V000228 Post.Cand.35. Outside Sen Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.35. Senate Democratic candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 11 13 15 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 3 3 3 12 ============================== V000229 Post.Cand.36. Outside Sen Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.36. Senate Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 4 3 3 ============================== V000230 Post.Cand.37. Outside Sen Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.37. Senate Republican candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== V000231 Post.Cand.38. Outside Sen Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.38. Senate Republican candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Republican candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 12 14 16 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 3 3 3 12 ============================== V000232 Post.Cand.39. Outside Sen Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.39. Senate Republican candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 7 3 ============================== V000233 Post.Cand.40. Outside Sen Ind1 cand name Character Post-Cand.40. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== V000234 Post.Cand.41. Outside Sen Ind1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.41. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 10 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 2 8 12 ============================== V000235 Post.Cand.42. Outside Sen Ind1 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.42. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 1 1 8 ============================== V000236 Post.Cand.43. Outside Sen Ind2 cand name Character Post-Cand.43. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no (2nd) independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== V000237 Post.Cand.44. Outside Sen Ind2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.44. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 8 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 9 12 ============================== V000238 Post.Cand.45. Outside Sen Ind2 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.45. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 1 9 ============================== V000239 Post.Summary.1. Post timing - section A MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.1. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000240 Post.Summary.2. Post timing - section B MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.2. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000241 Post.Summary.3. Post timing - section C MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.3. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000242 Post.Summary.4. Post timing - section D MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.4. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000243 Post.Summary.5. Post timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.5. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000244 Post.Summary.6. Post timing - section F MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.6. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000245 Post.Summary.7. Post timing - section G MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.7. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000246 Post.Summary.8. Post timing - section H MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.8. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section H administered in Pre; No Post IW ============================== V000247 Post.Summary.9. Post timing - section J MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.9. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION J --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000248 Post.Summary.10. Post timing - section K MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.10. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000249 Post.Summary.11. Post timing - section L MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.11. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000250 Post.Summary.12. Post timing - section M MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.12. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000251 Post.Summary.13. Post timing - section N MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.13. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000252 Post.Summary.14. Post timing - section P MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.14. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000253 Post.Summary.15. Post timing - section Q MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.15. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000254 Post.Summary.16. Post timing - section R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.16. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000255 Post.Summary.17. Post timing - section S MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.17. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000256 Post.Summary.18. Post timing - section T MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.18. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000257 Post.Summary.19. Post timing - section V MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.19. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION V --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000258 Post.Summary.20. Post timing - section Y MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.20. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000259 Post.Summary.21. Post timing - section Z MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.21. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000260 Post.Summary.22. Wrong CD admin(preload) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.22. POST: Wrong CD administered (preloaded)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: 3 cases (case IDs 900,1016,1114) were misidentified in the preload as PA cases but were actually conducted in New Jersey; the actual CD for the NJ location is not determined. Variables for survey questions which were administered according to Preload information are unchanged (affected cases not set to missing data). State and CD variables (e.g. V000079, V000080 etc.) are set to missing data but sampling variables associated with segment are correct for the actual segment location (if FTF mode). 0. No misidentification of CD 1. Wrong CD identified (administered) 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1553 3 251 ============================== V000261 Post.Summary.23. Type error in preload MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.23. POST: Type of error in preload --------------------------------------------------------------------- Code 1 corresponds to 3 cases in WV where Senate type race was misidentified as type race 12 instead of type race 19 (note: 1 additional case in WV had correct Senate type race preloaded). For the 3 cases coded 1, the preload information for the Senate Independent/3rd party candidate was not preloaded. 0. No error in Preload 1. Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases) 2. Wrong CD (1 in Post-Summary.22) 9. No Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1550 3 3 251 ============================== V000262 Post.Summary.24. Flag-Post rand failure MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.24. POST: Flag - randomization failure in Post admin --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). The randomization variables documented in V001752-V001810 describe the types of randomizations affected. 0. No randomization failure 1. Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1051 504 252 ============================== V000301 A1. Attention R paid to campaigns MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED 3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 525 886 396 ============================== V000302 A2. Does R care about Pres election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2. Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CARE A GOOD DEAL 3. DON'T CARE VERY MUCH 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 1402 397 8 ============================== V000303 A3. Did R vote in 1996 election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3. In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. YES, VOTED 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE --> SKIP TO A4/A5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP A4/A5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1264 530 12 1 ============================== V000304 A3a. Who did R vote for in 1996 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3a. IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT IN 1996: Which one did you vote for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. BILL CLINTON 3. BOB DOLE 5. ROSS PEROT 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 543 665 408 138 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 27 9 17 ............................................................................ A4. (Now I'd like to ask you about the good and bad points of the major candidates for President.) ============================== V000305 A4a. Does R like anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4a. Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4c 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 912 878 13 4 ============================== V000306 A4b(1). #1 detail about Gore R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9995 Numeric A4b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a ============================== V000307 A4b(2). #2 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000308 A4b(3). #3 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000309 A4b(4). #4 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000310 A4b(5). #5 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000311 A4c. Does R dislike anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4c. Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> A5a Or A6 8. Don't Know --> A5a Or A6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 860 934 10 3 ============================== V000312 A4d(1). #1 detail about Gore R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A4d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c ============================== V000313 A4d(2). #2 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000314 A4d(3). #3 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000315 A4d(4). #4 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000316 A4d(5). #5 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000317 A5a. Does R like anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5a. Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A5c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A5c 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 822 970 13 2 ============================== V000318 A5b(1). #1 detail about Bush R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a ============================== V000319 A5b(2). #2 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000320 A5b(3). #3 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000321 A5b(4). #4 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000322 A5b(5). #5 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000323 A5c. Does R dislike anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5c. Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 885 899 20 3 ============================== V000324 A5d(1). #1 detail about Bush R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c ============================== V000325 A5d(2). #2 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000326 A5d(3). #3 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000327 A5d(4). #4 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000328 A5d(5). #5 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000329 A6. Number of days R watched nat'l news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A6. How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A7 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 483 165 201 179 99 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 135 27 515 3 ============================== V000330 A6a/A6a.T. Attention to national news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A6a/A6a.T. IF R WATCHED NATIONAL NETWORK TV NEWS IN PAST WEEK: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A6 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 486 235 364 513 190 19 ============================== V000331 A7. Days R watched early local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A7. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as "Eyewitness News" or "Action News" in the late afternoon or early-evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 562 110 176 140 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 163 22 519 ============================== V000332 A8. Days R watched late local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A8. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 727 130 182 157 106 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 127 39 338 1 ============================== V000333 A8a/A8a.T. Attention to local news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A8a/A8a.T. IF NUMBER OF DAYS WATCHED IS NOT 0 FOR BOTH EARLY AND LATE LOCAL NEWS: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A7 and A8 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 327 192 316 558 347 67 ============================== V000334 A9. Does R have cable or satellite tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A9. Do you have either cable or satellite television? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1418 389 ============================== V000335 A10. Days R read a daily newspaper MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A10. How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A11 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 468 216 181 130 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 92 36 610 ============================== V000336 A10a. Did R read about campaign in paper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10a. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A11 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A10 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 468 790 548 1 ============================== V000337 A10b/A10b.T. Attention to newspaper articles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10b/A10b.T. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: IF R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN: FTF: (Please look at page 1 of the booklet.) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A10a 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1017 121 202 352 107 8 ============================== V000338 A11. Did R see ads for candidates on tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A11. Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't Know 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 1377 427 3 ============================== V000339 A12. Approve/disappr Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO B1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1177 565 55 10 ============================== V000340 A12a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Clinton MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT/ IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in A12 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 1145 587 8 2 ============================== V000341 A12x. Summary app/disapp Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL/ DISAPPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A12 and A12a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK (in A12 or A12a) 9. RF (in A12 or A12b) 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 745 425 162 400 63 12 ============================== V000342 B1. Did R care about House election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1. As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH 2. PRETTY MUCH 3. NOT VERY MUCH 4. NOT AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 501 669 475 155 7 ============================== V000343 B2. Does R remember names of House cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2. Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B3 8. DK --> SKIP TO B3 9. RF 0. NA; Washington D.C. 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 526 1277 4 ============================== V000344 B2a. #1 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2a. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 6 15 104 133 35 36 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 11 234 15 ============================== V000345 B2a1. #1 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 245 238 20 23 ============================== V000346 B2ax1. #1 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2ax1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 118 159 234 15 ============================== V000347 B2ax2. #1 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2ax2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 241 25 11 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 222 12 15 ============================== V000348 B2b. #2 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list or this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 6 4 16 14 35 36 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 16 141 67 ============================== V000349 B2b1. #2 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2b1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1521 121 120 35 10 ============================== V000350 B2bx1. #2 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2bx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 45 34 141 67 ============================== V000351 B2bx2. #2 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2bx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 68 9 2 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 132 9 67 ============================== V000352 B2c. #3 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2c. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 1 1 5 35 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 38 33 ============================== V000353 B2c1. #3 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2c1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 28 14 31 2 ============================== V000354 B2cx1. #3 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2cx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 2 6 38 33 ============================== V000355 B2cx2. #3 House cand recall-accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2cx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 7 1 32 6 33 ============================== V000356 B3. Congress job approve/dissapr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO C1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 933 617 246 11 ============================== V000357 B3a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Cong MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3a. IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB/ IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB: (Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job?) Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in B3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 257 603 947 ============================== V000358 B3x. Summary R approval of US Congress MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R APPROVAL OF U.S. CONGRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from B3 and B3a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove not strongly 8. DK (in B3 or B3a) 9. RF (in B3 or B3a) 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 648 299 318 246 11 ............................................................................ C1/C1.T. FTF: Please look at page 2 of the booklet. I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person and that you don't care too much for that person. You would rate the person at the 50 degree mark if you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. TELEPHONE: I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. The feeling thermometer can rate people from 0 to 100 degrees. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person. Rating the person at the midpoint, the 50 degree mark, means you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. ============================== V000359 C1a/C1a.T. Thermometer Bill Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1a/C1a.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Clinton TELEPHONE: The first person is: Bill Clinton Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton? THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000360 C1b/C1b.T. Thermometer Gore MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1b/C1b.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Al Gore TELEPHONE: The next person is: Al Gore (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - AL GORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000361 C1c/C1c.T. Thermometer George W Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1c/C1c.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) George W. Bush TELEPHONE: The next person is: George W. Bush (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000362 C1d/C1d.T. Thermometer Buchanan MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1d/C1d.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Pat Buchanan TELEPHONE: The next person is: Pat Buchanan (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him THERMOMETER - PAT BUCHANAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000363 C1e/C1e.T. Thermometer Nader MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1e/C1e.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Ralph Nader TELEPHONE: The next person is: Ralph Nader (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000364 C1f/C1f.T. Thermometer Mccain MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1f/C1f.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) John McCain TELEPHONE: The next person is: John McCain (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him? THERMOMETER - JOHN MCCAIN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000365 C1g/C1g.T. Thermometer Bradley MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1g/C1g.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Bradley TELEPHONE: The next person is: Bill Bradley (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - BILL BRADLEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000366 C1h/C1h.T. Thermometer Lieberman MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1h/C1h.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Joseph Lieberman TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Joseph Lieberman (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - JOSEPH LIEBERMAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000367 C1j/C1j.T. Thermometer Cheney MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1j/C1j.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Dick Cheney TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Dick Cheney (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - DICK CHENEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000368 C1k/C1k.T. Thermometer Hillary Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1k/C1k.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Hillary Clinton TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Hillary Clinton (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate her?) THERMOMETER - HILLARY CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ C2. Still using the thermometer: ============================== V000369 C2a. Thermometer Dem Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2a. (How would you rate:) the Democratic Party THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000370 C2b. Thermometer Rep Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2b. (How would you rate:) the Republican Party THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000371 C2c. Thermometer Reform Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2c. (How would you rate:) Reform Party THERMOMETER - REFORM PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000372 C2d. Thermometer parties in general MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2d. (How would you rate:) Political parties in general THERMOMETER - POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ D0. I'd like to ask you what you think are the good and bad points about the two national parties. ============================== V000373 D1. Like anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D1. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D2 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D2 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1018 766 20 3 ============================== V000374 D1a(1). #1 like Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D1a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1 ============================== V000375 D1a(2). #2 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000376 D1a(3). #3 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000377 D1a(4). #4 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000378 D1a(5). #5 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000379 D2. Dislike anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D2. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D3 or D5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D3 or D5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 996 25 4 ============================== V000380 D2a(1). #1 dislike Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D2a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2 ============================== V000381 D2a(2). #2 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000382 D2a(3). #3 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000383 D2a(4). #4 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000384 D2a(5). #5 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000385 D3. Like anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D3. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D4 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D4 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 808 975 20 4 ============================== V000386 D3a(1). #1 like Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D3a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3 ============================== V000387 D3a(2). #2 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000388 D3a(3). #3 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000389 D3a(4). #4 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000390 D3a(5). #5 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000391 D4. Dislike anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D4. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 915 867 21 4 ============================== V000392 D4a(1). #1 dislike Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D4a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4 ============================== V000393 D4a(2). #2 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000394 D4a(3). #3 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000395 D4a(4). #4 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000396 D4a(5). #5 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000397 D5. Preference for divided government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D5. Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER WHEN ONE PARTY CONTROLS BOTH 3. BETTER WHEN CONTROL IS SPLIT 5. IT DOESN'T MATTER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 420 926 420 38 3 ============================== V000398 E1/E1.T. Better/worse off in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1/E1.T. FTF: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? TELEPHONE: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E1b 5. THE SAME --> Skip to E2 8. DK --> Skip to E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 312 130 482 3 ============================== V000399 E1a. How much better off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1a. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN BETTER OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Better --> E2 5. Somewhat Better --> E2 8. DK --> E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1495 117 194 1 ============================== V000400 E1b. How much worse off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1b. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN WORSE OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Worse 5. Somewhat Worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1677 41 89 ============================== V000401 E1x. Summary R econ situation last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1x. Would you say that you (and your family [FTF: living here]) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY - R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E1/E1.T and E1a/E1b. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 9. RF (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 117 194 482 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 89 41 4 ============================== V000402 E2/E2.T. Did R delay med/dent treatment MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E2/E2.T. FTF: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? TELEPHONE: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 880 278 649 ============================== V000403 E3/E3.T. Expect better/worse in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3/E3.T. FTF: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? TELEPHONE: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E3B 5. THE SAME --> Skip to F1 8. DK --> Skip to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 369 53 479 26 ============================== V000404 E3a. How much better off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3a. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE BETTER OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much better off or somewhat better off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP to F1 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP to F1 8. DK --> SKIP to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1438 117 251 1 ============================== V000405 E3b. How much worse off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3b. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE WORSE OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1754 18 33 2 ============================== V000406 E3x. Summary R econ situation next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3x. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family [FTF: living here]) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better/worse off or somewhat better/worse off? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E3 and E3a/b. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Just about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E3 or E3a/E3b) 9. RF (in E 3 or E3a/E3b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half sample 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 117 251 479 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 33 18 3 ............................................................................ F0. Now we would like to know something about the feelings you have toward the candidates for President. I am going to name a candidate, and I want you to tell me whether something about that person, or something he has done, has made you have certain feelings like anger or pride. ============================== V000407 F1a. Angry- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1a. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series , and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 524 1272 9 2 ============================== V000408 F1aa. Angry- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1aa. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1283 94 102 221 107 ============================== V000409 F1b. Hopeful- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1b. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 853 934 18 2 ============================== V000410 F1bb. Hopeful- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1bb. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1b 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 954 141 254 379 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 77 1 1 ============================== V000411 F1c. Afraid- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1c. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F1 In Randomization 8. DK --> Next F1 In Randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 333 1462 10 2 ============================== V000412 F1cc. Afraid- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1cc. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1474 73 74 134 52 ============================== V000413 F1d. Proud- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1d. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 608 1174 23 2 ============================== V000414 F1dd. Proud- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1dd. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1199 111 198 250 48 1 ============================== V000415 F2a. Angry- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2a. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 487 1303 14 3 ============================== V000416 F2aa. Angry- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2aa. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2a 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1320 79 97 209 101 1 ============================== V000417 F2b. Hopeful- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2b. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 774 1014 17 2 ============================== V000418 F2bb. Hopeful- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2bb. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F26 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1033 124 227 348 74 1 ============================== V000419 F2c. Afraid- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2c. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 418 1374 13 2 ============================== V000420 F2cc. Afraid- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2cc. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2c 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1389 73 93 176 75 1 ============================== V000421 F2d. Proud- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2d. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 542 1239 24 2 ============================== V000422 F2dd. Proud- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2dd. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1265 96 148 250 46 2 ============================== V000423 F3a. Angry- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3a. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 197 505 67 1 ============================== V000424 F3aa. Angry- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3aa. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1610 53 40 82 22 ============================== V000425 F3b. Hopeful- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3b. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 114 588 67 1 ============================== V000426 F3bb. Hopeful- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3bb. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1693 10 17 61 26 ============================== V000427 F3c. Afraid- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3c. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 153 551 65 1 ============================== V000428 F3cc. Afraid- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3cc. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid-- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1654 46 34 51 22 ============================== V000429 F3d. Proud- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3d. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 78 623 68 1 ============================== V000430 F3dd. Proud- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3dd. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3d 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1729 8 23 33 14 ============================== V000431 F6(1). #1 most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 991 Numeric F6(1). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 1 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 991. "There were no issues"; "no issues, just party politics" 992. "There was no campaign in my district" 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, R not selected for half-sample administration (see Pre-Admin.2b, V000005b=0) ============================== V000432 F6(2). #2 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(2). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 2 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000433 F6(3). #3 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(3). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 3 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000434 F6(4). #4 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(4). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 4 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000435 F6x. Checkpoint for # of mentions MD: EQ 9 Numeric F6x. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF IMPORTANT PROBLEMS MENTIONED BY R --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNSURE WHETHER ONE PROBLEM OR MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM, CODE MORE THAN 1.] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. 0. No problem mentioned (000, 991-999 in F6(1)) 1. One problem mentioned 2. Two or more problems mentioned 9. R not selected for administration of F6-F7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 167 707 902 ============================== V000436 F7. Choice - most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 998 Numeric F7. IF R HAS MADE 2 OR MORE MENTIONS OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. If R mentioned only 1 problem, that mention is duplicated here. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 998. DK 999. RF; NA 000. Inap, R not selected for administration of F6-F7 (0 in F6x) ============================== V000437 F8. Gov't performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F8. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem -- a good job, only fair, or a poor job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. A GOOD JOB 3. ONLY FAIR 5. A POOR JOB 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 944 84 358 411 9 1 ============================== V000438 F9. Party performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F9. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem -- the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. REPUBLICANS 3. DEMOCRATS 5. THERE WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 944 201 237 382 26 17 ............................................................................ G1/G1.T. FTF: Please look at page 3 of the booklet. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal to extremely conservative. TELEPHONE: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. ============================== V000439 G1a. Self placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G1a.T; for FTF (and telephone) branching format, see G6.E (V000442). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 9 29 48 125 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 68 11 4 1341 ============================== V000439a G1a.T. Self placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G1a; for telephone (and FTF) branching format, see G6.E (V000442) 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 77 8 48 37 90 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 72 15 5 1407 ============================== V000440 G1ax. Summary: combined FTF/ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1ax. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1a and G1a.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 184 17 77 85 215 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 140 26 9 941 ============================== V000441 G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1b. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE, DK OR HAVEN'T THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL 3. CONSERVATIVE 5. MODERATE 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE 8. DK 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 or RF/NA in G1a or G1a.T; R selected for branching version 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1399 123 174 51 52 8 ============================== V000441a G1bx. Summary: comb FTF/phone-lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1bx. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT-SCALE SERIES: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1ax and G1b. This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF administration in previous years. Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a,G1b. 1. Liberal (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1) 3. Moderate (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA) 5. Conservative (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3) 7. Refused to choose (0/8,7) 8. DK (0/8,8) 9. NA/RF to entire question series (RF/NA,0) 0. NA to follow up question G4aa (0/8,9/NA) 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 302 51 453 52 8 941 ============================== V000442 G6.E. Self placement lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also: G1a and G1a.T (V000439 and V000439a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. A LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G6b.E 3. A CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 5. A MODERATE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 7. NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO G6a.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G6a.E 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> SKIP TO G6a.E 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 314 146 229 216 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 29 4 869 ============================== V000443 G6a.E. Had to choose lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS DK/NEITHER/MODERATE/NO THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 3. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. MODERATE[VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,9 in G6.E 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1244 143 241 58 111 10 ============================== V000444 G6b.E. R strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1661 65 79 2 ============================== V000445 G6c.E. R strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1578 119 105 5 ============================== V000446 G6x1. Summary self plcmnt lib-con scale/brnch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? COMBINED 7-POINT LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from: - branching data in G6.E, G6a.E, G6b.E, G6c.E. - 7-pt scale data in G1ax, G1b. NOTE: To make 7pt scale data comparable with the construction of a 7-pt summary of branching data, both the 7pt-scale data in G1ax and the "had to choose" data in G1b were used for constructing this summary. For both 7pt-scale and branching cases, Rs who answered moderate (4 in 7pt-scale) or DK or 'haven't thought much' (branching: or 'neither') were asked for the "had to choose" selection of liberal or conservative. Branching: If R selected liberal or conservative but strength followup was missing data (typically: DK) then 'not strong' has been coded in G6x1. Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 82 158 351 109 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 528 250 145 18 165 ============================== V000446a G6x1a. 7pt lib-con summary - FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1a. IF FTF MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for FTF cases only, summarizing FTF data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 51 77 212 57 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 314 129 77 9 80 ============================== V000446b G6x1b. 7pt lib-con summary - PHONE MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1b. IF PHONE MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for phone cases only, summarizing telephone data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 31 81 139 52 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 214 121 68 9 85 ============================== V000447 G6x2. Comb.7pt & branching summ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? 7PT FTF AND PHONE: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/ conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from G6x1. 1. Liberal (1-3 in G6x1) 3. Moderate (4 in G6x1) 5. Conservative (5-7 in G6x1) 7. Refused to choose (9 in G6x1) 8. DK (8 in G6x1) 0. NA (0 in G6x1) 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 591 109 923 165 18 ============================== V000448 G2. Clinton placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 78 120 91 85 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 30 31 4 29 ============================== V000448a G2.T. Clinton plcmnt lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G2; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 76 106 55 85 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 24 4 38 2 ============================== V000449 G2x. Combined FTF/ph Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2/G2.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 154 226 146 170 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 55 8 67 2 ============================== V000450 G7.E. Clinton placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. LIBERAL --> G7a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 434 78 285 139 3 ============================== V000451 G7a.E. Clinton strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G7.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1373 280 150 4 ============================== V000452 G7b.E. Clinton strong conservtive or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS CONSEVATIVE: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G7.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1729 45 32 1 ============================== V000453 G7x1.E. 5-pt br summary Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G7.E/G7a.E/G7b.E. 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G7.E 9. RF in G7.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 280 154 285 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 45 139 3 ============================== V000454 G7x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2x and G7x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 380 641 88 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 53 206 5 ============================== V000455 G3. Gore placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G3.T; for branching version, see G8.E (V000459). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 40 131 98 94 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 25 8 32 ============================== V000455a G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G3; for branching version, see G8.E (V000459). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 35 98 68 86 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 32 5 54 3 ============================== V000456 G3x. Combined FTF/ph Gore lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3/G3.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 75 229 166 180 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 57 13 86 3 ============================== V000457 G3a. Gore-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1371 92 210 134 ============================== V000458 G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con plcmnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G3.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1464 90 190 63 ============================== V000458a G3ax.T. Combined - certain Gore lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3ax. IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G3a and G3a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9, NA in G3/G3.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1028 182 400 197 ============================== V000459 G8.E. Gore placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G3 and G3.T (V000455 and V000455a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G8a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G8b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 386 150 254 149 ============================== V000460 G8a.E. Gore strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G8.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1421 250 130 5 1 ============================== V000461 G8b.E. Gore strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G8.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1657 89 58 3 ============================== V000462 G8x1.E. 5-pt br summary Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G8.E/G8a.E/G8b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G8.E 9. RF in G8.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 250 136 254 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 61 89 149 ============================== V000463 G8x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3x and G8x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 325 365 659 118 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 102 235 3 ============================== V000464 G8c.E. Gore-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1026 224 373 183 1 ============================== V000464a G8cx 7pt/branching summary Gore crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3ax.T and G8c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G3/G3.T/G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 406 773 380 1 ============================== V000465 G4. Bush placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G4.T; for branching format see G9.E (V000469). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 8 23 37 58 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 105 164 36 35 2 ============================== V000465a G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G4; for branching format see G9.E (V000469). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 6 32 18 49 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 146 35 51 2 ============================== V000466 G4x. Combined FTF/ph Bush lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4/G4.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 14 55 55 107 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 310 71 86 4 ============================== V000467 G4a. Bush-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G4 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1376 93 208 129 1 ============================== V000468 G4a.T. Bush-certain plcmnt lib-con phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G4.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1460 101 175 71 ============================== V000468a G4ax.T. Combined - certain GW Bush lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4ax. IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G4a and G4a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G4/G4.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1029 194 383 200 1 ============================== V000469 G9.E. Bush placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G4 and G4.T (V000465 and V000465a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G9a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 113 464 209 151 2 ============================== V000470 G9a.E. Bush strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G9.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 70 43 ============================== V000471 G9b.E. Bush strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G9.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1343 287 162 14 1 ============================== V000472 G9x1.E. 5-pt br summary Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G9.E/G9a.E/G9b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong cosnervative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G9.E 9. RF in G9.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 70 43 209 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 177 287 151 2 ============================== V000473 G9x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4x and G9x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 84 98 537 487 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 358 237 6 ============================== V000474 G9c.E. Bush-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G9.E; 8,9 or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1036 198 376 196 1 ============================== V000474a G9cx 7pt/branching summary Bush crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4ax.T and G9c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G4/G4.T/G9.E; 8,9,or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 258 392 759 396 2 ============================== V000475 G5. Buchanan placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale version see G5.T; for branching format see G10.E (V000479). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 14 15 26 57 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 55 115 145 3 ============================== V000475a G5.T. Buchan plcmnt lib-con scale phon MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) For the FTF version of the 7-point scale version see G5; for branching format see G10.E (V000479). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 3 17 8 35 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 61 108 154 4 ============================== V000476 G5x. Combined FTF/ph Buchan lib-con scl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5/G5.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 17 32 34 92 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 116 223 299 7 ============================== V000477 G5a. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G5 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1487 100 113 107 ============================== V000478 G5a.T. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G5.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1565 93 89 60 ============================== V000478a G5ax.T. Combined - certain Buchanan lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5ax. FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G5a and G5a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G5/G4.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1245 193 202 167 ============================== V000479 G10.E. Buchanan placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G5 and G5.T (V000475 and V000475a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G10a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G10b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 65 389 107 372 6 ============================== V000480 G10a.E. Buchanan strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G10.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1742 38 24 3 ============================== V000481 G10b.E. Buchan strong conserv or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G10.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1418 325 61 2 1 ============================== V000482 G10x1.E. 5-pt br summary Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x1.E. IF R SELECTED BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G10.E/G10a.E/G10b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G10.E 9. RF in G10.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 38 27 107 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 325 372 6 ============================== V000483 G10x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE) What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5x and G10x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 55 59 281 180 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 548 671 13 ============================== V000484 G10c.E. Certain-Buchan plcmnt lib-con br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G5/G5.T/G10.E; 8,9,or NA in G10a.E/G10b.E 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1252 225 181 149 ============================== V000484a G10cx. 7pt/branching summ Buchan l-c crt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5ax.T and G10c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 690 418 383 316 ============================== V000485 G11. Who does R think will be elected MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11. Who do you think will be elected President in November? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP to G11b 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 848 783 5 3 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 39 126 3 ============================== V000486 G11a. Race close or not- cand named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a. IF R NAMES PRES. CANDIDATE WHO R THINKS WILL WIN ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN IN G11] win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 8. DK --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in G11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 1449 213 16 ============================== V000487 G11b. Race close or not- cand not named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHO WILL WIN THE PRES. ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-7 in G11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1678 108 8 13 ============================== V000488a H1. US econ bttr/worse in last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN WORSE --> SKIP TO H1b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1.E 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 899 369 380 147 11 1 ============================== V000488b H1.E. US econ bttr/worse in last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN WORSE. --> SKIP TO H1b 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1. 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 908 155 405 331 8 ============================== V000489 H1a. How much better US econ past year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1a. IF R THINKS ECONOMY BETTER IN THE LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 251 448 1 ============================== V000490 H1b. How much worse US econ last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1b. IF R THINKS ECONOMY WORSE IN THE LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEWHAT WORSE 5. MUCH WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1505 232 70 ============================== V000491 H1x. Summary US econ btr/worse last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x. STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? BOTH VERSIONS: Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H1/H1.E and H1a,H1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 9. RF in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 251 448 785 70 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 232 20 1 ============================== V000492a H2. Esr/hrdr to find work last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN HARDER --> SKIP TO H2a 3. STAYED THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 125 313 447 16 ============================== V000492b H2.E. Esr/hrdr to find work last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 3. ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN HARDER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 901 454 300 129 23 ============================== V000493 H2a. How much harder to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2a. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN HARDER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much harder or a little harder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH HARDER --> H4 5. A LITTLE HARDER --> H4 8. DK --> H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1553 123 131 ============================== V000494 H2b. How much easier to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2b. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN EASIER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much easier or a little easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH EASIER 5. A LITTLE EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 493 404 3 1 ============================== V000495 H2x. Summary employ opps in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2x. STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? BOTH VERSIONS: Much harder/easier or a little harder/easier? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H2/H2.E and H2a,H2b. 1. Much harder 2. Somewhat harder 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. Much easier 8. DK in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 9. RF in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 123 131 613 404 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 493 42 1 ============================== V000496a H4. US econ bttr/worse in next year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET BETTER --> SKIP TO H4a 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4.E 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 896 181 535 163 29 3 ============================== V000496b H4.E. US econ bttr/worse in next year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET BETTER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 911 166 499 196 34 1 ============================== V000497 H4a. How much better US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4a. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET BETTER IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1430 113 264 ============================== V000498 H4b. How much worse US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4b. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET WORSE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1478 69 260 ============================== V000499 H4x. Summary US econ in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4x. STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN NEXT 12 MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H4/H4.E and H4a,H4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 9. RF in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 264 1034 260 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 69 63 4 ============================== V000500 H5. Approve/dissap Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H5b 8. DK --> SKIP to H6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1304 387 106 10 ============================== V000501 H5a. How much approve Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5a. IF R APPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 8. DK --> SKIP to H7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H5 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 503 783 516 4 1 ============================== V000502 H5b. How much dissprv Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5b. IF R DISAPPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H5 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1420 237 150 ============================== V000503 H5x. Summary Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H5 and H5a/H5b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in H5 or H5a/b 9. RF in H5 or H5a/b 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 783 516 150 237 110 11 ============================== V000504 H6. Is R invested in stock market MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H6. Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now -- either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1004 780 6 17 ============================== V000505 H7. Which party R thinks best to handle econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H7. Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM/NO DIFFERENCE 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 527 406 794 28 50 2 ============================== V000506 H8. Which party R thinks would avoid war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H8. Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. ABOUT THE SAME BY BOTH 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 373 324 1043 24 42 1 ============================== V000507 H9. Us position in world weaker/stronger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H9. Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WEAKER 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME 5. STRONGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 500 874 403 28 2 ============================== V000508 H10. Increase/decrease immigratration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. LEFT THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 172 785 785 60 5 ============================== V000509 H10a. Inc/dec immigratn little or a lot MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10a. IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE INCREASED/ IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE DECREASED: A little or a lot? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LITTLE 5. A LOT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H10 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 850 360 588 9 ============================== V000510 H10x. Summary immigration level MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10x. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? A little or a lot? SUMMARY: IMMIGRATION LEVEL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H10 and H10a. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased a little 3. Left the same 4. Decreased a little 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H10 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 100 785 260 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 520 69 5 ============================== V000511a H11. Favor/oppose import limits stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO H12 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO H12 7. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO H12 8. DK --> SKIP TO H12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11.E 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 897 245 263 385 17 ============================== V000511b H11.E. Favor/opp import limits ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 910 390 408 95 4 ============================== V000512 H11x. Combined versions import limits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric H11x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: IMPORT LIMITS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H11 and H11.E 1. Favor 5. Oppose 7. Haven't thought much (H11 only) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 635 671 385 112 4 ============================== V000513a H12. US better off to stay at home stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. AGREE --> SKIP to H13 5. DISAGREE --> SKIP to H13 8. DK --> SKIP to H13 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 916 235 640 15 1 ============================== V000513b H12.E. US better off to stay at home ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. BETTER OFF IF WE JUST STAYED HOME 5. BETTER OFF TRYING TO SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 267 601 44 4 ============================== V000514 H12x. Combined versions isolationism MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ISOLATIONISM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H12 and H12.E 1. Agree/ Better off to stay home 5. Disagree/ Better off trying to solve problems 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 502 1241 59 5 ============================== V000515 H13. Clinton foreign rel approve/disappr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H13b 8. DK --> SKIP to K1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1161 534 102 10 ============================== V000516 H13a. Strength appove Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H13 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 646 605 553 3 ============================== V000517 H13b. Strength dissapr Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13b. IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H13 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1273 328 202 3 1 ============================== V000518 H13x. Summary Clinton foreign relations MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: CLINTON HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H13 and H13a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H13 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 605 553 202 328 108 11 ============================== V000519 K1. Does R consider self Rep Dem or Ind MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN --> SKIP TO K1b 3. INDEPENDENT --> SKIP TO K1c 4. OTHER PARTY [SPECIFY] --> SKIP TO K1c 5. NO PREFERENCE --> SKIP TO K1c 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1c 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 620 451 496 27 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 204 5 4 ============================== V000520 K1a. Is R a strong Democrat or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1a. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A DEMOCRAT: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2-5, 8,9,0 in K1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1187 346 273 1 ============================== V000521 K1b. Is R a strong Republican or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1b. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A REPUBLICAN: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4,5,8,9,0 in K1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1356 236 214 1 ============================== V000522 K1c. Is R closer to Rep or Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1c. IF R'S PARTY PREFERENCE IS INDEPENDENT, NO PREFERENCE, OTHER, DK: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN 3. NEITHER [VOL] 5. CLOSER TO DEMOCRATIC 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,9,0 in K1 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1075 230 224 269 9 ============================== V000523 K1x. Party ID summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K1x. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? Would you call yourself a strong Democrat/Republican or a not very strong Democrat/ Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? SUMMARY: PARTY ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K1, K1a/b, K1c. Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a code of 5 (no preference) in K1 and a code of 3,8 or 9 in K1c AND also showed little or no interest in politics in response to the following survey questions: PRE question A1.(interest in campaigns), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race outcome), POST question C1 (voted), POST question F5 (follow public affairs); respondents who showed an interest in politics were coded 3. 0. Strong Democrat (1,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 1. Weak Democrat (1,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 2. Independent-Democrat (3/4/5/8,0,5 in K1, K1a/b, K1c 3. Independent-Independent (3,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c; 8,0,3 and 5,0,3/8/9 if not apolitical) 4. Independent-Republican (3/4/5/8,0,1 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 5. Weak Republican (2,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 6. Strong Republican (2,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 7. Other; minor party; refuses to say (4,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 8. Apolitical (8,0,3 or 5,0,3/8/9 in E6, E6a/b, E6c and no interest in politics 9. NA (8/9,0,0 in E6, E6a/b, E6c) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 346 274 269 206 230 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 215 236 9 17 5 ............................................................................ K1z/K1z.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe political figures. For each, tell me whether the word or phrase describes the candidate I name. TELEPHONE: I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe political figures. For each, please tell me whether the word or phrase describes the candidate I name. ============================== V000524 K2a. Gore trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 423 820 287 133 143 1 ============================== V000525 K2b. Gore trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 277 713 464 232 119 2 ============================== V000526 K2c. Gore trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 461 997 212 59 77 1 ============================== V000527 K2d. Gore trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 258 728 522 185 113 1 ============================== V000528 K2e. Gore trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2e. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 312 629 557 173 3 ============================== V000529 K2f. Gore trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2f. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 494 995 182 65 69 2 ============================== V000530 K2g. Gore trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2g. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 136 495 641 419 113 3 ============================== V000531 K3a. Bush trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3a. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 340 841 330 98 196 2 ============================== V000532 K3b. Bush trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3b. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 625 562 342 122 1 ============================== V000533 K3c. Bush trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3c. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 274 933 379 133 87 1 ============================== V000534 K3d. Bush trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3d. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 266 842 407 166 125 1 ============================== V000535 K3e. Bush trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3e. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 288 653 574 220 2 ============================== V000536 K3f. Bush trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3f. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 329 967 306 110 94 1 ============================== V000537 K3g. Bush trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3g. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 207 495 638 348 118 1 ============================== V000538 K4a. Buchanan trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4a. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 94 240 120 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 47 268 1 ============================== V000539 K4b. Buchanan trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4b. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 31 137 197 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 150 254 1 ============================== V000540 K4c. Buchanan trait- knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4c. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 50 304 139 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 41 235 1 ============================== V000541 K4d. Buchanan trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4d. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 23 136 227 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 138 245 1 ============================== V000542 K4e. Buchanan trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4e. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 17 65 224 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 175 287 2 ============================== V000543 K4f. Buchanan trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4f. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 82 323 98 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 37 229 1 ============================== V000544 K4g. Buchanan trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4g. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 85 183 177 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 79 244 2 ............................................................................ L1/L1.T. FTF: Please look at page 5 of the booklet. Some people think the government should provide fewer services even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people think the government should provide fewer services even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. ============================== V000545 L1a. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For telephone (branching) version of this question see L1a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> L1b 2. --> L1b 3. --> L1b 4. --> L1b 5. --> L1b 6. --> L1b 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> L1b 8. DK --> L1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 142 46 60 102 251 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 184 115 98 7 802 ============================== V000546 L1a.T. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For FTF (7-point scale) version of this question see L1a. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1a1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 179 378 93 7 1009 ============================== V000547 L1a1.T. How much reduce serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a1.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1628 74 105 ============================== V000548 L1a2.T. How much incr serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a2.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1429 141 233 3 1 ============================== V000549 L1ax1. 5-pt br summary of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L1ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: SPT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a.T and L1a1.T/L1a2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 7. Haven't thought much 8. DK in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 9. RF in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 74 105 93 233 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 141 10 4 ============================== V000550 L1ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? COMBINED 5PT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a and L1ax1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a or L1a.T 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 283 120 165 630 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 348 239 17 5 ============================== V000551 L1b. Clinton- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L1b.T 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 20 23 73 149 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 240 152 92 2 ============================== V000552 L1b.T. Clinton- serve/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1b. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1b1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1b2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 108 522 59 109 3 ============================== V000553 L1b1.T. Clinton- how much red srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b1.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1699 33 74 1 ============================== V000554 L1b2.T. Clinton- how much inc srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b2.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1285 246 275 1 ============================== V000555 L1bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b.T and L1b1.T/L1b2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 9. RF in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 33 74 59 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 275 246 111 3 ============================== V000556 L1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx2. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b and L1bx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b or L1b.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 97 536 515 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 398 203 5 ============================== V000557 L1c. Gore- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 9 27 62 154 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 262 251 129 111 1 ============================== V000558 L1c.T. Gore- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1c1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1c2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 91 553 41 114 2 ============================== V000559 L1c1.T. Gore- how much red serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c1.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1716 35 56 ============================== V000560 L1c2.T. Gore- how much inc serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c2.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1254 264 286 3 ============================== V000561 L1cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c.T and L1c1.T/L1c2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 9. RF in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 35 56 41 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 286 264 117 2 ============================== V000562 L1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c and L1cx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c or L1c.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 83 519 537 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 393 228 3 ============================== V000563 L1d. Bush- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 58 145 253 213 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 73 23 124 2 ============================== V000564 L1d.T. Bush- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING -->L1d1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING -->L1d2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 410 223 38 128 2 ============================== V000565 L1d1.T. Bush- how much reduce serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1397 208 200 2 ============================== V000566 L1d2.T. Bush- how much increase serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1584 69 153 1 ============================== V000567 L1dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d.T and L1d1.T/L1d2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 9. RF in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 208 200 38 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 153 69 131 2 ============================== V000568 L1dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d and L1dx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d or L1d.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 266 345 619 226 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 92 255 4 ============================== V000569 L1e. Dem Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 15 14 51 143 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 267 266 142 106 2 ============================== V000570 L1e.T. Dem Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1e1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1e2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 84 556 46 115 ============================== V000571 L1e1.T. Dem Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e1.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1723 31 53 ============================== V000572 L1e2.T. Dem Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A Great Deal --> Next Party or L2 5. Only Some --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1251 291 264 1 ============================== V000573 L1ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e.T and L1e1.T/L1e2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 9. RF in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 31 53 46 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 264 291 116 ============================== V000574 L1ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e and L1ex1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e or L1e.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 67 507 530 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 433 222 2 ============================== V000575 L1f. Rep Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 86 182 226 208 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 52 20 121 1 ============================== V000576 L1f.T. Rep Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1f1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1f2.T 7. SHOULD STAY SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 451 185 37 128 ============================== V000577 L1f1.T. Rep Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f1.T. IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1356 229 221 1 ============================== V000578 L1f2.T. Rep Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1622 54 131 ============================== V000579 L1fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f.T and L1f1.T/L1f2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 9. RF in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 229 221 37 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 131 54 129 ============================== V000580 L1fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f and L1fx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f or L1f.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 315 403 581 183 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 74 250 1 ............................................................................ L2/L2.T. FTF: Please look at page 6 of the booklet. Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. ============================== V000581 L2a. Self plcemnt-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question, see L2a.T 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 2. --> L2b 3. --> L2b 4. --> L2b 5. --> L2b 6. --> L2b 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 8. DK --> L2b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L2b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 161 35 33 72 238 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 229 144 85 8 802 ============================== V000582 L2a.T. Self plcemnt-def spending scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a.T. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question, see L2a. 1. YES, HAVE AN OPINION 5. NO, NO OPINION (HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH) --> L2b.T 8. DK --> L2b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 589 207 4 1 ============================== V000583 L2a1.T. Govt inc/dec def spending phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1.T. IF R DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1a.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1b.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0 in L2a.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1213 110 331 146 5 2 ============================== V000584 L2a1a.T. How much reduce def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1a.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2bT/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1697 54 56 ============================== V000585 L2a1b.T. How much incres def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1b.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1476 188 141 1 1 ============================== V000586 L2ax1. 5-pt br summary defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L2ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a.T, L2a1.T and L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 7. Haven't thought much (5 in L2a.T) 8. DK in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 9. RF in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 54 56 146 141 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 188 207 6 3 ============================== V000587 L2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEFENSE SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a and from L2a.T/L2a1.T/L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a; 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 368 89 89 685 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 273 14 4 ============================== V000588 L2b. Gore- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 29 72 169 239 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 186 83 32 195 1 ============================== V000589 L2b.T. Gore- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 157 167 273 203 1 ============================== V000590 L2b1.T. Gore-how much red/inc def spn ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b1.T. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1483 137 183 4 ============================== V000591 L2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b.T and L2b1.T/L2b2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 9. RF in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 78 76 273 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 59 207 1 ============================== V000592 L2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b and L2bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b or L2b.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 148 867 190 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 91 402 2 ============================== V000593 L2c. Bush- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 12 26 60 164 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 221 97 179 ============================== V000594 L2c.T. Bush- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 48 452 111 189 1 ============================== V000595 L2c1.T. Bush-how much red/inc def spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c1.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1307 304 186 10 ============================== V000596 L2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c.T and L2c1.T/L2c2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 9. RF in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 29 18 111 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 275 199 1 ============================== V000597 L2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c and L2cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c or L2c.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 44 582 389 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 372 378 1 ============================== V000598 L2d. Dem Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 26 107 180 240 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 85 39 160 1 ============================== V000599 L2d.T. Dem Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 197 171 248 185 ============================== V000600 L2d1.T. Dem Party-how much red/inc ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d1.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1439 151 212 5 ============================== V000601 L2dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d.T and L2d1.T/L2d2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 9. RF in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 90 103 248 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 109 61 190 ============================== V000602 L2dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d and L2dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d or L2d.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 116 210 836 194 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 100 350 1 ============================== V000603 L2e. Rep Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 12 25 77 169 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 238 234 86 165 ============================== V000604 L2e.T. Rep Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 68 441 106 186 ============================== V000605 L2e1.T. Rep Party-how much inc/red ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e1.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1298 288 217 4 ============================== V000606 L2ex1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e.T and L2e1.T/L2e2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 9. RF in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 36 32 106 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 185 252 190 ============================== V000607 L2ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e and L2ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e or L2e.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 57 590 419 338 355 ............................................................................ L3/L3.E/L3.T/L3.TE. L3. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Please look at page 7 of the booklet. There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. L3.E. FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Please look at page 8 of the booklet. There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. L3.T TELEPHONE VERSION 1: There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Others feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. L3.TE. TELEPHONE VERSION 2: here is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Others feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. ============================== V000608 L3(1). Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric L3(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR GOVT/PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (with endpoints reversed). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question is coded in reverse. 1. FTF standard version 2. FTF experimental version 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 515 491 376 425 ============================== V000608a L3a. Self placement-private or govt insur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 2. --> SKIP TO L4 3. --> SKIP TO L4 4. --> SKIP TO L4 5. --> SKIP TO L4 6. --> SKIP TO L4 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH --> SKIP TO L4 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 25 74 42 83 105 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 72 46 59 9 1292 ============================== V000608b L3a.E. Self placement-insur scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.E for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 2. --> L4 3. --> L4 4. --> L4 5. --> L4 6. --> L4 7. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 8. DK --> L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 41 48 62 89 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 57 83 2 1316 ============================== V000609 L3ax. Comb. FTF versions R insurnc scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF: STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL 7 PT MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a/L3a.E. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, phone mode [3, 4 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 157 99 157 194 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 134 94 100 11 801 ============================== V000610a L3a.T. Self placement-insur scale phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a1.T 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO L4.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 149 155 20 8 1431 ============================== V000610b L3a.TE. Self placement-insur scale phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.TE for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a2.T 5. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a1.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 146 188 30 14 1382 ============================== V000611 L3ax.TE. Comb. Ph versions R insur scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED PHONE VERSION 1/VERSION 2 - MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a.T and L3a.TE 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 337 301 50 22 1006 ============================== V000612 L3a1/a2.T. Strength of insurance plan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R FEELS THERE SHOULD BE GOVERNMENT INSURANCE PLAN/ IF R FEELS INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,0 or RF/NA in L3a.T or L3a.TE 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1169 507 127 3 1 ============================== V000613 L3x1. 5-pt br summary R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built L3ax.T and L3a1.T/L3a2.T 1. Strongly - government insurance plan 2. Not strongly - government insurance plan 3. Stay the same as it is now 4. Not strongly - individual insurance 5. Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 282 54 50 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 225 25 1007 ============================== V000614 L3x2. Comb.7pt/br summ of R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3ax and L3ax.T Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt insurance plan 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt insurance plan 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 ; BRANCHING: Stay the same as it is now 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - individual insurance 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 439 153 535 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 167 325 36 1 ............................................................................ L4/L4.T. FTF: Please look at page 9 of the booklet. Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others think the government should just let each person get ahead on their own. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. TELEPHONE: Please look at page 9 of the booklet. Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others think the government should just let each person get ahead on their own. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. ============================== V000615 L4a. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question see L4a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b. 2. --> L4b. 3. --> L4b. 4. --> L4b. 5. --> L4b. 6. --> L4b. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b. 8. DK --> L4b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 93 74 48 93 173 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 189 195 137 4 801 ============================== V000616 L4a.T. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question see L4a. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4a1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4a2.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b.T/L4c.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 193 439 55 3 1009 ============================== V000617 L4a1.T. How much should gov guar jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a1.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1614 152 40 1 ============================== V000618 L4a2t. How much should ppl get by on own MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD LET EACH GET AHEAD ON THEIR OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1368 346 93 ============================== V000619 L4x1. 5-pt br summary guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a; built from L4a.T and L4a1.T/L4a2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 152 40 55 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 93 346 4 1009 ============================== V000620 L4x2. Comb.7pt/br summ guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a and L4x1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 201 226 88 510 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 288 483 8 3 ============================== V000621 L4b. Gore-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 74 128 206 208 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 58 38 182 2 ============================== V000622 L4b.T. Gore-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b2T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR -->L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 434 180 20 165 2 ============================== V000623 L4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength of guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1193 444 162 8 ============================== V000624 L4bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b.T and L4b1.T/L4b2. 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 338 94 20 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 106 173 2 ============================== V000625 L4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b and L4bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 412 222 544 126 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 144 355 4 ============================== V000626 L4c. Bush-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 23 22 80 169 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 205 220 98 187 2 ============================== V000627 L4c.T. Bush-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4c1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 122 494 15 168 2 ============================== V000628 L4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1191 463 143 10 ============================== V000629 L4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c.T and L4c1.T/L4c2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 80 40 15 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 383 178 2 ============================== V000630 L4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c and L4cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 62 469 323 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 481 365 4 ============================== V000631 L4d. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 82 163 217 180 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 51 43 161 1 ============================== V000632 L4d.T. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4d1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 450 161 22 167 1 ============================== V000633 L4d1/d2.T. Dem Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1196 436 173 2 ============================== V000634 L4dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party guar jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d.T and L4d1.T/L4d2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 347 101 22 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 72 89 169 1 ============================== V000635 L4dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party gua jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d and L4dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 429 264 527 123 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 132 330 2 ============================== V000636 L4e. Rep Party-guar job/std liv FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 13 24 65 167 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 204 228 130 174 1 ============================== V000637 L4e.T. Rep Party-guar job/std liv phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4e1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN-->NEXT PARTY OR-->L5.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> L4e1.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 96 502 21 181 1 ============================== V000638 L4e1/e2.T. Rep Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1209 427 167 4 ============================== V000639 L4ex1. 5-pt br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e.T and L4e1.T/L4e2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 66 30 21 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 137 361 185 1 ============================== V000640 L4ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e and L4ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 54 457 365 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 491 359 2 ............................................................................ L5/L5.T. FTF: Please look at page 10 of the booklet. Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. ============================== V000641 L5a. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see L5a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b. 2. --> L5b. 3. --> L5b. 4. --> L5b. 5. --> L5b. 6. --> L5b. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b. 8. DK --> L5b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 69 52 40 79 250 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 150 160 193 4 810 ============================== V000642 L5a.T. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see L5a. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5a1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 196 339 104 2 1015 ============================== V000643 L5a1/a2.T. R-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a1/a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> L5b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1272 342 191 2 ============================== V000644 L5ax1. 5-pt br summary R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a.T and L5a1.T/L5a2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 86 110 104 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 81 256 4 1015 ============================== V000645 L5ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a and L5ax1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 220 138 150 583 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 241 449 8 18 ============================== V000646 L5b. Clinton plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5b.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 108 153 205 202 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 46 31 168 5 ============================== V000647 L5b.T. Clinton-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5b. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 446 111 46 192 6 ============================== V000648 L5b1/b2.T. Clinton-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1250 317 237 3 ============================== V000649 L5bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b.T and L5b1.T/L5b2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 267 176 46 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 50 195 6 ============================== V000650 L5bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b and L5bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 375 329 541 107 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 81 363 11 ============================== V000651 L5c. Gore plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 96 135 189 224 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 58 27 204 5 ============================== V000652 L5c.T. Gore-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5c1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 420 110 33 232 6 ============================== V000653 L5c1/c2.T. Gore-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 284 245 1 ============================== V000654 L5cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c.T and L5c1.T/L5c2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 234 185 33 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 50 233 6 ============================== V000655 L5cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c and L5cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 330 320 514 118 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 77 437 11 ============================== V000656 L5d. Bush plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 19 22 69 209 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 226 143 102 212 4 ============================== V000657 L5d.T. Bush-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5d1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 151 351 44 247 8 ============================== V000658 L5d1/d2.T. Bush-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 255 245 2 ============================== V000659 L5dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d.T and L5d1.T/L5d2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 45 106 44 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 139 210 249 8 ============================== V000660 L5dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d and L5dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 128 548 282 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 312 461 12 ============================== V000661 L5e. Dem Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES--> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 106 164 214 198 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 45 29 176 4 ============================== V000662 L5e.T. Dem Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5e1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5e1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR -->L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 437 112 26 220 6 ============================== V000663 L5e1/e2.T. Dem Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1258 301 247 1 ============================== V000664 L5ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e.T and L5e1.T/L5e2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 256 181 26 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 45 221 6 ============================== V000665 L5ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e and L5ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 362 345 508 111 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 74 397 10 ============================== V000666 L5f. Rep Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5f.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 15 19 66 186 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 218 196 116 186 4 ============================== V000667 L5f.T. Rep Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5f1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5f1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 151 369 43 232 6 ============================== V000668 L5f1/f2.T. Rep Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f1/f2.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5f.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1287 271 249 ============================== V000669 L5fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f.T and L5f1.T/L5f2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 44 107 43 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 142 227 232 6 ============================== V000670 L5fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f and L5fx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 126 513 338 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 343 418 10 ============================== V000671a L6. Appr/disappr affirmative action stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8 DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6.E 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 927 431 338 59 42 10 ============================== V000671b L6.E. Appr/disappr affirmative action ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 397 429 50 43 8 ============================== V000672 L6a. Strength for affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6a. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 979 601 221 6 ============================== V000673 L6b. Strength against affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6b. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1040 560 204 2 1 ============================== V000674 L6x. Summary affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? COMBINED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E. 1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 828 767 109 85 18 ============================== V000674a L6x1. Summary - Strength of feeling MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L6x1. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? SUMMARY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E and L6a/L6b. 1. Strongly - should have to have affirmative action 2. Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action 4. Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 5. Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 601 221 204 560 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 109 93 19 ............................................................................ L7. Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs. For each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to see spending increased or decreased. The first program is: ============================== V000675 L7a. Inc/dec build and repair highways MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7a. BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS be increased decreased or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 677 135 969 6 20 ============================== V000676 L7b. Inc/dec welfare programs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7b. What about WELFARE PROGRAMS? (Should federal spending on WELFARE PROGRAMS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 302 669 782 22 30 2 ============================== V000677 L7c. Inc/dec spending on aids research MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7c. What about SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH? (Should federal spending on SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 911 151 697 11 37 ============================== V000678 L7d. Inc/dec foreign aid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7d. What about FOREIGN AID? (Should federal spending on FOREIGN AID be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 162 787 792 22 42 2 ============================== V000679 L7e. Inc/dec food stamps MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7e. What about FOOD STAMPS? (Should federal spending on FOOD STAMPS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 549 890 32 49 2 ============================== V000680 L7f. Inc/dec aid to poor people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7f. What about AID TO POOR PEOPLE? (Should federal spending on AID TO POOR PEOPLE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 916 154 693 9 29 6 ============================== V000681 L7g. Inc/dec Social Security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7g. What about SOCIAL SECURITY? (Should federal spending on SOCIAL SECURITY be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1120 66 572 11 38 ============================== V000682 L7h. Inc/dec environmental protection MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7h. What about ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION? (Should federal spending on ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 913 164 694 2 33 1 ============================== V000683 L7j. Inc/dec public schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7j. What about PUBLIC SCHOOLS? (Should federal spending on PUBLIC SCHOOLS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1368 87 330 13 9 ============================== V000684 L7k. Inc/dec dealing with crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7k. What about DEALING WITH CRIME? (Should federal spending on DEALING WITH CRIME be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1180 89 514 7 17 ============================== V000685 L7m. Inc/dec child care MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7m. What about CHILD CARE? (Should federal spending on CHILD CARE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1108 128 515 16 39 1 ============================== V000686 L7n. Inc/dec against illegal immigrants MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7n. What about TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? (Should federal spending on TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 931 173 641 11 47 4 ============================== V000687 L7p. Inc/dec aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7p. What about AID TO BLACKS? (Should federal spending on AID TO BLACKS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 293 415 971 39 75 14 ============================== V000688 L8. App/dis using surplus for tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8. Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO L9 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1111 637 56 3 ============================== V000689 L8a/b. Strength app/dis tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8a/b. IF R APPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L8 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 1216 529 3 ============================== V000690 L8x. Summary tax cuts from surplus MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: TAX CUT FROM SURPLUS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L8 and L8a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 811 298 231 405 59 3 ============================== V000691 L9. App/dis surplus for Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO M1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1453 312 39 3 ============================== V000692 L9a/b. Strength app/dis Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9a/b. IF R APPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L9 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 1309 454 2 ============================== V000693 L9x. Summary surplus for Soc Sec medcare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: USE SURPLUS TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L9 and L9a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1153 298 156 156 41 3 ============================== V000694 M1/M1.T. Abortion self-placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1/M1.T. FTF: Please look at page 11 of the booklet. There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. TELEPHONE: There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 215 525 265 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 753 28 11 7 ============================== V000695 M1a. Importance of abortion to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1a. ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 76 193 499 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 640 389 3 4 ============================== V000696 M1b/M1b.T. Gore-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b/M1b.T. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1c OR M2 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 84 228 253 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 762 21 450 6 ============================== V000697 M1b1. Gore-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b1. IF GORE'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1b/M1b.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 459 426 540 380 2 ============================== V000698 M1c/M1c.T. Bush-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c/M1c.T. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1b OR M2 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 285 655 227 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 119 23 488 7 ============================== V000699 M1c1. Bush-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c1. IF GEORGE W. BUSH'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1c/M1c.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 498 315 560 433 1 ============================== V000700 M2. App/dis abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1395 353 44 12 ============================== V000701 M2a. Strength abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2a. IF R FAVORS ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION/ IF R OPPOSES ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 1461 286 1 ============================== V000702 M2x. Summary abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2x. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: PARENTAL CONSENT FOR ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M2 and M2a. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1233 162 124 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 228 45 12 ============================== V000703 M3. Fav/oppose prtl-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1236 444 108 16 ============================== V000704 M3a/b. Strength fav/opp p-b abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3a/b. IF R FAVORS BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS/ IF R OPPOSES BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M3 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 127 1386 289 5 ============================== V000705 M3x. Summary partial-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3x. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? SUMMARY: BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M3 and M3a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1097 137 152 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 289 113 16 ............................................................................ M4/M4.E/M4.T/M4.TE. FTF STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Please look at page 12 of the booklet Some people think it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs or otherwise reduces our standard of living. (Suppose these people are at one end of the scale, at point number 1) Other people think that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living. (Suppose these people are at the other end of the scale, at point number 7. And of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6). TELEPHONE VERSIONS 1 AND 2: Some people think it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs or otherwise reduces our standard of living. Other people think that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living. ============================== V000706 M4. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric M4(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR ENVIRONMENT VERSUS JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard version (M4a) 2. FTF experimental version (M4a.E) 3. PHONE version 1 (M4a.T) 4. PHONE version 2 (M4a.TE) 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 502 504 373 428 ============================== V000707a M4a. R-jobs/envir scale FTF stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4 for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO M4b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 66 66 70 131 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 26 16 1 1305 ============================== V000707b M4a.E. R-jobs/envir scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.E for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in M4(1) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 44 62 92 160 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 41 18 13 2 ============================== V000708 M4ax. Comb. FTF versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL - 7PT JOBS VS. ENVIRONMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a, M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (M4a only) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 110 128 162 291 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 130 67 34 14 805 ============================== V000709a M4a.T. R-jobs/envir br phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.T for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 177 52 29 5 1434 ============================== V000709b M4a.TE. R-jobs/envir phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.TE for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in M4(1) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1380 245 102 46 28 6 ============================== V000710 M4ax.T. Comb. Ph versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - ENVIRONMENT VS. JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a.T and M4a.TE 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (M4a.T only) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 422 154 75 33 1013 ============================== V000711 M4a1/a2.T. Strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF MAINTAINING JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 5. ONLY SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 8. DK --> M4b.T/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in M4a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in M4a.TE 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1231 336 240 ============================== V000712 M4a1x1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x1.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4ax.T and M4a1/a2.T 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a.T only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 270 152 75 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 66 33 1013 ============================== V000713 M4a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x2. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a and M4a1x1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a and M4a.T only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 176 380 280 658 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 100 47 11 ============================== V000714 M4b. Gore-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4c. OR M5. 2. --> M4c. OR M5. 3. --> M4c. OR M5. 4. --> M4c. OR M5. 5. --> M4c. OR M5. 6. --> M4c. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4c. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4c. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 132 161 171 178 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 45 22 213 3 ============================== V000715 M4b.T. Gore-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 461 101 21 215 2 ============================== V000716 M4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1245 324 234 4 ============================== V000717 M4bx1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4b.T and M4b1.T/M4b2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 298 161 21 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 26 219 2 ============================== V000718 M4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 430 322 449 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 118 48 432 5 ============================== V000719 M4c. Bush-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4b. OR M5. 2. --> M4b. OR M5. 3. --> M4b. OR M5. 4. --> M4b. OR M5. 5. --> M4b. OR M5. 6. --> M4b. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4b. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4b. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 23 18 73 199 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 209 168 63 249 2 ============================== V000720 M4c.T. Bush-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 194 327 39 237 3 ============================== V000721 M4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1286 242 273 6 ============================== V000722 M4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c.T and M4c1.T/M4c2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 78 114 39 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 159 164 243 3 ============================== V000723 M4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c and M4cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 101 132 520 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 327 227 492 5 ============================== V000724 M5. Fav/oppose homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5a 5. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5b 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1285 414 86 19 ============================== V000725 M5a. Strngth fav homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5a. IF R SAYS ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> M6a 5. NOT STRONGLY --> M6a 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 522 871 410 4 ============================== V000726 M5b. Strngth opp homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5b. IF R SAYS DO NOT ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in M5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1393 322 89 3 ============================== V000727 M5x. Summary homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5x. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? SUMMARY: HOMOSEXUALS IN ARMED FORCES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M5 and M5a/b. 1. Strongly - should be allowed to serve 2. Not strongly - should be allowed to serve 4. Not strongly - should not be allowed to serve 5. Strongly - should not be allowed to serve 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 871 410 89 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 322 93 19 ============================== V000728 M6a. R-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a1 3. MAKE IT EASIER --> SKIP TO M6a2 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1060 75 659 8 2 ============================== V000729 M6a1. R-strength more gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a1. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 5. SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in M6a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 747 861 199 ============================== V000730 M6a2. R-strength less gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a2. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT EASIER 5. SOMEWHAT EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in M6a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 39 36 ============================== V000731 M6ax. Summary gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6ax. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/more difficult? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6 and M6a/b. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 861 199 659 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 39 8 2 ============================== V000732 M6a3. R-importance of gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a3. ALL GUN RESTRICTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 37 139 461 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 716 448 3 ============================== V000733 M6b. Gore plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1139 19 350 294 2 ============================== V000734 M6b1/b2. Gore-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b1/b2. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/ A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6b3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6b 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 649 718 437 3 ============================== V000735 M6bx. Summary Gore gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6bx. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GORE POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6b and M6b1/b2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 709 427 350 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 9 297 2 ============================== V000736 M6b3. Gore-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b3. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENGTH OF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6b1/M6b2 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 652 393 542 219 1 ============================== V000737 M6c. Bush plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> M6c2 8. DK --> N1/n1.e 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 375 315 806 306 2 ============================== V000738 M6c1/c2. Bush-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c1/c2. IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6c3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6c3 8. DK --> SKIP TO N1/N1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1117 318 370 2 ============================== V000739 M6cx. Summary Bush gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6cx. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GW BUSH POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6c and M6c1/c2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 182 193 806 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 177 136 308 2 ============================== V000740 M6c3. Bush-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c3. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENTH OF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6c1/M6c2 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1119 190 318 180 ============================== V000741a N1. Fav/opp school voucher program stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO NIa 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for N1.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 925 424 394 62 2 ============================== V000741b N1.E. Fav/opp school voucher program ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO N2 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 332 259 12 887 ============================== V000742 N1x. Combined versions school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED VERSIONS - SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N1 and N1.E. 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 756 653 74 7 ============================== V000743 N1a/b. Strength fav/opp school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a/b. IF R FAVORS SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM/ IF R OPPOSES SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: an error in the instrument programming excluded for this question respondents from the standard version; only respondents from N1.E were asked N1a/b. 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 or NA in N1.E; R selected for N1 and excluded in error from N1a/b 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1216 439 152 ============================== V000744 N1ax. Summary school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1ax. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build from N1x and N1a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 245 87 65 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 194 12 887 ============================== V000745 N2. R fav/opp English official language MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2. Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 3. NEITHER FAVOR NOR OPPOSE [VOL] 5. OPPOSE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1202 130 446 24 2 ============================== V000746 N3. R interest in school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3. Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO N4 8. DK --> SKIP TO N4 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1195 580 27 2 ============================== V000747 N3a. Fav/opp gov help school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3a. IF R HAS OPINION WHETHER GOVT SEE TO BLACK/WHITE KIDS IN SAME SCHOOLS: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEE TO IT THAT WHITE AND BLACK CHILDREN GO TO THE SAME SCHOOLS 5. STAY OUT OF THIS AREA AS IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER; DEPENDS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N3 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 612 596 531 56 10 2 ============================== V000748 N4. Fav/opp h-sexual couples adopt chldn MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N4. Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 747 909 126 22 ============================== V000749 N5. Fav/opp death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO N5a 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO N5b 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1240 462 87 15 ============================== V000750 N5a. How much favor death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5a. IF R FAVORS DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 8. DK --> P1/P1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 567 925 314 1 ============================== V000751 N5b. How much oppose death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5b. IF R OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in N5 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1345 283 177 1 1 ============================== V000752 N5x. Summary R position on death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5x. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (Do you favor/oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON DEATH PENALTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N5 and N5a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 925 314 177 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 283 89 16 ............................................................................ P1/P1.T. FTF STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS: Please look at page 13 of the booklet. Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE VERSIONS 1 AND 2: Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. ============================== V000753 P1. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric P1(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR WOMEN'S EQUAL ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard 2. FTF experimental 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 520 486 382 419 ============================== V000754a P1a. R plcmnt equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2,3,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 296 80 31 44 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 20 14 16 1 1287 ============================== V000754b P1a.E. R plcmnt equal role scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4 in P1(1) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1323 276 62 39 60 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 9 13 6 1 ============================== V000755 P1ax. Comb. FTF versions R equal role sc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (P1a only) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 572 142 70 104 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 23 29 7 804 ============================== V000756a P1a.T. R equal role branch stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1,2,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 328 18 14 3 1425 ============================== V000756b P1a.TE. R equal role branch ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3 in P1(1) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1389 367 23 24 3 1 ============================== V000757 P1ax.T. Comb. Ph. Versions R eql role br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (P1a.T only) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 695 41 38 6 1008 ============================== V000758 P1a1/a2.T. R strength equal roles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R SAYS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R SAYS A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in P1a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in P1a.TE 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1071 680 55 1 ============================== V000759 P1a1x1. 5-pt br summary R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x1.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax.T and P1a1/a2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 652 42 38 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 13 28 7 1008 ============================== V000760 P1a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x2. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax and P1a1x1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 1224 184 250 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 57 14 5 ============================== V000761 P1b. Gore-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 273 185 145 127 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 24 19 193 2 ============================== V000762 P1b.T. Gore-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1b. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1b1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1b1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 552 40 19 187 2 ============================== V000763 P1b1/b2.T. Gore-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b1/b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GORE FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1215 506 78 8 ============================== V000764 P1bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b.T and P1b1/b2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 480 64 19 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 26 195 2 ============================== V000765 P1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b and P1bx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 753 249 327 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 45 388 4 ============================== V000766 P1c. Bush-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 154 99 153 172 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 114 60 30 220 2 ============================== V000767 P1c.T. Bush-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1c. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK --> P1b.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 440 112 30 216 2 ============================== V000768 P1c1/c2.T. Bush-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c1/c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1255 412 133 7 ============================== V000769 P1cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c.T and P1c1/c2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 344 90 30 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 68 223 2 ============================== V000770 P1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c and P1cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 498 189 469 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 98 443 4 ............................................................................ P2/P2.T. FTF: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6.) TELEPHONE: Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. ============================== V000771 P2a. self placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see P2a.T 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 192 172 149 159 167 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 76 48 36 5 803 ============================== V000772 P2a.T. R-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see P2a. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 243 337 132 73 11 1011 ============================== V000773 P2a1.T. How much tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a1.T. IF R THINKS TOUGHER REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2a3 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2a3 8. DK --> P2a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1470 217 120 ============================== V000774 P2a2.T. How much are regulatns a burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a2.T. IF R THINKS REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1675 58 74 ============================== V000775 P2ax1. 5-pt br summary R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax1.T. TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-LACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a.T and P2a1/a2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 243 217 120 73 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 58 11 1011 ============================== V000776 P2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a and P2ax1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 435 389 269 475 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 122 94 16 7 ============================== V000777 P2aa. How important is envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2aa. ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 129 223 648 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 563 219 21 1 ============================== V000778 P2b. Gore placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2bb 2. --> P2bb 3. --> P2bb 4. --> P2bb 5. --> P2bb 6. --> P2bb 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK --> SKIP TO P2c OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 153 232 178 138 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 24 10 223 1 ============================== V000779 P2b.T. Gore-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 483 71 19 225 2 ============================== V000780 P2b1.T. Gore-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b1.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1324 331 151 1 ============================== V000781 P2b2.T. Gore-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR -->P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1736 7 64 ============================== V000782 P2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore envir regul Numeric P2bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2b.T and P2b1/b2.T. 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 331 151 19 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 7 226 2 ============================== V000783 P2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2b and P2bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 484 383 380 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 17 449 3 ============================== V000784 P2bb. Gore-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bb. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2b; 7,8,9 or NA in P2b.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 473 420 548 364 1 1 ============================== V000785 P2c. Bush placemnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2cc 2. --> P2cc 3. --> P2cc 4. --> P2cc 5. --> P2cc 6. --> P2cc 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 26 40 93 203 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 182 148 63 248 1 ============================== V000786 P2c.T. Bush-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 159 355 43 241 2 ============================== V000787 P2c1.T. Bush-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1648 68 91 ============================== V000788 P2c2.T. Bush-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1452 136 216 3 ============================== V000789 P2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c.T and P2c1/c2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 68 91 43 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 216 136 244 2 ============================== V000790 P2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c and P2cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 94 131 521 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 364 199 492 3 ============================== V000791 P2cc. Bush-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cc. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2c; 7,8,9 or NA in P2c.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 541 255 570 440 1 ============================== V000792 P3. R expect to vote in Nov election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3. So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO P3c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P3c 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1547 230 27 ============================== V000793 P3a. Who will R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3a. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WILL VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P3c 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 260 740 604 5 41 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 70 63 21 ============================== V000794 P3b. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3b. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: IF INTENDED PRESIDENTIAL VOTE IS NOT NONE OR DK/RF: Would you say that your preference for [GORE/BUSH/BUCHANAN/OTHER] is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 5. NOT STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 8. DK --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or 0 in P3a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 347 1114 339 7 ============================== V000795 P3c. If R voted, who would R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3c. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WOULD VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P4 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 9 in P3; 1-4,7,8,9 or NA in P3a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1547 89 104 2 4 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 6 19 3 ============================== V000796 P3d. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3d. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: IF R NAMES PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HE WOULD VOTE FOR IF VOTING: Would you say that your preference for is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0,8,9 in P3c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1602 105 97 3 ============================== V000797 P4. Which party will control the House MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P4. The next couple of questions are about what you think will happen as a result of the upcoming elections. After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 815 604 384 1 ============================== V000798 P5. Which party will control the Senate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P5. Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 814 557 430 3 ============================== V000799 P6. Interest in fair treatment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6. Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, HAVE INTEREST IN QUESTION --> P6a 5. NO, HAVEN'T HAD INTEREST --> P7 8. DK --> P7 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1192 585 18 9 ============================== V000800 P6a. Govt should ensure Blacks equ trtment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON SHOULD SEE TO IT THAT BLACK PEOPLE GET FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS 5. THIS IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK -->P7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P6 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 615 625 519 46 1 1 ============================== V000801 P6a1. Strength blacks equal trtmnt jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a1. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: IF R'S POSITION IS SEE TO FAIR TREATMENT/ IF R'S POSITION IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVT'S BUSINESS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,7,8,9 in P6a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 663 951 192 1 ============================== V000802 P6x. Summary blacks equal treatment jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P6x. How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P6,P6a,P6a1. 1. Strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 2. Not strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 4. Not strongly - not the government's business 5. Strongly - not the government's business 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no interest (5 in P6) 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 588 524 100 92 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 427 46 20 10 ============================== V000803 P7. Preferences for blacks in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7. Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7a 5. AGAINST PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> section Q as randomly selected 8. DK --> section Q as randomly selected 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 262 1366 94 66 15 ============================== V000804 P7a. Strength for preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7a. IF R FAVORS PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9,0 in P7 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1545 174 87 1 ============================== V000805 P7b. Strength against preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7b. IF R OPPOSES PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9,0 in P7 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 441 1021 342 3 ============================== V000806 P7x. Summary preference for blacks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P7x. What about your opinion- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? Do you favor/oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P7 and P7a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 174 87 342 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1021 94 70 15 ............................................................................ Q0. Now I'd like to talk to you about Bill Clinton ============================== V000807 Q1. Budget deficit lg/sm since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1. As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. GOTTEN SMALLER 3. GOTTEN LARGER --> SKIP TO Q1b 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 496 126 203 61 1 ============================== V000808 Q1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1a. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS SMALLER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1311 240 248 8 ============================== V000809 Q1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1b. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS LARGER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LARGER 5. SOMEWHAT LARGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1681 44 78 4 ============================== V000810 Q1x. Summary budget deficit since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1x. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller/ larger or somewhat smaller/larger? SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q1 and Q1a/b. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much larger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 240 248 203 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 78 44 73 1 ============================== V000811 Q2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1 INCREASED 3 DECREASED 5 STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q3 8 DK --> SKIP TO Q3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 339 158 275 114 1 ============================== V000812 Q2a. How much inc/dec aid to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2a. IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS DECREASED SINCE 1992/ IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS INCREASED SINCE 1992: A lot or somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1310 130 362 5 ============================== V000813 Q2x. Summary assistance to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2x. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A lot or somewhat? SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q2 and Q2a. 1. Increases a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 81 256 275 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 106 49 119 1 ============================== V000814 Q3. Economy better/worse compared to 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q3b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 633 59 185 10 ============================== V000815 Q3a. Economy much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3a. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1174 372 261 ============================== V000816 Q3b. Economy much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3b. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 22 37 ============================== V000817 Q3x. Summary economy since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3 and Q3a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 372 261 185 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 37 22 10 ============================== V000818 Q4. Clinton made economy better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO Q4b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 502 41 321 23 ============================== V000819 Q4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4a. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 242 260 ============================== V000820 Q4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4b. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1766 15 26 ============================== V000821 Q4x. Summary Clinton effect on US econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4x. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q4 and Q4a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 242 260 321 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 26 15 23 ============================== V000822 Q5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q5. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 189 75 608 15 ============================== V000823 Q6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q6b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 215 261 379 32 ============================== V000824 Q6a. U.S. much more secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6a. IF R SAYS U.S. MORE SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q6 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1592 71 144 ============================== V000825 Q6b. U.S much less secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6b. IF R SAYS U.S. LESS SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q6 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1546 107 153 1 ============================== V000826 Q6x. Summary US secure from for enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more/less secure or somewhat more/ less secure? SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q6 and Q6a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Not changed very much 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 71 144 379 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 153 107 33 ============================== V000827 Q7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 192 218 449 28 ============================== V000828 Q7a. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1615 73 119 ============================== V000829 Q7b. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1589 99 119 ============================== V000830 Q7x. Summ- Clinton impact on U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more/less secure or somewhat more/less secure? SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q7 and Q7a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 73 119 449 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 119 99 28 ============================== V000831 Q8. U.S. crime rate better/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q8b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 327 276 260 24 ============================== V000832 Q8a. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8a. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q8 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 82 244 1 ============================== V000833 Q8b. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8b. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q8 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1531 138 138 ============================== V000834 Q8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8x. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q8 and Q8a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 82 244 260 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 138 138 25 ============================== V000835 Q9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q9b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 234 72 543 38 ============================== V000836 Q9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q9 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1573 72 161 1 ============================== V000837 Q9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1735 36 36 ============================== V000838 Q9x. Summary - Clinton impact on crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q9 and Q9a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 72 161 543 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 36 36 39 ============================== V000839 Q10. Moral climate btr/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q10b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 87 470 314 15 1 ============================== V000840 Q10a.Moral climate much/smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10a. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q10 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1720 28 59 ============================== V000841 Q10b.Moral climate much/smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10b. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q10 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1337 260 209 1 ============================== V000842 Q10x. Summary moral climate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q10 and Q10a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 28 59 314 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 209 260 15 2 ============================== V000843 Q11. Clinton made moral climate btr/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q11b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 65 373 425 21 3 ============================== V000844 Q11a.Clinton made moral climate much/swht btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1742 23 42 ============================== V000845 Q11b.Clinton made moral climate much/swht wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1434 214 159 ============================== V000846 Q11x. Summary - Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11x. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q11 and Q11a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, ; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 23 42 425 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 159 214 21 3 ============================== V000847 Q14a. Angry- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 617 297 2 ============================== V000848 Q14a1. Angry- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1190 138 143 263 73 ============================== V000849 Q14b. Hopeful- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 469 444 3 ============================== V000850 Q14b1. Hopeful- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1338 90 135 203 41 ============================== V000851 Q14c. Afraid- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 232 682 2 ============================== V000852 Q14c1. Afraid- how often Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1575 40 55 96 41 ============================== V000853 Q14d. Proud- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 367 544 4 1 ============================== V000854 Q14d1. Proud- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1440 80 101 150 35 1 ============================== V000855 Q15a/Q15a.T. Clinton trait-moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15a/Q15a.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is)'' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 34 111 293 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 456 20 2 ============================== V000856 Q15b/Q15b.T. Clinton trait-really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15b/Q15b.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 128 316 280 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 165 26 1 ============================== V000857 Q15c/Q15c.T. Clinton trait-knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15c/Q15c.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 330 462 90 18 16 ============================== V000858 Q15d/Q15d.T. Clinton trait-strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15d/Q15d.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 207 374 213 106 16 ============================== V000859 Q15e/Q15e.T. Clitnon trait-dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15e/Q15e.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 284 304 223 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 76 26 3 ============================== V000860 Q15f/Q15f.T. Clinton trait-intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15f/Q15f.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 376 412 88 30 10 ============================== V000861 Q15g/Q15g.T. Clinton trait-out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15g/Q15g.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 107 245 351 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 183 29 1 ============================== V000862 R1. How opinionated is R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1. Some people have opinions about almost everything; other people have opinions about just some things; and still other people have very few opinions. What about you? Would you say you have opinions about almost everything, about many things, about some things, or about very few things? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALMOST EVERYTHING 2. MANY THINGS 3. SOME THINGS 4. VERY FEW THINGS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 348 633 693 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 124 3 1 ============================== V000863 R1a. Fewer or more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEWER OPINIONS 3. ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER OF OPINIONS 5. MORE OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 244 969 558 27 4 ============================== V000864 R1a1. How much more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS MORE OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just somewhat more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 5. SOMEWHAT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 8. DK --> SKIP TO R2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in R1a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1249 255 303 ============================== V000865 R1a2. More much fewer opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS FEWER OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just somewhat fewer opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT FEWER OPINIONS 5. SOMEWHAT FEWER OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R1a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1563 58 186 ============================== V000866 R1x. Summary degree R opinionated MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1x. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? Would you say that you have a lot more/fewer opinions or just somewhat more/fewer opinions? SUMMARY: DEGREE R OPINIONATED --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R1a and R1a1/R1a2. 1. A lot fewer 2. Somewhat fewer 3. About the same 4. Somewhat more 5. A lot more 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 58 186 969 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 303 255 27 4 ============================== V000867 R2. Does R like respnsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2. Some people like to have responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, and other people don't like to have responsibility for situations like that. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE 3. DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R2b 5. NEITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1068 243 485 6 ============================== V000868 R2a. How much like respnbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2a. IF R SAYS R LIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you like it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> SKIP TO R3 5. SOMEWHAT --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 739 707 360 1 ============================== V000869 R2b. How much dislike rsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2b. IF R SAYS R DISLIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISLIKE IT A LOT 5. DISLIKE IT SOMEWHAT 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in R2 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1564 74 169 ============================== V000870 R2x. Summary like/dislike thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2x. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? Do you like/dislike it a lot or just somewhat? SUMMARY: R LIKE/DISLIKE FOR INTENSIVE THOUGHT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R2 and R2a/b. 1. Like it a lot 2. Like it somewhat 3. Neither like it nor dislike it 4. Dislike it somewhat 5. Dislike it a lot 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 707 360 485 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 169 74 7 ============================== V000871 R3. Like simple or complex problems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3. Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve more complex problems. Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or complex? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SIMPLE 5. COMPLEX 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 889 872 34 7 ============================== V000872 S1. Is religion important to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1. Do you consider religion to be an important part of your life, or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. IMPORTANT 5. NOT IMPORTANT --> SKIP TO S3 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO S3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1373 426 1 2 ============================== V000873 S2. How much guidance from religion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2. IF R SAYS THAT RELIGION IS IMPORTANT: Would you say your religion provides some guidance in your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOME 3. QUITE A BIT 5. A GREAT DEAL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S1 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 292 395 685 1 ============================== V000874 S3/S3.T. How often does R pray MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3/S3.T. FTF: Please look at page 15 of the booklet. People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 567 402 312 284 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 192 27 2 16 ============================== V000875 S4/S4.T. How often does R read the bible MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4/S4.T. FTF: Still looking at page 15 of the booklet. Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 64 187 245 556 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 690 48 2 10 ============================== V000876 S5/S5.T. Bible is word of God or men MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5/S5.T. FTF: Please look at page 16 of the booklet. Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of your choice. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a short list of statements. Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of the statement you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE BIBLE IS THE ACTUAL WORD OF GOD AND IS TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 2. THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD BUT NOT EVERYTHING IN IT SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 3. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK WRITTEN BY MEN AND IS NOT THE WORD OF GOD. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 600 869 247 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 44 21 21 ============================== V000877 X1. Attend religious services MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1. Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or funerals? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO X2 5. NO --> SKIP TO X1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO X1a 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1249 545 8 ============================== V000878 X1a. Part of a church or denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1a. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Regardless of whether you now attend any religious services do you ever think of yourself as part of a particular church or denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3 5. NO --> GO TO Y1 8. DK --> GO TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,9,0 in X1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1262 294 251 ============================== V000879 X2. Attend religious services how often MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you go to religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERY WEEK --> X2a 2. ALMOST EVERY WEEK --> X3 3. ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH --> X3 4. A FEW TIMES A YEAR --> X3 5. NEVER --> X3 8. DK --> X3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in X1 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 558 479 205 270 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 282 8 1 4 ============================== V000880 X2a. Attend relig serv > once/week MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2a. IF R SAYS ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES 'EVERY WEEK': Would you say you go to religious services once a week or more often than once a week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONCE A WEEK 2. MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9, 0 in X1; 2-5,8,9 or NA in X2 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1328 270 209 ============================== V000881 X3. Attend church checkpoint MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric X3. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH: / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: CHECKPOINT: CHURCH ATTENDANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3a 5. NO (5 in X1) --> X3b 9. RF (9 in X1) 0. INAP, 0 in X1 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1240 554 8 ============================== V000882 X3a. Attend protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> X7 3. JEWISH --> X6a 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,9 in X3 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 567 543 359 28 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 303 2 5 ============================== V000883 X3b. Belong protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> SKIP TO X7 3. JEWISH --> SKIP TO X6b 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 1,0,9 in X3 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1504 123 100 15 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 62 1 2 ============================== V000884 X4. Denomination/other specify MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric X4. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BAPTIST --> SKIP TO X4b 2. EPISCOPALIAN/ANGLICAN/CHURCH OF ENGLAND --> SKIP TO X7 3. LUTHERAN --> SKIP TO X4c 4. METHODIST --> SKIP TO X4d 5. JUST PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 6. PRESBYTERIAN --> SKIP TO X4e 7. REFORMED --> SKIP TO X4f 8. BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X4g 9. EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X7 10. CHRISTIAN OR JUST CHRISTIAN --> SKIP TO X4h 11. CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST --> SKIP TO X7 12. CHURCH (or CHURCHES) OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X4i 13. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 14. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 15. CHURCH OF GOD --> SKIP TO X4j 16. ASSEMBLY OF GOD --> SKIP TO X7 17. CONGREGATIONALIST --> SKIP TO X7 18. HOLINESS --> SKIP TO X4k 19. PENTACOSTAL --> SKIP TO X4k 20. FRIENDS, QUAKER --> SKIP TO X7 21. ORTHODOX, e.g. Greek, Russian (SPECIFY);C --> SKIP TO X7 22. NON-DENOMINATIONAL - PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 23. MORMONS --> SKIP TO X7 24. JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES --> SKIP TO X7 25. LATTER DAY SAINTS --> SKIP TO X7 26. UNITARIAN/UNIVERSALIST --> SKIP TO X7 27. BUDDHIST --> SKIP TO X7 28. HINDU --> SKIP TO X7 29. MUSLIM/ISLAM --> SKIP TO X7 30. NATIVE AMERICAN --> SKIP TO X7 95. NA 98. DK --> SKIP TO X7 99. RF 00. INAP, 9,0 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 2,3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b 90. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO X4m 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 776 307 32 101 111 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 75 2 1 5 63 3 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 11 6 12 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 39 4 5 52 12 24 25 26 27 28 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 18 10 4 1 4 30 90 ----- ----- Count 2 85 ============================== V000885 X4(1). (blanked) denomination other Character X4(1). IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': IF R DENOMINATION IS 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? TEXT OF X4 DENOMINATION CODE 90 'OTHER' (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality. ============================== V000886 X4a. Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4a. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION --> X7 2. AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES IN USA --> X7 3. AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION --> X7 4. INDEPENDENT BAPTIST --> X7 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,2-99 in X4 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1500 160 19 18 4 7 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 49 44 17 ============================== V000887 X4b. Independent Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4b. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: IF R'S CHURCH IS INDEPENDENT BAPTIST: Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LARGER BAPTIST GROUP [SPECIFY] --> X7 2. LOCAL --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-3,7,8,9,0 in X4a 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1758 3 46 ============================== V000888 X4c. Lutheran group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4c. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS LUTHERAN IN X4: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH --> X7 2. MISSOURI SYNOD --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1,2,4-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1706 52 27 15 7 ============================== V000889 X4d. Methodist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4d. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS METHODIST IN X4: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. UNITED METHODIST CHURCH --> X7 2. AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-3,5-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1696 96 8 5 2 ============================== V000890 X4e. Presbyterian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4e. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS PRESBYTERIAN IN X4: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA (FORMERLY UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-5,7-99 in X4 0 1 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 63 10 2 ============================== V000891 X4f. Reformed group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4f. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS REFORMED IN X4: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH --> X7 2. THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-6,8-99 in X4 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000892 X4g. Brethren group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4g. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BRETHREN IN X4: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN --> X7 2. THE PLYMOUTH BRETHREN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-7,9-99 in X4 0 2 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V000893 X4h. Christian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4h. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R SAYS DENOMINATION IS 'CHRISTIAN' IN X4: When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ," or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> X7 2. I AM JUST A CHRISTIAN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-9,11-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1744 12 37 12 2 ============================== V000894 X4i. Church of Christ group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4i. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF CHRIST IN X4: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 2. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-11,13-99 in X4 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1790 16 1 ============================== V000895 X4j. Church of God group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4j. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF GOD IN X4: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANDERSON, INDIANA --> X7 2. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE --> X7 3. CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-14,16-99 in X4 0 1 2 3 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1795 4 3 1 4 ============================== V000896 X4k. (blanked) holiness/pentacostal Character X4k. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS HOLINIESS OR PENTACOSTAL IN X4: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is the church called? HOLINESS OR PENTACOSTAL TEXT (18 and 19 in X4) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [THESE QUESTIONS ARE PROBES. USE THESE AND OTHERS TO GET AS MUCH SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000897 X4a-j. (blanked) other Character X4a-j. IF R'S DENOMINATION SPECIFIES 'OTHER' IN X4a-X4k: TEXT OF OTHER (SPECIFY) IN DENOMINATIONAL FOLLOWUPS: --------------------------------------------------------------------- This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000898 X4m. (blanked) other group/denomination Character X4m. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [USE ANY OR ALL AS NECESSARY; GET AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000899 X4m1. Is other group christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4m1. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: Is that group Christian? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X7 5. NO --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-30,95-99 in X4 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1722 77 7 1 ============================== V000900 X6a. Attend Jewish group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES AND IS JEWISH IN X3a: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX` --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3a 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1779 6 11 11 ============================== V000901 X6b. Jewish denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF JEWISH IN X3b: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3b 0 2 3 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1792 2 9 4 ============================== V000902 X7. Member place of worship MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X7. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation, temple or other place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X8 or Y1 5. NO --> X8 or Y1 8. DK --> X8 or Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 264 1030 509 2 2 ============================== V000903 X8. Born-again christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X8. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF A CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: IF R IDENTIFIES A CHRISTIAN RELIGION IN X3a, X3b, X4 OR X4m1: Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is, have you personally had a conversion experience related to Jesus Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b; 5,8,9 or NA in X4m1 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 336 594 865 8 4 ============================== V000904 X9x. Religion summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric X9x. Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else / Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? JEWISH: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what/ Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? PROTESTANT OR SOMETHING ELSE: What church or denomination is that? IF BAPTIST: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? (INDEPENDENT BAPTIST:) Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? IF LUTHERAN: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? IF METHODIST: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? IF PRESBYTERIAN: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? IF REFORMED: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? IF BRETHREN: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what?' IF 'CHRISTIAN': When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ" or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? IF CHURCH OF CHRIST: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? IF CHURCH OF GOD: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? IF PENTECOSTAL OR HOLINESS: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is that church called? IF OTHER: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? IF OTHER: Is that group Christian? RELIGION SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable summarizes the information gathered in questions X3a/b, X4, X4a-m, X4m1, X6a/b. Information collected in the open-ended responses to the religion section component questions have been hand coded into this summary variable. NOTE: in 1 case, an R whose initial religious group was identified as Protestant was discovered, upon further probing, to be Roman Catholic. Codes 010-990 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does not attend religious services) ============================== V000905 Y1(1). Month of birth MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y1(1). What is the month, day and year of your birth? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-12 98. DK 99. RF; NA 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 164 123 159 143 143 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 174 147 156 124 11 12 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 146 163 1 31 ============================== V000906 Y1(2). Day of birth (blanked) Numeric Y1(2). What is the month, day and year of your birth? DAY (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blanked. ============================== V000907 Y1(3). Year of birth MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9998 Numeric Y1(3). What is the month, day and year of your birth? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== V000908 Y1x. Respondent age MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y1x. What is the month, day and year of your birth? SUMMARY - RESPONDENT AGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Age was calculated by subtracting the year of birth from 2000. For cases where R refused to give year of birth or year of birth was NA in the survey variable, a check was made of Household listing information: if age of R was included in the Household listing, it was included here from the Household listing. Codes 17-96 and: 97. 97 and older 00. NA 0 18 19 20 21 22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 12 16 23 23 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 26 26 28 28 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 22 34 30 36 33 40 35 36 37 38 39 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 45 48 40 44 46 41 42 43 44 45 46 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 48 37 41 34 35 47 48 49 50 51 52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 36 32 39 35 26 53 54 55 56 57 58 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 30 26 36 40 33 59 60 61 62 63 64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 25 21 20 17 29 16 65 66 67 68 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 24 17 14 17 18 17 71 72 73 74 75 76 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 16 22 17 17 14 77 78 79 80 81 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 12 13 10 9 15 83 84 85 86 87 88 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 9 5 1 2 6 89 90 91 92 93 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 2 1 1 2 1 96 97 ----- ----- Count 1 1 ============================== V000909 Y2. Marital status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y2. Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife) -- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212, 1381,1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in V000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner. 1. MARRIED 2. WIDOWED 3. DIVORCED 4. SEPARATED 5. NEVER MARRIED 6. PARTNERED, NOT MARRIED [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 935 168 238 55 5 6 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 348 49 1 8 ============================== V000910 Y3. Highest grade completed MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y3. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 98. DK 99. RF; NA 0 2 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 3 5 2 14 12 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 30 26 52 66 483 181 14 15 16 17 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 240 106 316 259 9 ============================== V000911 Y3a. Diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y3a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF EDUCATION IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-16 or NA in Y3 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 519 180 1 ============================== V000912 Y3b. Highest degree earned MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y3b. IF HIGHEST GREADE OF EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that you have earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0-12, 99 in Y3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 705 373 139 27 7 5 6 7 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 2 168 377 1 ============================== V000913 Y3x. R educ summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y3x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that you have earned? SUMMARY: R EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y3, Y3a, Y3b. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3, 1 in Y3a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y3, 96 in Y3b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y3b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b] 8. DK [98 in Y3, 8 in Y3a; 98 in Y3b] 9. NA [99 in Y3; 9 in Y3a; 99 or NA in Y3b] 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 116 519 377 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 373 183 7 ============================== V000914 Y4. Highest grade of partner MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y4. IF MARRIED OR PARTNERED: What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 98. DK 99. RF; NA; INAP, 2-5,8,9,0 in Y2 0 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 2 2 2 3 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 21 12 23 23 285 73 14 15 16 17 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 39 205 140 9 823 ============================== V000915 Y4a. Partner diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y4a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-17, 99 in Y4 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1421 297 82 7 ============================== V000916 Y4b. Partner highest degree MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y4b. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1-12, 98, 99 in Y4 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1209 218 88 17 1 10 6 7 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 85 174 2 2 ============================== V000917 Y4x. Sp educ. Summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y4x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? SUMMARY: SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y4, Y4a, Y4b. Note: 3 cases [561,1017,1719] coded 98 (DK) for number of school years in Y4 and 'no' in Y4a (no high school diploma) are coded 2 here; 3 cases [77,1057,1799] where R indicated 12 years of schooling but DK for Y4a diploma are coded 2. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y4, 1 in Y4a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y4, 96 in Y4b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y4b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y4b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y4, 2-6 in Y4b] 8. DK [98 in Y4, 8 in Y4a; 98 in Y4b] 9. NA [99 in Y4; 9 in Y4a; 99 or NA in Y4b] 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 29 56 297 174 85 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 218 117 6 825 ............................................................................ Y6. Occupation/employment variables represent 5 series of questions. The question series initially assigned to R in Y6(1) is determined by R's self-identification of employment status. The series occupation data are: "UNEMPLOYED" - past occupation "RETIRED" - past occupation "DISABLED" - past occupation "HOMEMAKER" (nonworking) - past occupation "STUDENT" (nonworking) - past occupation "WORKING NOW" - current occupation "TEMPORARILY LAID OFF" - current occupation Note: The final employment status summaries Y6(2)-Y6(3) are built using both R's initial self-identification per Y6(1) and additional information provided by R during questioning. The retired who are also currently working have data in both the RETIRED and WORKING NOW series; the disabled may have data in both DISABLED and WORKING NOW series. For homemaker and student Rs, the 1st question in the HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series asks whether R is currently working; if so, R is immediately transferred out of that series to the WORKING NOW series (the HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series not completed). Since many questions are asked across multiple series, data for common questions across series are "stacked" into variables V000979-V000989; for these stacked variables the following data are included: PAST employment of all retirees [15,50,51 in Y6(1)] PAST employment of the unemployed [40 in Y6(1)] PAST employment of nonworking disabled [60 in Y6(1)] PRESENT employment of working disabled [16,61 in Y6(1)] PRESENT employment of Rs working now only [10,20 in Y6(1)] or working homemaker/student [17,18,71,81 in Y6(2)] NO data for nonworking homemakers/students [70,75,80 in Y6(1)] ============================== V000918 Y6(1). Assigned employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(1). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? ASSIGNED EMPLOYMENT SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. This variable describes the series of employment questions to which R is initially assigned according to R's self- identification of employment status. By contrast, the Y6(2) and Y6(3) employment status summary variables are built using relevant information from R's Y6(1) self-identification and also from information obtained during questioning (especially number of hours worked). Initial series assignment from multiple mentions given by R for his or her own employment status is as follows: RET ONLY or (RET and any others) -->retired series HM/ST ONLY or (HM/ST and UN/DIS/WN/TLO) -->hmkr/st series DIS ONLY or (DIS and UN/WN/TLO) -->disabled series WN/TLO ONLY -->wrkg now series Note that Rs initially assigned per Y6(1) to the RETIRED, DISABLED or HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series are redirected from within those series to the WORKING NOW series if the R was also currently working (both series completed if retired or disabled). For this reason, the WORKING NOW series appears last in codebook variables: - V000921-000931 UNEMPLOYED [UN] - V000932-000944 RETIRED [RET] - V000945-000956 PERMANENTLY DISABLED [DIS] - V000957-000967 HOMEMAKER/STUDENT [HM/ST] - V000968-000978 WORKING NOW/TEMP. LAID OFF [WN/TLO] 1. Assigned WORKING NOW series - working now (Y7-Y7j) 2. Assigned WORKING NOW series - temporarily laid off (Y7-Y7j) 3. Assigned UNEMPLOYED series (Y9-Y10h) 4. Assigned RETIRED series (Y11-Y12j) 5. Assigned PERMANENTLY DISABLED series (Y13-Y14j) 6. Assigned HOMEMAKER series (Y15-Y16j) 7. Assigned STUDENT series (Y15-Y16j) 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1035 17 59 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 336 74 183 96 ============================== V000919 Y6(2). 2 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(2). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 2 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built using Y5, Y12g, Y14g, Y15, Y7e. This is a summary which describes R's occupation status as categorized AFTER all information has been collected. Note that case 1263 has been coded 81 rather than 18 although number of hours worked (V000974) was coded as DK; for this case, information in the thumbnail indicated that R worked only a few hours a week. 10. WORKING NOW only 15. WORKING NOW and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 16. WORKING NOW and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or more hours per week 17. WORKING NOW and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 18. WORKING NOW and student (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 20. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 40. UNEMPLOYED 50. RETIRED, no other occupation 51. RETIRED and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 60. PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working 61. PERMANENTLY DISABLED and working now, currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 70. HOMEMAKER, no other occupation 71. HOMEMAKER and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 75. HOMEMAKER and student (R volunteers), no other occupation 80. STUDENT, no other occupation 81. STUDENT and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 00. NA 0 10 15 16 17 18 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1035 18 2 55 51 20 40 50 51 60 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 59 300 18 72 114 71 75 80 81 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 2 25 18 ============================== V000920 Y6(3). 1 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(3). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 1 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y6(2) 1. R WORKING NOW (working now or working 20 hours or more per week if also retired, permanently disabled, homemaker or student 2. R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF [20 in Y6(2)] 4. R UNEMPLOYED [40 in Y6(2)] 5. R RETIRED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [50,51 in Y6(2)] 6. R PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [60,61 in Y6(2)] 7. R HOMEMAKER, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [also nonworking Rs who are both homemakers and students-- 70,71,75 in Y6(2)] 8. R STUDENT, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week ([80,81 in Y6(2)] 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1161 17 59 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 318 72 130 43 ============================== V000921 Y9. R unemp: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y9. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 58 1 ============================== V000922 Y10a(1). 2-digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(1). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Codes 1-71 and: 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 7 9 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 6 3 2 3 2 18 20 22 24 32 33 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 9 1 1 2 3 35 36 37 42 48 54 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 6 3 3 1 1 61 63 65 66 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 1 1 1 1 ============================== V000922a Y10a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10a(2). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000923 Y10a(3). 1-digit occup summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(3). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? UNEMPLOYED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 4 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 9 7 10 7 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 3 2 5 2 2 ============================== V000924 Y10a(4). Prestige code (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y10a(4). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y10a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000925 Y10b. R unemp: past industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10b. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000926 Y10c. R unemp: past self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10c. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y10e 8. DK --> Y10e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 48 4 6 ============================== V000927 Y10d. R unemp: past employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10d. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10c 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1755 5 47 ============================== V000928 Y10e. R unemp: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10e. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 28 30 ============================== V000929 Y10f. R unemp: hrs/wk 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y10f. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000930 Y10g. R unemp: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10g. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 36 23 ============================== V000931 Y10h. R unemp: worry about find job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10h. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10g 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1771 8 11 17 ============================== V000932 Y11(1). Retired: month of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y11(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- MONTH: 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER 96. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 15 22 47 16 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 27 25 19 17 11 12 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 30 1471 17 ============================== V000933 Y11(2). Retired: year of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Y11(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9996. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== V000934 Y12a(1). 2-digit occup retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000934a Y12a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12a(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000935 Y12a(3). 1-digit occup summary retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(3). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 59 58 9 27 54 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 8 34 4 31 24 12 13 14 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 5 2 4 ============================== V000936 Y12a(4). Prestige code (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y12a(4). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y12a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000937 Y12b. R ret: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12b. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000938 Y12c. R ret: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12c. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y12e 8. DK --> Y12e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 281 9 45 1 ============================== V000939 Y12d. R ret: employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12d. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1517 87 202 1 ============================== V000940 Y12e. R ret: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12e. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y12g 8. DK --> Y12g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 46 290 ============================== V000941 Y12f. R ret: hours/wk work 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y12f. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF HAS HAD A JOB IN LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000942 Y12g. R ret: working for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12g. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 36 300 ============================== V000943 Y12h. R ret: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12h. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y12g 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1507 8 292 ============================== V000944 Y12j. R ret: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12j. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y12h 0 5 ----- ----- Count 1799 8 ============================== V000945 Y13. R disabled: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y13. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y14h 8. DK --> Y14h 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 68 6 ============================== V000946 Y14a(1). 2-digit occup disabled MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(1). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== V000946a Y14a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) disable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(2). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== V000947 Y14a(3). 1-digit occup summary disabled MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y14a(3). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1739 7 5 5 7 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 21 1 6 11 12 13 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 5 5 1 ============================== V000948 Y14a(4). Prestige code (blanked) disable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y14a(4). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y14a(2) 00.00 INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000949 Y14b. R dis: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14b. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== V000950 Y14c. R dis: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14c. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y14e 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1739 57 3 8 ============================== V000951 Y14d. R dis: work for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14d. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1747 11 47 2 ============================== V000952 Y14e. R dis: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14e. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y14g 8. DK --> Y14g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1739 6 62 ============================== V000953 Y14f. R dis: hours/wk work 6 mnths MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y14f. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000954 Y14g. R dis: working for pay now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14g. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Rs who respond "yes" to this question are also asked the WORKING NOW series for current employment. 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1801 2 4 ============================== V000955 Y14h. R dis: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14h. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/ IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./ IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in Y13; 8,9 or NA in Y14e; 1,8,9 or NA in Y14g 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1735 6 66 ============================== V000956 Y14j. R dis: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14j. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/ IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./ IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW: IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14h 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1801 4 1 1 ============================== V000957 Y15. Homemaker/student: work for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1528 138 141 ============================== V000958 Y15a. Hmk/stu: work last 6 mon MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16a. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: In the last six months, did you do any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y16h 8. DK --> Y16h 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y16 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1666 35 106 ============================== V000959 Y16a(1). 2-digit occup hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y16a(1). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== V000959a Y16a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y16a(2). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== V000960 Y16a(3). 1-digit occup summary hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y16a(3). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1772 2 5 1 5 7 6 7 8 12 13 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 7 2 2 1 ============================== V000961 Y16a(4). Prestige code (blanked) hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y16a(4). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y16a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000962 Y16b. Hmk/stu: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y16b. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== V000963 Y16c. Hmk/stu: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16c. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y16f 8. DK --> Y16f 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1772 33 1 1 ============================== V000964 Y16d. Hmk/stu: worked for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16d. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: IF R WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16c 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1774 7 26 ============================== V000965 Y16f. Hmk/stu: hrs/wk wrk last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y16f. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000966 Y16h. Hmk/stu: looking for work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16h. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y16 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1666 19 122 ============================== V000967 Y16j. Hmk/stu: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16j. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16h 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1788 8 7 4 ============================== V000968 Y7a(1). 2-digit occup R work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y7a(1). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 579 125 47 34 33 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 50 20 76 4 25 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 30 16 13 4 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 71 24 50 1 14 2 24 25 26 27 29 30 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 14 6 28 2 7 31 32 33 34 35 36 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 26 24 4 21 40 37 38 39 40 42 43 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 29 30 5 8 2 44 45 46 47 48 50 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 16 16 5 16 37 13 51 52 53 54 56 57 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 5 1 3 3 58 59 60 61 62 63 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 1 2 3 12 8 64 65 66 67 68 69 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 31 1 8 5 10 70 71 95 ----- ----- ----- Count 14 5 6 ============================== V000968a Y7a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) R wk now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y7a(2). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] ============================== V000969 Y7a(3). 1-digit occup summary R work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y7a(3). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 579 172 295 57 146 169 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 21 117 15 114 38 12 13 14 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 29 5 6 ============================== V000970 Y7a(4). Prestige code (blanked) R wk now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y7a(4). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 98.00 903,904,905 in Y7a(2) 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000971 Y7b. Work now/TLO: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y7b. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What kind of (business/industry) is that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] ============================== V000972 Y7c. Work now/TLO: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7c. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: Do you work for someone else, are you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y7e 8. DK --> Y7e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 579 1041 28 158 1 ============================== V000973 Y7d. Work now/TLO: work for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7d. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: IF NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Are you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y7c 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 738 211 853 4 1 ============================== V000974 Y7e. Work now/TLO: hours work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y7e. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: About how many hours do you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000975 Y7f. Work now/TLO: work hours right MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7f. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: IF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED IS NOT DK/REF: Is that more hours than you want to work, fewer hours than you want to work, or generally about right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE 3. FEWER 5. ABOUT RIGHT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 996-998 in Y7e 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 586 363 86 772 ============================== V000976 Y7g. Work now/TLO: worry lose job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7g. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: How worried are you about losing your job in the near future: a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 3. SOMEWHAT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 579 78 153 995 2 ============================== V000977 Y7h. Work now: out work/layoff last 6mo MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7h. IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: Were you out of work or laid off at any time during the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 597 108 1102 ============================== V000978 Y7j. Work now: reduction in hrs/pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7j. IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: During the last six months, have you had a reduction in your work hours or had to take a cut in pay at any time for reasons other than illness or personal choice? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 597 97 1113 ============================== V000979 Y17(1). Stacked - 2 digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y17(1). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? STACKED - 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(1), Y10a(1), Y12a(1), Y14a(1). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. The original 3-digit 1990 US Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect Respondents' anonymity. See CENSUS OCCUPATION Master Code. Codes 01-71 and: 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 177 62 43 35 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 63 22 100 7 30 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 31 20 13 5 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 85 27 72 1 21 3 24 25 26 27 29 30 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 19 8 38 2 9 31 32 33 34 35 36 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 15 31 37 8 31 65 37 38 39 40 41 42 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 44 38 9 1 10 43 44 45 46 47 48 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 18 22 7 20 45 49 50 51 52 53 54 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 20 1 4 5 2 56 57 58 59 60 61 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 5 3 1 5 6 62 63 64 65 66 67 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 21 17 11 37 4 19 68 69 70 71 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 15 18 7 11 ============================== V000979a Y17(1a). Stacked - 3 dig occup (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y17(1a). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - 3-DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(2), Y10a(2), Y12a(2), Y14a(2). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== V000980 Y17(2). Stacked - 1 digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y17(2). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(3), Y10a(3), Y12a(3), Y14a(3). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 239 357 65 185 231 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 31 178 22 148 69 12 13 14 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 41 7 11 ============================== V000981 Y17(3). Stacked - occ prestige (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y17(3). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - OCCUPATION PRESTIGE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(4), Y10a(4), Y12a(4), Y14a(4). This variable represents employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are not used). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a represented here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a represented here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. 98.00 903,904,905 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2) 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2) 00.00. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== V000982 Y17(4). Stacked - industry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y17(4). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What do/did they make or do where you work/ed? What kind of a business or industry is/was that? STACKED - OCCUPATION INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7b, Y10b, Y12b, Y14b. This variable combines industry data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for industry of employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have industry of their current occupation from Y7b coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have industry of past occupation from Y12b coded here rather than industry of current occupation in Y7b. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== V000983 Y17(5). Stacked - work for self MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(5). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Do/did you work for someone else, are/were you self- employed, or what? STACKED - WORK FOR SELF --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7c, Y10c, Y12c, Y14c. This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have description of their current occupation from Y7c coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have description of past occupation from Y12c coded here rather than for current occupation in Y7c. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 1403 44 203 1 1 ============================== V000984 Y17(6). Stacked - employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(6). IF R WORKED NOT EXCLUSIVELY FOR SELF and: IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Are/were you employed by a federal, state or local government? STACKED - EMPLOYED BY GOVERNMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7d, Y10d, Y12d, Y14d. This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have description of their current occupation from Y7d coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have description of past occupation from Y12d coded here rather than for current occupation in Y7d. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13; 5,8,9,NA in Y10c/Y12c/Y14c/Y7c 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 360 312 1127 7 1 ============================== V000985 Y17(7). Stacked - hours per week MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y17(7). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: / IF R IS DISABLED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: About how many hours do/did you work on your job in the average week? STACKED - HOURS WORKING/WORKED PER WEEK --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7e, Y10f, Y12f, Y14f. This variable combines data for all Rs currently working or who have worked within the past six months: - Employed or temp. laid off [present employment Y7e], - Unemployed [employment within past 6 months Y10f], - Retired [employment within past 6 months Y12f], - Permanently disabled [employment within past 6 months Y14f]. Note that homemakers or students without current outside employment are coded 00 [Y16f data are NOT used]. The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have data for their current occupation from Y7e coded here. For retirees, since data for number of hours worked describes recent employment within past 6 months, this may in effect describe pre-retirement employment (i.e. for very recent retirees), current employment (i.e. for working retirees at a post-retirement job that has been held in the last 6 months), or employment that is neither pre-retirement nor a current job bur rather an interim position. 1-168 996. INAP, 70,75,80,0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9; 5,8,9,NA in Y13; 5,8,9,NA in Y10e, Y12e or Y14e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000986 Y17(8). Stacked - worr abt los/find job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(8). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED:/ IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: How worried are you about losing your job/ not being able to find a job in the near future: A LOT, SOMEWHAT, or NOT MUCH AT ALL? STACKED - WORRIED ABOUT LOSING/FINDING JOB --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7g, Y10h, Y12j, Y14j. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Employed or temp. laid off [Y7g], (including working retired and working disabled) - Unemployed [Y10h], - Retired and not working [Y12j], - Permanently disabled and not working [Y14j]. Note that homemakers or students without current outside employment are coded 0 [Y16j data are NOT used]. 1. A LOT 3. SOMEWHAT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y10g; 5,8,9,NA in Y12h; 5,8,9,NA in Y14h 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 529 90 165 1021 2 ============================== V000987 Y17(9). Stacked - job in past 6 mos. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(9). IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY / IF R IS RETIRED/ IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the past 6 months? STACKED - JOB IN PAST 6 MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y10e, Y12e, Y14e. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Unemployed [Y10e], - Retired [Y12e], - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked [Y14e] NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16a are NOT included. 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1345 80 382 ============================== V000988 Y17(10). Stacked - looking for work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(10). IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: / IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT WORKING NOW: Are you looking for work at the present time? STACKED - LOOKING FOR WORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y10g, Y12h, Y14h. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Unemployed [Y10g], - Retired, if R is not currently working [Y12h], - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked but is not currently working [Y14h]. NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16h are NOT included. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2); 1,8,9,NA in Y12g; 1,8,9,NA in Y14g 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1376 50 381 ============================== V000989 Y17(11). Stacked - ever work for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(11). IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: / IF R IS DISABLED: Have you ever done any work for pay? STACKED - EVER WORK FOR PAY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y4. Built from Y9 and Y13. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 10,15,17,18,20,50,51,70,71,75,80,81,0 in Y6(2) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1674 126 7 ============================== V000990 Y25. Anyone in HH belong to union MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25. Do you or anyone else in this household belong to a labor union? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y26 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y26 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 250 1545 5 1 ============================== V000991a Y25a1. Who belongs to union #1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a1. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION: Who is it that belongs? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1557 150 30 49 19 2 ============================== V000991b Y25a2. Who belongs to union #2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a2. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION Who is it that belongs? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention 0 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1789 6 8 4 ============================== V000991c Y25a3. Who belongs to union #3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a3. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION Who is it that belongs? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention 0 4 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V000992 Y26. IWR chkpt: # of Persons age 14+ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Y26. INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS R THE ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: This variable was completed by interviewers. In 67 cases, households corresponding to more than 1 adult were incorrectly coded 1 in this variable; as a result of the effect upon the skip pattern, household income was not asked. For these cases, the following revisions have been made to the original data: V000992 recoded to 5; V000993 [HH income] and V000994 [HH income summary] recoded to 00 NA; V000995 [R income] assigned the value formerly coded in V000996; V000996 recoded to 96 Inap. 1. YES, R IS ONLY HH MEMBER 14+ --> SKIP TO Y28 5. NO, THERE ARE OTHER HH MEMBERS 14+ 9. NA 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 6 491 1310 ============================== V000993 Y27/Y27.T. HH income - others in HH 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y27/Y27.T. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: Please look at page 18 of the booklet. Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income of all members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of income categories. Please tell me which category best describes the. total income of all members of your family living in your house in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your family's income. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 1,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 67 10 26 48 100 134 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 167 164 109 90 56 43 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 23 13 12 12 9 18 19 20 21 22 96 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 5 1 5 11 497 98 99 ----- ----- Count 58 105 ============================== V000994 Y27x. HH income -all HHs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y27x. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+ / IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: Please look at page 18 of the booklet. Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income of all members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of income categories. Please tell me which category best describes the. total income of all members of your family living in your house in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your family's income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. SUMMARY: HOUSEHOLD INCOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] This variables combines data for Respondents from households with other members age 14 and older and data for Respondents who are the only member age 14 and older. 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA (9 in 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 48 81 102 174 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 199 238 200 122 94 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 50 36 24 17 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 13 11 7 6 20 21 22 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 5 14 71 148 ============================== V000995 Y27a/Y27a.T. R income - others in HH 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y27a/Y27a.T. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and the rest of your family). Please look at this page and tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family. Please tell me which category best describes the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 1,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 101 116 175 210 169 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 94 43 37 21 15 5 13 14 15 16 17 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 1 4 5 4 1 21 22 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 7 497 37 113 ============================== V000996 Y28/Y28.T. R income - only HH member 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y28/Y28a.T. IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 5,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 55 54 74 65 71 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 13 4 5 7 1 13 14 16 17 19 22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 1 2 1 3 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1316 13 43 ============================== V000997 Y28x. R income -all HHs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y28x. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+ / IF YES, R IS ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and the rest of your family). Please look at this page and tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family. Please tell me which category best describes the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. SUMMARY: R INCOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA (9 in 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 178 156 170 249 275 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 240 130 56 41 26 22 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 11 5 4 6 6 19 21 22 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 10 50 156 ============================== V000998 Y29. Ever think of self as wrk/mid class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29. (Not using the booklet) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y29b 8. DK --> Y29b 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 1230 557 10 4 ============================== V000999 Y29a. Which one (workng or middle class) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29a. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MEMBER OF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS: Which one? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MIDDLE CLASS --> Y29c 5. WORKING CLASS --> Y29e 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> Y30 8. DK --> Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y29 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 577 710 497 23 ============================== V001000 Y29b. If had to choose class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29b. IF R DOESN'T CONSIDER SELF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS: Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MIDDLE CLASS --> SKIP TO Y29c 3. LOWER CLASS (VOL) --> SKIP TO Y30 5. WORKING CLASS --> SKIP TO Y29e 6. UPPER CLASS (VOL) --> SKIP TO Y30 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO Y30 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1,5 or NA in Y29a 0 1 3 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1219 223 18 287 2 27 3 28 ============================== V001001 Y29c. Middle class- avg or upper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29c. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS: Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AVERAGE MIDDLE 5. UPPER MIDDLE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 879 660 256 9 3 ============================== V001002 Y29d. Middle class - feel close to class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29d. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS: Would you say you feel pretty close to middle class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSE --> SKIP TO Y30 5. NOT CLOSE --> SKIP TO Y30 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 879 585 322 18 3 ============================== V001003 Y29e. Working class - avg or upper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29e. IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS: Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AVERAGE WORKING 5. UPPER WORKING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1024 624 145 11 3 ============================== V001004 Y29f. Working class -feel close to class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29f. IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS: Would you say you feel pretty close to working class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSE 5. NOT CLOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1024 508 250 24 1 ============================== V001005 Y29x. Soc.class summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29x. (Not using the booklet) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? (IF YES:) Which one? (IF NO:) Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? (IF MIDDLE CLASS:) Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? (IF WORKING CLASS:) Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? SUMMARY: R SOCIAL CLASS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y29, Y29a, Y29b,Y29c,Y29e. 0. Lower class (VOLUNTEERED) 1. Average working class 2. Working class -- NA if average or upper 3. Upper working class 4. Average middle class 5. Middle class - NA if average or upper 6. Upper middle class 7. Upper class (VOLUNTEERED) 8. Refused to accept idea of class 9. Other, DK, RF, NA in Y29b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 624 15 145 660 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 256 2 28 42 ============================== V001006a Y30(1). Racial group #1 self-description MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30(1). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 1 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA 0 10 20 30 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 208 32 20 93 50 60 75 76 79 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1393 9 4 4 3 80 90 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 8 3 10 ============================== V001006b Y30(2). Racial group #2 self-description MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30(2). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 2 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 00. NA; INAP, no further mention 0 10 20 30 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1757 6 2 11 40 50 60 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 24 2 1 ============================== V001006c Y30(3). Racial group #3 self-description MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30(3). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 3 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 70. JEWISH 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 00. NA; INAP, no further mention 0 20 30 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1799 2 1 2 60 76 80 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 ============================== V001007 Y30a. Both parents born in U.S.? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y30a. Were both of your parents born in this country? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 1528 269 3 1 ============================== V001008 Y30b(1). Ethnic/nationality group #1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30b(1). In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? MENTION 1 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Codes 1-89, 91-94 and: 90. None 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 55 8 5 17 4 8 9 11 12 14 16 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 2 3 10 2 5 18 19 20 21 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 162 33 9 16 19 26 28 29 31 32 33 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 48 265 25 4 11 35 36 37 38 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 2 26 25 11 10 43 44 45 47 48 49 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 1 8 6 58 18 50 55 57 60 61 62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 7 1 105 4 12 64 65 67 68 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 1 13 10 8 3 71 72 76 78 80 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 5 1 2 3 3 83 84 85 86 87 88 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 16 3 1 72 153 51 89 90 91 93 94 96 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 124 1 19 2 82 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 7 40 7 ============================== V001009 Y30b(2). Ethnic/nationality group #2 MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30b(2). In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? MENTION 2 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Codes 1-89,91-94 and: 90. None 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 00. NA; no further mention 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1411 35 1 2 6 1 12 14 16 18 19 20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 38 59 12 21 23 24 26 28 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 4 14 1 18 62 31 33 35 37 38 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 14 1 6 6 1 41 43 45 47 48 49 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 9 2 1 9 5 51 54 56 57 60 62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 2 17 1 64 67 69 80 86 87 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 10 1 1 3 5 88 93 96 97 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 6 2 ============================== V001010 Y30bx. IWR ckpt: >2 ethnic mentions? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Y30bx1. INTERVIEWER CHECKPPOINT: NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents who have identified more than one group are asked the 'choice' question Y30c. 0. NO NATIONALITY/GROUP MENTIONED 1. ONE NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUP MENTIONED 2. 2 OR MORE NATIONALITY/GROUPS MENTIONED 9. RESPONDENT REFUSED OR DK/NA ANSWER TO NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 124 1230 397 56 ============================== V001010a Y30bx2. Number of ethnic groups mentioned MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30bx2. NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS MENTIONED BY R --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the exact number of mentions given by R 00. No mention (0 in Y30bx1) 01. One mention 02. Two mentions . . 06. Six mentions 96. Ethnicity question NA 98. R responded DK to ethnicity question 99. R refused ethnicity question 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 124 1230 299 70 17 5 6 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 5 9 40 7 ============================== V001011 Y30c. Choice of ethnic/nationality group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30c. IF MORE THAN 1 NATIONALITY/ETHNIC GROUP IDENTIFIED: With which of these groups do you most closely identify? CHOICE - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Rs giving only 1 mention to Y22 were not asked this question; their single response to Y22 has been duplicated in this variable. Note that this variable was coded according to IWR indentification of number of ethnic groups mentioned; in some instances, the IWR counted only 1 mention when in fact more than 1 was given by R. For such cases, the 'choice' variable (Y30c) was unasked. Codes 1-89,91-94 and: 90. None; neither 95. Both/all of them 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; 0,9 in Y30bx1 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 204 55 8 5 19 4 8 9 11 12 14 16 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 2 3 9 1 4 18 19 20 21 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 122 155 29 7 15 1 26 27 28 29 31 32 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 39 240 24 4 33 35 36 37 38 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 8 2 22 20 11 43 44 45 47 48 49 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 1 7 6 51 17 50 55 57 60 61 62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 7 2 101 3 9 64 65 67 68 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 15 1 14 10 8 3 71 72 76 78 80 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 4 1 2 3 3 83 84 85 86 87 88 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 16 3 1 71 150 51 89 90 91 93 94 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 45 1 19 2 29 96 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 88 12 10 ============================== V001012 Y30x/Y31. Spanish or Hispanic descent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y30x/Y31. INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP MENTIONED AS MAIN GROUP? (IF NO:) Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent? IS R OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- The question about Spanish or Hispanic descent was directed to the respondent at the interviewer's discretion if the interviewer decided that R had not already mentioned a Spanish or Hispanic group in the ethnicity mentions. In a few cases, mentions coded 4,5,8,12 or 16 in Y30b(1) or Y30b(2) contradict what has been coded in this checkpoint. Note that, if R gave more than 2 mentions in Y30, the code for the specific Spanish or Hispanic group may not be represented in the 2 variables for Y30. See also Pre-Csheet.37 and Pre-Csheet.28 (V000068,V000069) and Post-Csheet.32 and Post-Csheet.33 (V000184d, V000184e). 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO Z1 8. DK --> SKIP TO Z1 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 132 1659 7 3 ============================== V001013 Y31a/Y31a.T. Category of Hispanic descnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y31a/Y31a.T. IF R MENTIONED SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP/ IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS SPANISH OR HISPANIC DESCENT: FTF: Please look at page 19 of the booklet and tell me which category best describes your Hispanic origin. TELEPHONE: Would you describe your Hispanic origin as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin American, Central American, or Spanish? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [CODE SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP W/O ASKING, IF R Y31a MENTIONS ONE OF THE RESPONSE OPTIONS BELOW] 1. MEXICAN 2. PUERTO RICAN 3. CUBAN 4. LATIN AMERICAN 5. CENTRAL AMERICAN 6. SPANISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y30x/Y31 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1675 52 16 6 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 11 27 8 ============================== V001014 Z1. Where R grew up-ICPSR st/cntry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 998 Numeric Z1. Where was it that you grew up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNITED STATES: WHICH STATE OR STATES?] Use STATE AND COUNTRY codes 101-997 and: 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V001015 Z2. FTF- urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Z2. FTF: Looking at page 20 of the booklet. Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For telephone format, see Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T 1. ON A FARM 2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE) 4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000) 5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000) 6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY 7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000) 8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY 9. DK 0. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 804 123 114 282 134 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 147 98 71 33 1 ============================== V001016 Z2.T. Phone -urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2.T. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. ON A FARM 3. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 5. IN A CITY 7. OR, IN A SUBURB OF A CITY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1009 119 136 299 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 240 1 3 ============================== V001017 Z2a. Phone -urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2a.T. IF R BROUGHT UP IN A CITY: TELEPHONE: Were you mostly brought up in. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE 3. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY 50,000-100,000 5. IN A LARGE CITY, 100,000-500,000 7. OR, IN A VERY LARGE CITY, OVER 500,000 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,7,8,9,0 in Z2.T 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1508 104 62 73 57 3 ============================== V001018 Z2b. Phone - urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2b.T. IF R BROUGHT UP IN A SUBURB OF A CITY: TELEPHONE: Were you mostly brought up in. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY (100,000 TO 500,000 PEOPLE) 5. OR IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000 PEOPLE) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,5,8,9,0 in Z2.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1567 172 62 6 ============================== V001019 Z2x. Comb. Summary where R grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2x. FTF: Looking at page 20 of the booklet. Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? Were you mostly brought up in. SUMMARY: SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GREW UP --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z2 and Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T. 1. ON A FARM 2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE) 4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000) 5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000) 6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY 7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000) 8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY 9. DK 0. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 242 250 386 196 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 220 270 128 105 1 ============================== V001020a Z3(1). Mos. -how long lived in community MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z3(1). (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-23 and: 96. ALL MY LIFE 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1403 29 21 19 13 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 63 7 10 5 8 2 12 13 15 16 18 20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 2 1 1 9 1 96 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 191 6 1 ============================== V001020b Z3(2). Yrs. -how long lived in community MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric Z3(2). (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? YEARS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-89 and: 995. INAP, 96 in Z3(1) 997. NA 998. DK 999. RF ============================== V001020c Z3x. Summ. - how long lived in community MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z3x. (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN COMMUNITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z3(1) and Z3(2). 0. O-11 months 1. 12-23 months 2. 2 years . . 89. 89 years 96. 'All my life' 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 77 71 95 63 67 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 28 51 39 68 40 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 28 25 27 53 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 26 9 74 18 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 40 24 23 12 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 11 27 14 12 26 36 37 38 39 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 15 13 12 9 20 14 42 43 44 45 46 47 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 9 3 10 3 7 48 49 50 51 52 53 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 7 21 1 9 4 54 55 56 57 58 59 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 8 6 5 5 5 60 61 62 64 65 66 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 2 3 1 3 3 67 68 70 71 72 73 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 4 2 2 3 74 75 76 79 81 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 3 1 2 1 83 89 96 97 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 1 191 6 ============================== V001021a Z4(1)/Z4(1).T. Mos.-length resid in home MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z4(1)/Z4(1).T. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-23 and: 96. ALL MY LIFE 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1386 63 41 49 19 16 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 105 15 11 13 13 12 12 13 15 17 18 20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 4 2 1 17 1 96 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 26 6 2 ============================== V001021b Z4(2)/Z4(1).T. Yrs.-length resid in home MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric Z4(2)/Z4(2).T. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? YEARS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-100 and: 995. INAP, 96 in Z4(1)/Z4(1).T 997. NA 998. DK 999. RF ============================== V001021c Z4x. Summ. - length residence in home MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z4x. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN HOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z4(1)/Z4(1).T and Z4(2)/Z4(2).T. 0. O-11 months 1. 12-23 months 2. 2 years . . 89. 89 years 96. 'All my life' 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 227 175 161 133 82 105 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 71 49 58 44 68 24 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 34 29 47 24 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 11 39 16 20 18 24 25 26 27 28 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 13 29 19 12 9 5 30 31 32 33 34 35 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 34 9 13 9 4 24 36 37 38 39 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 6 3 3 15 5 42 43 44 45 46 47 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 7 4 3 4 3 48 49 50 51 58 60 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 2 11 2 1 1 64 65 73 76 79 96 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 1 1 26 97 ----- Count 6 ============================== V001022 Z5. Does R family own/rent home MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z5. (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OWN HOUSE 5. PAY RENT 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 1205 531 56 9 ============================== V001023 Z8. Does R have children MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z8. These are the last few questions. Often we find that people who have children or commute great distances have less time to participate in politics. How about you? Do you have any children? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (INCLUDE STEP AND ADOPTED CHILDREN) 1. YES 3. YES, STEPCHILDREN/ADOPTED [VOL] 5. NO --> SKIP TO Z9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Z9 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 1306 19 475 1 ============================== V001024 Z8a. How many children R has under 18 MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Z8a. IF R HAS ANY CHILDREN: How many children do you have under 18? --------------------------------------------------------------------- O. --> SKIP TO Z9 1-25. 95. NA 96. INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Z8 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 672 251 264 90 34 8 6 7 9 10 11 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 1 1 1 1 482 ============================== V001025 Z8b. R's children under 18 living w/R MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Z8b. IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: How many of them live with you at least half of the time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- O. --> SKIP TO Z9 1-25. 95. NA 96. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a 98. DK 99. RF 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 243 245 86 28 5 6 7 9 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 2 1 1 1154 ============================== V001026a Z8c(1). Mention 1 minor child age MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z8c(1). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a 98. DK 99. RF 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 80 43 39 36 21 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 34 17 39 31 37 11 12 13 14 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 32 41 41 39 16 17 95 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 43 1154 2 4 ============================== V001026b Z8c(2). Mention 2 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(2). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 23 18 26 18 20 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 22 19 23 29 29 31 13 14 15 16 17 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 26 21 26 18 15 1429 ============================== V001026c Z8c(3). Mention 3 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(3). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 3 1 11 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 13 11 6 8 11 13 14 15 16 17 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 10 6 2 4 1681 ============================== V001026d Z8c(4). Mention 4 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(4). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1 2 2 3 6 7 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 7 2 4 5 12 14 15 16 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1 1 2 1766 ============================== V001026e Z8c(5). Mention 5 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(5). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 2 3 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 3 1 1 1 8 10 12 13 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 1 1795 ============================== V001026f Z8c(6). Mention 6 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(6). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 2 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 1 1 1 11 16 95 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1800 ============================== V001026g Z8c(7). Mention 7 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(7). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 1 5 9 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 1804 ============================== V001026h Z8c(8). Mention 8 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(8). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention 10 95 ----- ----- Count 1 1806 ============================== V001027 Z9. How many miles R drives per day MD1: EQ 998, MD2: GE 999 Numeric Z9. (And finally), about how many miles do you drive in a typical day? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-996 997. 997 and more 998. DK 999. NA ============================== V001028 ZZ0. Education estimate if missed in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ0. IF HIGHEST GRADE AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING / IF HIGHEST GRADE <12 AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING: ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO WAY OF BEING 100% ACCURATE, PLEASE GIVE YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE RESPONDENT'S PROBABLE APPROXIMATE EDUCATION LEVEL [IF YOU FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN 2 CHOICES, SELECT 'OTHER' AND EXPLAIN] --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LOW - PROBABLY LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 2. PROBABLY HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 3. AT LEAST SOME COLLEGE 4. OTHER (SPECIFY) 0. NA; INAP, education data not missing 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001029 ZZ1. IWR obs: R gender Numeric ZZ1. R's sex is: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE 2. FEMALE 1 2 ----- ----- Count 790 1017 ============================== V001030 ZZ2. FTF IWR obs: R race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric ZZ2. FTF: R's race is: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WHITE 2. BLACK 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 804 863 137 1 2 ============================== V001031a ZZ3(1). FTF: #1 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(1). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 590 125 71 124 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 33 60 804 ============================== V001031b ZZ3(2). FTF: #2 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(2). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 26 42 11 16 1708 ============================== V001031c ZZ3(3). FTF: #3 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(3). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 12 3 10 1780 ============================== V001031d ZZ3(4). FTF: #4 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(4). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention 2 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 1804 ============================== V001031e ZZ3(5). FTF: #5 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(5). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention 9 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001032 ZZ4. IWR obs: R cooperation MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ4. R's cooperation was: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR 5. VERY POOR 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1168 492 117 18 5 ============================== V001033 ZZ5. IWR obs: R informed about politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ5. R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 325 450 586 334 105 ============================== V001034 ZZ6. IWR obs: R intelligence MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ6. R's apparent intelligence: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 404 601 671 98 10 ============================== V001035 ZZ7. IWR obs: R suspicious MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ7. How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS 2. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS 3. VERY SUSPICIOUS 0. NA 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1417 330 53 ============================== V001036 ZZ8. IWR obs: R interest in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ8. Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 515 604 537 124 20 ============================== V001037 ZZ9. IWR obs: R sincerity MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ9. How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETE SINCERE --> ZZ10 3. USUALLY SINCERE --> ZZ9a 5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE --> ZZ9a 0. NA 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 1584 185 30 ============================== V001038 ZZ9a. IWR: obs: insincere in what part(blanked) Character ZZ9a. IF NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE: Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you doubted R's sincerity? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER] This variable is blanked. ============================== V001039 ZZ10. IWR obs: R report income correctly MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ10. FTF: Do you feel R reported income accurately? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, THINK R REPORTED INCOME CORRECTLY 2. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME INCORRECTLY 3. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME DISHONESTLY 4. R REFUSED INCOME Q's 0. NA; INAP, phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 1550 26 5 182 ============================== V001040 ZZ10a. IWR obs: est income -surv inc off MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric ZZ10a. IF R DID NOT REPORT INCOME OR IWR SUSPECTS DID NOR REPORT CORRECTLY: If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's family income is (before taxes in 1999). --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 97. DK 98. Y. Impossible to estimate 00. NA; INAP, 1 in ZZ10; phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1701 1 4 7 10 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 6 12 5 6 10 11 12 14 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 3 2 1 1 16 18 19 22 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 1 4 27 ============================== V001041a ZZ11(1). Mention 1 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(1). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA 0 10 11 12 13 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 25 79 7 11 15 20 22 30 31 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 20 48 78 184 6 5 45 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 20 4 1050 247 ============================== V001041b ZZ11(2). Mention 2 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(2). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 11 12 13 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1432 9 7 9 9 20 22 30 31 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 16 28 66 6 41 45 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 16 2 157 43 ============================== V001041c ZZ11(3). Mention 3 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(3). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 11 12 13 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1686 2 2 6 3 20 22 30 31 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 5 10 22 6 41 45 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 4 2 38 16 ============================== V001041d ZZ11(4). Mention 4 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(4). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 12 13 15 22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1765 1 1 2 1 30 31 40 41 45 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 9 2 1 3 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- Count 2 14 4 ============================== V001041e ZZ11(5). Mention 5 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(5). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 13 15 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1794 1 1 2 40 45 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 1 2 2 ============================== V001041f ZZ11(6). Mention 6 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(6). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 15 22 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1803 1 1 2 ============================== V001041g ZZ11(7). Mention 7 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(7). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 40 45 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1804 1 1 1 ============================== V001041h ZZ11(8). Mention 8 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(8). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 41 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001041j ZZ11(9). Mention 9 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(9). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention 0 45 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001042 Pre.Rand.A4/A5. Order-Gore,GWB lik/dis MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.A4/A5. Order of Gore and Bush in Pre A4-A5 Likes/dislikes --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore first 2. GW Bush first 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 915 887 5 ============================== V001043 Pre.Rand.C1b. Pos-Gore in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1b. Position of Gore in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 446 478 455 428 ============================== V001044 Pre.Rand.C1c. Pos-GW Bush in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1c. Position of GW Bush in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 439 492 440 436 ============================== V001045 Pre.Rand.C1d. Pos-Buchanan in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1d. Position of Buchanan in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 466 414 474 453 ============================== V001046 Pre.Rand.C1e. Pos-Nader in thermoms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1e. Position of Nader in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 456 423 438 490 ============================== V001047 Pre.Rand.C1f/g. Pos-Mccain, Bradley ther MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1f/g. Position of McCain and Bradley in Pre Thermometers C1f-C1g / C1f.T-C1g.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. McCain 6th name, Bradley 7th name 2. Bradley 6th name, McCain 7th name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 901 906 ============================== V001048 Pre.Rand.C1h/k. Pos-Cheney,Liebermn ther MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1h/k. Position of Lieberman and Cheney in Pre Thermometers C1h-C1j / C1h.T-C1j.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Lieberman 8th name, Cheney 9th name 2. Cheney 8th name, Lieberman 9th name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 901 906 ============================== V001049 Pre.Rand.C2. Order-parties in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C2. Order of 3 major parties in Pre thermometers C2a-C2c --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic 1st, Republican 2nd, Reform 3rd 2. Democratic 1st, Reform 2nd, Republican 3rd 3. Republican 1st, Democratic 2nd, Reform 3rd 4. Republican 1st, Reform 2nd, Democratic 3rd 5. Reform 1st, Democratic 2nd, Republican 3rd 6. Reform 1st, Republican 2nd, Democratic 3rd 9. NA 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 305 310 290 310 308 ============================== V001050 Pre.Rand.D1/D3. Order-parties in lik/dis MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.D1/D3. Order of 2 major parties in Pre 'Likes-Dislikes' D1-D2/D3-D4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic party first (D1-D2), Republican party 2nd (D3-D4) 2. Republican Party first (D1-D2), Democratic party 2nd (D3-D4) 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 897 905 5 ============================== V001051 Pre.Rand.F1-F3. Order-Gore, GWB, Buchn MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1-F3. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Affects series F1,F2,F3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd 5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 316 277 326 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 285 290 29 ============================== V001052 Pre.Rand.F1a. Pos-angry -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1. Pre: Position of Angry among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 424 443 467 473 ============================== V001053 Pre.Rand.F1b. Pos-hopeful -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 479 479 428 421 ============================== V001054 Pre.Rand.F1c. Pos-afraid -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1c. Pre: Position of Afraid among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 450 450 459 448 ============================== V001055 Pre.Rand.F1d. Pos-proud -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1d. Pre: Position of Proud among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 454 435 453 465 ============================== V001056 Pre.Rand.F2a. Pos-angry -GW Bush affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2a. Pre: Position of Angry among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 442 478 453 ============================== V001057 Pre.Rand.F2b. Pos-hopeful -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 436 457 456 458 ============================== V001058 Pre.Rand.F2c. Pos-afraid -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2c. Pre: Position of Afraid among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 454 454 460 439 ============================== V001059 Pre.Rand.F2d. Pos-proud -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2d. Pre: Position of Proud among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 483 454 413 457 ============================== V001060 Pre.Rand.F3a. Pos-angry -Buchnn affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3a. Pre: Position of Angry among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 463 413 461 446 24 ============================== V001061 Pre.Rand.F3b. Pos-hopeful -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 464 464 441 414 24 ============================== V001062 Pre.Rand.F3c. Pos-afraid -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3c. Pre: Position of Afraid among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 422 480 437 444 24 ============================== V001063 Pre.Rand.F3d. Pos-proud -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3d. Pre: Position of Proud among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 426 444 479 24 ============================== V001064 Pre.Rand.G3-G5. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/con MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.G3-G5. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements G3-G5 / G3.T-G5.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton placement was always first. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 87 91 69 69 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 67 85 1339 ============================== V001065 Pre.Rand.G8-G10.E. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/c MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.G8-10.E. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements G8.E-G10.E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton placement was always first. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 138 163 165 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 156 151 868 ============================== V001066 Pre.Rand.K2-K4. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2-K4. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Traits series K2,K3,K4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd 5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 138 122 134 121 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 136 119 1037 ============================== V001067 Pre.Rand.K2a. Order-moral -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2a. Pre: Order of Moral among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 291 237 274 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 255 249 244 ============================== V001068 Pre.Rand.K2b. Order-cares -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 281 231 256 257 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 246 300 236 ============================== V001069 Pre.Rand.K2c. Order-knowldg -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 254 249 261 269 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 258 243 273 ============================== V001070 Pre.Rand.K2d. Order-leader -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 239 238 260 266 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 271 264 269 ============================== V001071 Pre.Rand.K2e. Order-dishon -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 271 248 254 232 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 274 269 259 ============================== V001072 Pre.Rand.K2f. Order-intell -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 246 285 256 249 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 260 244 267 ============================== V001073 Pre.Rand.K2g. Ord-out touch -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 260 264 283 259 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 244 238 259 ============================== V001074 Pre.Rand.K3a. Order-moral -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3a. Pre: Order of Moral among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 275 219 251 267 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 272 270 253 ============================== V001075 Pre.Rand.K3b. Order-cares -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 239 267 281 248 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 236 262 274 ============================== V001076 Pre.Rand.K3c. Order-knowldg -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 249 277 264 274 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 264 234 245 ============================== V001077 Pre.Rand.K3d. Order-leader -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3d. Pre: Order of Leadership among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 277 290 245 248 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 229 267 251 ============================== V001078 Pre.Rand.K3e. Order-dishon -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 269 259 267 202 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 263 281 266 ============================== V001079 Pre.Rand.K3f. Order-intell -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 258 245 233 299 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 257 262 253 ============================== V001080 Pre.Rand.K3g. Ord-out touch -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 240 250 266 269 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 286 231 265 ============================== V001081 Pre.Rand.K4a. Ord-moral -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4a. Pre: Order of Moral among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 100 112 116 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 104 111 117 1037 ============================== V001082 Pre.Rand.K4b. Ord-cares -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 97 130 100 99 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 124 101 119 1037 ============================== V001083 Pre.Rand.K4c. Ord-knowl -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 131 100 119 102 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 112 116 90 1037 ============================== V001084 Pre.Rand.K4d. Ord-leader -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 109 108 120 124 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 105 101 1037 ============================== V001085 Pre.Rand.K4e. Ord-dishon -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 116 106 97 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 111 110 1037 ============================== V001086 Pre.Rand.K4f. Ord-intell -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 111 93 125 129 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 101 98 1037 ============================== V001087 Pre.Rand.K4g. Ord-out touch-Buchnn traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 98 122 88 103 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 99 125 135 1037 ============================== V001088 Pre.Rand.L1c/L1d. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L1c/L1d. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Services/Spending placements L1c-L1d / L1c-L1d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name 2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V001089 Pre.Rand.L1e/L1f. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L1e/L1f. Pre: Order of major parties among Services/Spending placements L1e-L1f / L1e-L1f.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th 2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V001090 Pre.Rand.L2b/L2c. Order-Gore,GWB def sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L2b/L2c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Defense Spending placements L2b-L2c / L2b.T-L2c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 910 897 ============================== V001091 Pre.Rand.L2d/L2e. Order-parties defse sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L2d/L2e. Pre: Order of major parties among Defense Spending placements L2d-L2e / L2d.T-L2e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th 2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 910 897 ============================== V001092 Pre.Rand.L4b/L4c. Order-Gore,GWB guarjob MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L4b/L4c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Guaranteed Jobs placements L4b-L4c / L4b.T-L4c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 886 921 ============================== V001093 Pre.Rand.L4d/L4e. Order-parties guar job MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L4d/L4e. Pre: Order of major parties among Guaranteed Jobs placements L4d-L4e / L4d.T-L4e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th 2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 886 921 ============================== V001094 Pre.Rand.L5c/L5d. Ord-Gore,GWB aid blcks MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L5c/L5d. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Aid to Blacks placements L5c-L5d /L5c.T-L5d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name 2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V001095 Pre.Rand.L5e/L5f. Order-parties aid blks MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L5e/L5f. Pre Order of major parties among Aid to Blacks placements L5e-L5f /L5e.T-L5f.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th 2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 927 880 ============================== V001096 Pre.Rand.L7b. Order-welfare -fed spendng MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7b. Order of Welfare among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 165 164 136 141 161 139 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 160 130 135 156 163 157 ============================== V001097 Pre.Rand.L7c. Order-aids resch-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7c. Order of Aids Research among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 135 161 154 163 144 167 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 142 154 160 134 146 147 ============================== V001098 Pre.Rand.L7d. Order-forgn aid -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7d. Order of Foreign Aid among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 163 144 164 158 137 156 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 148 155 158 133 146 145 ============================== V001099 Pre.Rand.L7e. Order-food stps -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7e. Order of Food Stamps among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 120 166 133 184 148 160 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 144 158 153 141 150 150 ============================== V001100 Pre.Rand.L7f. Order-aid poor -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7f. Order of Aid to Poor among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 181 133 143 150 168 137 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 145 137 165 166 143 139 ============================== V001101 Pre.Rand.L7g. Order-soc sec -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7g. Order of Soc Security among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 156 141 156 131 157 149 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 139 127 170 150 190 ============================== V001102 Pre.Rand.L7h. Ord-env protect -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7h. Order of Env Protection among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 154 164 141 143 169 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 147 151 149 161 144 ============================== V001103 Pre.Rand.L7j. Ord-publ schls -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7j. Order of Public Schls among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 143 144 148 146 142 153 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 186 162 152 160 141 130 ============================== V001104 Pre.Rand.L7k. Ord-deal w/crime-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7k. Order of Deal w/Crime among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 137 154 150 148 163 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 131 163 172 152 145 151 ============================== V001105 Pre.Rand.L7m. Order-child care-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7m. Order of Child Care among Pre Federal spendinging items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 164 146 171 141 155 137 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 138 162 151 146 138 158 ============================== V001106 Pre.Rand.L7n. Order-border sec-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7n. Order of Border Security amng Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 154 144 165 142 147 140 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 153 153 150 139 180 140 ============================== V001107 Pre.Rand.L7p. Order-aid blacks-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7p. Order of Aid to Blacks among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA 2 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 152 173 119 160 157 137 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 147 133 161 144 156 ============================== V001108 Pre.Rand.M1b/M1c. Ord-Gore-GWB abortion MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M1b/M1c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Abortion placements M1b-M1c / M1b.T-M1c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 921 883 3 ============================== V001109 Pre.Rand.M4b/M4c. Ord-Gore-envir/jobs MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M4b/M4c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environment-Jobs placements M4b-M4c / M4b.T-M4c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 920 884 3 ============================== V001110 Pre.Rand.M6b/M6c. Ord-Gore-gun restrictn MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M6b/M6c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush for Gun restriction placement M6b-M6c --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 926 878 3 ============================== V001111 Pre.Rand.P1b/P1c. Ord-Gore-women's role MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.P1b/P1c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Women's Role placements P1b-P1c / P1b.T-P1c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 888 916 3 ============================== V001112 Pre.Rand.P2b/P2c. Ord-Gore-envir reg MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.P2b/P2c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environmental regulation placements P2b-P2c / P2b.T-P2c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 905 899 3 ============================== V001113 Pre.Rand.Q14a. Ord-angry-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14a. Pre: Order of Angry among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 232 245 205 234 ============================== V001114 Pre.Rand.Q14b. Ord-hopeful-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14b. Pre: Order of Hopeful among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 220 215 227 254 ============================== V001115 Pre.Rand.Q14c. Ord-afraid -Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14c. Pre: Order of Afraid among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 228 240 234 214 ============================== V001116 Pre.Rand.Q14d. Ord-proud-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14d. Pre: Order of Proud among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 236 216 250 214 ============================== V001117 Pre.Rand.Q15a. Ord-moral-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15a. Pre: Order of Moral among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 136 142 125 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 120 132 123 138 ============================== V001118 Pre.Rand.Q15b. Ord-cares-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 129 131 151 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 120 131 121 133 ============================== V001119 Pre.Rand.Q15c. Ord-knowl-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable amng Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 134 121 112 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 137 143 129 ============================== V001120 Pre.Rand.Q15d. Ord-leader-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 133 132 130 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 148 129 113 131 ============================== V001121 Pre.Rand.Q15e. Ord-dishon-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 122 121 136 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 134 107 158 138 ============================== V001122 Pre.Rand.Q15f. Ord-intell-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 133 124 124 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 137 147 118 133 ============================== V001123 Pre.Rand.Q15g. Ord-out touch-Clint trait MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 129 145 138 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 117 133 140 114 ============================== V001201 A1. R interest in campaigns MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you were very much interested, somewhat interested, or not much interested in following the political campaigns this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED 3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 643 687 225 ============================== V001202 A2. R watched programs about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2. Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A3 8. DK --> SKIP TO A3 9. RF --> SKIP TO A3 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1287 268 ============================== V001203 A2a. How many programs R watched about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2a. IF R WATCHED PROGRAMS ABOUT CAMPAIGN: Would you say you watched a good many, several, or just one or two? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD MANY 3. SEVERAL 5. JUST ONE OR TWO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in A2 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 520 387 565 333 2 ============================== V001204 A3. Does R ever discuss politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3. Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4 8. DK --> SKIP TO A4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1258 297 ============================== V001205 A3a. How often does R discuss politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric A3a. IF R DISCUSSES POLITICS: How many days in the past week did you talk about politics with family or friends? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-7 96. NONE (NO DAYS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9 in A3; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 549 63 149 145 97 5 6 7 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 23 648 21 2 ============================== V001206 A4. Does R recall names of House candidates MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, REMEMBER 5. NO, DON'T REMEMBER --> SKIP TO B1 8. DK --> SKIP TO B1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 673 877 1 ============================== V001207 A4a1. Hse name recall 1 - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric A4a1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no Post interview 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1134 12 25 164 182 35 36 39 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 12 1 250 10 ============================== V001208 A4b1. Hse party recall 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no Post interview 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1134 322 319 4 26 2 ============================== V001209 A4(1)x1. Actual party of recall 1 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(1)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a1 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1394 193 219 1 ============================== V001210 A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(2)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a1 and A4b1. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA/RF for candidate name and NA/RF for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1134 382 21 10 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 240 10 2 8 ============================== V001211 A4a2. Hse name recall 2 - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric A4a2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1469 17 9 16 27 35 36 39 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 30 1 191 4 ============================== V001212 A4b2. Hse party recall 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 2nd RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1469 154 166 12 5 1 ============================== V001213 A4(2)x1. Actual party of recall 2 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(2)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a2 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1664 76 66 1 ============================== V001214 A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(2)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 2nd RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a2 and A4b2. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention 0 1 2 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1469 129 14 185 6 4 ============================== V001215 A4a3. Hse name recall 3 - cand code MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4a3. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1755 1 2 3 35 36 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 41 3 ============================== V001216 A4b3. Hse party recall 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b3. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1755 14 24 9 3 2 ============================== V001217 A4(3)x1. Actual party of recall 3 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(3)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1799 3 5 ============================== V001218 A4(3)x2. Accuracy of recall 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(3)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a3 and A4b3. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention 0 1 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1755 7 1 37 4 3 ============================== V001219 B1. Party talked to R about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1. As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate. Did anyone from one of the political parties call you up or come around and talk to you about the campaign this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B1b 8. DK --> SKIP TO B1b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 587 966 2 ============================== V001220 B1a. Party that spoke to R about campgn MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1a. IF SOMEONE FROM PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT CAMPAIGN: Which party was that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 5. REPUBLICANS 6. BOTH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1 0 1 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1220 153 199 199 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 16 19 1 ============================== V001221 B1b. Anyone else talk to R about cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1b. Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) call you up or come around and talk to you about supporting specific candidates in this last election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 175 1378 2 ============================== V001222 B1c. Party send R mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1c. Did anyone from one of the political parties send you mail about the campaign this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B1D 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1003 546 6 ============================== V001223 B1c1. Party that sent mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1c1. IF POLITICAL PARTY SENT MAIL: Which party was that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 5. REPUBLICANS 6. BOTH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1c 0 1 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 804 158 197 560 28 60 ============================== V001224 B1d. Anyone else send mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1d. Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) send you mail about supporting specific candidates in this last election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 400 1138 17 ============================== V001225 B2. Did R try to influence vote of others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2. We would like to find out about some of the things people do to help a party or a candidate win an election. During the campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for or against one of the parties or candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 546 1009 ============================== V001226 B3. Did R display button/sticker/sign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3. Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 156 1398 1 ============================== V001227 B4. Did R go to meetings/rallies etc. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B4. Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches, dinners, or things like that in support of a particular candidate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 85 1470 ============================== V001228 B5. Did R do any other campaign work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B5. Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 43 1512 ============================== V001229 B6. Did R contribute to candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B6. During an election year people are often asked to make a contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to an individual candidate running for public office? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B7 8. DK --> SKIP TO B7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 103 1450 2 ============================== V001230 B6a. Party of candidate - R contribution MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B6a. IF R GAVE MONEY TO INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE: Which party did that candidate belong to? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. OTHER (SPECIFY) 6. BOTH DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AND REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE (VOL) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B6 0 1 3 5 6 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1704 33 54 9 5 2 ============================== V001231 B7. Did R give money to party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B7. Did you give money to a political party during this election year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B8 8. DK --> SKIP TO B8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 99 1456 ============================== V001232 B7a. Party - R contribution MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B7a. IF R GAVE MONEY TO POLITICAL PARTY: To which party did you give money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. OTHER (SPECIFY) 6. BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B7 0 1 3 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1708 34 51 8 6 ============================== V001233 B8. Did R give to group for/against candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B8. Did you give any money to any other group that supported or opposed candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 69 1486 ============================== V001234 B9. Did anyone talk to R about registering or voting MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B9. During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about registering to vote or getting out to vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, SOMEONE DID 5. NO, NO ONE DID 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 672 882 1 ============================== V001235 B10. Did moral/relig groups discuss cmpaign w/R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B10. Were there any groups concerned with moral or religious issues that tried to encourage you to vote in a particular way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, THERE WERE GROUPS 5. NO, NO GROUPS TRIED TO ENCOURAGE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 252 1300 3 ============================== V001236 B11. Clergy provide election information MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B11. Was information about candidates, parties, or political issues made available in your place of worship before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK RESPONSE] 1. YES 5. NO, NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE 7. NO, DON'T GO TO CHURCH [VOL] --> C1 8. DK --> C1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 191 1125 218 19 2 ============================== V001237 B12. Did clergy encourage R to vote for cand or prty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B12. IF R DID NOT INDICATE NON-ATTENDANCE IN B11: Did the clergy or other church leaders at your place of worship encourage you to vote for a particular candidate or party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO C1 8. DK --> SKIP TO C1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in B11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 491 84 1228 4 ============================== V001238 B12a1. Clergy endorsement 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a1. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 1 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12 0 1 2 5 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1723 20 30 2 1 1 33 71 81 82 90 91 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 5 4 7 1 94 95 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 4 4 ============================== V001239 B12a2. Clergy endorsement 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a2. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 2 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12; no further mention 0 1 12 34 74 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1795 1 1 1 1 81 90 96 97 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 4 1 1 ============================== V001240 B12a3. Clergy endorsement 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a3. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 3 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12a; no further mention 0 82 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001241 C1. Did R vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C1. In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INTERVIEWER: PLEASE READ ALL OPTIONS] 1. I DID NOT VOTE (IN THE ELECTION THIS NOVEMBER). 2. I THOUGHT ABOUT VOTING THIS TIME, BUT DIDN'T. 3. I USUALLY VOTE, BUT DIDN'T THIS TIME. 4. I AM SURE I VOTED --> SKIP TO C3 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 185 103 84 1182 1 ============================== V001242 C2. Was R registered MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C2. IF R DID NOT VOTE: Were you registered to vote in this election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO C9(2) 6. VOL: NOT REQUIRED TO REGISTER IN R'S STATE --> SKIP TO C9(2) 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9(2) 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9(2) 0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1 0 1 5 6 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1434 154 210 2 7 ============================== V001243 C3. Registered in county of IW? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C3. IF R IS REGISTERED/ IF R VOTED: Your residence is located in County. Are you registered to vote in County? / Your residence is located in Washington D.C. Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, REGISTERED IN (PRELOAD COUNTY) --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, /WASHINGTON D.C ELSE GO TO C9(1)) 5. NO, REGISTERED IN OTHER COUNTY --> SKIP TO C3a 8. DK --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1) 9. RF --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1) 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 5, 6, 8, 9 or NA in C2 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 471 1269 67 ============================== V001244 C3a1. State of registration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C3a1. IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.: In what county and state are you registered? STATE OF REGISTRATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- ICPSR state code 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C3 0 5 12 13 14 21 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1741 1 1 2 4 4 22 23 25 40 41 42 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 4 1 4 2 1 43 44 45 49 54 62 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 3 1 7 4 2 65 67 71 72 73 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 7 3 2 ============================== V001244a C3a2. County of registration (blank) Character C3a2. IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.: In what county and state are you registered? COUNTY OF REGISTRATION (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve the confidentiality of the respondent. ============================== V001245 C4. Did R vote on election day or before MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C4. IF R VOTED: Did you vote on election day -- that is, November 7th 2000, or did you vote at some time before this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELECTION DAY --> SKIP TO C5 5. SOME TIME BEFORE THIS --> C4a 8. DK --> SKIP TO C5 9. RF --> SKIP TO C5 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 625 1000 182 ============================== V001246 C4a. How long before election did R vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C4a. IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY: How long before November 7th did you vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?] 01. Less than one week, 1-6 days 02. One week; 7 days 03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days 04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days 05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days 06. One month; 29-31 days 07. More than one month; 32-60 days 11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS 12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS 91. More than a few days -- NFS 92. More than a few weeks --NFS 97. Other 98. DK; not sure 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1626 58 41 53 4 2 6 11 12 91 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 8 9 3 1 ============================== V001247 C4b. Did R vote in person or absentee MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C4b. IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY: Did you vote in person or by absentee ballot? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. IN PERSON --> SKIP TO C5 5. ABSENTEE BALLOT --> SKIP TO C5 7. R VOLUNTEERS: BY MAIL [OREGON ONLY] --> SKIP TO C5 8. DK --> SKIP TO C5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1625 61 102 19 ============================== V001248 C5. Did R vote for President? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C5. IF R VOTED: How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, VOTED FOR PRESIDENT 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR PRESIDENT --> SKIP TO C9 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 625 1178 4 ============================== V001249 C6. R vote cast for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C6. IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT: Who did you vote for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE --> SKIP TO C6a 3. GEORGE W. BUSH --> SKIP TO C6a 5. PAT BUCHANAN --> SKIP TO C6a 6. RALPH NADER --> SKIP TO C6a 2. HOWARD PHILLIPS - CONSTITUTION PARTY CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO C6a 4. HARRY BROWN - LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO C6a 7. R REPORTS VOTING FOR SELF --> SKIP TO C6a 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C5 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 629 590 530 3 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 9 3 10 ============================== V001250 C6a. How strong R support Pres cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C6a. IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: Would you say that your preference for (IF NAME GIVEN: ) / (IF OTHER SPECIFY: this candidate) was strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 642 876 286 3 ============================== V001251 C7. Timing of Pres vote decision MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C7. IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: How long before the election did you decide that you were going to vote the way you did? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE IF NECESSARY "WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN A FEW DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION, A WEEK, OR LONGER THAN THAT?] 01. Knew all along/from the first; always vote for the same party; before the convention/nomination (no mention of Gore/Bush/ Buchanan/Nader); before the primaries; 9 months or more 02. Before the convention because of Gore's/ Bush's/ Buchanan's/ Nader's candidacy; as soon as Gore/Bush/Buchanan/Nader said he would run; "months before"; "early on"; "long time/quite a bit before the election" 03. At the time of the Republican convention/ when Bush was nominated; just after the Republican convention; 3 months; July; "a few months";"2-3 months" 04. During the Democratic convention when Gore was nominated; just after the Democratic convention; 4 months; August 05. After the convention(s); during the campaign (NFS); 2 months; "a couple of months"; September 06. Five to seven weeks before the election 07. One month; three weeks; October; after the Presidential debates 08. About two weeks before the election; "ten days" 09. In the last few days of the campaign; the last part of it 10. On election day 11. During/after the primaries (not codeable in 02); "several months"; 5-8 months 12. After the vice-presidential debate 97. Other 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 645 147 257 87 21 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 44 102 76 126 10 11 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 57 134 1 2 ============================== V001252a C8(1). If R cld have cast more than one vote -1st MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(1). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 642 33 29 45 6 7 8 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 159 105 792 2 ============================== V001252b C8(2). If R cld have cast more than one vote -2nd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(2). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention 0 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1798 4 2 3 ============================== V001252c C8(3). If R cld have cast more than one vote -3rd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(3). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001253a C9(1). Hse ckpt: vote in/out county MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric C9(1). CHECKPOINT: VOTE IN COUNTY OF INTERIVEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 3. R DID NOT VOTE (AND DK IF VOTED) 4. WASHINGTON DC 9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREAT AS WITHIN COUNTY) 0. INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1130 48 373 4 ============================== V001253b C9(2). Hse ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names MD: EQ 0 Numeric C9(2). IF R VOTED: CHECKPOINT: RANDOM ORDER OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes, for House vote and nonvoter House preference, the order in which names appeared on the FTF ballot card or the order in which names were read in Telephone administration. NOTE: in VT01 and VA05, the independent incumbent candidate was randomized, in the FTF ballot card and in the order of names in the Telephone wording, as if the candidate were a major party candidate: VT01 candidate Bernie Sanders was randomized as if a Democratic name, and in VA05 Virgil Goode Jr. was randomized as if a Republican name (no Democratic name was preloaded for VT01 and no Republican name was preloaded for VA05). All other ind/3rd-party candidate names appearing on the FTF ballot card or included in Telephone wording appear last in order. NOTE: ind/3rd-party candidate names are included in response codes/question wording whenever they have been preloaded; ind/3rd-party names are preloaded only for candidates who have been identified as especially viable. See note concerning randomization failure in V000262. 1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD) 2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD) 0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C. 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 629 406 772 ============================== V001254 C9a/C11a.T. In-county: vote for House? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9a/C11a.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: FTF: Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this district. How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? TELEPHONE: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 677 952 154 24 ============================== V001255 C9b(1)/C11bx1.T. In-county House vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9b(1)/C11bx1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate from that party ran in R's district. CODE 6 NOTE: In 8 cases where R resided in county of interview, R did not select one of the names from the district of the interview location but provided a name which was later identified as belonging to another congressional district. These cases have been coded 6 in V001255 but the candidate code and party identification according to the other district are coded in V001256 and V001257. In Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) these cases are coded as a vote outside CD of interview. TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 81. Democratic candidate 82. Republican candidate 83. Democratic incumbent 84. Republican incumbent 85. Democratic challenger 86. Republican challenger 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T 0 31 32 33 34 35 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 856 40 45 291 296 128 36 39 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 87 1 36 21 6 ============================== V001257 C9b(3)/C11bx.T. In-House vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9b(3)/C11bx.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. Democratic 2. Republican 3. Other (3rd party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 856 459 428 1 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 36 21 6 ============================== V001258 C10a/C12a.T. Out-county: vote for House? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10a/C12a.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1759 32 16 ============================== V001259 C10b1/C12b1.T. Out- House vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C10b1/C12b1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,39). VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW: DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY) 81. Democratic candidate 82. Republican candidate DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 83. Democratic incumbent 84. Republican incumbent 85. Democratic challenger 86. Republican challenger ALL DISTRICTS: 80. Third party or independent candidate ** 91. Democrat--no name given 92. Republican--no name given 97. Name not on candidate list (name unidentified with party or candidate or CD not identified) 98. DK --> C14a 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T 0 32 34 36 81 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 2 4 1 1 82 83 84 86 91 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 2 1 1 5 92 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 6 2 6 ============================== V001260 C10b2/C12b2.T. Out- House vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10b2/C12b2.T. IF R VOTED: IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK --> C14a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 8 16 2 6 ============================== V001261 C10c/C12c.T. Out- party ment of Hse vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10c/C12c.T. IF R VOTED: IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Which party was that? PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH HOUSE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER: SPECIFY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 12 19 1 ============================== V001262 C10x1/C12x1.T. Summ- Hose vote cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C10x1/C12x1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: IN-COUNTY FTF: Who did you vote for? OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C9b(2)/C11bx2.T and C10b1/C12b1.T. ** IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW (CODES 81-92): DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: 81. Democratic candidate 82. Republican candidate DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 83. Democratic incumbent 84. Republican incumbent 85. Democratic challenger 86. Republican challenger ALL OUT OUT-OF-COUNTY DISTRICTS: 80. Third party or independent candidate ** 91. Democrat--no name given 92. Republican--no name given 97. Name not on candidate list 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C9(1); 5,8,9,NA in C9a/C11a.T or 5,7,8,9, NA in C10a/C12a.T 0 31 32 33 34 35 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 824 40 47 291 300 128 36 39 81 82 83 84 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 1 1 1 2 1 86 91 92 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 5 6 38 27 6 ============================== V001263 C10x2/C12x2.T. Summary- House vote party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10x2/C12x2.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: IN-COUNTY FTF: Who did you vote for? OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C10x1/C12x1.T 1. Democratic 2. Republican 3. Other (independent and 3rd party) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 824 467 444 1 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 38 27 6 ============================== V001264 C13(1). Sen ckpt: vote in/out county MD: EQ 0 Numeric C13(1). IF R VOTED: SENATE CHECKPOINT: RACE IN STATE OF INTERVIEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- For identification of states without races, see the Senate type race variable (V000204). 1. Race in state of interview 2. No race in state of inerview 0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington DC 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 629 900 278 ============================== V001265 C13(2). Sen ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric C13(2). SENATE CHECKPOINT: R VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 3. R DID NOT VOTE/DK IF VOTED 4. WASHINGTON DC 9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREATED AS WITHIN COUNTY) 0. INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1130 48 373 4 ============================== V001266 C13a/C15a.T. In-county: vote for Senate? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C13a/C15a.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or 2, 3, 4, 0 in C13(2) 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 949 775 78 5 ============================== V001267 C13b1/C15bx1.T. In county - Senate vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 C13b1/C15bx1.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate from that party ran in R's district. MISSOURI NOTE: In 4 cases in Missouri (IDs 581,1071,1072,1507) Rs voted for Mel Carnihan (deceased). Because this name was not included in the preload, these responses were coded 7. TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. --> D1 3. --> D1 4. --> D1 5. D1 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> D1 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T 0 1 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1032 403 6 4 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 331 16 9 6 ============================== V001268 C13b2/C15bx2.T. In county -Sen vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C13b2/C15bx2.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T 0 8 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1032 4 6 80 55 196 14 15 16 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 185 127 91 16 9 6 ============================== V001269 C13b3/C15bx3.T. In county- Sen vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C13b3/C15bx3.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1032 403 331 10 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 16 9 6 ============================== V001270 C14a/C16a.T. Out-county:vote for Senate? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14a/C16a.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE --> D1 7. R VOLUNTEERS: NO RACE IN STATE OF VOTE --> D1 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2) 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1765 32 8 2 ============================== V001271 C14b1/C16b1.T. Out of county - Sen vote -cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14b1/C16b1.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes 08,10,11,12,13,14,15,16). CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 80. Third party or independent Senate candidate 81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 82. Republican candidate in open Senate race 83. Democratic Senate incumbent 84. Republican Senate incumbent 85. Democratic Senate challenger 86. Republican Senate challenger 91. Democrat - no name given 92. Republican - no name given 97. Name given not on candidate list for this race (name not identified with candidate or party, or CD not identified) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T 0 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 1 3 4 4 91 92 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 2 5 9 ============================== V001272 C14b2/C16b2.T. Out of county - Senate vote party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14b2/C16b2.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 9 9 5 9 ============================== V001273 C14c/C16c.T. Out of county- party of Sen vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14c/C16c.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Which party was that? PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH SENATE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT --> D1 5. REPUBLICAN --> D1 7. OTHER: SPECIFY: --> D1 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1775 14 15 2 1 ============================== V001274 C14x1/C16x1.T. Summ- Sen vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14x1/C16x1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- **IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 80. Third party or independent Senate candidate 81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 82. Republican candidate in open Senate race 83. Democratic Senate incumbent 84. Republican Senate incumbent 85. Democratic Senate challenger 86. Republican Senate challenger 91. Democrat - no name given 92. Republican - no name given 97. Name given not on candidate list for this race; 'outside' name not identified with candidate or party, or 'outside' CD not identified) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1); 5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T 0 8 10 11 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1000 4 6 81 58 13 14 15 16 91 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 200 189 127 91 4 92 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 21 18 6 ============================== V001275 C14x2/C16x2.T. Summary- Sen vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14x2/C16x2.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C14x1/C16x1.T 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1); 5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1000 412 340 10 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 21 18 6 ============================== V001276 C17. Nonvoter - prefer any Pres cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17. IF R DID NOT VOTE: How about the election for President? Did you prefer one of the candidates for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1434 260 110 2 1 ============================== V001277 C17a. Nonvoter- Pres cand preferred MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17a. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT: Who did you prefer? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W. BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C17 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1547 129 117 1 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 8 4 1 ============================== V001278 C17b. Nonvoter-strength Pres cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17b. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT: IF NAMED PREFERENCE IS NOT DK/RF: Would you say your preference for this candidate was strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C17a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1548 163 95 1 ============================== V001279 C18/C18.T. Nonvoter-prefer Hse cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18/C18.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: FTF: Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this district. How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? TELEPHONE: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD CARD] 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1434 74 292 7 ============================== V001280 C18a/C18a.T. Nonvoter-Hse cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18a/C18a.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. 5. 7. Other - specify 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 39 28 5 1 1 ============================== V001281 C18a1/C18a1.T.Nonvotr-Hse cand pref code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric C18a1/C18a1.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 2 6 30 18 35 36 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 4 5 1 1 ============================== V001282 C18a2/C18a2.T.Nonvoter-Hse cand pref pty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18a2/C18a2.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T 0 1 2 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 39 28 5 1 1 ============================== V001283 C19a/C19.T. Nonvoter-pref Senate cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19a/C19.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD BALLOT CARD] 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or; 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2) 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1518 90 195 4 ============================== V001284 C19b/C19a.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19b/C19a.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. 4. 5. 7. OTHER; SPECIFY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T 0 1 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1717 45 1 41 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 ============================== V001285 C19b1/C19a1.T. Nonvotr-Sen cand pref code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric C19b1/C19a1.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T 0 8 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1717 1 14 9 22 27 15 16 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 5 1 1 1 ============================== V001286 C19b2/C19a2.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref pty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19b2/C19a2.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1717 45 41 1 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 ============================== V001287 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----- Count 1807 ==================== V001288 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----- Count 1807 ==================== V001289 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----- Count 1807 ==================== V001290 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ----- Count 1807 ==================== V001291 C20. How fair was November election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C20. Please continue thinking about the November election. In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted fairly. In other countries, people believe that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking of the presidential election we've just had, do you believe it was very fair, somewhat fair, neither fair nor unfair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. VERY FAIR 2. SOMEWHAT FAIR 3. NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR 4. SOMEWHAT UNFAIR 5. VERY UNFAIR 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; interview or portion of interview administered before question added 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 357 322 415 155 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 309 217 28 4 ............................................................................ D1/D1.T. FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person and that you don't care too much for that person. You would rate the person at the 50 degree mark if you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. TELEPHONE: I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. The feeling thermometer can rate people from 0 to 100 degrees. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person. Rating the person at the midpoint, the 50 degree mark, means you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. ============================== V001292 D1a/D1a.T. Thermometer Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1a/D1a.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) BILL CLINTON TELEPHONE: Our first person is Bill Clinton. Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton? THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001293 D1b/D1b.T. Thermometer Gore MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1b/D1b.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) AL GORE TELEPHONE: The next person is AL GORE. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - AL GORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001294 D1c/D1c.T. Thermometer GW Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1c/D1c.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) GEORGE W. BUSH TELEPHONE: The next person is GEORGE W. BUSH. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001295 D1d/D1d.T. Thermometer Nader MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1d/D1d.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) RALPH NADER TELEPHONE: The next person is RALPH NADER. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001296 D1e/D1e.T. Thermometer Jesse Jackson MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1e/D1e.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) JESSE JACKSON TELEPHONE: The next person is JESSE JACKSON. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - JESSE JACKSON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001297 D1f/D1f.T. Thermometer former Pres Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1f/D1f.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH TELEPHONE: The next person is FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001298 D1g/D1g.T. Thermometer Dem House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1g/D1g.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Democratic House candidate; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001299 D1h/D1h.T. Thermometer Rep House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1h/D1h.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Republican House candidate; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001300 D1j/D1j.T. Thermometer retiring Hse rep MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1j/D1j.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF HOUSE INCUMBENT IS NOT RUNNING: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, retiring House Representative; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001300a D1jx. Checkpt:Hse retiree also Sen cand? MD: EQ 9 Numeric D1jx. CHECKPOINT: IS RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE ALSO THE SENATE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. House retiree is not also Senate candidate 1. House retiree is also the Senate Democratic candidate 2. House retiree is also the Senate Republican candidate 9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1535 11 5 256 ============================== V001301 D1k/D1k.T. Thermometer Dem Senate cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1k/D1k.T. IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.: IF SENATE RACE IN STATE: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE: IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no Post interview; Washington D.C.; 1 in D1jx. 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001302 D1m/D1m.T. Thermometer Rep Senate cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1m/D1m.T. IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.: IF SENATE RACE IN STATE: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE: IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no Post interview; Washington D.C.; 2 in D1jx 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001303 D1n/D1n.T. Thermometer Ind House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1n/D1n.T. IF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS VT01 OR VA05: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no incumbent Independent House candidate (VT01, VA05); no Post interview or Washington D.C.; 0,9 in D1nx. 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001303a D1nx. Checkpoint: VT01 or VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric D1nx. CHECKPOINT: VT01 OR VA05 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. CD OF INTERVIEW IS NEITHER VT01 NOR VA05 1. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VT01 2. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VA05 9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1547 1 3 256 ............................................................................ D2. Still using the thermometer, how would you rate: ============================== V001304 D2a. Thermometer supreme court MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2a. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE SUPREME COURT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001305 D2b. Thermometer Congress MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2b. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CONGRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001306 D2c. Thermometer military MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2c. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001307 D2d. Thermometer federal govt in Wash DC MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2d. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001308 D2e. Thermometer blacks MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2e. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001309 D2f. Thermometer whites MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2f. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001310 D2g. Thermometer conservatives MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2g. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001311 D2h. Thermometer liberals MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2h. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - LIBERALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001312 D2j. Thermometer labor unions MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2j. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001313 D2k. Thermometer big business MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2k. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001314 D2m. Thermometer poor people MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2m. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001315 D2n. Thermometer people on welfare MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2n. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - PEOPLE ON WELFARE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001316 D2p. Thermometer Hispanics MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2p. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001317 D2q. Thermometer Chrstn Fundamentalists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2q. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001318 D2r. Thermometer women's movement MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2r. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001319 D2s. Thermometer older people MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2s. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001320 D2t. Thermometer environmentalists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2t. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - ENVIRONMENTALISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001321 D2u. Thermometer homosexuals MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2u. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - GAY MEN AND LESBIANS, THAT IS, HOMOSEXUALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001322 D2v. Thermometer Christian Coalition MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2v. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE CHRISTIAN COALITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001323 D2w. Thermometer Catholics MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2w. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001324 D2x. Thermometer Jews MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2x. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - JEWS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001325 D2xx. Thermometer Protestants MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2xx. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - PROTESTANTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001326 D2y. Thermometer feminists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2y. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - FEMINISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V001327 D2z. Thermometer Asian-americans MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2z. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ E0. Next I would like to ask you some questions about the candidate(s) who ran in this district for the U.S. House of Representatives. ============================== V001328 E1. Like anything- Dem House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VTO1: Was there anything in particular that you liked about , the Democratic candidate (VT01: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES --> SKIP TO E1a 5. NO --> SKIP TO E2 7. R VOLUNTEERS: I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE --> E3 or E5a 8. DK --> SKIP TO E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Democratic candidate in House race 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 370 395 551 470 12 9 ============================== V001329 E1a(1). #1 like Dem House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E1a(1). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no Post IW ============================== V001330 E1a(2). #2 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(2). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001331 E1a(3). #3 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(3). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001332 E1a(4). #4 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(4). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001333 E1a(5). #5 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(5). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001334 E2. Dislike anything- Dem House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E2. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VTO1: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about , the Democratic candidate (VT01: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E2a 5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E3 8. DK --> SKIP TO E3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP,0, 7 in E1; Democratic candidate in House race; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 843 182 760 14 8 ============================== V001335 E2a(1). #1 dislike Dem House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E2a(1). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no Post IW ============================== V001336 E2a(2). #2 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(2). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001337 E2a(3). #3 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(3). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001338 E2a(4). #4 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(4). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001339 E2a(5). #5 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(5). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001340 E3. Like anything- Repub House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VA05: Was there anything in particular that you liked about , the Republican candidate (VA05: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING LIKED --> SKIP TO E3a 5. NO, NOTHING LIKED --> SKIP TO E4 7. R VOLUNTEERS: I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO E3 or E5a 8. DK --> SKIP TO E4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Republican candidate in House race; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 357 381 573 474 12 10 ============================== V001341 E3a(1). #1 like Repub House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E3a(1). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no Post IW ============================== V001342 E3a(2). #2 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(2). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001343 E3a(3). #3 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(3). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001344 E3a(4). #4 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(4). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001345 E3a(5). #5 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(5). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001346 E4. Dislike anything- Repub House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E4. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VA05: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about , the Republican candidate (VA05: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E4a 5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E5 8. DK --> SKIP TO E5a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 7 in E3 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 831 194 762 8 12 ============================== V001347 E4a(1). #1 dislike Repub House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E4a(1). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no Post IW ============================== V001348 E4a(2). #2 dislike repun House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(2). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001349 E4a(3). #3 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(3). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001350 E4a(4). #4 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(4). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001351 E4a(5). #5 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(5). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001352 E5. Checkpt: number of Hse cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF HOUSE CANDIDATES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. One House candidate in candidate list 2. Two or more House candidates in candidate list 9. Washington DC 0. No Post IW ============================== V001353a E5a(1). 2 cands- either cand incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5a(1). IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates, / or /(VA05: ), was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 1. YES, --> E6 2. YES, --> E6 3. YES --> E6 4. BOTH [VOL] --> E6 5. NO, NEITHER WAS [VOL] --> E6 7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL] --> E6 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in E5 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 471 368 399 3 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 57 491 1 ============================== V001353b E5a(2). Cand iden as incum- 2 cand race MD: EQ 0 Numeric E5a(2). IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates, / (VT01: or /(VA05: ), was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 2 CANDIDATE RACE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. 30. NONINCUMBENT INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE (VA05/VT01) 31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 35. DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 36. REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 39. INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE 90. "BOTH" 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5a(1) 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1020 11 18 348 374 35 36 39 90 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 7 3 17 ============================== V001354 E5b(1). 1 cand- is candidate incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5b(1). IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 1. YES 5. NO 7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL] 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 9, 0 in E5 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1592 120 20 75 ============================== V001355 E5b(2). Cand iden as incum- 1 cand race MD: EQ 0 Numeric E5b(2). IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 1 CANDIDATE RACE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 00. INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5b(1) 0 33 34 ----- ----- ----- Count 1687 59 61 ============================== V001356 E6. Party control House before election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E6. Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the House of Representatives in Washington BEFORE the election (this/last) month? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?) [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. THE DEMOCRATS 5. THE REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 185 849 521 ============================== V001357 E7. Party control Senate before election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E7. Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the U.S. Senate BEFORE the election (this/last) month? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?) [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. THE DEMOCRATS 5. THE REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 148 776 631 ============================== V001358 F1. Appr/dissapr House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1. In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way Representative has been handling job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE --> SKIP TO F1a 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP TO F1b 8. DK --> F2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 912 172 455 12 ============================== V001359 F1a. Strength approve House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1a. IF R APPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE STONGLY --> SKIP TO F2 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO F2 8. DK --> SKIP TO F2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 895 481 426 5 ============================== V001360 F1b. Strength disappr House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1b. IF R DISAPPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in F1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1635 87 82 3 ============================== V001361 F1x. Summary- approve/disapp Hse incumb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1x. In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way Representative has been handling job? Do you approve strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVE RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from F1 and F1a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in F1 or F1a/b 9. RF in F1a or F1a/b 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 481 426 82 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 87 463 12 ============================== V001362 F2. Special action by incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2. Do you happen to remember anything special that Representative has done for the people in district while has been in Congress? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 297 1099 152 3 ============================== V001363 F3. R know #yrs Hse incumbent has serv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3. Do you happen to know about how many years has been in the House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, R KNOWS --> SKIP TO F3a 5. NO --> SKIP TO F3b 8. DK --> SKIP TO F3b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 532 901 116 2 ============================== V001364 F3a. #yrs House incumbent has been in of MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric F3a. IF R SAYS KNOWS HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE: (About how many?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Actual number coded. 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F3 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1275 2 39 4 147 7 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 78 2 109 1 26 1 12 13 14 15 16 18 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 1 5 10 2 4 20 25 26 32 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 3 2 1 10 ============================== V001365 F3b. Incumbent more/less 12 yrs in offic MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3b. IF R DK HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE: Would you say less than 12 years, about 12 years, or more than 12 years? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. LESS THAN 12 YEARS 3. ABOUT 12 YEARS 5. MORE THAN 12 YEARS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in F3 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 790 450 140 55 372 ============================== V001366 F4. House incumb kept in touch w/distric MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F4. How good a job would you say U.S. Representative does of keeping in touch with the people in your district -- does (he/she) do a very good job, fairly good, fairly poor, or a very poor job of keeping in touch with the people in this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. FAIRLY GOOD 3. FAIRLY POOR 4. VERY POOR 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 300 559 236 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 150 302 4 ============================== V001367 F5. R follows govt and public affairs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F5. Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election going on or not. Others aren't thatinterested. Would you say you follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, some of the time, only now and then, or hardly at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOST OF THE TIME 2. SOME OF THE TIME 3. ONLY NOW AND THEN 4. HARDLY AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 339 569 423 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 212 11 1 ............................................................................ G1/G1.T. FTF: Please look at page 2 of the booklet. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal to extremely conservative. TELEPHONE: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. ============================== V001368 G1a/G1a.T. R placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a/G1a.T. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> G2b 2. LIBERAL --> G2b 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> G2b 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 6. CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 308 33 169 139 386 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 197 264 50 6 255 ============================== V001369 G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1b. IF R LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL 3. CONSERVATIVE 5. MODERATE [VOL] 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 in G1a/G1a.T; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1104 78 109 413 91 12 ============================== V001370 G1x. 3-category lib-con summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1x. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1a/G1a.T and G1b. This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF administration in previous years. Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a/G1a.T,G1b. 1. Liberal (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1) 3. Moderate (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA) 5. Conservative (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3) 7. Refused to choose (0/8,7/9) 8. DK (0/8,8) 9. NA/RF to entire question series (RF/NA,0) 0. NA to follow up question G4aa (0/8,NA); No Post IW 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 419 428 620 78 10 252 ============================== V001371 G2/G2.T. Clinton placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2/G2.T. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 202 487 286 259 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 71 29 150 3 ============================== V001372 G3/G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3/G3.T. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 162 505 295 202 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 94 99 29 166 3 ============================== V001373 G3a/G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con placemnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a/G3a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G3/G3.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 421 387 685 313 1 ============================== V001374 G4/G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4/G4.T. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 18 94 75 165 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 273 647 107 173 3 ============================== V001375 G4a/G4a.T. Bush-certain lib-con placemnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a/G4a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G4/G4.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 428 326 735 318 ============================== V001376 G5/G5.T. Buchanan placemnt lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5/G5.T. FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 24 72 54 154 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 62 211 471 504 3 ============================== V001377 G5a/G5a.T. Buchanan-certain lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a/G5a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF BUCHANAN IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G5/G5.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 759 365 395 288 ============================== V001378 G6. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G6. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1332 101 114 1 3 256 ============================== V001378a G6(1)/G6(1).T. Dem Hse cand placemt-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6(1)/G6(1).T. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1g): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1g 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 648 24 182 162 187 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 54 56 9 484 1 ============================== V001378b G6.(2)/G6(2).T. #1 incum Ind cand place MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6(2)/G6(2).T. IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n 0 3 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001379a G6a1/G6a1.T. Dem Hse cand-crtn lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a1/G6a1.T. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G6(1)/G6(1).T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1133 135 314 224 1 ============================== V001379b G6a2/G6a2.T. #1 incum Ind cand-crtn lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a2/G6a2.T. IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G6(2)/G6(2).T 0 3 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001380a G7.(1)/G7(1).T. Rep Hse cand placmnt-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7(1)/G7(1).T. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS IN HOUSE RACE: IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1h): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1h 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 11 43 40 155 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 164 250 24 463 2 ============================== V001380b G7.(2)/G7(2).T. #2 incum Ind cand-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7(2)/G7(2).T. IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n 0 6 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 1805 1 1 ============================== V001381a G7a1/G7a1.T. Rep Hse cand-certn lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a1/G7a1.T. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(1)/G7(1).T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1120 136 327 224 ============================== V001381b G7a2/G7a2.T. #2 incum Ind cand lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a2/G7a2.T. IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(2)/G7(2).T 0 3 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001382 G8/G8.T. Dem Party placemnt lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8/G8.T. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 87 602 301 196 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 91 28 183 2 ============================== V001383 G9/G9.T. Repub Party placement lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9/G9.T. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 14 84 70 152 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 271 693 70 199 2 ============================== V001384 G10/G10.T. Reform Party placemnt lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10/G10.T. FTF: Where would you place the Reform Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Reform Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 42 99 80 264 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 85 147 96 737 5 ............................................................................ G11/G11.T. FTF: Please look at page 3 of the booklet. Some people think the government should provide fewer services even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people think the government should provide fewer services, even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Still others feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. ============================== V001385 G11a. R placement- services/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b or G11c 2. --> G11b or G11c 3. --> G11b or G11c 4. --> G11b or G11c 5. --> G11b or G11c 6. --> G11b or G11c 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b or G11c 8. DK --> G11b or G11c 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode (see Post Admin. 1); no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> G11b or G11c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 21 59 98 198 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 50 41 4 1112 ============================== V001386 G11a.T. R placemnt-services/spend branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11a1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11a2.T 5. CONTINUE AT PRESENT LEVEL --> G11a3.T 8. DK --> G11a3.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode (see Post Admin. 1); no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> G11a3.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 58 163 289 340 8 949 ============================== V001387 G11a1.T. How much reduce services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a1.T. IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> G11b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> G11b.T 8. DK --> G11b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1644 73 90 ============================== V001388 G11a2.T. How much increase servics/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> G11b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> G11b.T 8. DK --> G11b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1518 121 167 1 ============================== V001389 G11a3.T. If serv/spend changed, would favor inc/dec MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a3.T. IF R THINKS SERVICES/SPENDING SHOULD STAY SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE 3. DECREASE 5. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3 in G11a.T; FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1399 175 139 84 9 1 ============================== V001390 G11ax. PH Summary R serv/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11ax1.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME:) If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11a.T, G11a1.T, G11a2.T, G11a3.T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (0/5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (0/5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post IW 0. Haven't thought much (0,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 20 73 90 139 69 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 175 168 121 4 948 ============================== V001390a G11ax. Summary R serv/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT:) If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11a and G11ax1. Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP,no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 93 94 149 237 267 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 326 218 162 8 253 ============================== V001391 G11b. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G11b. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR SERVICES/SPENDING HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, services/spending placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, services/spending placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1332 101 114 1 3 256 ============================== V001391a G11b1. Dem Hse candidate on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in VT01, FTF respondents were administered G11b(2). Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1258 2 7 30 77 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 114 53 14 252 ============================== V001391b G11b2. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VT01: ) on this issue? [DON'T PROBE DK] --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in districts other than VT01, FTF respondents were administered G11b(1). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001392a G11b(1).T. Dem Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] PHONE: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in VT01, Phone respondents were administered G11b(2).T. Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1197 36 182 93 298 1 ============================== V001392b G11b(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2.T. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about (VT01: )? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] PHONE: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in districts other than VT01, Phone respondents were administered G11b(1).T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 5 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001393a G11b1(1).T. Dem cand- how much reduce services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1771 11 25 ============================== V001393b G11b1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbnt Hse cand- how much red MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001394a G11b2(1).T. Dem Hse cand-how much incrsease ser/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1625 77 104 1 ============================== V001394b G11b2(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001395a G11b3(1).T. Dem Hse cnd- if serv/spnd chnged, inc/dec MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b3(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1714 57 19 14 3 ============================== V001395b G11b3(2).T. #1 Ind inc Hse cand- if chnged, incr/decr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b3(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T 0 3 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001396 G11bx1. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11b1/G11b2.T, G11b1(1)/G11b1(2).T, G11b2(1).T/G11b2(2).T, G11b3(1).T/G11b3(2).T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Democratic candidate and not VT01; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1196 11 25 20 17 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 57 105 77 298 1 ============================== V001396a G11bx2. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11bx2. FTF: Where would you place on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from and G11b1/G11b2 and G11bx1. Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Democratic candidate and not VT01; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 647 13 32 50 94 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 171 158 91 550 1 ============================== V001397a G11c1. Repub House candidate on services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in VA05, FTF respondents were administered G11c(2). Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1295 6 36 98 94 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 49 15 3 211 ============================== V001397b G11c2. #2 Ind inc Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VA05: ) on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in districts other than VA05, FTF respondents were administered G11c(1). 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001398a G11c(1).T. Rep Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/ G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in VA05, Phone respondents were administered G11c(2).T Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11c1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11c2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1167 169 59 114 298 ============================== V001398b G11c(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2.T. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about (VA05: )? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/ G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in districts other than VA05, Phone respondents were administered G11c(1).T 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11c1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11c2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1805 1 1 ============================== V001399a G11c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand- how much reduce services/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1638 53 114 2 ============================== V001399b G11c1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much reduc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T 0 5 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001400a G11c2(1).T. Rep Hse cand-how much incrsease serv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 17 42 ============================== V001400b G11c2(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incre MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V001401a G11c3(1).T. Rep Hse cand- if serv/spend chngd, inc/de MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c3(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1693 32 55 22 5 ============================== V001401b G11c3(2).T. #2 Ind incumbt Hse cand- if srv/spd chang MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c3(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T 0 3 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001402 G11cx1. PH Summary Rep cand services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPENDING REPUB HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11c1/G11c2.T, G11c1(1)/G11c1(2).T, G11c2(1).T/G11c2(2).T, G11c3(1).T/G11c3(2).T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Republican candidate and not VA05; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1165 53 117 56 27 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 32 42 17 298 ============================== V001402a G11cx2. Summary Rep cand services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11cx2. FTF: Where would you place on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND REPUBLICAN HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Republican candidate and not VA05; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 653 59 153 154 121 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 81 57 20 509 ============================== V001403 G12/G12.T. R placement- abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12/G12.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. TELEPHONE: There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 172 458 277 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 612 24 8 4 ============================== V001404 G12a. How important is abortion issue to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12a. ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 9, 0 in G12/G12.T 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 62 173 473 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 538 301 7 1 ============================== V001405 G12b. Checkpoint: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G12b. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR ABORTION HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, abortion placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, abortion placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1332 101 114 1 3 256 ============================== V001405a G12b1/G12b1.T. Dem Hse cand placmt on abortion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1/G12b1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12c or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12c or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12c or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12c or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12c or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1g 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 648 18 66 96 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 195 1 781 2 ============================== V001405b G12b2/G12b2.T. #1 Ind inc cand plac on abort MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b2/G12b2.T. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VT01: ) (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12c or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12c or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12c or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12c or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12c or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1n 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001406a G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T. Dem Hse cand-cetainty of plcmt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(1)/G12b(1).T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1431 70 151 154 1 ============================== V001406b G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T. #1 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(2)/G12b(2).T 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001407a G12c1/G12c1.T. Rep Hse cand placmt on abortion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1/G12c1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VT01, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) and G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12b or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12b or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12b or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12b or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12b or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1h 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 70 196 74 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 1 763 2 ============================== V001407b G12c2/G12c2.T. #2 Ind inc cand placmt on abort MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c2/G12c2.T. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VA05: ) (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (VA05: ) (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12b or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12b or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12b or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12b or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12b or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in Dln 0 2 3 ----- ----- ----- Count 1805 1 1 ============================== V001408a G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand-certainty of plct MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(1)/G12c(1).T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1420 59 158 169 1 ============================== V001408b G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T. #2 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VA05 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(2)/G12c(2).T 0 1 3 ----- ----- ----- Count 1805 1 1 ============================== V001409 G13. R thinks of themself as Republican or Democrat MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G13. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat or Republican? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 3. REPUBLICAN 5. NEITHER [VOL] 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 706 522 253 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 62 10 2 ============================== V001410 H1. R better/worse off in last year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP H1b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP H2 8. DK --> SKIP H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered ' section H in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 247 79 435 2 2 ============================== V001411a H1a. How much better off in last yer financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1a. IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION BETTER IN LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP H2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP H2 8. DK --> SKIP H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1560 66 181 ============================== V001411b H1b. How much worse off last year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1b. IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION WORSE IN LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 23 56 ============================== V001412 H1x. Summary of R's financial situation in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. The same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H1 or H1a/b 9. RF in H1 or H1a/b 0. NA; INAP, no Post IW; R selected for administration in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 66 181 435 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 56 23 2 2 ============================== V001412a H1x1. Pre/Post Summary of R financial situation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x1. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? COMBINED PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. Built from Pre E1x and Post H1x 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. The same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 183 375 917 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 145 64 6 2 ============================== V001413 H2. Put off medical or dental treatmnt in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2. In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered section H in Post 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 179 585 1 ============================== V001413a H2x. Pre/Po: Put off medical or dental treatment MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2x. In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? COMBINED PRE/POST: MEDICAL OR DENTAL TREATMENT POSTPONED --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. Built from Pre E2 and Post H2. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 457 1234 1 ============================== V001414 H3. R expects next year to be better/worse financial MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip H3b 5. THE SAME --> Skip H4 8. DK --> Skip H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered section H in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 289 43 414 17 2 ============================== V001415 H3a. How much better off next year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3a. IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE BETTER IN NEXT YEAR: Much better off or somewhat better off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP H4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP H4 8. DK --> Skip H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1518 87 200 2 ============================== V001416 H3b. How much worse off next year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3b. IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE WORSE IN NEXT YEAR: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1764 6 37 ============================== V001417 H3x. Summary: R financial expectations in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3x. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H3 or H3a/b 9. RF in H3 or H3a/b 0. NA; INAP, no post IW; administered in Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 87 200 414 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 6 19 2 ============================== V001417a H3x1. Pre/Po: Financial situation in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3x1. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 204 451 893 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 24 22 2 ============================== V001418 H4. How afraid is R of assault in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4. How afraid are you that a member of your family, or a close friend, or you yourself might be the victim of an assault during the coming year? Would you say you are very afraid, somewhat afraid, a little bit afraid, or not afraid? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. NOTE: due to an error in the application logic, this variable was administered only to cases selected for Post administration of questions H1-H3. 1. VERY AFRAID 3. SOMEWHAT AFRAID 5. A LITTLE BIT AFRAID 7. NOT AFRAID 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, logic error; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1042 41 142 244 338 ============================== V001419 J1. R's attitude about serving on jury duty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J1. If you were selected to serve on a jury, would you be happy to do it or would you rather not serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HAPPY TO DO IT 5. RATHER NOT SERVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 957 585 12 1 ............................................................................ J2. Next, I am going to ask you to choose which of two statements I read comes closer to your own opinion. You might agree to some extent with both, but we want to know which one is closer to your own views. ============================== V001420 J2a. Less govt, or more things government should do MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2a. ONE, the less government, the better; OR TWO, there are more things that government should be doing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. THE LESS GOVERNMENT THE BETTER 2. MORE THINGS GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE DOING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 639 888 25 3 ============================== V001421 J2b. Strong govt to handle cmplx prbls or free mrket MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2b. ONE, we need a strong government to handle today's complex economic problems; OR TWO, the free market can handle these problems without government being involved. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. NEED A STRONG GOV'T TO HANDLE COMPLEX ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 2. FREE MARKET CAN HANDLE WITHOUT GOV'T INVOLVEMENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 928 575 50 2 ============================== V001422 J2c. Reason govt is bigger- meddlesome or big prblms MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2c. ONE, the main reason government has become bigger over the years is because it has gotten involved in things that people should do for themselves; OR TWO, government has become bigger because the problems we face have become bigger. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE IT'S INVOLVED IN THINGS PEOPLE SHOULD HANDLE THEMSELVES 2. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE PROBLEMS BIGGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 671 854 28 2 ============================== V001423 J2d. Better cooperative or self-reliant MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2d. ONE, it is more important to be a cooperative person who works well with others; OR TWO, it is more important to be a self-reliant person able to take care of oneself. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. MORE IMPT. TO BE COOPERATIVE 2. MORE IMPT. TO BE SELF-RELIANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 852 662 34 7 ============================== V001424 J3. # times R watched jeopardy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J3. Now I'd like to ask you a few short questions about television viewing, because what you watch often determines what political advertising you will see. How many times in the last week have you watched "Jeopardy"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 97. R VOLUNTEERS,"NEVER WATCHES TELEVISION" --> SKIP TO J 8 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 112 83 65 27 52 6 7 9 10 13 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 5 3 1 1 42 96 97 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1122 32 3 1 ============================== V001425 J4. # times R watched wheel of fortune MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J4. How many times in the last week have you watched "Wheel of Fortune"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 105 86 57 23 5 6 7 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 11 8 4 1 95 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 1097 1 1 ============================== V001426 J5. # times R watched morning news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J5. How many times in the last week have you watched morning news programs such as "Today," "Good Morning America," or "The Early Show"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 122 110 123 61 5 6 95 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 181 16 177 729 4 ============================== V001427 J6. # times R watched daytime talk show MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J6. How many times in the last week have you watched daytime television talk shows such as "Oprah Winfrey," "Rosie O'Donnell," or "Jerry Springer"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 141 91 70 31 61 6 7 9 95 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 5 1 36 1082 3 ============================== V001428 J7. Network news program R watches most MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J7. Which of the network news programs do you watch most often - "World News Tonight" on ABC, "NBC Nightly News," "The CBS Evening News," or some other network news program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ABC 3. NBC 5. CBS 6. WATCH NO NETWORK NEWS PROGRAM [VOL] 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 284 307 362 264 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 184 394 12 ============================== V001429 J8. How much can you trust the media MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J8. How much of the time do you think you can trust the media to report the news fairly? Just about always, most of the time, only some of the time, or almost never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME 4. ALMOST NEVER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 110 642 669 132 2 ============================== V001430 J9. Does R listen to political talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9. There are a number of programs on radio in which people call in to voice their opinions about politics. Do you ever listen to political talk radio programs of this type? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, LISTEN --> GO TO J9a 5. NO, DON'T LISTEN --> GO TO J10 8. DK --> GO TO J10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 561 994 ============================== V001431 J9a. How often does R listen to talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9a. IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO: How often do you listen to those programs -- every day, most days, once or twice a week, or only occasionally? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERYDAY 2. MOST DAYS 3. ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK 4. ONLY OCCASIONALLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1246 92 77 144 248 ============================== V001432 J9b. How closely does R listen to talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9b. IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO: Some people listen carefully to these talk radio programs while others just keep them on in the background while they do other things. How about you? When you turn on a political talk radio program, would you say you pay very close attention, fairly close attention, occasional attention, or very little attention? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CLOSE ATTENTION 2. FAIRLY CLOSE ATTENTION 3. OCCASIONAL ATTENTION 4. VERY LITTLE ATTENTION 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1246 107 258 145 51 ============================== V001433 J10. Does R have Internet or WWW access MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J10. Do you have acces to the Internet or the World Wide Web? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> J11 8. DK --> J11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 973 581 1 ============================== V001434 J10a. Has R seen election info on Internet MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J10a. IF R HAS ACCESS TO THE INTERNET: Have you seen any information about this election campaign on the (Internet/Web)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J10 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 834 464 509 ============================== V001435 J11. Important differences b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J11. Do you think there are any important differences in what the Republicans and Democrats stand for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, DIFFERENCES 5. NO, NO DIFFERENCES 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1066 457 31 1 ============================== V001436a J11a1(1). #1 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric J11a1(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 1 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11 ============================== V001436b J11a1(2). #1 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J11a1(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 1 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 8. DK (998 in J11a1(1)) 9. RF (999 in J11a1(1)) 0. NA (995 in J11a1(1)); Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 741 350 11 10 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 342 322 31 ============================== V001436c J11a2(1). #2 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a2(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 2 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001436d J11a2(2). #2 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a2(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 2 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 886 306 17 21 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 360 1 216 ============================== V001436e J11a3(1). #3 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a3(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 3 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001436f J11a3(2). #3 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a3(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 3 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1137 221 16 24 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 245 1 163 ============================== V001436g J11a4(1). #4 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a4(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 4 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001436h J11a4(2). #4 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a4(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 4 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1302 187 13 22 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 189 1 93 ============================== V001436j J11a5(1). #5 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a5(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 5 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001436k J11a5(2). #5 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a5(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 5 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1490 114 10 15 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 118 1 59 ============================== V001436m J11a6(1). #6 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a6(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 6 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== V001436n J11a6(2). #6 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a6(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 6 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW 0 1 2 4 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1591 90 8 9 81 28 ............................................................................ K1. Some people think that certain groups have too much influence in American life and politics, while other people feel that certain groups don't have as much influence as they deserve. I am going to read you a list of groups, for each one please tell me whether that group has too much influence, just about the right amount of influence or too little influence. ============================== V001437 K1a. Whites influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1a. The first group is WHITES. Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 425 971 124 21 14 ============================== V001438 K1b. Blacks influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1b. What about BLACKS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 310 575 623 34 13 ============================== V001439 K1c. Hispanics influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1c. What about HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 121 502 849 69 14 ============================== V001440 K1d. Asian-Americans influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1d. What about ASIAN AMERICANS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 85 586 771 100 13 ============================== V001441 K1e. Jews influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1e. What about JEWS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 223 854 351 111 16 ============================== V001442 K1f. Protestants influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1f. What about PROTESTANTS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 135 1012 221 171 16 ============================== V001443 K1g. Catholics influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1g. What about CATHOLICS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 250 1050 143 97 15 ============================== V001444 K1h. Men influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1h. What about MEN? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 830 608 81 27 9 ============================== V001445 K1j. Women influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1j. And the last group is WOMEN. (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 105 556 866 19 9 ............................................................................ K2. Now we have a set of questions concerning various public figures. We want to see how much information about them gets out to the public from television, newspapers and the like. ============================== V001446a K2a. Identify Trent Lott -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a.E; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 85 260 680 ============================== V001446b K2a.E. Identify Trent Lott -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 50 167 311 2 ============================== V001447 K2ax. Summary identify Trent Lott MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2ax. The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? SUMMARY: TRENT LOTT OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2a/K2a.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 135 427 991 2 ============================== V001448 K2a1.E. Identify Trent Lott- DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2a1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? CHECKPOINT: LOTT - PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1279 241 287 ============================== V001449a K2b. Identify William Rehnquist -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b.E; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 98 297 630 ============================== V001449b K2b.E. Identify William Rehnquist -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 66 189 274 1 ============================== V001450 K2bx. Summary identify William Rehnquist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2bx. WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) SUMMARY: REHNQUIST OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2b/K2b.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 164 486 904 1 ============================== V001451 K2b1.E. Identify William Rehnquist - DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2b1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1279 220 308 ============================== V001452a K2c. Identify Tony Blair -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c.E; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 347 73 604 1 ============================== V001452b K2c.E. Identify Tony Blair-experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 189 69 271 1 ============================== V001453 K2cx. Summary identify Tony Blair MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2cx. TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) SUMMARY: BLAIR OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2c/K2c.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 536 142 875 2 ============================== V001454 K2c1.E. Identify Tony Blair - DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2c1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1278 218 311 ============================== V001455a K2d. Identify Janet Reno -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d.E; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 561 165 296 3 ============================== V001455b K2d.E. Identify Janet Reno -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 296 108 125 1 ============================== V001456 K2dx. Summary identify Janet Reno MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2dx. JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) SUMMARY: RENO OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2d/K2d.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 857 273 421 4 ============================== V001457 K2d1.E. Identify Janet Reno -DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2d1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1278 130 399 ............................................................................ K3. Next, I'd like to ask you about the candidates who ran for President and their running mates. We're interested in some of the things that people may have heard about these candidates. The first candidate I'd like to ask you about is George W. Bush. ============================== V001458 K3a. In what state does Bush live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3a. What U.S. state does George W. Bush live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 2 17 1393 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 36 105 1 ============================== V001459 K3a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K3a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 145 1410 ============================== V001460 K3b. What is Bush's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K3b. What is George W. Bush's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 15 236 125 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 621 552 253 ============================== V001461 K3b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K3b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 255 673 879 ............................................................................ K4. Now take Al Gore ============================== V001462 K4a. What state is Gore from MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4a. What U.S. state is Al Gore from originally? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 19 1053 12 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 194 271 1 ============================== V001463 K4a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K4a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 253 300 1254 ============================== V001464 K4b. What is Gore's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K4b. What is Al Gore's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 255 102 10 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 575 598 253 ============================== V001465 K4b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K4b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 604 951 ............................................................................ K5. What about Dick Cheney. ============================== V001466 K5a. In what state does Cheney live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K5a. What U.S. state does Dick Cheney live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 21 7 145 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 288 270 823 1 ============================== V001467 K5a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K5a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 253 751 803 ============================== V001468 K5b. What is Cheney's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K5b. What is Dick Cheney's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 16 64 59 13 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 503 899 253 ============================== V001469 K5b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K5b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 254 771 782 ............................................................................ K6. And Joseph Lieberman. ============================== V001470 K6a. In what state does Lieberman live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K6a. What U.S. state does Joseph Lieberman live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 473 16 11 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 355 694 1 ============================== V001471 K6a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K6a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 614 941 ============================== V001472 K6b. What is Lieberman's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K6b. What is Joseph Lieberman's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 18 6 1083 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 87 358 253 ============================== V001473 K6b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K6b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 319 1236 ============================== V001474 K7. Volunteer work in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K7. Many people say they have less time these days to do volunteer work. What about you, were you able to devote any time to volunteer work in the last 12 months or did you not do so? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 665 890 ============================== V001475 K8. Are people trustworthy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K8. Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOST PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED 5. CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 816 728 9 2 ============================== V001476 K9. People take advantage or act fairly MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K9. Do you think most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance or would they try to be fair? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TAKE ADVANTAGE 5. TRY TO BE FAIR 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 467 1072 15 1 ============================== V001477 K10. People helpful or selfish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K10. Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are just looking out for themselves? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TRY TO BE HELPFUL 5. JUST LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1002 537 16 ============================== V001478 K11. Fav/opp laws protect against job discrm homosexu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11. Recently there has been a lot of talk about job discrimination. Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO K11b 8. DK --> SKIP TO K12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 993 480 59 23 ============================== V001479 K11a. How much favor law protecting homosexuals MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11a. IF R FAVORS PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION: Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR STRONGLY --> K12 5. FAVOR NOT STRONGLY --> K12 8. DK --> K12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 814 597 394 2 ============================== V001480 K11b. How much oppose law protecting homosexuals MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11b. IF R OPPOSES PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION: Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OPPOSE STRONGLY 5. OPPOSE NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in K11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1327 278 200 2 ============================== V001481 K11x. Summary protctng homosxls against job discrim MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11x. Recently there has been a lot of talk about job discrimination. Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination? (IF FAVOR/OPPOSE:) Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly?/ Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bult from K11 and K11a/b 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in K11 or K11a/b 9. RF in K11 or K11a/b 0. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 597 394 200 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 278 63 23 ............................................................................ K12/K12.T. FTF: Please look at page 5 of the booklet. Some people say that the best way to reduce crime is to address the social problems that cause crime, like bad schools, poverty and joblessness. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Other people say the best way to reduce crime is to make sure that criminals are caught, convicted and punished. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people say that the best way to reduce crime is to address the social problems that cause crime, like bad schools, poverty and joblessness. Still others say the best way to reduce crime is to make sure that criminals are caught, convicted and punished. ============================== V001482 K12a. R placmnt crime -address social prblms/punish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 76 70 80 146 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 83 64 134 1 1114 ============================== V001482a K12a.T. R placmnt crime -address social prbl/punish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME --> K12a1.T 3. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED --> K12a2.T 5. DO SOMETHING IN BETWEEN --> K12a3.T 8. DK --> K13a3.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> K13a3.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 342 211 265 2 947 ============================== V001483 K12a1.T. How much btr is approach -adressing social MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a1.T. IF R'S OPINION IS TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS: TELEPHONE: Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> K13 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> K13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1465 214 127 1 ============================== V001484 K12a2.T. How much btr is approach -punishing crimls MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a2.T. IF R'S OPINION IS TO MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT AND PUNISHED: TELEPHONE: Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> K13 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> K13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1596 106 102 2 1 ============================== V001485 K12a3.T. If had to choose, which approach is better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a3.T. IF R'S OPINION IS 'SOMETHING IN BETWEEN'/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH: TELEPHONE: If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESSING SOCIAL PROBLEMS 5. MAKING SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 9 in K12a.T 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1500 156 107 37 7 ============================== V001486 K12ax1. PH Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12ax1.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? BRANCHING SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K12a.T, K12a1.T, K12a2.T, K12a3.T. 1. MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS 4. IN-BETWEEN 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS 6. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 7. MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post IW 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 214 128 156 34 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 105 106 1 947 ============================== V001486a K12ax2. Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K12 and K12ax1 Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 2. SCALE: 2/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 3. SCALE: 3/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS 4. SCALE: 4/ IN-BETWEEN 5. SCALE: 5/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS 6. SCALE: 6/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 7. SCALE: 7/ MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post IW 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 290 198 236 180 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 190 169 240 2 254 ============================== V001487 K13. How worried is R about nuclear war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K13. How worried are you about our country getting into a nuclear war at this time? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Through an error in the survey application program, this variable was administered only to telephone Rs. 1. VERY WORRIED 3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED 5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 947 69 306 484 1 ============================== V001488 K14. How worried is R about conventional war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K14. How worried are you about our country getting into a conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear weapons are not used? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Through an error in the survey application program, this variable was administered only to FTF Rs. 1. VERY WORRIED 3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED 5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1112 72 300 322 1 ............................................................................ K15. Recently, there has been a lot of talk about campaign finance reform. Some people believe that we should protect government from excessive influence by campaign contributors. Others think that protecting the freedom of individuals to financially support political candidates and parties is more important. ============================== V001489 K15a. Campn fin- protect govt from infl or individ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K15a. Which is closer to the way you think, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTECT GOVERNMENT FROM EXCESSIVE INFLUENCE 5. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF INDIVIDUALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 561 740 239 14 253 ============================== V001490 K16. How should the financing of campaigns change MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K16. In general, which of the following statements best represents what you feel about the way political campaigns are financed in this country: it needs to be completely overhauled, it needs major changes, it needs minor changes, or it is basically fine the way it is? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY OVERHAULED 3. MAJOR CHANGES 5. MINOR CHANGES 7. FINE THE WAY IT IS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 241 626 413 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 214 60 1 ============================== V001491 L5. Worked on community issue in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5. During the past 12 months, have you worked with other people to deal with some issue facing your community? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 407 1146 2 ============================== V001492 L6. Contacted public official to express in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6. During the past twelve months, have you telephoned, written a letter to, or visited a government official to express your views on a public issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 321 1232 2 ============================== V001493 L7. Attend commun meeting about issue in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7. During the past twelve months, did you attend a meeting about an issue facing your community or schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 427 1127 1 ============================== V001494 L8. Is R a member of any organizations MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8. Here is a list of some organizations people can belong to. There are labor unions, associations of people who do the same kinds of work, fraternal groups such as Lions or Kinterviewanis, hobby clubs or sports teams, groups working on political issues, community groups, and school groups. Of course, there are lots of other types of organizations, too. Not counting membership in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of any of these kinds of organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> L9 8. DK --> L9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 645 910 ============================== V001495 L8a. How many organizations is R currently a member MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric L8a. How many organizations are you currently a member of? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NO ORGANIZATIONS --> L9 1. ONE ORGANIZATION --> L8b 2-96. ORGANIZATIONS --> L8bb 97. 97 OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS --> L8bb 98. DK --> L8bb 99. RF; NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L8 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 281 193 89 38 17 6 7 8 10 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 5 3 4 1 15 20 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1162 ============================== V001496 L8b. 1 org-how many hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8b. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1526 147 37 16 7 10 6 7 8 9 10 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 2 3 1 10 3 15 16 20 24 40 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 5 1 1 1 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 24 2 ============================== V001497 L8c. 1 org-do orgs try to influence government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8c. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1526 105 170 6 ============================== V001498 L8d. 1 org-does org try to influence schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8d. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> L9 5. NO --> L9 8. DON'T KNOW --> L9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1526 92 184 5 ============================== V001499 L8bb. 2+ org-how many hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8bb. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 110 47 33 30 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 28 11 1 13 1 10 12 13 14 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 15 2 1 1 4 16 20 25 35 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 8 2 2 2 50 72 90 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 1 42 6 ============================== V001500 L8cc. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8cc. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 217 147 ============================== V001501 L8dd. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8dd. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 167 196 1 ============================== V001502 L8x1. Summary hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8x1. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organization(s)? SUMMARY: NUMBER OF HOURS/WEEK WITH ORGANIZATIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1162 257 84 49 37 38 6 7 8 9 10 12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 3 16 2 25 5 13 14 15 16 20 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 1 5 3 13 1 25 35 40 50 72 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 3 1 1 1 90 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 43 30 2 ============================== V001503 L8x2. Summary org influence schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x2. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government?/ Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE GOVERNMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1162 322 317 6 ============================== V001504 L8x3. Summary org influence government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x3. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools/ Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE SCHOOLS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1162 259 380 6 ============================== V001505 L9. Contributed to church or charity in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9. Many people are finding it more difficult to make contributions to church or charity as much as they used to. How about you -- were you able to contribute any money to church or charity in the last 12 months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1234 320 1 ============================== V001506 L10. Taken part in Protest or march in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L10. Aside from a strike against your employer, in the past twelve months, have you taken part in a protest, march, or demonstration on some national or local issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 49 1506 ============================== V001507 L10a. How many times protested/marched MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L10a. IF R TAKEN PART IN PROTEST, MARCH OR DEMONSTRATION ON LOCAL ISSUE: About how many times was that -- once, two or three times, or four times or more? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONCE 2. TWO OR THREE 4. FOUR TIMES OR MORE 7. CAN'T REMEMBER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L10 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1758 27 19 3 ............................................................................ M3/M3.T. FTF: Please turn to page 6 in the booklet. Now I'm going to read several statements. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is: TELEPHONE: Now I'm going to read several statements. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is: ============================== V001508 M3a/M3a.T. Blks should overcome prejudice w/o favors MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3a/M3a.T. 'Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 561 491 188 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 212 89 9 5 ============================== V001509 M3b/M3b.T. Blacks have gotten less than they deserve MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3b/M3b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 112 348 273 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 452 346 18 6 ============================== V001510 M3c/M3c.T. If blks wld try harder they cld be welloff MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3c/M3c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 351 427 251 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 331 172 14 9 ============================== V001511 M3d/M3d.T. Past discrim impacts blks today MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3d/M3d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 170 447 168 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 384 365 15 6 ============================== V001512 N1. R have opinion on strength of federal govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1. Now I'd like to ask you about your feelings toward the federal government. Some people are afraid the government in Washington is getting too powerful for the good of the country and the individual person. Others feel that the government in Washington is not getting too strong. Do you have an opinion on this or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> N2 8. DK --> N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 960 583 10 2 ============================== V001513 N1a. Govt is getting too powerful or not too strong MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a. IF R HAS AN OPINION: What is your feeling, do you think the government is getting too powerful or do you think the government is not getting too strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT TOO POWERFUL --> SKIP TO N1b 5. GOVERNMENT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG 7. OTHER; DEPENDS (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO N2 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in N1 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 847 622 293 38 6 1 ============================== V001514 N1a1. Should govt become more powerful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a1. IF R THINKS GOVT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG: Do you think the government should become more powerful or should it stay the way it is? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BECOME MORE POWERFUL --> N1b 5. STAY THE WAY IT IS --> N2 8. DK --> N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1514 62 229 2 ============================== V001515 N1b. Which party favors a strong federal govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1b. IF R THINKS GOVT TOO POWERFUL IN N1a/ IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD BECOME MORE POWERFUL IN N1a1: Which party do you think is more likely to favor a powerful government in Washington -- the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them on this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. NO DIFFERENCE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a; 5, 8, 9 or NA in N1a1 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1123 324 105 247 8 ............................................................................ N2/N2.T. FTF: Please continue looking at page 6 of the booklet. I'd like to read you a few statements about public life. I'll read them one at a time and please tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with each of them. TELEPHONE: I'd like to read you a few statements about public life. I'll read them one at a time. Please tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with each of them. ============================== V001516 N2a/N2a.T. Does R have good undrstdg of pol issues MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2a/N2a.T. ' I feel that I have a pretty good understanding of the important political issues facing our country. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 287 725 200 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 221 109 11 2 ============================== V001517 N2b/N2b.T. R well-qulfd to participate in politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2b/N2b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 205 379 226 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 393 346 4 2 ============================== V001518 N2c/N2c.T. Could do good job in public office MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2c/N2c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office as most other people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office as most other people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 191 322 211 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 421 404 5 1 ============================== V001519 N2d/N2d.T. Better informed about govt than most MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2d/N2d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I think that I am better informed about politics and government than most people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I think that I am better informed about politics and government than most people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 147 381 299 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 428 292 7 1 ============================== V001520 N3. Does R believe their vote matters MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3. So many other people vote in the national election that it doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not. (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; question not implemented at time of interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 357 72 86 79 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 232 973 4 4 ............................................................................ P1/P1.T. FTF: (Looking at page 6 of the booklet) Next, I'd like to ask you about equal rights. I am going to read several more statements. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is: TELEPHONE: I am going to read several statements about equal rights. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is: ============================== V001521 P1a/P1a.T. Society needs to give everyone equal oppr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a/P1a.T. ' Our society should do whatever is necessary to make sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 905 392 91 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 40 4 1 ============================== V001522 P1b/P1b.T. We've pushed equal rights too far MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b/P1b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 209 385 215 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 420 318 6 1 ============================== V001523 P1c/P1c.T. We don't give everyone equal chance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c/P1c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' One of the big problems in this country is that we don't give everyone an equal chance. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' One of the big problems in this country is that we don't give everyone an equal chance. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 267 458 174 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 444 204 5 2 ============================== V001524 P1d/P1d.T. Better if we worried less about equality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1d/P1d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 248 428 224 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 393 243 13 5 ============================== V001525 P1e/P1e.T. OK if some people have more chances than MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1e/P1e.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 120 349 255 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 481 338 9 2 ============================== V001526 P1f/P1f.T. We'd have fewr probs if people treated eq MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1f/P1f.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' If people were treated more equally in this country we would have many fewer problems. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'If people were treated more equally in this country we would have many fewer problems.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 429 544 176 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 288 110 6 1 ............................................................................ Q1Q1.T. FTF: (Again looking at page 6 of the booklet) Please tell me how much you agree or disagree with these statements about the government. The first is: TELEPHONE: Please tell me how much you agree or disagree with these statements about the government. The first is: ============================== V001527 Q1a/Q1a.T. Public officials don't care MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1a/Q1a.T. ' Public officials don't care much what people like me think. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 286 564 163 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 436 98 6 1 ============================== V001528 Q1b/Q1b.T. People dont have say in govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1b/Q1b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' People like me don't have any say about what the government does. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' People like me don't have any say about what the government does. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 227 380 129 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 596 216 5 1 ============================== V001529 Q1c/Q1c.T. Politics too complicated MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1c/Q1c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 319 574 108 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 341 208 1 3 ............................................................................ Q2/Q2.T. FTF: (Still on page 6) Now I am going to read several statements about society in general. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is. TELEPHONE: Now I am going to read several statements about society in general. After each one, I would like you to tell me how strongly you agree or disagree. The first statement is . ============================== V001530 Q2a/Q2a.T. New morals are causing society breakdown MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2a/Q2a.T. ' The newer lifestyles are contributing to the breakdown of our society. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 464 517 202 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 242 117 9 3 ============================== V001531 Q2b/Q2b.T. Should adjust views to chgd moral behav MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2b/Q2b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our view of moral behavior to those changes. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our view of moral behavior to those changes. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 211 410 142 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 361 424 2 4 ============================== V001532 Q2c/Q2c.T. Less prblms if emphasize trad family ties MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2c/Q2c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' This country would have many fewer problems if there were more emphasis on traditional family ties. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' This country would have many fewer problems if there were more emphasis on traditional family ties. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 866 466 89 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 89 38 4 2 ============================== V001533 Q2d/Q2d.T. Should tolerate other's morality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2d/Q2d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live according to their own moral standards, even if they are very different from our own. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live according to their own moral standards, even if they are very different from our own. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 361 605 216 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 225 138 5 4 ............................................................................ Q3/Q3.T. FTF: (Not using the booklet) People have different ideas about the government in Washington. These ideas don't refer to Democrats or Republicans in particular, but just to the government in general. We want to see how you feel about these ideas. For example: TELEPHONE: People have different ideas about the government in Washington. These ideas don't refer to Democrats or Republicans in particular, but just to the government in general. We want to see how you feel about these ideas. For example: ============================== V001534 Q3a. How much can govt be trusted MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3a. How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Washington to do what is right -- just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME 4. NEVER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 64 615 850 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 16 8 1 ============================== V001535 Q4. How much of taxes does govt waste MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4. Do you think that people in government waste a lot of the money we pay in taxes, waste some of it, or don't waste very much of it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WASTE A LOT 3. WASTE SOME 5. DON'T WASTE VERY MUCH 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 922 585 34 12 1 ============================== V001536 Q5. Govt run by big intersts or for benefit of all MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q5. Would you say the government is pretty much run by a few big interests looking out for themselves or that it is run for the benefit of all the people? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOV'T RUN BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS 5. GOV'T RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 955 518 69 12 ============================== V001537 Q6. How many in govt are crooked MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6. Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are crooked, not very many are, or do you think hardly any of them are crooked? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. QUITE A FEW ARE CROOKED 3. NOT VERY MANY ARE CROOKED 5. HARDLY ANY ARE CROOKED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 553 772 198 27 4 ============================== V001538 Q7. Elections make govt pay attention MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7. How much do you feel that having elections makes the government pay attention to what the people think -- good deal, some, or not much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD DEAL 3. SOME 5. NOT MUCH 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 253 735 613 196 10 ============================== V001539 Q8. Attn govt pays to people when making decisions MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8. Over the years, how much attention do you feel the government pays to what people think when it decides what to do -- a good deal, some, or not much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD DEAL 3. SOME 5. NOT MUCH 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 254 263 978 301 11 ............................................................................ R1/R1.T. FTF: Looking at page 7 of the booklet, here is a list of groups. Please read over the list and tell me the number of those groups you feel particularly close to -- people who are most like you in their ideas and interests and feelings about things. TELEPHONE: I am going to read a list of groups. For each, please tell me if it is a group you feel particularly close to -- people who are most like you in their ideas and interests and feelings about things. ============================== V001540 R1a. Close to whites FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1a. FTF: WHITES CLOSE TO GROUP - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 463 231 ============================== V001541 R1a.T. Close to whites phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a.T. TELEPHONE: What about whites? Do you feel particularly close to whites? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 743 97 9 10 ============================== V001542 R1b. Close to poor people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1b. FTF: POOR PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - POOR PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 208 486 ============================== V001543 R1b.T. Close to poor people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1b.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) poor people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 530 310 10 9 ============================== V001544 R1c. Close to Asian Americans FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1c. FTF: ASIAN AMERICANS CLOSE TO GROUP - ASIAN AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 67 627 ============================== V001545 R1c.T. Close to Asian americans phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1c.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) Asian Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 269 558 20 12 ============================== V001546 R1d. Close to liberals FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1d. FTF: LIBERALS CLOSE TO GROUP - LIBERALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 118 576 ============================== V001547 R1d.T. Close to liberals phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1d.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) liberals (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 322 492 37 8 ============================== V001548 R1e. Close to elderly FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1e. FTF: THE ELDERLY CLOSE TO GROUP - THE ELDERLY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 311 383 ============================== V001549 R1e.T. Close to elderly phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1e.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) the elderly (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 671 172 7 9 ============================== V001550 R1f. Close to blacks FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1f. FTF: BLACKS CLOSE TO GROUP - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 139 555 ============================== V001551 R1f.T. Close to blacks phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1f.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) blacks (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 421 413 13 12 ============================== V001552 R1g. Close to labor unions FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1g. FTF: LABOR UNIONS CLOSE TO GROUP - LABOR UNIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 89 605 ============================== V001553 R1g.T. Close to labor unions phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1g.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) labor unions (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 217 611 20 11 ============================== V001554 R1h. Close to feminists FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1h. FTF: FEMINISTS CLOSE TO GROUP - FEMINISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 85 609 ============================== V001555 R1h.T. Close to feminists phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1h.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) feminists (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 245 577 27 10 ============================== V001556 R1j. Close to southerners FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1j. FTF: SOUTHERNERS CLOSE TO GROUP - SOUTHERNERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 113 581 ============================== V001557 R1j.T. Close to southerners phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1j.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) southerners (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 438 392 17 12 ============================== V001558 R1k. Close to business people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1k. FTF: BUSINESS PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - BUSINESS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 196 498 ============================== V001559 R1k.T. Close to business people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1k.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) business people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 521 323 7 8 ============================== V001560 R1m. Close to young people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1m. FTF: YOUNG PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - YOUNG PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 318 376 ============================== V001561 R1m.T. Close to young people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1m.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) young people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 695 148 9 7 ============================== V001562 R1n. Close to conservatives FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1n. FTF: CONSERVATIVES CLOSE TO GROUP - CONSERVATIVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 187 507 ============================== V001563 R1n.T. Close to conservatives phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1n.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) conservatives (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 489 334 30 6 ============================== V001564 R1p. Close to Hispanic-Americans FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1p. FTF: HISPANIC-AMERICANS CLOSE TO GROUP - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 117 577 ============================== V001565 R1p.T. Close to Hispanic-Americans ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1p.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) Hispanic-Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 354 470 23 12 ============================== V001566 R1q. Close to women FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1q. FTF: WOMEN CLOSE TO GROUP - WOMEN --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 376 318 ============================== V001567 R1q.T. Close to women phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1q.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) women (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 750 95 7 7 ============================== V001568 R1r. Close to working-class FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1r. FTF: WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE CLOSE TO PEOPLE - WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 437 257 ============================== V001569 R1r.T. Close to working-class phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1r.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) working-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 799 48 7 5 ============================== V001570 R1s .Close to middle-class FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1s. FTF: MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 453 241 ============================== V001571 R1s.T. Close to middle-class phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1s.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) middle-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 782 63 9 5 ============================== V001572 R1t. Close to men FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1t. FTF: MEN CLOSE TO GROUP - MEN --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1113 282 412 ============================== V001573 R1t.T. Close to men phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1t.T. TELEPHONE: What about) men (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (V000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 948 701 144 8 6 ............................................................................ R2/R2.T. FTF: Please turn to page 8 of the booklet. Now I have some questions about different groups in our society. I'm going to show you a seven-point scale on which the characteristics of the people in a group can be rated. In the first statement a score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group tend to be "hard-working." A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are "lazy." A score of 4 means that you think that most people in the group are not closer to one end or the other, and of course, you may choose any number in between. TELEPHONE: Now I have some questions about different groups in our society. Imagine a seven-point scale on which the characteristics of the people in a group can be rated. In the first question a score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group tend to be "hard-working." A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are "lazy." A score of 4 means that you think that most people in the group are not closer to one end or the other, and of course, you may choose any number in between. ============================== V001574 R2a/R2a.T. Hardworking- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2a/R2a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites in general on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. HARDWORKING RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 193 338 329 536 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 76 21 13 20 26 ============================== V001575 R2b/R2b.T. Hardworking- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2b/R2b.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 64 97 241 659 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 278 112 50 25 26 ============================== V001576 R2c/R2c.T. Hardworking- Hispanic-America MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2c/R2c.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate: Hispanic Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 131 196 311 571 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 67 32 52 26 ============================== V001577 R2d/R2d.T. Hardworking- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2d/R2d.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 268 393 295 363 5 6 7 8 9 ............................................................................ R3/R3.T. FTF: Please turn to page 9 of the booklet. The next set asks if people in each group tend to be "intelligent" or "unintelligent." TELEPHONE: The next set of questions ask about intelligence. Again, please imagine a seven-point scale on which the characteristics of the people in a group can be rated. A score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group tend to be "intelligent." A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are "unintelligent." A score of 4 means that you think that most people in the group are not closer to one end or the other, and of course, you may choose any number in between. ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 39 23 64 28 ============================== V001578 R3a/R3a.T. Intelligence- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3a/R3a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. INTELLIGENT RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 210 345 344 528 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 17 8 23 32 ============================== V001579 R3b/R3b.T. Intelligence- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3b/R3b.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 89 132 275 692 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 207 68 32 25 32 ============================== V001580 R3c/R3c.T. Intelligence- Hispanic-Americ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3c/R3c.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 85 117 279 701 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 206 59 22 49 34 ============================== V001581 R3d/R3d.T. Intelligence- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3d/R3d.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate: Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 208 337 330 469 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 72 28 17 57 34 ............................................................................ R4/R4.T. FTF: Please turn to page 10 of the booklet. The next set asks if people in each group tend to be "trustworthy" or "untrustworthy." TELEPHONE: Thinking about trustworthiness as a general group characteristic, please imagine a seven point scale again. A score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group tend to be trustworthy. A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are untrustworthy. A score of 4 means that you think that most people in the group are not closer to one end or the other, and of course, you may choose any number in between. ============================== V001582 R4a/R4a.T. Trustworthy- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4a/R4a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. TRUSTWORTHY RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 128 283 373 594 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 30 13 25 33 ============================== V001583 R4b/R4b.T. Trustworthy- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4b/R4b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 57 114 260 713 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 201 93 47 34 33 ============================== V001584 R4c/R4c.T. Trustworthy- Hispanic-America MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4c/R4c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 61 130 262 726 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 174 63 46 57 33 ============================== V001585 R4d/R4d.T. Trustworthy- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4d/R4d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 84 211 308 677 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 105 38 25 70 34 ............................................................................ R5. Although there are a number of qualities that people feel that children should have, every person thinks that some are more important than others. I am going to read you pairs of desirable qualities. ============================== V001586 R5a. Independence or respect for elders MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5a. Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have: INDEPENDENCE OR RESPECT FOR ELDERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INDEPENDENCE 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. RESPECT FOR ELDERS 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 233 230 1084 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 3 1 ============================== V001587 R5b. Obedience or self-reliance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5b. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) OBEDIENCE OR SELF-RELIANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OBEDIENCE 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. SELF-RELIANCE 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 814 214 516 2 6 ============================== V001588 R5c. Curiosity or good manners MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5c. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) CURIOSITY OR GOOD MANNERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CURIOSITY 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. GOOD MANNERS 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 446 269 832 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1 1 ============================== V001589 R5d. Considerate or well behaved MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5d. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) BEING CONSIDERATE OR WELL BEHAVED --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BEING CONSIDERATE 3. BOTH 5. WELL BEHAVED 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 804 355 389 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 2 1 1 ............................................................................ S0. Now we'd like to talk to you about Bill Clinton. ============================== V001590 S1. Budget deficit lar/smal since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1. As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. GOTTEN SMALLER 3. GOTTEN LARGER --> SKIP TO S1b 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO S2 8. DK --> SKIP TO S2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 487 93 157 54 ============================== V001591 S1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1a. IF BUDGET DEFICIT SMALLER SINCE 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH SMALLER --> SKIP TO S2 5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER --> SKIP TO S2 8. DK --> SKIP TO S2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1320 230 254 3 ============================== V001591a S1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1b. IF BUDGET DEFICIT LARGER SINCE 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LARGER 5. SOMEWHAT LARGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1714 31 60 2 ============================== V001592 S1x. Summary - budget deficit since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1x. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S1 and S2a/b. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much larger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 230 254 157 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 60 31 59 ============================== V001592a S1x1. Summary pre & post - budget deficit MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1x1. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? COMB SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q1s and Post S1x. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much larger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 470 502 360 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 138 75 132 1 ============================== V001593 S2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO S3 8. DK --> SKIP TO S3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 288 162 274 67 ============================== V001594 S2a. Spend poor a lot/somwhat more/less MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2a. IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR INCREASED SINCE 1992/ IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR DECREASED SINCE 1992: A lot or somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1357 101 347 2 ============================== V001595 S2x. Summary - spending on poor since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2x. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S2 and S2a. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 64 222 274 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 125 37 69 ============================== V001595a S2x1. Summary pre & post - spending on poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2x1. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? COMB. SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q2x and Post S2x. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 145 478 549 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 231 86 188 1 ============================== V001596 S3. Economy better/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S3b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S4 8. DK --> SKIP TO S4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 563 40 172 16 ============================== V001597 S3a. Economy much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3a. IF U.S. ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S4 8. DK --> SKIP TO S4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1244 310 252 1 ============================== V001598 S3b. Economy much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3b. IF U.S. ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1767 12 28 ============================== V001599 S3x. Summary - economy since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S3, S3a, S3b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 310 252 172 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 28 12 17 ============================== V001599a S3x1. Summary pre & post - econ since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q3x and Post S3x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 682 513 357 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 65 34 27 ============================== V001600 S4. Clinton made economy better/worse since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO S4b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO S5 8. DK --> SKIP TO S5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 419 21 327 24 ============================== V001601 S4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S5 8. DK --> SKIP TO S5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1388 192 227 ============================== V001602 S4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1786 6 15 ============================== V001603 S4x. Summary - Clinton made econ better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4x. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S4, S4a, S4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 192 227 327 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 15 6 24 ============================== V001603a S4x1. Summary pre & post - Clinton made econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4x1. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q4x and Post S4x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 434 487 648 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 41 21 47 ============================== V001604 S5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 163 61 558 9 ============================== V001604a S5x. Clinton admin hurt/help R economically? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5x. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q5 and Post S5. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 352 136 1166 24 ============================== V001605 S6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO S6b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO S7 8. DK --> SKIP TO ->S7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 202 223 346 19 1 ============================== V001606 S6a. U.S. much/somewhat more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6a. IF U.S. MORE SECURE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S7 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S7 8. DK --> SKIP TO S7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S6 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1605 61 141 ============================== V001607 S6b. U.S. much/somewhat less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6b. IF U.S LESS SECURE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S6 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1584 99 124 ============================== V001608 S6x. Summary - U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S6, S6a, S6b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 61 141 346 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 124 99 19 1 ============================== V001608a S6x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q6x and Post S6x. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 132 285 725 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 277 206 52 1 ============================== V001609 S7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO S7b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO S8 8. DK --> SKIP TO S8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 185 198 382 25 1 ============================== V001610 S7a. Clinton made much/smwht more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S8 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S8 8. DK --> SKIP TO S8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1622 63 122 ============================== V001611 S7b. Clinton made much/smwhat less secur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1609 91 107 ============================== V001612 S7x. Summ-Clinton impact on U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7x. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S7, S7a, S7b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 63 122 382 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 91 25 1 ============================== V001612a S7x1. Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on secur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7x1. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q7x and Post S7x. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 136 241 831 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 226 190 53 1 ============================== V001613 S8. U.S. crime rate better/wors since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S8b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S9 8. DK --> SKIP TO S9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 294 220 256 21 ============================== V001614 S8a. U.S. crime rate much/smwht better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8a. IF U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S9 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S9 8. DK --> SKIP TO S9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1513 79 214 1 ============================== V001615 S8b. U.S. crime rate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8b. IF U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1587 82 138 ============================== V001616 S8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8x. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S8, S8a, S8b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 79 214 256 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 138 82 22 ============================== V001616a S8x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8x1. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q8x and Post S8x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 161 458 516 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 276 220 47 ============================== V001617 S9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S9b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO S10 8. DK --> SKIP TO S10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 190 65 508 27 1 ============================== V001618 S9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht bettr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S10 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S10 8. DK --> SKIP TO S10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1617 50 140 ============================== V001619 S9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S.S CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1742 24 41 ============================== V001620 S9x. Summ-Clinton impact on crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9x. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S9, S9a, S9b. 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 50 140 508 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 24 27 1 ============================== V001620a S9x1.Summ pre & post - Clinton impact on crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9x1. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q9x and Post S9x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 122 301 1051 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 77 60 66 1 ============================== V001621 S10. Moral climate better/worse since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S10b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S11 8. DK --> SKIP TO S11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 58 412 307 14 ============================== V001622 S10a.Moral climate much/smwht better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10a. IF U.S MORAL CLIMATE BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S11 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S11 8. DK --> SKIP TO S11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 11 47 ============================== V001623 S10b. Moral climate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10b. IF U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1395 204 208 ============================== V001624 S10x. Summary - moral climate since 92 Numeric S10x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S10, S10a, S10b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 11 47 307 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 208 204 14 ============================== V001624a S10x1. Summ pre & post - moral climate since 92 Numeric S10x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q10x and Post S10x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 39 106 621 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 464 29 2 ============================== V001625 S11. Clinton made moral climate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S11b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO S14 8. DK --> SKIP TO S14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 47 336 391 15 2 ============================== V001626 S11a. Clinton made moral clim mch/s better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S14 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S14 8. DK --> SKIP TO S14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1760 13 34 ============================== V001627 S11b. Clinton made moral clim mch/s worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 168 168 ============================== V001628 S11x. Summ-Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11x. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S11, S11a, S11b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1016 13 34 391 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 168 15 2 ============================== V001628a S11x1.Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11x1. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q11x and Post S11x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 36 76 816 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 327 382 36 5 ............................................................................ S14. Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done -- ever made you feel: ============================== V001629 S14a. Clinton makes R angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 470 285 7 1 ============================== V001629a S14ax. Summ pre & post Clinton - angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14ax. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY COMB.PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14a and Post S14a. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 1087 582 9 1 ============================== V001630 S14a1. How often Clinton makes R angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1337 72 100 218 80 ============================== V001630a S14a1x. Summ pre & post - how often angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a1x. How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTEN AFFECT - ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14a1 and Post S14a1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 720 210 243 481 153 ============================== V001631 S14b. Clinton makes R hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 360 397 3 3 ============================== V001631a S14bx. Summ pre & post Clinton -hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14bx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14b and Post S14b. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 829 841 6 3 ============================== V001632 S14b1. How often Clinton make R hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1447 55 105 171 29 ============================== V001632a S14b1x. Summ pre & post - how often hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b1x. How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14b1 and Post S14b1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 978 145 240 374 70 ============================== V001633 S14c. Clinton makes R afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 146 612 4 1 ============================== V001633a S14cx. Summ pre & post Clinton - afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14cx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14c and Post S14c. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 378 1294 6 1 ============================== V001634 S15c1. How often Clinton makes R afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S14c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1661 36 29 57 24 ============================== V001634a S14c1x. Summ pre & post - how often afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c1x. How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14c1 and Post S14c1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1429 76 84 153 65 ============================== V001635 S14d. Clinton makes R proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 308 450 4 1 ============================== V001635a S14dx. Summ pre & post Clinton - proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14dx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14d and Post S14d. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 675 994 8 2 ============================== V001636 S14d1. How often Clinton makes R proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14d 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1499 37 90 158 23 ============================== V001636a S14d1x. Summ pre & post - how often proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d1x. How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14d1 and Post S14d1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1132 117 191 308 58 1 ............................................................................ S15/S15.T. FTF: Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he (is) ?' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? TELEPHONE: I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe Bill Clinton. For each, tell me whether the word or phrase describes him extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all. ============================== V001637 S15a. Clinton trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15a. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 20 104 275 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 351 10 3 ============================== V001637a S15ax. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15ax. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15a and Post S15a. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 54 215 568 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 807 30 5 ============================== V001638 S15b. Clinton trait-cares about people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15b. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 96 283 238 129 17 ============================== V001638a S15bx. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait-cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15bx. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - CARES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15b and Post S15b. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 224 599 518 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 294 43 1 ============================== V001639 S15c. Clinton trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15c. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 290 394 53 13 13 ============================== V001639a S15cx. Summ pre & post-Clinton knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15cx. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15c and Post S15c. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 620 856 143 31 29 ============================== V001640 S15d. Clinton trait-strong leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15d. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 164 333 178 82 6 ============================== V001640a S15dx. Summ pre & post-Clinton leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15dx. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15d and Post S15d. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 371 707 391 188 22 ============================== V001641 S15e. Clinton trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15e. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 168 250 247 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 81 15 2 ============================== V001641a S15ex. Summ pre & post-Clinton dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15ex. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15e and Post S15e. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 452 554 470 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 157 41 5 ============================== V001642 S15f. Clinton trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15f. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 318 367 51 19 8 ============================== V001642a S15fx. Summ pre & post-Clinton-intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15fx. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15f and Post S15f. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 694 779 139 49 18 ============================== V001643 S15g. Clinton trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15g. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1044 57 226 319 141 20 ============================== V001643a S15gx. Summ pre & post-Clinton out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15gx. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15g and Post S15g. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 128 164 471 670 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 324 49 1 ============================== V001644 T1. Did R watch a Pres debate on tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T1. Did you watch a televised presidential debate between Al Gore and George W. Bush? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, WATCHED --> SKIP TO T1a 5. NO, DIDN'T WATCH --> SKIP TO T2 8. DK --> SKIP TO T2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 1069 480 3 ============================== V001645 T1a. Did R watch an entire or just part of debate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T1a. IF R WATCHED PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: Did you watch an entire debate or just part of it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WATCHED ENTIRE DEBATE 5. JUST PART OF IT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 738 455 614 ============================== V001646 T2. Did R listen to campaign speeches or diss on radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T2. Did you listen to any speeches or discussions about the campaign on the radio? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO T2a 5. NO --> SKIP TO T3 8. DK --> SKIP TO T3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 614 937 1 ============================== V001647 T2a. How much did R listen to radio speeches & diss MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T2a. IF R LISTENED TO RADIO CAMPAIGN PROGRAMS: Would you say you listened to a good many, several, or just one or two? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD MANY 3. SEVERAL 5. JUST ONE OR TWO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T2 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1193 136 244 234 ============================== V001648 T3/T3.T. How much attention to Pres campaign news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T3/T3.T. FTF: Looking at page 12 in the booklet: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 296 426 560 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 224 45 1 ============================== V001649 T4/T4.T. How much attention to Cong campaign news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T4/T4.T. FTF: (Still on page 12 in the booklet) In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is, the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is, the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 64 127 481 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 632 246 2 ============================== V001650 T5/T5.T. Two parties, no labels, or new party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T5/T5.T. FTF: Looking at page 13 of the booklet: Here is a question about political parties. Which of the following outcomes regarding political parties best represents what you would like to see happen? You can just tell me the number of the outcome you choose. TELEPHONE: Which one of the following outcomes regarding political parties best represents what you would like to see happen? ONE, a continuation of the two party system of Democrats and Republicans. TWO, elections in which candidates run as individuals without party labels or THREE, the growth of one or more parties that could effectively challenge the Democrats and Republicans? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ..A CONTINUATION OF THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM OF DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS? 2. ...ELECTIONS IN WHICH CANDIDATES RUN AS INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT PARTY LABELS? 3. ...THE GROWTH OF ONE OR MORE PARTIES THAT COULD EFFECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS? 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 572 423 509 41 7 ============================== V001651 T6. Is R satisfied with US Democracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T6. On the whole, are you satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the United States? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. SATISFIED 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 3. NOT VERY SATISFIED 4. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; interview administered before question added 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 360 454 688 216 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 58 26 5 ============================== V001652 V1. Bush effect on US economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1. As you will remember, former President George Bush (George W. Bush's father) was elected in November 1988. The next several questions ask you to think about his four years as President. Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO V1b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO V2 7. DK ANYTHING ABOUT BUSH SR. [VOL.] --> SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 441 254 605 220 31 ============================== V001653 V1a. How much better Bush made economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1a. IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V2 8. DK --> SKIP TO V2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1366 113 328 ============================== V001654 V1b. How much worse Bush made economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1b. IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1553 71 183 ============================== V001655 V1x. Summary: Bush effect on economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1x. Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON 1988-1992 ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V1, V1a, V1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 113 328 605 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 183 71 31 ============================== V001656 V2. Bush made US more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2. Would you say that the Bush administration made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TOV2b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V3 8. DK --> SKIP TO V3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 709 96 492 34 ============================== V001657 V2a. Bush made US how much more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO V3 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO V3 8. DK --> SKIP TO V3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1098 316 393 ============================== V001658 V2b. Bush made US how much less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1711 27 69 ============================== V001659 V2x. Summary: Bush effect on security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2x. Would you say that the Bush administration made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON U.S. SECURITY 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V2, V2a, V2b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No difference 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 316 393 492 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 69 27 34 ============================== V001660 V3. Bush effect on US crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3. Would you say that the Bush administration made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO V3b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V4 8. DK --> SKIP TO V4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 197 118 943 73 ============================== V001661 V3a. Bush made crime rate how mch better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V4 8. DK --> SKIP TO V4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1610 55 142 ============================== V001662 V3b. Bush made crime rate how much worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1689 39 79 ============================== V001663 V3x. Summary: Bush effect on crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3x. Would you say that the Bush administration made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON U.S. CRIME 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V3, V3a, V3b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 55 142 943 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 79 39 73 ============================== V001664 V4. Bush effect on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4. Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO V4b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 367 53 878 31 2 ============================== V001665 V4a. Bush moral climate how much better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1440 119 247 1 ============================== V001666 V4b. Bush moral climate how much worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1754 20 33 ============================== V001667 V4x. Summary: Bush effect on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4x. Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON MORAL CLIMATE 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bult from V4, V4a, V4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 119 247 878 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 20 32 2 ............................................................................ V5/V5.T. FTF: Please look at page 11 of the booklet. I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe former President George Bush. For each, please tell me how well the word or phrase describes him. (FIRST TRAIT:) In your opinion, does the phrase 'he (is) ?' describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? TELEPHONE: I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe former President George Bush. For each, please tell me how well the word or phrase describes him. (FIRST TRAIT:) In your opinion, does the phrase 'he (is) ?' describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? ============================== V001668 V5a. Bush trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5a. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 459 689 112 21 50 ============================== V001669 V5b. Bush trait - cares about people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5b. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 123 566 437 158 47 ============================== V001670 V5c. Bush trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5c. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 343 811 121 24 32 ============================== V001671 V5d. Bush trait - strong leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5d. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 276 679 289 50 37 ============================== V001672 V5e. Bush trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5e. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 34 126 453 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 659 56 3 ============================== V001673 V5f. Bush trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5f. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 381 799 104 16 31 ============================== V001674 V5g. Bush trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5g. Please look at page 11 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 476 134 382 546 222 47 ............................................................................ Y4. Now, on another topic.. ============================== V001675 Y5. Is R currently working MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y5. Are you currently working? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> Y7 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 256 1036 515 ============================== V001676a Y6a. Why is R not working, reason 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6a. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1292 10 31 279 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 63 111 20 1 ============================== V001676b Y6b. Why is R not working, reason 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6b. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1764 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 13 20 4 ============================== V001676c Y6c. Why is R not working, reason 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6c. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention 0 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1804 1 1 1 ============================== V001677 Y7. Workers: How satisfied is R with work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: On the whole, how satisfied are you with the work you do? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY SATISFIED 2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 771 547 402 63 23 1 ============================== V001678 Y7a. WRKS: Does R spend work time with people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7a. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5. OR BY YOURSELF 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 771 896 139 1 ============================== V001679 Y8. WRKS: Rs coworkers looking out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION ---> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 771 59 237 431 231 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 27 7 3 ============================== V001680 Y8a. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8a. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 798 26 43 293 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 492 142 10 3 ============================== V001681 Y8b. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8b. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 798 169 569 230 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 5 6 3 ============================== V001682 Y8c. WRKS: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8c. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL --> Z1 2. QUITE WELL --> Z1 3. NOT TOO WELL --> Z1 4. NOT WELL AT ALL --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW --> Z1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 798 248 626 102 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 23 8 2 ============================== V001683 Y8d. WRKS:Racial diversity of Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8d. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Thinking about the diversity of your workplace, are the people who work where you work all White, mostly white, about half and half, mostly Black, or all Black? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL WHITE 2. MOSTLY WHITE 3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF 4. MOSTLY BLACK 5. ALL BLACK 7. R VOLUNTEERS: OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 798 208 463 187 37 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 102 5 1 ============================== V001684 Y10. Laid off:Does R spend days alone/with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: When you are working, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5. OR BY YOURSELF 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1796 6 5 ============================== V001685 Y11. LOff: Rs coworkers just looking out for selves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION ---> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c 0 1 2 3 4 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1796 2 2 3 2 2 ============================== V001686 Y11a. LOff: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11a. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 0 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1798 2 2 4 1 ============================== V001687 Y11b. LOff:Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11b. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1798 2 4 3 ============================== V001688 Y11c. LOFF: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11c. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL --> Z1 2. QUITE WELL --> Z1 3. NOT TOO WELL --> Z1 4. NOT WELL AT ALL --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW --> Z1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1798 1 5 3 ============================== V001689 Y15. Retired:Does R spend days alone/with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y15. IF R IS RETIRED: Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during the day with other people or were you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5 OR BY YOURSELF 8 DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1525 254 28 ============================== V001690 Y16. RET:Rs coworker look out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16. IF R IS RETIRED: For these next few questions please continue thinking about your last job. I'm going to ask you about the people you saw regularly at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they were just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1525 15 50 100 4 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 78 24 12 3 ============================== V001691 Y16a. RET:Did Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16a. IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say those people you saw regularly at work tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1537 7 10 61 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 131 57 3 1 ============================== V001692 Y16b. RET:Were Rs coworkers respectful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16b. IF R IS RETIRED: (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at work) Would you say that they treated others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1536 74 146 38 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 9 1 3 ============================== V001693 Y16c. RET: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16c. IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say that honest described the people you worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1536 92 150 20 5 4 ============================== V001694 Y17x. Summary: R work with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17x. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?/ When you are working, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?/ Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during the day with other people or were you pretty much by yourself? SUMMARY: R WORK WITH OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5 OR BY YOURSELF 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; no Post IW 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 478 1156 172 1 ============================== V001695 Y18x. Summary: co-workers look out for selves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18x. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they were just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS LOOK OUT FOR SELVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION --> Z1 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 478 76 289 534 311 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 41 10 3 ============================== V001696 Y18ax. Summary: co-workers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18ax. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ Would you say those people you saw regularly at work tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TAKE ADVANTAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 519 33 55 356 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 627 200 13 4 ============================== V001697 Y18bx. Summary: co-workers treat others w/respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18bx. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at work) Would you say that they treated others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TREAT OTHERS WITH RESPECT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 518 245 719 271 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 6 9 3 ============================== V001698 Y18cx. Summary: co-workers honest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18cx. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?/ Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?/ Would you say that honest described the people you worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS HONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 518 341 781 125 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 28 12 2 ============================== V001699 Z1. Person R discusses politics with: name 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z1. Now let's shift our attention to another area. From time to time, people discuss government, elections and politics with other people. I'd like to ask you about the people with whom you discuss these matters. These people might or might not be relatives. Can you think of anyone? R IDENTIFIES NAME 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z25 8. DK -->Z25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 256 1152 399 ============================== V001700 Z3. Person R discusses politics with: name 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z3. Is there anyone else you talk with about these matters? R IDENTIFIES NAME 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 861 290 1 ============================== V001701 Z5. Person R discusses politics with: name 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z5. Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? R IDENTIFIES NAME 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 946 550 311 ============================== V001702 Z7. Person R discusses politics with: name 4 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z7. Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? R IDENTIFIES NAME 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 327 223 ============================== V001703 Z9. Is name 1 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z10 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z9a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z9a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 263 266 619 2 2 ============================== V001704 Z9a. Is name 1 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 678 470 3 1 ============================== V001705 Z9b. Is name 1 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9b. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1184 311 309 2 1 ============================== V001706 Z9c. Does name 1 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9c. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1184 76 544 2 1 ============================== V001707 Z9d. Is name 1 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9d. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1184 178 442 2 1 ============================== V001708 Z10. How often does R discuss politics w/name 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z10. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 354 593 195 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 6 2 2 ============================== V001709 Z11. How much does name 1 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z11. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 483 557 104 7 1 ============================== V001710 Z12. How name 1 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z12. I have another question about the first person you have named. How do you think voted in the election? Do you think he/she voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think didn't vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 655 442 479 46 7 8 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 16 62 4 ============================== V001711 Z13. Is name 2 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z14 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z13a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z13a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 946 90 270 500 1 ============================== V001712 Z13a. Is name 2 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 946 478 381 2 ============================== V001713 Z13b. Is name 2 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13b. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1306 234 266 1 ============================== V001714 Z13c. Does name 2 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13c. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1306 80 420 1 ============================== V001715 Z13d. Is name 2 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13d. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1306 141 359 1 ============================== V001716 Z14. How often does R discuss politics w/name 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z14. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 3 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 946 186 483 189 2 1 ============================== V001717 Z15. How much does name 2 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z15. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 946 285 478 94 3 1 ============================== V001718 Z16. How name 2 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z16. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE [SPECIFY] 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 946 336 342 30 7 8 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 75 10 66 2 ============================== V001719 Z17. Is name 3 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z18 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z17a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z17a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 44 187 319 ============================== V001720 Z17a. Is name 3 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 312 237 1 ============================== V001721 Z17b. Is name 3 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17b. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1488 153 166 ============================== V001722 Z17c. Does name 3 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17c. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1488 44 275 ============================== V001723 Z17d. Is name 3 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17d. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1488 78 241 ============================== V001724 Z18. How often does R discuss politics w/name 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z18. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY, OR 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 0 1 3 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 104 295 147 4 ============================== V001725 Z19. How much does name 3 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z19. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 187 292 69 2 ============================== V001726 Z20. How name 3 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z20. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) [SPECIFY] 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1257 201 230 12 7 8 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 43 9 55 ============================== V001727 Z21. Is name 4 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z22 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z21a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z21a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 18 109 200 ============================== V001728 Z21a. Is name 4 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 178 149 ============================== V001729 Z21b. Is name 4 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21b. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1607 95 105 ============================== V001730 Z21c. Does name 4 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21c. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1607 29 171 ============================== V001731 Z21d. Is name 4 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21d. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1607 45 155 ============================== V001732 Z22. How often does R discuss politics w/name 4 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z22. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY, OR 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 0 1 3 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 58 168 97 4 ============================== V001733 Z23. How much does name 4 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z23. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 108 177 42 ============================== V001734 Z24. How name 4 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z24. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 105 147 6 7 8 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 26 6 36 1 ============================== V001735 Z25. Has R worked with neighbor on common issue/year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z25. Now, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in your neighborhood. During the past twelve months, have you worked with others from your neighborhood to deal with a common issue or problem? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 256 378 1173 ============================== V001736 Z26. How satisfied is R with neighbrhood MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z26. On the whole, how satisfied are you with your neighborhood? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY SATISIFIED 2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 844 528 120 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 55 3 1 ============================== V001737 Z27. Are neighbors just looking out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27. I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see in your neighborhood. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 99 344 627 4 5 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 324 95 58 4 ============================== V001738 Z27a. Do neighbors try to take advantage of others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27a. Would you say those people you see regularly in your neighborhood try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 28 43 234 4 5 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 852 325 66 3 ============================== V001739 Z27b. Do neighbors treat others w/respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27b. (Again, thinking about those people you see in your neighborhood) Would you say they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 3. MOST OF THE TIME 5. SOME OF THE TIME 7. HARDLY EVER 8. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 398 820 223 4 5 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 17 43 4 ============================== V001740 Z27c. Does honest describe neighbors MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z27c. Would you say that honest describes the people in your neighborhood extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8 DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 440 873 118 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 47 70 3 ============================== V001741 Z27d. What is the racial diversity of neighborhood MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z27d. Thinking about the diversity of your neighborhood, are the people who live where you live all White, mostly white, about half and half, mostly Black, or all Black? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL WHITE 2. MOSTLY WHITE 3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF 4. MOSTLY BLACK 5. ALL BLACK 7. R VOLUNEERS: OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 403 700 238 70 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 30 104 5 1 ============================== V001742 Z28. How satisfying is Rs life MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z28. In general, how satisfying do you find the way you're spending your life these days? Would you call it completely satisfying, pretty satisfying, or not very satisfying? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY SATISFYING 3. PRETTY SATISFYING 5. NOT VERY SATISFYING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 317 1029 202 1 2 ============================== V001743a ZZ1(1). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(1). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 431 87 48 79 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 33 857 254 ============================== V001743b ZZ1(2). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(2). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 15 28 14 10 857 875 ============================== V001743c ZZ1(3). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(3). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 6 3 6 857 932 ============================== V001744 ZZ2. Rs cooperation MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ2. R's cooperation was: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR 5. VERY POOR 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 978 452 104 12 4 ============================== V001745 ZZ3. Rs knowledge of politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ3. R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 187 400 551 301 111 ============================== V001746 ZZ4. Rs apparent intelligence MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ4. R's apparent intelligence: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 272 243 543 675 63 11 ============================== V001747 ZZ5. How suspicious did R seem MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ5. How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS 3. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS 5. VERY SUSPICIOUS 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 1483 63 4 ============================== V001748 ZZ6. How great Rs interest in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ6. Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 425 519 498 88 20 ============================== V001749 ZZ7. How sincere did R seem MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ7. How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETE SINCERE --> ZZ11 3. USUALLY SINCERE --> ZZ7a 5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE --> ZZ7a 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 1438 97 15 ============================== V001750 ZZ7a. Areas IWR doubted sincerity Character ZZ7a. IF R NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE: Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you doubted R's sincerity? (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER] This response was blanked to preserve the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V001751a ZZ11(1). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(1). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 10 11 12 13 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 257 12 59 6 15 1 20 22 30 31 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 24 27 131 4 13 45 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 2 1023 205 ============================== V001751b ZZ11(2). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(2). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 10 11 12 13 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1548 1 5 4 6 6 20 22 30 31 40 41 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 9 10 25 6 7 45 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1 124 46 ============================== V001751c ZZ11(3). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(3). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 13 15 20 22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1745 3 2 1 2 30 31 40 41 45 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 12 3 4 2 50 70 80 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 26 3 ============================== V001751d ZZ11(4). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(4). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 15 30 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1789 2 1 3 40 41 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 5 3 ============================== V001751e ZZ11(5). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(5). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 31 40 41 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1801 1 1 2 2 ============================== V001751f ZZ11(6). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(6). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 40 41 ----- ----- ----- Count 1805 1 1 ============================== V001751g ZZ11(7). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(7). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview 0 70 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V001752 Post-Rand.C9(2). MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Rand.C9(2). Order of Dem and Repub names in Vote section --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD) 2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD) 0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C. 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 629 406 772 ============================== V001753 Post-Rand.D2b-D2d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.D1b-D1d. Order of Gore, GW Bush and Nader in Post Thermometers D1b-D1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after Clinton (1st name) On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Nader 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Nader 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Nader 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Nader 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Nader 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Nader 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 187 162 663 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 167 186 190 ============================== V001754 Post-Rand.D2g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1g. Order of Democratic House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no Democratic candidate 0 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 156 595 182 10 11 12 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 185 152 119 ============================== V001755 Post-Rand.D2h. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1h. Order of Republican House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no Republican candidate 0 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 623 149 162 10 11 12 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 156 189 168 108 ============================== V001756 Post-Rand.D2j. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1j. Order of Retiring House Representative in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no retiring House representative 0 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 14 17 47 10 11 12 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 24 15 18 1420 ============================== V001757 Post-Rand.D2k. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1k. Order of Democratic Senate candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state 0 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 142 154 128 10 11 12 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 137 441 131 422 ============================== V001758 Post-Rand.D2m. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1m. Order of Republican Senate candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no race in state 0 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 108 150 148 10 11 12 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 138 133 477 401 ============================== V001759 Post-Rand.D2n. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1n. Order of Independent Incumbent House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- This var represents candidates in VT01 and VA05. D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no independent incumbent House candidate 0 7 9 10 11 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1 1 1 1 1551 ============================== V001760 Post-Rand.D3a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2a. Order of Supreme Court in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 45 46 45 58 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 50 57 44 516 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 44 49 36 48 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 38 43 51 39 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 43 56 50 46 ============================== V001761 Post-Rand.D3b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2b. Order of Congress in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 39 50 34 530 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 49 36 40 54 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 49 41 46 46 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 36 48 48 49 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 44 51 46 39 ============================== V001762 Post-Rand.D3c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2c. Order of the Military in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 39 37 40 40 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 45 45 56 42 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 55 40 53 55 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 51 40 45 42 36 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 49 53 25 527 44 ============================== V001763 Post-Rand.D3d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2d. Order of the Federal Govt in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 42 50 55 53 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 57 46 43 44 46 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 34 36 49 53 45 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 41 36 42 36 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 41 64 59 523 ============================== V001764 Post-Rand.D3e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2e. Order of Blacks in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 48 61 51 41 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 35 521 52 41 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 62 51 43 38 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 53 40 45 38 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 43 43 40 37 ============================== V001765 Post-Rand.D3f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2f. Order of Whites in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 38 44 535 37 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 42 48 47 57 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 54 46 42 41 48 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 59 54 45 41 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 37 27 44 51 ============================== V001766 Post-Rand.D3g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2g. Order of Conservatives in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 49 45 38 47 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 529 43 40 44 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 50 45 51 51 48 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 49 47 43 48 34 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 37 42 41 45 ============================== V001767 Post-Rand.D3h. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2h. Order of Liberals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 512 48 47 50 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 50 38 45 46 63 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 33 41 44 37 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 45 40 47 51 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 40 43 37 49 ============================== V001768 Post-Rand.D3j. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2j. Order of Labor Unions in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 49 50 53 43 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 58 41 45 45 41 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 31 36 57 56 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 30 42 45 519 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 50 33 49 42 ============================== V001769 Post-Rand.D3k. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2k. Order of Big Business in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 37 43 33 34 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 54 48 34 47 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 538 40 44 45 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 49 43 42 46 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 58 46 51 40 49 ============================== V001770 Post-Rand.D3m. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2m. Order of Poor People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 45 42 58 51 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 50 36 40 32 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 44 48 43 48 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 521 40 63 52 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 51 36 50 44 ============================== V001771 Post-Rand.D3n. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2n. Order of People on Welfare in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 45 43 38 44 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 43 37 58 41 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 522 40 46 49 41 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 54 44 36 48 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 54 46 43 46 51 ============================== V001772 Post-Rand.D3p. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2p. Order of Hispanics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 58 34 35 47 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 48 51 38 40 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 40 36 54 49 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 45 43 520 41 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 47 43 65 44 ============================== V001773 Post-Rand.D3q. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2q. Order of Christian Fund in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 52 46 41 58 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 43 50 60 52 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 39 50 528 40 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 45 44 41 45 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 47 49 39 28 ============================== V001774 Post-Rand.D3r. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2r. Order of Women's Movement in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 43 45 43 45 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 54 52 38 40 37 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 48 38 48 42 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 31 53 47 51 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 50 527 43 46 ============================== V001775 Post-Rand.D3s. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2s. Order of Older People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 50 43 44 53 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 38 43 535 37 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 45 37 40 50 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 44 46 42 52 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 43 59 27 42 ============================== V001776 Post-Rand.D3t. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2t. Order of Environmentalists in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 45 44 42 43 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 31 45 51 52 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 33 59 35 42 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 46 38 44 52 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 55 534 44 47 47 ============================== V001777 Post-Rand.D3u. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2u. Order of Homosexuals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 51 30 44 38 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 42 39 47 45 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 52 518 44 47 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 58 44 50 45 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 54 39 47 40 ============================== V001778 Post-Rand.D3v. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2v. Order of Christian Coalition in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 39 48 51 42 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 34 47 42 39 60 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 53 26 37 52 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 46 47 35 46 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 524 37 44 37 52 ============================== V001779 Post-Rand.D3w. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2w. Order of Catholics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 63 43 39 39 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 49 41 38 29 44 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 56 43 51 35 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 45 527 45 52 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 49 49 39 52 ============================== V001780 Post-Rand.D3x. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2x. Order of Jews in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 46 37 42 38 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 523 45 56 42 39 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 55 46 50 33 43 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 45 47 50 40 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 38 51 39 51 ============================== V001781 Post-Rand.D3xx. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2xx. Order of Protestants in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 23 528 46 41 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 44 64 54 34 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 52 39 41 52 33 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 46 53 40 59 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 32 55 45 44 ============================== V001782 Post-Rand.D3y. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2y. Order of Feminists in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 40 59 59 42 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 49 47 38 54 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 40 66 38 524 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 34 37 48 42 33 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 44 38 62 39 ============================== V001783 Post-Rand.D3z. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2z. Order of Asian-Americans in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 57 39 42 41 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 54 53 38 36 37 10 11 12 13 14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 39 41 57 35 43 15 16 17 18 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 526 54 47 45 50 20 21 22 23 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 49 43 36 50 ============================== V001784 Post-Rand.E1/E3. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.E1/E3. Post: Order of Democratic/Republican House candidates in 'Likes-Dislikes' E1-E2/E3-E4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate first, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate first, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1017 534 4 ============================== V001785 Post-Rand.G3-G5. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G3-G5. Post: Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Liberal- Conservative placements G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after Clinton (1st name). On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 181 172 659 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 184 180 179 ============================== V001786 Post-Rand.G6-G7. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G6-G7. Post: Order of Democratic and Republican House candidates in Liberal-Conservative Placements G6-G7/G6.T-G7.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore, GW Bush, and Buchanan. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 5th, Republican House candidate 6th 2. Republican House candidate 5th, Democratic House candidate 6th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 716 839 ============================== V001787 Post-Rand.G8-G10. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G8-G10. Post: Order of Democratic, Republican, and Reform parties in Liberal-Conservative Placements G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan, the Democratic House candidate, and the Republican House candidate. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Reform Party 9th 2. Democratic Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Republican Party 9th 3. Republican Party 7th, Democratic Party 8th, Reform Party 9th 4. Republican Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th 5. Reform Party 7th , Democratic Party 8th, Republican Party 9th 6. Reform Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 181 172 659 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 184 180 179 ============================== V001788 Post-Rand.G11b/c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G11b/c. Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in Services-Spending placements G11b-G11c/G11b.T-G11c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1078 477 ============================== V001789 Post-Rand.G12b/c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G12b/c. Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in Abortion placements G12b-G12c/G12b.T-G12c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1214 341 ============================== V001790 Post-Rand.R2b-R2d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R2b-R2d. Post: Order of racial groups Hardworking R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 190 671 180 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 177 166 168 3 ============================== V001791 Post-Rand.R3b-R3d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R3b-R3d. Post: Order of racial groups Intelligent R3b-R3d/R3b.T-R3d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 185 164 179 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 174 651 199 3 ============================== V001792 Post-Rand.R4b-R4d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R4b-R4d. Post: Order of racial groups Trustworthy R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 174 191 192 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 646 170 179 3 ============================== V001793 Post-Rand.S14a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14a. Post: Order of Angry in Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 135 130 372 126 792 ============================== V001794 Post-Rand.S14b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14b. Post: Order of Hopeful Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 131 348 138 146 792 ============================== V001795 Post-Rand.S14c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14c. Post: Order of Afraid Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 359 140 138 126 792 ============================== V001796 Post-Rand.S14d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14d. Post: Order of Proud Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 138 145 115 365 792 ============================== V001797 Post-Rand.S15a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15a. Post: Order of Moral in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 301 84 83 81 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 74 67 792 ============================== V001798 Post-Rand.S15b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15b. Post: Order of Really Cares in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 68 78 65 87 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 78 308 79 792 ============================== V001799 Post-Rand.S15c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15c. Post: Order of Knowlegeable in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 76 301 81 68 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 83 86 68 792 ============================== V001800 Post-Rand.S15d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15d. Post: Order of Leadership in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 82 80 66 69 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 76 78 312 792 ============================== V001801 Post-Rand.S15e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15e. Post: Order of Dishonest in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 70 60 77 72 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 325 75 84 792 ============================== V001802 Post-Rand.S15f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15f. Post: Order of Intelligent in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 81 71 80 309 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 71 83 792 ============================== V001803 Post-Rand.S15g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15g. Post: Order of Out of Touch in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 85 89 311 77 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 71 70 792 ============================== V001804 Post-Rand.V5a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5a. Post: Order of Moral in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 137 139 134 130 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 539 118 134 224 ============================== V001805 Post-Rand.V5b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5b. Post: Order of Really Cares in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 139 140 542 128 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 130 124 128 224 ============================== V001806 Post-Rand.V5c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5c. Post: Order of Knowledgeable in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 140 114 129 135 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 116 149 548 224 ============================== V001807 Post-Rand.V5d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5d. Post: Order of Leadership in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 545 139 132 131 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 130 128 126 224 ============================== V001808 Post-Rand.V5e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5e. Post: Order of Dishonest in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 114 127 129 137 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 567 136 224 ============================== V001809 Post-Rand.V5f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5f. Post: Order of Intelligent in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 135 127 129 544 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 126 137 224 ============================== V001810 Post-Rand.V5g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5g. Post: Order of Out of Touch in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (V000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 121 545 136 126 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 162 119 122 224 ============================