FILE anes2000to2004merged_var.txt ----------------------------- ANES 2000-2004 Merged File Codebook variable documentation file VERSION 20110812 (August 12, 2011) ============================================================================= DESCRIPTION OF CODEBOOK DOCUMENTATION ============================================================================= DSETID - WT04 Vars specific to ANES 2000-2004 Merged file (this file) M000003 - M001810 Vars from the ANES 2000 Time Series Study M021001 - M025201 Vars from the ANES 2002 Time Series Study ('panel' cases only) M041201 - M045209 Vars from the ANES 2004 Panel Study Except for prefix "M" at the beginning of variable names, variable descriptions are the same as in documentation for the stand-along studies. ============================================================================= VERSION Dataset Version ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: Version of ANES dataset NOTES: ------ This is the version of the ANES 2000-2004 Merged File release in format: 2004ANESVERSION:yyyymmmdd TYPE: ----- Character ============================================================================= DSETID Dataset ID ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: ANES dataset ID NOTES: ------ This is the ANES dataset ID of the ANES 2000-2004 Merged File: 2004.M2000 TYPE: ----- Character ============================================================================= ID Case ID ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: Case ID VALID CODES: ------------ 001-1811 NOTES: ------ This is the ANES 2000 Time Series Study (pre-election) case ID. There are gaps in the numbering. TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 0 ============================================================================= 2002ID 2002 Case ID ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: 2002 Pre Election Case ID VALID CODES: ------------ 0001-1513 NOTES: ------ This is the ANES 2002 Time Series Study (pre-election) case ID. There are four gaps in the numbering. TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 0 ============================================================================= 2004ID 2004 Case ID ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: 2004 post election case ID VALID CODES: ------------ 001-897 NOTES: ------ This is the ANES 2004 Panel Study 4-digit case ID. There are gaps in the numbering. TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 0 ============================================================================= Years Years. Year Participation ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: Year Participation 2000-2002-2004 VALID CODES: ------------ 1. 2000 only 2. 2000 and 2002 3. 2000 - 2002 - 2004 TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 0 ============================================================================= Waves Waves. Wave Participation ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: Wave Participation 2000-2002-2004 VALID CODES: ------------ 2000 ONLY: 01. 2000 Pre 02. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post 2000 AND 2002: 03. 2000 Pre - - 2002 Pre 04. 2000 Pre - - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post 05. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre 06. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post 2000,2002,2004: 07. 2000 Pre - --------- - 2002 Pre - --------- - 2004 Post 08. 2000 Pre - --------- - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post - 2004 Post 09. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - --------- - 2004 Post 10. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post - 2004 Post TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 0 ============================================================================= WT00PRE 2000 Pre-Election Sample Weight ============================================================================= Sample weight for Pre variables --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A poststratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March Supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: < high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more. TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 4 ============================================================================= WT00PO 2000 Post-Election Sample Weight ============================================================================= Sample weight for Post variables --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. 0. No Post IW TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 4 ============================================================================= WT02PRE 2002 Pre-Election 'Panel' Weight (2000-2002) ============================================================================= Pre-election Post-stratified weight --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 decimal places. This weight compensates for the unequal probabilities of selection for respondents in different size households and for different non-response across geographic sample design categories. A post stratification adjustment used the 2000 CPS March Supplement estimates as the standard. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: < high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more. TYPE: ----- Num Dec 0 ============================================================================= WT02PO 2002 Post-Election 'Panel' Weight (2000-2002) ============================================================================= Post-election Post-stratified weight --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 decimal places. See note WEIGHT.1; WEIGHT.2 values are constructed for the cases reinterviewed in the Post. 0. No Post interview TYPE: ----- Num Dec 0 ============================================================================= WT04 2004 Panel Study Weight (2000-2002-2004) ============================================================================= STUDY DESCRIPTIVE: 2004 Panel Weight TYPE: ----- Numeric Dec 4 ============================== M000003 Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post Numeric Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Pre-Election and Post-Election interviews 1. Pre-Election Interview only ============================== M000004 Pre.Admin.1. Mode of Pre IW Numeric Pre-Admin.1. PRE: Mode of Pre IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Personal (FTF) 5. Telephone ============================== M000005a Pre.Admin.2a. Form - E section Numeric Pre-Admin.2a. PRE: Form - E section administered in Pre --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. 0. Section E not administered in Pre [Post section H P001410-P001417] 1. Section E administered in Pre [P000398-P000406] ============================== M000005b Pre.Admin.2b. Form - F6-F9 half sample Numeric Pre-Admin.2b. PRE: Form - F6-F9 half sample --------------------------------------------------------------------- The series of questions F6-F9 concerning "most important problem" was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the Pre 0. R not selected for F6-F9 Pre administration 1. R selected for F6-F9 Pre administration [P000431-P000438] ============================== M000005c Pre.Admin.2c. Form - Q1-Q11 or Q14-15 Numeric Pre-Admin.2c. PRE: Form - Clinton retrospective Q1-Q11 series or Clinton affects/traits Q14-Q15 series --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rs were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective (Q1-Q11) or the Clinton traits and affects questions (Q14-Q15 sections) in the Pre. The questions for which R was not selected for Pre administration were administered in the Post (S1-S11 and the S14-S15 sections). 1. Q1-Q11 asked in Pre [Clinton retrospective P000807-P000846] 2. Q14-Q15 sections asked in Pre [Clinton affects and traits [P000847-P000861] ============================== M000005d Pre.Admin.2d. Form - G section lib-con Numeric Pre-Admin.2d. PRE: Form - G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T or G6.E-G10.E Lib/Con format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for Liberal/Conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. The standard format items are G1-G5 (FTF) and G1.T-G5.T (phone); the experimental format items are G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone). SELF PLACEMENT G1a Standard format FTF = P000439 G1a.T Standard format Ph = P000439a G6.E-G6c.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000442-445 CLINTON PLACEMENT G2 Standard format FTF = P000448 G2.T Standard format Ph = P000448a G7.E-G7b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000450-452 GORE PLACEMENT G3 Standard format FTF = P000455 G3.T Standard format Ph = P000455a G8.E-G8b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000459-461 GW BUSH PLACEMENT G4 Standard format FTF = P000465 G4.T Standard format Ph = P000465a G9.E-G9b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000469-471 BUCHANAN PLACEMENT G5 Standard format FTF = P000475 G5.T Standard format Ph = P000475a G10.E-G10b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000479-481 1. Standard format G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T (FTF/phone) 2. Experimental format G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone) ============================== M000005e Pre.Admin.2e. Form - H1 or H1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2e. PRE: Form - H1 or H1.E economy retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H1) or experimental (H1.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [P000488a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [P000488b] ============================== M000005f Pre.Admin.2f. Form - H2 or H2.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2f. PRE: Form - H2 or H2.E employment retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H2) or experimental (H2.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [P000492a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [P000492b] ============================== M000005g Pre.Admin.2g. Form - H4 or H4.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2g. PRE: Form - H4 or H4.E economy prospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H4) or experimental (H4.E) format. 1. Standard format H4 [P000496a] 2. Experimental format H4.E [P000496b] ============================== M000005h Pre.Admin.2h. Form - H11 or H11.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2h. PRE: Form - H11 or H11.E imports format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H11) or experimental (H11.E) format. 1. Standard format H11 [P000511a] 2. Experimental format H11.E [P000511b] ============================== M000005j Pre.Admin.2j. Form - H12 or H12.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2j. PRE: Form - H12 or H12.E isolationism format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H12) or experimental (H12.E) format. 1. Standard format H12 [P000513a] 2. Experimental format H12.E [P000513b] ============================== M000005k Pre.Admin.2k. Form - L3 medical insur. Numeric Pre-Admin.2k. PRE: Form - L3/L3.T or L3.E/L3.TE medical insurance format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Govt/Private Health Insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is L3a; the experimental format (with reversed scale) is L3a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2. The version 1 format is L3a; the version 2 format (with reversed coding) is L3a.E. 1. FTF Standard L3a/ Phone Version 1 L3a.T [P000608a/P000610a] 2. FTF Experimental L3a.E/ Phone Version 2 L3a.TE [P000608b/P000610b] ============================== M000005m Pre.Admin.2m. Form - L6 or L6.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2m. PRE: Form - L6 or L6.E affirmative action format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (L6) or experimental (L6.E) format. 1. Standard format L6 [P000671a] 2. Experimental format L6.E [P000671b] ============================== M000005n Pre.Admin.2n. Form - M4 env vs. jobs Numeric Pre-Admin.2n. PRE: Form - M4a/M4a.T or M4a.E/M4a.TE environment vs. jobs format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Environment Versus Jobs self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is M4a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is M4a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is M4a; the version 2 (without "haven't thought much" option) format is M4a.E. 1. FTF Standard M4a/ Phone Version 1 M4a.T [P000707a/P000709a] 2. FTF Experimental M4a.E/ Phone Version 2 M4a.TE [P000707b/P000709b] ============================== M000005p Pre.Admin.2p. Form - N1 or N1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2p. PRE: Form - N1 or N1.E school voucher format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (N1) or experimental (N1.E) format. 1. Standard format N1 [P000741a] 2. Experimental format N1.E [P000741b] ============================== M000005q Pre.Admin.2q. Form - P1 women's role Numeric Pre-Admin.2q. PRE: Form - P1/P1.T or P1.E/P1.TE women equal role format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Women's Equal Role self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is P1a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is P1a.T; the version 2 format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.TE. 1. FTF Standard P1a / Phone Version 1 P1a.T [P000754a/P000756a] 2. FTF Experimental P1a.E/Phone Version 2 P1a.TE [P000754b/P000756b] ============================== M000006 Pre.Admin.3. Month of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.3. PRE: Month of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November ============================== M000007 Pre.Admin.4. Day of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.4. PRE: Day of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 ============================== M000008 Pre.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) Character Pre-Admin.5. PRE: Month and day (MMDD) of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. ============================== M000009 Pre.Admin.6. No. days after election Numeric Pre-Admin.6. PRE: Number of days before election --------------------------------------------------------------------- Election day was November 7, 2000. 1-63 days ============================== M000010 Pre.Admin.7. IW length MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Admin.7. PRE: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Average Pre interview length is 68.35 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) ============================== M000011 Pre.Admin.8. IW number Numeric Pre-Admin.8. PRE: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-53 ============================== M000012 Pre.Admin.9. Date of beginning VQ file Numeric Pre-Admin.9. PRE: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 ============================== M000013 Pre.Admin.10. Date of ending VQ file MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.10. PRE: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 99. INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) ============================== M000014 Pre.Admin.11. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.11. PRE: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. NA, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) ============================== M000015 Pre.Admin.12. Advance letter sent? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.12. PRE: Advance letter sent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No advance letter sent 1. Advance letter sent 9. NA ============================== M000016 Pre.Admin.13. Payment amount MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.13. PRE: Payment amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 99. NA ============================== M000017 Pre.Admin.14. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.14. PRE: Payment mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA ============================== M000018 Pre.Admin.15. Payment date MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.15. PRE: Payment date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; R requested no payment ============================== M000019 Pre.Admin.16. Tape recorded? Numeric Pre-Admin.16. PRE: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No ============================== M000020 Pre.Admin.17. Verification Numeric Pre-Admin.17. PRE: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- Approximately 15 percent of interviews (completed or partially completed) were randomly selected and verified by field supervisors for new interviewers, and 6 percent were randomly selected and verified for SRC-experienced interviewers. Verification was attempted by phone (phone interviews) or by letter (FTF interviews) within 3 days of interview date. If no contact/ response with the respondent was made after 3 attempts, a replacement line was selected. The respondent was asked whether they were interviewed by the interviewer of record, the approximate length of the interview, and whether or not the interview was interesting; in addition , 3 questions were asked about content of the interview. NOTE: for verification codes, a "don't remember" response is considered a non-match. 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). ============================== M000021 Pre.Admin.18. Evaluation Numeric Pre-Admin.18. PRE: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate ============================== M000022 Pre.Admin.19. Conversion indicator Numeric Pre-Admin.19. PRE: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal conversion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated ============================== M000023 Pre.Admin.20. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.20. PRE: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA ============================== M000024 Pre.Admin.21. Date per letter requested MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.21. PRE: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. No persuasion letter requested ============================== M000025 Pre.Admin.22. Date persuasion sent MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.22. PRE: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; INAP, no persuasion letter requested (9999 in Pre-Admin.21) ============================== M000026 Pre.Admin.23. Type of persuasion letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.23. PRE: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no persuasion letter sent (0,9 in Pre-Admin.20) ============================== M000027 Pre.Admin.24. Telephone calls Numeric Pre-Admin.24. PRE: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-42 ============================== M000028 Pre.Admin.25. FTF calls Numeric Pre-Admin.25. PRE: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-22 ============================== M000029 Pre.Admin.26. Final result Numeric Pre-Admin.26. PRE: Final result --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Interview, complete 5. Interview, partial ============================== M000030 Pre.Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) Numeric Pre-Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All cases coded 1. There was a single release of the entire sample. 1. Released at start of the field period ============================== M000031 Pre.Admin.28. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Pre-Admin.28. PRE: Language of IW (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) 1. English ============================== M000032 Pre.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Pre-CSheet.1. PRE - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing Coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Missing coversheet ============================== M000033 Pre.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.2. PRE - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF coversheets were blue or green. Telephone coversheets were yellow. GREEN COVERSHEETS: used by FTF interviewers when updating the area probability sample. Type II updates involved addition of unlisted (hidden) HUs at the selected listed address: for example, once the IWR was inside the HU, he or she may have noticed that the house was divided into separate and complete apartment units that were not apparent from outside. Each interviewer received a set of unlabeled coversheets that had a provision for adding up to three unlisted HUs discovered at the listed address. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 4. Green - FTF type II updating 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) ============================== M000034 Pre.CSheet.3. PH- type phone # MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.3. IF TELEPHONE RDD: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Business 2. Home 3. Both 4. Group headquarters 5. Cell phone 9. NA; Phone mode and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned FTF mode ============================== M000035 Pre.CSheet.4. PH- business with residence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.4. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3a: Does anyone live there on the premises? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No. 9. NA 0. Inap, 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode ============================== M000036 Pre.CSheet.5. PH- bus res has personal# MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.5. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: IF SOMEONE LIVES ON THE PREMISES: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3b: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Have other 2. Use this 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.4; 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode ============================== M000037 Pre.CSheet.6. FTF- HH listing from MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 6: Household listing obtained from: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HU member 2. Neighbor 3. Apt. manager 4. Landlord 5. Observation 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; FTF and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode ============================== M000038 Pre.CSheet.7. Selection table MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.7. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Selection table --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from all household members who are eligible adults.(An eligible adult is a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or older by Election Day.) The Selection Table appears on the Coversheet below the Household Listing. After a complete listing of the HH is taken, each eligible adult is assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of gender and age [beginning with the oldest male as number 1, males are numbered by increments of 1 according to descending age; females are numbered by descending age starting with the number one higher than that assigned to the youngest male]. The interviewer then uses the Selection Table to determine the "Number" of the eligible adult to be interviewed. The Selection Table itself consists of 2 parallel columns. In the first column the interviewer circles the total number of eligible adults in the household; in the second column (same row) is identified the Number" of the person who will be the respondent. There are 8 different Selection Tables used and they are randomly assigned. [Note that although only 8 tables are used, there are 12 codes in this variable because the 8 tables are used in cycles of 12; this procedure is used to equalize the probability of selection for each eligible adult]. A summary describing all 8 Selection Tables appears below. PERSONS PERSON SELECTED (person "Number") --------------------------------- A B1 B2 C D E1 E2 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 1 2 2 2 4 3 5 5 6 or more 1 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 1. Selection table A 2. Selection table B1 3. Selection table B2 4. Selection table C 5. Selection table D 6. Selection table E1 7. Selection table E2 8. Selection table F 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) ============================== M000039 Pre.CSheet.8. Number of elig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.8. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number of eligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: In addition to completing the HH listing on the coversheet, the IWR entered a value for number of eligible respondents in CSMS. For this reason, cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable. 1-7 9. NA ============================== M000040 Pre.CSheet.9. Number inelig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.9. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number ineligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- These are usually adults (over 18) in the HU who are noncitizens. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 0-6 9. NA ============================== M000041 Pre.CSheet.10. Household composition MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-CSheet.10. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Household composition --------------------------------------------------------------------- The HH composition code is derived from information provided in the household listing. "Adults" are 18 years of age (by election day) or older; all individuals included in the HH composition codes below refer to adults. A designation of a HH member as "the householder" (HHR) describes HU member who owns or rents the home (in whose name the lease is held). Cohabiting couples are coded as married (30,40, 50-52). Roommates of opposite sex are coded 11,12,21,22; in all cases of unrelated roommates the respondent is HHR. If R identifies self as married/partnered but spouse/partner is residing elsewhere (nursing home, job requirement or other reason), R is coded as adult male HHR/adult female HHR (codes 10-22 and 60-95) and is identified as married/partnered in marital status question. In cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212,1381, 1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in P000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner in HH listing or elsewhere other than marital status question. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 10. 1 adult male HHR 11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative 12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 20. 1 adult female HHR 21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative 22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living at home are under 18 40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative 50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives 51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative 52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives 55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives 60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative 65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives 70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative 85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives 90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 95. Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR 99. NA ============================== M000042 Pre.CSheet.11. R person number MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.11. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: R person number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. Coded 1-5 9. NA ============================== M000043 Pre.CSheet.12. FTF- type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.12. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode ============================== M000044 Pre.CSheet.13. FTF- gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.13. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode ============================== M000045 Pre.CSheet.14. FTF- type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.14. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; assigned phone mode ============================== M000046 Pre.CSheet.15. Resistance from contact? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.15. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA ============================== M000047 Pre.CSheet.16. Contact resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000048 Pre.CSheet.17. Contact resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.17. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000049 Pre.CSheet.18. Contact resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.18. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000050 Pre.CSheet.19. Contact resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.19. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000051 Pre.CSheet.20. Contact resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.20. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000052 Pre.CSheet.21. Contact resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.21. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000053 Pre.CSheet.22. Contact resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.22. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000054 Pre.CSheet.23. R refuse initially? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.23. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA ============================== M000055 Pre.CSheet.24. R break appointments MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.24. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 9. NA ============================== M000056 Pre.CSheet.25. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.25. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000057 Pre.CSheet.26. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.26. SUMMARY: resistance (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000058 Pre.CSheet.27. R resist-waste time MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000059 Pre.CSheet.28. R resist-too personal MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.28. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000060 Pre.CSheet.29. R resist-confidentiality MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.29. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000061 Pre.CSheet.30. R resist-not interested in politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.30. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000062 Pre.CSheet.31. R resist-too busy MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.31. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000063 Pre.CSheet.32. R resist-health MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.32. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000064 Pre.CSheet.33. R resist-other MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.33. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 ============================== M000065 Pre.CSheet.34. IWR est income (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000066 Pre.CSheet.35. IWR est race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.35. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Post equivalent of this variable in Post-CSheet.31. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000067 Pre.CSheet.36. Certainty of race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.36. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.35 ============================== M000068 Pre.CSheet.37. Hispanic HH? (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.37. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also P000184d, P000184e (Post version of these variables) and Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000069 Pre.CSheet.38. Certainty if Hisp (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.38. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 ============================== M000070 Pre.IWR.1. Interviewer of record Numeric Pre-IWR.1. PRE: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== M000071 Pre.IWR.2. Supervisor Numeric Pre-IWR.2. PRE: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== M000072 Pre.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.3. PRE: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female ============================== M000073 Pre.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.4. PRE: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA ============================== M000074 Pre.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.5. PRE: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA ============================== M000075 Pre.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.6. PRE: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA ============================== M000076 Pre.IWR.7. Interviewer languages MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.7. PRE: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. 0. NA ============================== M000077 Pre.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-IWR.8. PRE: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA ============================== M000078 Pre.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.9. PRE: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA ============================== M000079 Pre.Sample.1. ICPSR state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.1. ICPSR state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (P000260). NEW ENGLAND 43. Florida 01. Connecticut 44. Georgia 02. Maine 45. Louisiana 03. Massachusetts 46. Mississippi 04. New Hampshire 47. North Carolina 05. Rhode Island 48. South Carolina 06. Vermont 49. Texas MIDDLE ATLANTIC BORDER STATES 11. Delaware 51. Kentucky 12. New Jersey 52. Maryland 13. New York 53. Oklahoma 14. Pennsylvania 54. Tennessee EAST NORTH CENTRAL 55. Washington DC 21. Illinois 56. West Virginia 22. Indiana MOUNTAIN STATES 23. Michigan 61. Arizona 24. Ohio 62. Colorado 25. Wisconsin 63. Idaho WEST NORTH CENTRAL 64. Montana 31. Iowa 65. Nevada 32. Kansas 66. New Mexico 33. Minnesota 67. Utah 34. Missouri 68. Wyoming 35. Nebraska PACIFIC STATES 36. North Dakota 71. California 37. South Dakota 72. Oregon SOLID SOUTH 73. Washington 40. Virginia EXTERNAL STATES 41. Alabama 81. Alaska 42. Arkansas 82. Hawaii 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== M000080 Pre.Sample.2. FIPS state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.2. FIPS state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (P000260). 01. Alabama 30. Montana 02. Alaska 31. Nebraska 04. Arizona 32. Nevada 05. Arkansas 33. New Hampshire 06. California 34. New Jersey 08. Colorado 35. New Mexico 09. Connecticut 36. New York 10. Delaware 37. North Carolina 11. Washington DC 38. North Dakota 12. Florida 39. Ohio 13. Georgia 40. Oklahoma 15. Hawaii 41. Oregon 16. Idaho 42. Pennsylvania 17. Illinois 44. Rhode Island 18. Indiana 45. South Carolina 19. Iowa 46. South Dakota 20. Kansas 47. Tennessee 21. Kentucky 48. Texas 22. Louisiana 49. Utah 23. Maine 50. Vermont 24. Maryland 51. Virginia 25. Massachusetts 53. Washington 26. Michigan 54. West Virginia 27. Minnesota 55. Wisconsin 28. Mississippi 56. Wyoming 29. Missouri 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== M000081 Pre.Sample.3. 2000 state abbr and CD Character Pre-Sample.3. 2000 state abbreviation and Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable provides the state (2-character Postal abbreviation) and congressional district number of the location of R's residence at the time of the 2000 Pre- election interview. Washington D.C. is blank in this variable. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded "9996". See Post-Summary.24 (P000260). ============================== M000082 Pre.Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state code and congresional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (P000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== M000083 Pre.Sample.5. Congressional district no. MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.5. Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-52. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post-Summary.24 (P000260). 96. Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C. ============================== M000084 Pre.Sample.6. ICPSR state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.6. ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (P000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== M000085 Pre.Sample.7. Did R vote outside IW CD? MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.7. Did R vote in state and CD of interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R voted in state and CD of interview 1. R did not vote in state and CD of interview 8. NA if vote was in state/CD of interview (4 in Post C1 and 8,9,0 in Post C3) 9. INAP, R did not vote or NA/DK if voted; no Post interview; IW location misidentified in the Preload (1 in Post-Summary.24) ============================== M000086 Pre.Sample.8. State/CD -vote outside CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.8. State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- The first 2 digits represent the state FIPS code, and the second 2 digits are CD number. Where the state differs but the CD number is unknown, the state will be coded in the first 2 digits but the last 2 digits will be 99. 9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview (8 in Pre-Sample.7) 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000087 Pre.Sample.9. FIPS state and county MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.9. FIPS state and county - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. The FIPS State code is represented in digits 1 and 2 of this variable, the FIPS County code in the last 3 digits. ============================== M000087a Pre.Sample.9a. County (alpha) Character Pre-Sample.9a. Name of County - Interview location (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. NOTE: This variable was constructed for use as preload in Post-Election C3 (variable P001243), which attempts to ascertain specific registration location of the respondent. It should be noted that, although county identification in this variable for face-to-face interviews meets normal standards for accuracy, the P000087a Post preload data for RDD cases were created by imputing area code, central office codes and similar listed numbers. ============================== M000088 Pre.Sample.10. Primary area name Character Pre-Sample.10. Primary area name - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. This is a character variable for the Primary Selection Unit (PSU) name. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. ============================== M000089 Pre.Sample.11. Primary area code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.11. Primary area code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been recoded to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. The 44 PSU codes listed below (110 through 482) have been recoded to values 1-44 in random order. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255. Columbus, GA-AL 131. Detroit, MI 257. Jacksonville, FL 132. Cleveland, OH 258. Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141. St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262. Birmingham, AL 152. Baltimore, MD 273. Waco, TX 154. Miami-Hialeh, FL 274. McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 292. Fresno, CA 181. Denver, CO 293. Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434. Saginaw, MI 191. Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464. Gardner, MA 194. Anaheim, CA 466. Decatur Co., IN 196. San Francisco, CA 470. Mower Co., MN 211. New Haven, CT 474. DeSoto Parish, LA 213. Manchester-Nashua NH 477. Chicot Co., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery Co., VA 226. Atlantic City, NJ 482. El Dorado Co., CA 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000090 Pre.Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. 3-digit code and: 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000090a Pre.Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) Character Pre-Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000091 Pre.Sample.14. Number of HH units MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.14. Number of household unit --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-5 and: 9. NA 0. Phone IW ============================== M000092 Pre.Sample.15. Census region Numeric Pre-Sample.15. Census region - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT) 2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI) 3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV) 4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY) ============================== M000093 Pre.Sample.16. Belt code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.16. Belt code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census and 1990 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions, 1990 Census Population reports (as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro, City and County Data book) and 1990 Census "urbanized area" (as shown in the 1994 Rand McNally Road Atlas - 70th edition. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 1. Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CMSAs), plus the 15 next largest CMSA/MSAs (population over 2,000,000) 2. Central Cities of CMSAs and MSAs with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21 largest CMSA/MSAs -- code 1) 3. Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAs and 15 next largest CMSAs/MSAs 4. Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAs 5. Adjacent Areas: includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50 miles of the central business district of a central city 6. Outlying Area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000094 Pre.Sample.17. Population in 1000s MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Pre-Sample.17. Population in 1000s - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- The actual 1990 Census Place population is coded in thousands, rounding to the nearest whole thousand (from the 1990 Population total for the city/place as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro City and County Data Book). NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. Actual population in 1000s and: 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) 9999. 9,998,500 persons or over 0000. Rural place, no defined Census Place, or Census Place with fewer than 500 persons ============================== M000095 Pre.Sample.18. Census size of place MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.18. Census size of place - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the appendix on CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census. The major objective of the Census Bureau in delineating urbanized areas is to provide a better separation of urban and rural population in the vicinity of large cities. An urbanized area consists of a central city or cities, and surrounding closely settled territory ("urban fringe"). Size of Place codes 21 and 41 include areas that are in the "urban fringe" but are not Census Places. Note for Codes 50-53: in a few cases, Non-MSA PSUs (based on the 1980 OMB SMSA definitions) contain areas which are now part of a 1990 PMSA or MSA (based on the June 1990 OMB definition). In these cases, the Size of Place Code for any SSUs (segments) within such areas are coded in the "40s" rather than in the "50s" as shown. This occurred in El Dorado county CA (the major part of the El Dorado/Alpine Co, CA PSU #82) which is now a part of the Sacramento CA MSA, and also for one SSU (segment) in the Gardner MA PSU (#64), which is now a part of the Worchester MA MSA. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. THE SIX LARGEST CMSAs PLUS THE 15 NEXT LARGEST CMSAs/ MSAs (I.e. those coded 1 or 3 [possibly 5, rarely 6] 11. Central Cities (these would have been coded 1 on the Belt Code SUBURBS OF THE 6 LARGEST CMSAs AND THE 15 NEXT LARGEST 20. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population 21. 2,500-9,999 plus other urbanized areas ("urban fringe" not in Census places) 22. 10,000-29,999 23. 30,000-49,999 24. 50,000-99,999 25. 100,000-149,999 26. 150,000-349,999 27. 350,000 and over, exclusive of cities coded 11 CMSAs/MSAs W/LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION CENTRAL CITIES IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION (2 on Belt Code): 30. Under 50,000 (identified by OMB, June 1990, as Central Cities 31. 50-000-99,999 32. 100,000-149,999 33. 150,000-349,999 34. 350,000 and over SUBURBS IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 40. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population) 41. 2,500-9,999 42. 10,000-29,999 43. 30,000-49,999 44. 50,000-99,999 45. 100,000-149,999 46. 150,000 and over "NON-CMSA/PMSA/MASs" 50. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,000,000 population) 51. 2,500-9,999 52. 10,000-29,999 53. 30,000-49,999 00. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000096 Pre.Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent 0. Enumeration district 1. Tracted 9. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000097 Pre.Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code Numeric Pre-Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Sampling documentation in this codebook. The first 2 digits contain the 200 Sampling Error Stratum code and the last digit represents the 2000 SECU or Sampling Error Computation Unit code. ============================== M000098 Pre.Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA Numeric Pre-Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 360. Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA 520. Atlanta, GA 560. Atlantic City, NJ 720. Baltimore, MD 875. Bergen-Passiac, NJ PMSA (Former code and title: 6040 Paterson-Clifton-Passaic, NJ) 1000. Birmingham, AL 1123. Boston-Lawrence-Salem-Lowell-Brockton, MA NECMA 1125. Boulder-Longmont, CO PMSA 1145. Brazoria, TX PMSA 1280. Buffalo, NY 1600. Chicago, IL 1680. Cleveland OH 1800. Columbus, GA-AL 1920. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 2000. Dayton, OH 2080. Denver-Boulder, CO 2120. Des Moines, IA 2160. Detroit, MI 2400. Eugene-Springfield, OR 2760. Fort Wayne, IN 2800. Fort Worth-Arlington TX, PMSA 2840. Fresno, CA 3000. Grand Rapids, MI 3360. Houston, TX 3600. Jacksonville, FL 3760. Kansas City, MO-KS 3840. Knoxville, TN 3965. Lake County, IL PMSA 3980. Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 4480. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 4720. Madison WI 4763. Manchester-Nashua, NH NECMA 4880. McAllen-Pharr-Edinburgh, TX 5000. Miami, FL 5015. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ PMSA (former code and title: 5460 New Brunswick-Perth Amboy-Sayreville NJ) 5080. Milwaukee, WI 5120. Minneapolis-St Paul, MN-WI 5350. Nashua, NH PMSA 5380. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 5480. New Haven-West Haven, CT 5483. New Haven-Waterbury-Meriden, CT NECMA 5600. New York, NY-NJ 5640. Newark, NJ 5700. Niagara Falls, NY PMSA 5775. Oakland, CA PMSA 6160. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 6200. Phoenix, AZ 6280. Pittsburgh, PA 6453. Portsmouth-Dover-Rochester, NH NECMA 6760. Richmond, VA 6780. Riverside-San Bernardino, Ontario, CA 6920. Sacramento, CA (1990 MSA definition) 6960. Saginaw, MI 7040. St. Louis, MO-IL 7160. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT MSA 7360. San Francisco-Oakland,CA 7600. Seattle-Everett, WA 8003. Springfield, MA NECMA 8080. Steubenville-Wierton, OH-WV 8200. Tacoma, WA 8800. Waco, TX 8840. Washington, DC-MD-VA 9000. Wheeling, WV-OH 9243. Worcester-Fitchburn-Leominster, MA NECMA 0000. INAP; location not in SMSA (MSA)/ NECMA 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== M000099 Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.22. 2000 CMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. The six largest CMSA's are marked with **. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 07. Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14. Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28. Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31. Dallas-Ft Worth TX (Since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34. Denver-Boulder CO (Since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added in 35. Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49. Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56. Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63. Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77. Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78. Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84. San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91. Seattle-Tacoma WA 96. Telephone sample (RDD) 00. INAP, Location not in CMSA. This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990) ============================== VAR 000099x Pre.Sample.22x. 2000 MSA MD1: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.22x. 2000 MSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the 2000 MSA for the full sample, including the the RDD telephone component. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. Metropolitan Statistical Area code and: 00. INAP, Location not in MSA. ============================== M000100 Pre.Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000101 Pre.Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 case corresponded to more than one Census tract. ============================== M000102 Pre.Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000103 Pre.Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 case corresponded to more than one Census block. ============================== M000104 Pre.Sample.27. 2000 MCD MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.27. 2000 MCD - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000105 Pre.Sample.28. 2000 CDP MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Numeric Pre-Sample.28. 2000 CDP - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000106 Pre.Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M000107 Pre.Summary.1. Pre timing - section A MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.1. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000108 Pre.Summary.2. Pre timing - section B MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.2. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000109 Pre.Summary.3. Pre timing - section C MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.3. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000110 Pre.Summary.4. Pre timing - section D MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.4. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000111 Pre.Summary.5. Pre timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.5. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section E selected for Post administration ============================== M000112 Pre.Summary.6. Pre timing - section F MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.6. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000113 Pre.Summary.7. Pre timing - section G MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.7. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000114 Pre.Summary.8. Pre timing - section H MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.8. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000115 Pre.Summary.9. Pre timing - section K MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.9. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000116 Pre.Summary.10. Pre timing - section L MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.10. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000117 Pre.Summary.11. Pre timing - section M MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.11. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000118 Pre.Summary.12. Pre timing - section N MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.12. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000119 Pre.Summary.13. Pre timing - section P MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.13. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000120 Pre.Summary.14. Pre timing - section Q MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.14. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000121 Pre.Summary.15. Pre timing - section R MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.15. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000122 Pre.Summary.16. Pre timing - section S MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.16. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000123 Pre.Summary.17. Pre timing - section X MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.17. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION X --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000124 Pre.Summary.18. Pre timing - section Y MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.18. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000125 Pre.Summary.19. Pre timing - section Z MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.19. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== M000126 Post.Admin.1. Mode of Interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.1. POST: Mode of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Post-Admin.1a. 5 cases re-assigned to phone mode in the Post were administered FTF in error; note that several of these cases, although administered FTF, used telephone logic in the interview. 1. Personal 5. Telephone 7. ADMINISTERED USING WRONG MODE: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as Personal interview 0. No post IW ============================== M000126a Post.Admin.1a. Mode switch flag Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST - MODE SWITCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 200 FTF Pre cases were selected for reassignment to Phone administration in the Post. Of these, 168 were completed interviews. Assignment of all Post cases (interview and non-interview) are described here. 1. Assigned FTF, not switched to Phone mode 2. Assigned Phone 3. Assigned FTF, switched to Phone mode ============================== M000127a Post.Admin.2a. Form desc 1 - H in Post MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2a. POST: Form - section H administered in Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. Because assignment was set during Pre administration, this randomization was unaffected by the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. Section H not administered in Post [Pre section E P000398-P000406] 1. Section H administered in Post [P000410-P000417] 9. No Post IW ============================== M000127b Post.Admin.2b. Form desc 2 - K format MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2b. POST: Form - K2 format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to have the K2a-K2d office recognition battery administered with or without the use of probes [P001446a-P001454]. NOTE: see item Post-Summary.124 (P000262) for description of the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. K2a-K2d administered without probes 1. K2a-K2d administered with probes 9. No post IW ============================== M000128 Post.Admin.3. Mo. IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.3. POST: Month of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December 00. No Post IW ============================== M000129 Post.Admin.4. Day IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.4. POST: Day of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 and: 0. No Post IW ============================== M000130 Post.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.5. POST: Month and day (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW; '9999' indicates NA ============================== M000131 Post.Admin.6. No. days after election MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.6. POST: Number of days after election --------------------------------------------------------------------- 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA ============================== M000132 Post.Admin.7. IW bef/aft Gore concession MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.7. POST: Interview taken before or after Gore concession --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gore concession: December 13, 2000 0. Before 1. Day of concession (Dec. 13) 2. After 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000133 Post.Admin.8. IW length MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Post-Admin.8. POST: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. The average Post interview length is 63.76 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000134 Post.Admin.9. IW no. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.9. POST: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-44 and: 99. NA 00. INAP, no Post Interview ============================== M000135 Post.Admin.10. Date of beg VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.10. POST: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 0. No Post IW ============================== M000136 Post.Admin.11. Date of end VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.11. POST: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 ============================== M000137 Post.Admin.12. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.12. POST: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. INAP, partial IW; no post IW ============================== M000138 Post.Admin.13. Release MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST: Release --------------------------------------------------------------------- Because of the turnaround time needed to prepare it after the Pre interviewing was concluded, the Post sample was released in 3 releases. 1. Release 1 - November 7 2. Release 2 - November 15 3. Release 3 - November 21. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000139 Post.Admin.14. Payment amt MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.14. POST: Payment to R - amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA ============================== M000139a Post.Admin.14a. Interviewer incentive MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.14a. INTERVIEWER INCENTIVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. 0. Post interview date not in incentive period 1. Post interview date in incentive period. 9. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000140 Post.Admin.15. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.15. POST: Payment to R - mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000141 Post.Admin.16. Payment date MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.16. POST: Payment to R - date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/ Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== M000142 Post.Admin.17. Tape recorded MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.17. POST: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000143 Post.Admin.18. Verification MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.18. POST: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes in Pre-Admin.17 (P000020). 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000144 Post.Admin.19. Evaluation MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.19. POST: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate 9. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000145 Post.Admin.20. Conversion ind. MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.20. POST: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal convesion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000146 Post.Admin.21. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.21. POST: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000147 Post.Admin.22. Date requested MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.22. POST: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== M000148 Post.Admin.23. Date sent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.23. POST: Date persuasion letter sent --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== M000149 Post.Admin.24. Type letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.24. POST: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000150 Post.Admin.25. Tel calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.25. POST: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000151 Post.Admin.26. FTF calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.26. POST: Number of Face-to-Face calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000152 Post.Admin.27. Final result Numeric Post-Admin.27. POST: Final result code --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 IW complete 05 IW partial 51 Refusal by R 52 Refusal by person other than R 54 Initial refusal, not reached for conversion 61 No contact 63 Noninterview, permanent reason 66 Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete 67 Noninterview, other reason 68 Could not Locate R ============================== M000153 Post.Admin.28. Result date (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.28. POST: Result date (Post noninterviews) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with Post IW; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== M000154 Post.Admin. 29. Flag - mode switch MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.29. POST: Flag - pre/post mode switch --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P000004 and P000126. Some interviews conducted FTF in the pre were administered by phone in the Post. 1. Pre FTF and Post FTF 2. Pre phone and Post phone 3. Pre FTF and Post phone 0. INAP, no post IW ============================== M000155 Post.Admin.30. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Post-Admin.30. POST: Language of interview (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews were conducted entirely in English 1. English ============================== M000156 Post.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Post-CSheet.1. POST - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing CS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Coversheet missing ============================== M000157 Post.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.2. POST - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- Pink coversheets were copies of coversheets that were in transfer. NOTE: for an unknown reason, some cases assigned to FTF mode were administered using yellow (phone) coversheets. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 3. Pink 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000158 Post.CSheet.3. Item 1. R at samp addr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.3. POST - COVERSHEET Item 1: Does (NAME) still live here? R STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewers omitted filling out this box (code 9) on 227 coversheets. 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000159 Post.CSheet.4. Item 2b. PHONE: New phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.4. IF PHONE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - PHONE COVERSHEET Item 2b: New phone number available --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Available 2. Not available 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); FTF mode ============================== M000160 Post.CSheet.5. Item 2b. FTF: Addr status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.5. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - FTF COVERSHEET Item 2b: Address is: STATUS OF NEW ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Out of range 3. Within range 5. Can't find 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); Phone mode ============================== M000161 Post.CSheet.6. FTF type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode ============================== M000162 Post.CSheet.7. FTF gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.7. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode ============================== M000163 Post.CSheet.8. FTF type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.8. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; coversheet missing; assigned phone mode ============================== M000164 Post.CSheet.9. Resist from contact MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.9. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000165 Post.CSheet.10. Contct resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.10. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000166 Post.CSheet.11. Contct resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.11. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000167 Post.CSheet.12. Contct resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.12. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000168 Post.CSheet.13. Contct resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.13. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000169 Post.CSheet.14. Contct resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.14. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000170 Post.CSheet.15. Contct resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.15. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000171 Post.CSheet.16. Contct resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000172 Post.CSheet.17. R refuse initially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.17. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000173 Post.CSheet.18. R break appts MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.18. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 8. NA 9. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000174 Post.CSheet.19. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.19. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000175 Post.CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000176 Post.CSheet.21. R resist- waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.21. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000177 Post.CSheet.22. R resist- too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.22. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000178 Post.CSheet.23. R resist- confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.23. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000179 Post.CSheet.24. R resist- not interested in politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.24. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000180 Post.CSheet.25. R resist- too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.25. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000181 Post.CSheet.26. R resist- health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.26. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000182 Post.CSheet.27. R resist- other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000183 Post.CSheet.28. Ever make contact (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3: Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000183a Post.CSheet.28a. Ever contact R (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28a. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3d: Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) ============================== M000184 Post.CSheet.29. Reason no contact (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.29. IF NO CONTACT WITH HOUSEHOLD FOR POST INTERVIEW: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD4: What was the reason for no contact? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained 2. All occupants away during entire study period (i.e. long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc. 3. Nobody answered door but think somone in HU [FTF: when visits made] 4. Could not obtain access to HU 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1) ============================== M000184a Post-CSheet.30. CSMS estimated income MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.30. IF FTF MODE: POST- COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000184b Post-CSheet.31. CSMS estimated HH race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.31. IF FTF MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Pre equivalent of this variable in Pre-CSheet.35. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000184c Post-CSheet.32. CSMS est HH race certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.32. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Post-Csheet.31 ============================== M000184d Post-CSheet.33. CSMS estimated Hispanic MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.33. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also P000068, P000069 (Pre version of these variables) ans Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000184e Post-CSheet.34. CSMS est Hispanic certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 ============================== M000185 Post.IWR.1. Interviewer of record MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.1. POST: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== M000186 Post.IWR.2. Supervisor MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.2. POST: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== M000187 Post.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.3. POST: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000188 Post.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.4. POST: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000189 Post.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.5. POST: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000190 Post.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-IWR.6. POST: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000191 Post.IWR.7. Interviewer languages Numeric Post-IWR.7. POST: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. ============================== M000192 Post.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-IWR.8. POST: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000193 Post.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.9. POST: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M000194 Post.Cand.1. House race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1. House race type --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC ============================== M000194a Post.Cand.1a. Retiring House Repr name Character Post-Cand.1a. Retiring House Representative name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000194b Post.Cand.1b. Retiring House Repr code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1b. Retiring House Representative code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 41. Democratic Representative--retiring (district with open race) 42. Republican Representative--retiring (district with open race) 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC ============================== M000194c Post.Cand.1c. Retiring House Repr gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.1c. Retiring House Representative gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No retiring House representative; Washington DC ============================== M000194d Post.Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Independent/3rd party incumbent candidate 31. Democratic candidate in open race 32. Republican candidate in open race 33. Democratic incumbent 34. Republican incumbent 35. Democratic challenger 36. Republican challenger 39. Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. Washington DC ============================== M000194e Post.Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election Numeric Post-Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race 13 Democratic Senate incumbent 14 Republican Senate incumbent 15 Democratic Senate challenger 16 Republican Senate challenger 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. No race in state; Washington CD ============================== M000194f Post.Cand.1f. Competitiveness of respondent CD MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1f. Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. 1. Least competitive 2. 3. 4. 5. Most competitive 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1); Washington D.C. ============================== M000194g Post.Cand.1g. Open seat in 2000 in respondent district? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1g. Open seat in R's district in 2000? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NO 1. YES 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) Washington D.C. ============================== M000195 Post.Cand.2. House Democratic cand name Character Post-Cand.2. House Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000196 Post.Cand.3. House Democratic cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.3. House Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Democratic candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000197 Post.Cand.4. House Democratic cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.4. House Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000198 Post.Cand.5. House Republican cand name Character Post-Cand.5. House Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000199 Post.Cand.6. House Republican cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.6. House Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000200 Post.Cand.7. House Republican cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.7. House Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000201 Post.Cand.8. House Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.8. House Independent/third party candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000202 Post.Cand.9. House Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.9. House Independent/third party candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000202a Post.Cand.9a. House Ind cand party Character Post-Cand.9a. House Independent/third party candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an alpha variable ============================== M000203 Post.Cand.10. House Ind cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.10. House Independent/third party candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000204 Post.Cand.11. Senate race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.11. Senate race type: STATES WITH SENATE RACE STATES WITHOUT SENATE RACE Arizona Alabama California Arkansas Connecticut Colorado Delaware Idaho Florida Illinois Georgia Iowa Indiana Kansas Maine Kentucky Maryland Louisiana Massachusetts New Hampshire Michigan North Carolina Minnesota Oklahoma Mississippi Oregon Missouri South Carolina Montana South Dakota Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico New York North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96 Code 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC ============================== M000205 Post.Cand.12. Senate Democr cand name Character Post-Cand.12. Senate Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000206 Post.Cand.13. Senate Democr cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.13. Senate Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000207 Post.Cand.14. Senate Democr cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.14. Senate Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000208 Post.Cand.15. Senate Repub cand name Character Post-Cand.15. Senate Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000209 Post.Cand.16. Senate Repub cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.16. Senate Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000210 Post.Cand.17. Senate Repub cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.17. Senate Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000211 Post.Cand.18. Senate Ind 1 cand name Character Post-Cand.18. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000212 Post.Cand.19. Senate Ind 1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.19. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent ** 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent ** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000212a Post.Cand.19a. Senate Ind 1 cand party Character Post-Cand.19a. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000213 Post.Cand.20. Senate Ind 1 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.20. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000214 Post.Cand.21. Senate Ind 2 cand name Character Post-Cand.21. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000215 Post.Cand.22. Senate Ind 2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.22. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000215a Post.Cand.22a. Senate Ind 2 cand party Character Post-Cand.22a. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== M000216 Post.Cand.23. Senate Ind 2 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.23. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC ============================== M000217 Post.Cand.24. Outside Hse Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.24. House Democratic candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== M000218 Post.Cand.25. Outside Hse Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.25. House Democratic candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000219 Post.Cand.26. Outside Hse Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.26. House Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000220 Post.Cand.27. Outside Hse Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.27. House Republican candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== M000221 Post.Cand.28. Outside Hse Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.28. House Republican candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000222 Post.Cand.29. Outside Hse Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.29. House Republican candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000223 Post.Cand.30. Outside Hse Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.30. House Independent/third party candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== M000224 Post.Cand.31. Outside Hse Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.31. House Independent/third party candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000225 Post.Cand.32. Outside Hse Ind cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.32. House Independent/third party candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000226 Post.Cand.33. Outside Hse race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33. House race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. Washington DC 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000226a Post.Cand.33a. Outside Sen race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33a. Senate race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96. Washington DC 99. R vote in another district but not another state 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== M000227 Post.Cand.34. Outside Sen Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.34. Senate Democratic candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== M000228 Post.Cand.35. Outside Sen Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.35. Senate Democratic candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC ============================== M000229 Post.Cand.36. Outside Sen Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.36. Senate Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC ============================== M000230 Post.Cand.37. Outside Sen Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.37. Senate Republican candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== M000231 Post.Cand.38. Outside Sen Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.38. Senate Republican candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Republican candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC ============================== M000232 Post.Cand.39. Outside Sen Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.39. Senate Republican candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC ============================== M000233 Post.Cand.40. Outside Sen Ind1 cand name Character Post-Cand.40. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== M000234 Post.Cand.41. Outside Sen Ind1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.41. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC ============================== M000235 Post.Cand.42. Outside Sen Ind1 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.42. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC ============================== M000236 Post.Cand.43. Outside Sen Ind2 cand name Character Post-Cand.43. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no (2nd) independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== M000237 Post.Cand.44. Outside Sen Ind2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.44. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC ============================== M000238 Post.Cand.45. Outside Sen Ind2 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.45. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC ============================== M000239 Post.Summary.1. Post timing - section A MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.1. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000240 Post.Summary.2. Post timing - section B MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.2. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000241 Post.Summary.3. Post timing - section C MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.3. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000242 Post.Summary.4. Post timing - section D MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.4. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000243 Post.Summary.5. Post timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.5. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000244 Post.Summary.6. Post timing - section F MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.6. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000245 Post.Summary.7. Post timing - section G MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.7. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000246 Post.Summary.8. Post timing - section H MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.8. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section H administered in Pre; No Post IW ============================== M000247 Post.Summary.9. Post timing - section J MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.9. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION J --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000248 Post.Summary.10. Post timing - section K MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.10. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000249 Post.Summary.11. Post timing - section L MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.11. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000250 Post.Summary.12. Post timing - section M MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.12. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000251 Post.Summary.13. Post timing - section N MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.13. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000252 Post.Summary.14. Post timing - section P MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.14. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000253 Post.Summary.15. Post timing - section Q MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.15. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000254 Post.Summary.16. Post timing - section R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.16. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000255 Post.Summary.17. Post timing - section S MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.17. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000256 Post.Summary.18. Post timing - section T MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.18. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000257 Post.Summary.19. Post timing - section V MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.19. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION V --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000258 Post.Summary.20. Post timing - section Y MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.20. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000259 Post.Summary.21. Post timing - section Z MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.21. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== M000260 Post.Summary.22. Wrong CD admin(preload) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.22. POST: Wrong CD administered (preloaded)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: 3 cases (case IDs 900,1016,1114) were misidentified in the preload as PA cases but were actually conducted in New Jersey; the actual CD for the NJ location is not determined. Variables for survey questions which were administered according to Preload information are unchanged (affected cases not set to missing data). State and CD variables (e.g. P000079, P000080 etc.) are set to missing data but sampling variables associated with segment are correct for the actual segment location (if FTF mode). 0. No misidentification of CD 1. Wrong CD identified (administered) 9. No Post IW ============================== M000261 Post.Summary.23. Type error in preload MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.23. POST: Type of error in preload --------------------------------------------------------------------- Code 1 corresponds to 3 cases in WV where Senate type race was misidentified as type race 12 instead of type race 19 (note: 1 additional case in WV had correct Senate type race preloaded). For the 3 cases coded 1, the preload information for the Senate Independent/3rd party candidate was not preloaded. 0. No error in Preload 1. Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases) 2. Wrong CD (1 in Post-Summary.22) 9. No Post IW ============================== M000262 Post.Summary.24. Flag-Post rand failure MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.24. POST: Flag - randomization failure in Post admin --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). The randomization variables documented in P001752-P001810 describe the types of randomizations affected. 0. No randomization failure 1. Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview 9. No Post IW ============================== M000301 A1. Attention R paid to campaigns MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED 3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000302 A2. Does R care about Pres election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2. Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CARE A GOOD DEAL 3. DON'T CARE VERY MUCH 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000303 A3. Did R vote in 1996 election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3. In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. YES, VOTED 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE --> SKIP TO A4/A5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP A4/A5 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000304 A3a. Who did R vote for in 1996 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3a. IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT IN 1996: Which one did you vote for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. BILL CLINTON 3. BOB DOLE 5. ROSS PEROT 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A3 ============================== M000305 A4a. Does R like anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4a. Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4c 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000306 A4b(1). #1 detail about Gore R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9995 Numeric A4b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a ============================== M000307 A4b(2). #2 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000308 A4b(3). #3 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000309 A4b(4). #4 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000310 A4b(5). #5 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000311 A4c. Does R dislike anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4c. Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> A5a Or A6 8. Don't Know --> A5a Or A6 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000312 A4d(1). #1 detail about Gore R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A4d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c ============================== M000313 A4d(2). #2 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000314 A4d(3). #3 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000315 A4d(4). #4 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000316 A4d(5). #5 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000317 A5a. Does R like anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5a. Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A5c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A5c 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000318 A5b(1). #1 detail about Bush R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a ============================== M000319 A5b(2). #2 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000320 A5b(3). #3 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000321 A5b(4). #4 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000322 A5b(5). #5 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== M000323 A5c. Does R dislike anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5c. Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000324 A5d(1). #1 detail about Bush R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c ============================== M000325 A5d(2). #2 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000326 A5d(3). #3 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000327 A5d(4). #4 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000328 A5d(5). #5 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== M000329 A6. Number of days R watched nat'l news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A6. How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A7 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA ============================== M000330 A6a/A6a.T. Attention to national news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A6a/A6a.T. IF R WATCHED NATIONAL NETWORK TV NEWS IN PAST WEEK: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A6 ============================== M000331 A7. Days R watched early local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A7. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as "Eyewitness News" or "Action News" in the late afternoon or early-evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY ============================== M000332 A8. Days R watched late local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A8. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA ============================== M000333 A8a/A8a.T. Attention to local news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A8a/A8a.T. IF NUMBER OF DAYS WATCHED IS NOT 0 FOR BOTH EARLY AND LATE LOCAL NEWS: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A7 and A8 ============================== M000334 A9. Does R have cable or satellite tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A9. Do you have either cable or satellite television? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000335 A10. Days R read a daily newspaper MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A10. How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A11 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA ============================== M000336 A10a. Did R read about campaign in paper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10a. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A11 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A10 ============================== M000337 A10b/A10b.T. Attention to newspaper articles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10b/A10b.T. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: IF R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN: FTF: (Please look at page 1 of the booklet.) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A10a ============================== M000338 A11. Did R see ads for candidates on tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A11. Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't Know 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000339 A12. Approve/disappr Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO B1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000340 A12a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Clinton MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT/ IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in A12 ============================== M000341 A12x. Summary app/disapp Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL/ DISAPPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A12 and A12a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK (in A12 or A12a) 9. RF (in A12 or A12b) 0. NA ============================== M000342 B1. Did R care about House election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1. As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH 2. PRETTY MUCH 3. NOT VERY MUCH 4. NOT AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000343 B2. Does R remember names of House cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2. Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B3 8. DK --> SKIP TO B3 9. RF 0. NA; Washington D.C. ============================== M000344 B2a. #1 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2a. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. ============================== M000345 B2a1. #1 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. ============================== M000346 B2ax1. #1 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2ax1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2 ============================== M000347 B2ax2. #1 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2ax2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2 ============================== M000348 B2b. #2 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list or this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M000349 B2b1. #2 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2b1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M000350 B2bx1. #2 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2bx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention ============================== M000351 B2bx2. #2 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2bx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention ============================== M000352 B2c. #3 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2c. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M000353 B2c1. #3 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2c1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M000354 B2cx1. #3 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2cx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention ============================== M000355 B2cx2. #3 House cand recall-accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2cx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention ============================== M000356 B3. Congress job approve/dissapr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO C1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000357 B3a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Cong MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3a. IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB/ IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB: (Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job?) Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in B3 ============================== M000358 B3x. Summary R approval of US Congress MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R APPROVAL OF U.S. CONGRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from B3 and B3a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove not strongly 8. DK (in B3 or B3a) 9. RF (in B3 or B3a) 0. NA ============================== M000359 C1a/C1a.T. Thermometer Bill Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1a/C1a.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Clinton TELEPHONE: The first person is: Bill Clinton Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton? THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000360 C1b/C1b.T. Thermometer Gore MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1b/C1b.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Al Gore TELEPHONE: The next person is: Al Gore (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - AL GORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000361 C1c/C1c.T. Thermometer George W Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1c/C1c.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) George W. Bush TELEPHONE: The next person is: George W. Bush (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000362 C1d/C1d.T. Thermometer Buchanan MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1d/C1d.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Pat Buchanan TELEPHONE: The next person is: Pat Buchanan (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him THERMOMETER - PAT BUCHANAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000363 C1e/C1e.T. Thermometer Nader MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1e/C1e.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Ralph Nader TELEPHONE: The next person is: Ralph Nader (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000364 C1f/C1f.T. Thermometer Mccain MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1f/C1f.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) John McCain TELEPHONE: The next person is: John McCain (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him? THERMOMETER - JOHN MCCAIN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000365 C1g/C1g.T. Thermometer Bradley MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1g/C1g.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Bradley TELEPHONE: The next person is: Bill Bradley (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - BILL BRADLEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000366 C1h/C1h.T. Thermometer Lieberman MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1h/C1h.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Joseph Lieberman TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Joseph Lieberman (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - JOSEPH LIEBERMAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000367 C1j/C1j.T. Thermometer Cheney MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1j/C1j.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Dick Cheney TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Dick Cheney (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - DICK CHENEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000368 C1k/C1k.T. Thermometer Hillary Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1k/C1k.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Hillary Clinton TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Hillary Clinton (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate her?) THERMOMETER - HILLARY CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ C2. Still using the thermometer: ============================== M000369 C2a. Thermometer Dem Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2a. (How would you rate:) the Democratic Party THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000370 C2b. Thermometer Rep Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2b. (How would you rate:) the Republican Party THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000371 C2c. Thermometer Reform Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2c. (How would you rate:) Reform Party THERMOMETER - REFORM PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M000372 C2d. Thermometer parties in general MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2d. (How would you rate:) Political parties in general THERMOMETER - POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ D0. I'd like to ask you what you think are the good and bad points about the two national parties. ============================== M000373 D1. Like anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D1. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D2 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D2 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000374 D1a(1). #1 like Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D1a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1 ============================== M000375 D1a(2). #2 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== M000376 D1a(3). #3 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== M000377 D1a(4). #4 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== M000378 D1a(5). #5 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== M000379 D2. Dislike anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D2. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D3 or D5 ============================== M000380 D2a(1). #1 dislike Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D2a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2 ============================== M000381 D2a(2). #2 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== M000382 D2a(3). #3 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== M000383 D2a(4). #4 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== M000384 D2a(5). #5 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== M000385 D3. Like anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D3. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D4 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D4 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000386 D3a(1). #1 like Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D3a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3 ============================== M000387 D3a(2). #2 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== M000388 D3a(3). #3 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== M000389 D3a(4). #4 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== M000390 D3a(5). #5 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== M000391 D4. Dislike anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D4. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000392 D4a(1). #1 dislike Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D4a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4 ============================== M000393 D4a(2). #2 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== M000394 D4a(3). #3 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== M000395 D4a(4). #4 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== M000396 D4a(5). #5 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== M000397 D5. Preference for divided government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D5. Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER WHEN ONE PARTY CONTROLS BOTH 3. BETTER WHEN CONTROL IS SPLIT 5. IT DOESN'T MATTER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000398 E1/E1.T. Better/worse off in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1/E1.T. FTF: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? TELEPHONE: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E1b 5. THE SAME --> Skip to E2 8. DK --> Skip to E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample ============================== M000399 E1a. How much better off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1a. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN BETTER OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Better --> E2 5. Somewhat Better --> E2 8. DK --> E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T ============================== M000400 E1b. How much worse off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1b. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN WORSE OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Worse 5. Somewhat Worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T ============================== M000401 E1x. Summary R econ situation last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1x. Would you say that you (and your family [FTF: living here]) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY - R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E1/E1.T and E1a/E1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 9. RF (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample ============================== M000402 E2/E2.T. Did R delay med/dent treatment MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E2/E2.T. FTF: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? TELEPHONE: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample ============================== M000403 E3/E3.T. Expect better/worse in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3/E3.T. FTF: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? TELEPHONE: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E3B 5. THE SAME --> Skip to F1 8. DK --> Skip to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample ============================== M000404 E3a. How much better off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3a. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE BETTER OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much better off or somewhat better off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP to F1 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP to F1 8. DK --> SKIP to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T ============================== M000405 E3b. How much worse off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3b. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE WORSE OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T ============================== M000406 E3x. Summary R econ situation next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3x. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family [FTF: living here]) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better/worse off or somewhat better/worse off? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E3 and E3a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Just about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E3 or E3a/E3b) 9. RF (in E 3 or E3a/E3b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half sample ============================== M000407 F1a. Angry- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1a. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series , and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000408 F1aa. Angry- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1aa. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely ============================== M000409 F1b. Hopeful- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1b. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000410 F1bb. Hopeful- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1bb. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1b ============================== M000411 F1c. Afraid- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1c. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F1 In Randomization 8. DK --> Next F1 In Randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000412 F1cc. Afraid- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1cc. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1c ============================== M000413 F1d. Proud- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1d. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000414 F1dd. Proud- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1dd. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1d ============================== M000415 F2a. Angry- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2a. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000416 F2aa. Angry- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2aa. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2a ============================== M000417 F2b. Hopeful- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2b. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization ============================== M000418 F2bb. Hopeful- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2bb. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F26 ============================== M000419 F2c. Afraid- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2c. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000420 F2cc. Afraid- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2cc. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2c ============================== M000421 F2d. Proud- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2d. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000422 F2dd. Proud- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2dd. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2d ============================== M000423 F3a. Angry- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3a. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped ============================== M000424 F3aa. Angry- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3aa. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3a ============================== M000425 F3b. Hopeful- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3b. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped ============================== M000426 F3bb. Hopeful- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3bb. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3b ============================== M000427 F3c. Afraid- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3c. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped ============================== M000428 F3cc. Afraid- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3cc. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid-- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3c ============================== M000429 F3d. Proud- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3d. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped ============================== M000430 F3dd. Proud- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3dd. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3d ============================== M000431 F6(1). #1 most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 991 Numeric F6(1). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 1 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 991. "There were no issues"; "no issues, just party politics" 992. "There was no campaign in my district" 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, R not selected for half-sample administration (see Pre-Admin.2b, P000005b=0) ============================== M000432 F6(2). #2 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(2). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 2 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== M000433 F6(3). #3 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(3). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 3 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== M000434 F6(4). #4 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(4). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 4 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== M000435 F6x. Checkpoint for # of mentions MD: EQ 9 Numeric F6x. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF IMPORTANT PROBLEMS MENTIONED BY R --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNSURE WHETHER ONE PROBLEM OR MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM, CODE MORE THAN 1.] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. 0. No problem mentioned (000, 991-999 in F6(1)) 1. One problem mentioned 2. Two or more problems mentioned 9. R not selected for administration of F6-F7 ============================== M000436 F7. Choice - most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 998 Numeric F7. IF R HAS MADE 2 OR MORE MENTIONS OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. If R mentioned only 1 problem, that mention is duplicated here. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, R not selected for administration of F6-F7 (0 in F6x) ============================== M000437 F8. Gov't performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F8. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem -- a good job, only fair, or a poor job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. A GOOD JOB 3. ONLY FAIR 5. A POOR JOB 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x ============================== M000438 F9. Party performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F9. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem -- the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. REPUBLICANS 3. DEMOCRATS 5. THERE WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x ============================== M000439 G1a. Self placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G1a.T; for FTF (and telephone) branching format, see G6.E (P000442). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b ============================== M000439a G1a.T. Self placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G1a; for telephone (and FTF) branching format, see G6.E (P000442) 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b ============================== M000440 G1ax. Summary: combined FTF/ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1ax. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1a and G1a.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] ============================== M000441 G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1b. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE, DK OR HAVEN'T THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL 3. CONSERVATIVE 5. MODERATE 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE 8. DK 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 or RF/NA in G1a or G1a.T; R selected for branching version ============================== M000441a G1bx. Summary: comb FTF/phone-lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1bx. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT-SCALE SERIES: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1ax and G1b. This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF administration in previous years. Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a,G1b. 1. Liberal (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1) 3. Moderate (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA) 5. Conservative (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3) 7. Refused to choose (0/8,7) 8. DK (0/8,8) 9. NA/RF to entire question series (RF/NA,0) 0. NA to follow up question G4aa (0/8,9/NA) ============================== M000442 G6.E. Self placement lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also: G1a and G1a.T (P000439 and P000439a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. A LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G6b.E 3. A CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 5. A MODERATE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 7. NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO G6a.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G6a.E 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> SKIP TO G6a.E ============================== M000443 G6a.E. Had to choose lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS DK/NEITHER/MODERATE/NO THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 3. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. MODERATE[VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,9 in G6.E ============================== M000444 G6b.E. R strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E ============================== M000445 G6c.E. R strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E ============================== M000446 G6x1. Summary self plcmnt lib-con scale/brnch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? COMBINED 7-POINT LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from: - branching data in G6.E, G6a.E, G6b.E, G6c.E. - 7-pt scale data in G1ax, G1b. NOTE: To make 7pt scale data comparable with the construction of a 7-pt summary of branching data, both the 7pt-scale data in G1ax and the "had to choose" data in G1b were used for constructing this summary. For both 7pt-scale and branching cases, Rs who answered moderate (4 in 7pt-scale) or DK or 'haven't thought much' (branching: or 'neither') were asked for the "had to choose" selection of liberal or conservative. Branching: If R selected liberal or conservative but strength followup was missing data (typically: DK) then 'not strong' has been coded in G6x1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA ============================== M000446a G6x1a. 7pt lib-con summary - FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1a. IF FTF MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for FTF cases only, summarizing FTF data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000446b G6x1b. 7pt lib-con summary - PHONE MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1b. IF PHONE MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for phone cases only, summarizing telephone data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000447 G6x2. Comb.7pt & branching summ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? 7PT FTF AND PHONE: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/ conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from G6x1. 1. Liberal (1-3 in G6x1) 3. Moderate (4 in G6x1) 5. Conservative (5-7 in G6x1) 7. Refused to choose (9 in G6x1) 8. DK (8 in G6x1) 0. NA (0 in G6x1) ============================== M000448 G2. Clinton placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (P000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000448a G2.T. Clinton plcmnt lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (P000450). Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G2; for branching format, see G7.E (P000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000449 G2x. Combined FTF/ph Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2/G2.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version ============================== M000450 G7.E. Clinton placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. LIBERAL --> G7a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000451 G7a.E. Clinton strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G7.E ============================== M000452 G7b.E. Clinton strong conservtive or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS CONSEVATIVE: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G7.E ============================== M000453 G7x1.E. 5-pt br summary Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G7.E/G7a.E/G7b.E. 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G7.E 9. RF in G7.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000454 G7x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2x and G7x1.E 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000455 G3. Gore placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G3.T; for branching version, see G8.E (P000459). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000455a G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G3; for branching version, see G8.E (P000459). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000456 G3x. Combined FTF/ph Gore lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3/G3.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version ============================== M000457 G3a. Gore-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G3 ============================== M000458 G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con plcmnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G3.T ============================== M000458a G3ax.T. Combined - certain Gore lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3ax.T. IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G3a and G3a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9, NA in G3/G3.T; R selected for branching format ============================== M000459 G8.E. Gore placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G3 and G3.T (P000455 and P000455a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G8a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G8b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000460 G8a.E. Gore strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G8.E ============================== M000461 G8b.E. Gore strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G8.E ============================== M000462 G8x1.E. 5-pt br summary Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G8.E/G8a.E/G8b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G8.E 9. RF in G8.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000463 G8x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3x and G8x1.E 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000464 G8c.E. Gore-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E ============================== M000464a G8cx 7pt/branching summary Gore crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3ax.T and G8c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G3/G3.T/G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E ============================== M000465 G4. Bush placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G4.T; for branching format see G9.E (P000469). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000465a G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G4; for branching format see G9.E (P000469). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000466 G4x. Combined FTF/ph Bush lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4/G4.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version ============================== M000467 G4a. Bush-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G4 ============================== M000468 G4a.T. Bush-certain plcmnt lib-con phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G4.T ============================== M000468a G4ax.T. Combined - certain GW Bush lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4ax.T. IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G4a and G4a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G4/G4.T; R selected for branching format ============================== M000469 G9.E. Bush placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G4 and G4.T (P000465 and P000465a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G9a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000470 G9a.E. Bush strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G9.E ============================== M000471 G9b.E. Bush strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G9.E ============================== M000472 G9x1.E. 5-pt br summary Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G9.E/G9a.E/G9b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong cosnervative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G9.E 9. RF in G9.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000473 G9x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4x and G9x1.E 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000474 G9c.E. Bush-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G9.E; 8,9 or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E ============================== M000474a G9cx 7pt/branching summary Bush crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4ax.T and G9c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G4/G4.T/G9.E; 8,9,or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E ============================== M000475 G5. Buchanan placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale version see G5.T; for branching format see G10.E (P000479). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000475a G5.T. Buchan plcmnt lib-con scale phon MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) For the FTF version of the 7-point scale version see G5; for branching format see G10.E (P000479). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version ============================== M000476 G5x. Combined FTF/ph Buchan lib-con scl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5/G5.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version ============================== M000477 G5a. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G5 ============================== M000478 G5a.T. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G5.T ============================== M000478a G5ax.T. Combined - certain Buchanan lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5ax.T. FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G5a and G5a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G5/G4.T; R selected for branching format ============================== M000479 G10.E. Buchanan placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G5 and G5.T (P000475 and P000475a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G10a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G10b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000480 G10a.E. Buchanan strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G10.E ============================== M000481 G10b.E. Buchan strong conserv or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G10.E ============================== M000482 G10x1.E. 5-pt br summary Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x1.E. IF R SELECTED BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G10.E/G10a.E/G10b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G10.E 9. RF in G10.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version ============================== M000483 G10x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE) What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5x and G10x1.E 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000484 G10c.E. Certain-Buchan plcmnt lib-con br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G5/G5.T/G10.E; 8,9,or NA in G10a.E/G10b.E ============================== M000484a G10cx. 7pt/branching summ Buchan l-c crt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5ax.T and G10c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000485 G11. Who does R think will be elected MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11. Who do you think will be elected President in November? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP to G11b 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000486 G11a. Race close or not- cand named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a. IF R NAMES PRES. CANDIDATE WHO R THINKS WILL WIN ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN IN G11] win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 8. DK --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in G11 ============================== M000487 G11b. Race close or not- cand not named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHO WILL WIN THE PRES. ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-7 in G11 ============================== M000488a H1. US econ bttr/worse in last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN WORSE --> SKIP TO H1b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1.E ============================== M000488b H1.E. US econ bttr/worse in last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN WORSE. --> SKIP TO H1b 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1. ============================== M000489 H1a. How much better US econ past year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1a. IF R THINKS ECONOMY BETTER IN THE LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1.E ============================== M000490 H1b. How much worse US econ last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1b. IF R THINKS ECONOMY WORSE IN THE LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEWHAT WORSE 5. MUCH WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1.E ============================== M000491 H1x. Summary US econ btr/worse last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x. STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? BOTH VERSIONS: Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H1/H1.E and H1a,H1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 9. RF in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 0. NA ============================== M000492a H2. Esr/hrdr to find work last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN HARDER --> SKIP TO H2a 3. STAYED THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2.E ============================== M000492b H2.E. Esr/hrdr to find work last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 3. ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN HARDER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2 ============================== M000493 H2a. How much harder to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2a. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN HARDER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much harder or a little harder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH HARDER --> H4 5. A LITTLE HARDER --> H4 8. DK --> H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2.E ============================== M000494 H2b. How much easier to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2b. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN EASIER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much easier or a little easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH EASIER 5. A LITTLE EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2.E ============================== M000495 H2x. Summary employ opps in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2x. STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? BOTH VERSIONS: Much harder/easier or a little harder/easier? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H2/H2.E and H2a,H2b. 1. Much harder 2. Somewhat harder 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. Much easier 8. DK in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 9. RF in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 0. NA ============================== M000496a H4. US econ bttr/worse in next year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET BETTER --> SKIP TO H4a 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4.E ============================== M000496b H4.E. US econ bttr/worse in next year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET BETTER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4 ============================== M000497 H4a. How much better US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4a. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET BETTER IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4.E ============================== M000498 H4b. How much worse US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4b. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET WORSE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4.E ============================== M000499 H4x. Summary US econ in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4x. STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN NEXT 12 MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H4/H4.E and H4a,H4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 9. RF in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 0. NA ============================== M000500 H5. Approve/dissap Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H5b 8. DK --> SKIP to H6 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000501 H5a. How much approve Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5a. IF R APPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 8. DK --> SKIP to H7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H5 ============================== M000502 H5b. How much dissprv Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5b. IF R DISAPPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H5 ============================== M000503 H5x. Summary Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H5 and H5a/H5b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in H5 or H5a/b 9. RF in H5 or H5a/b 0. NA ============================== M000504 H6. Is R invested in stock market MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H6. Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now -- either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000505 H7. Which party R thinks best to handle econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H7. Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM/NO DIFFERENCE 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000506 H8. Which party R thinks would avoid war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H8. Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. ABOUT THE SAME BY BOTH 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000507 H9. Us position in world weaker/stronger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H9. Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WEAKER 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME 5. STRONGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000508 H10. Increase/decrease immigratration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. LEFT THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000509 H10a. Inc/dec immigratn little or a lot MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10a. IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE INCREASED/ IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE DECREASED: A little or a lot? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LITTLE 5. A LOT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H10 ============================== M000510 H10x. Summary immigration level MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10x. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? A little or a lot? SUMMARY: IMMIGRATION LEVEL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H10 and H10a. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased a little 3. Left the same 4. Decreased a little 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H10 ============================== M000511a H11. Favor/oppose import limits stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO H12 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO H12 7. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO H12 8. DK --> SKIP TO H12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11.E ============================== M000511b H11.E. Favor/opp import limits ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11 ============================== M000512 H11x. Combined versions import limits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric H11x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: IMPORT LIMITS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H11 and H11.E 1. Favor 5. Oppose 7. Haven't thought much (H11 only) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000513a H12. US better off to stay at home stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. AGREE --> SKIP to H13 5. DISAGREE --> SKIP to H13 8. DK --> SKIP to H13 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12.E ============================== M000513b H12.E. US better off to stay at home ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. BETTER OFF IF WE JUST STAYED HOME 5. BETTER OFF TRYING TO SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12 ============================== M000514 H12x. Combined versions isolationism MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ISOLATIONISM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H12 and H12.E 1. Agree/ Better off to stay home 5. Disagree/ Better off trying to solve problems 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000515 H13. Clinton foreign rel approve/disappr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H13b 8. DK --> SKIP to K1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000516 H13a. Strength appove Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H13 ============================== M000517 H13b. Strength dissapr Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13b. IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H13 ============================== M000518 H13x. Summary Clinton foreign relations MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: CLINTON HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H13 and H13a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H13 ============================== M000519 K1. Does R consider self Rep Dem or Ind MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN --> SKIP TO K1b 3. INDEPENDENT --> SKIP TO K1c 4. OTHER PARTY [SPECIFY] --> SKIP TO K1c 5. NO PREFERENCE --> SKIP TO K1c 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1c 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000520 K1a. Is R a strong Democrat or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1a. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A DEMOCRAT: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2-5, 8,9,0 in K1 ============================== M000521 K1b. Is R a strong Republican or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1b. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A REPUBLICAN: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4,5,8,9,0 in K1 ============================== M000522 K1c. Is R closer to Rep or Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1c. IF R'S PARTY PREFERENCE IS INDEPENDENT, NO PREFERENCE, OTHER, DK: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN 3. NEITHER [VOL] 5. CLOSER TO DEMOCRATIC 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,9,0 in K1 ============================== M000523 K1x. Party ID summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K1x. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? Would you call yourself a strong Democrat/Republican or a not very strong Democrat/ Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? SUMMARY: PARTY ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K1, K1a/b, K1c. Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a code of 5 (no preference) in K1 and a code of 3,8 or 9 in K1c AND also showed little or no interest in politics in response to the following survey questions: PRE question A1.(interest in campaigns), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race outcome), POST question C1 (voted), POST question F5 (follow public affairs); respondents who showed an interest in politics were coded 3. 0. Strong Democrat (1,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 1. Weak Democrat (1,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 2. Independent-Democrat (3/4/5/8,0,5 in K1, K1a/b, K1c 3. Independent-Independent (3,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c; 8,0,3 and 5,0,3/8/9 if not apolitical) 4. Independent-Republican (3/4/5/8,0,1 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 5. Weak Republican (2,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 6. Strong Republican (2,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 7. Other; minor party; refuses to say (4,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 8. Apolitical (8,0,3 or 5,0,3/8/9 in E6, E6a/b, E6c and no interest in politics 9. NA (8/9,0,0 in E6, E6a/b, E6c) ============================== M000524 K2a. Gore trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000525 K2b. Gore trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000526 K2c. Gore trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000527 K2d. Gore trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000528 K2e. Gore trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2e. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000529 K2f. Gore trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2f. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000530 K2g. Gore trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2g. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000531 K3a. Bush trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3a. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000532 K3b. Bush trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3b. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000533 K3c. Bush trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3c. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000534 K3d. Bush trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3d. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000535 K3e. Bush trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3e. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000536 K3f. Bush trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3f. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000537 K3g. Bush trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3g. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000538 K4a. Buchanan trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4a. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000539 K4b. Buchanan trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4b. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000540 K4c. Buchanan trait- knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4c. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000541 K4d. Buchanan trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4d. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000542 K4e. Buchanan trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4e. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000543 K4f. Buchanan trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4f. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000544 K4g. Buchanan trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4g. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped ============================== M000545 L1a. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For telephone (branching) version of this question see L1a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> L1b 2. --> L1b 3. --> L1b 4. --> L1b 5. --> L1b 6. --> L1b 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> L1b 8. DK --> L1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b ============================== M000546 L1a.T. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For FTF (7-point scale) version of this question see L1a. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1a1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b.T ============================== M000547 L1a1.T. How much reduce serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a1.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T ============================== M000548 L1a2.T. How much incr serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a2.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T ============================== M000549 L1ax1. 5-pt br summary of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L1ax1. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: SPT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a.T and L1a1.T/L1a2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 7. Haven't thought much 8. DK in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 9. RF in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a.T; FTF mode ============================== M000550 L1ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? COMBINED 5PT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a and L1ax1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a or L1a.T 0. Haven't thought much ============================== M000551 L1b. Clinton- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L1b.T 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000552 L1b.T. Clinton- serve/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1b. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1b1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1b2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000553 L1b1.T. Clinton- how much red srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b1.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T ============================== M000554 L1b2.T. Clinton- how much inc srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b2.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T ============================== M000555 L1bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b.T and L1b1.T/L1b2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 9. RF in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b.T; FTF mode ============================== M000556 L1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx2. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b and L1bx1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b or L1b.T ============================== M000557 L1c. Gore- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000558 L1c.T. Gore- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1c1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1c2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000559 L1c1.T. Gore- how much red serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c1.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T ============================== M000560 L1c2.T. Gore- how much inc serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c2.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T ============================== M000561 L1cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c.T and L1c1.T/L1c2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 9. RF in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c.T; FTF mode ============================== M000562 L1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c and L1cx1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c or L1c.T ============================== M000563 L1d. Bush- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000564 L1d.T. Bush- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING -->L1d1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING -->L1d2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000565 L1d1.T. Bush- how much reduce serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T ============================== M000566 L1d2.T. Bush- how much increase serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T ============================== M000567 L1dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d.T and L1d1.T/L1d2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 9. RF in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d.T; FTF mode ============================== M000568 L1dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d and L1dx1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d or L1d.T ============================== M000569 L1e. Dem Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000570 L1e.T. Dem Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1e1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1e2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000571 L1e1.T. Dem Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e1.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T ============================== M000572 L1e2.T. Dem Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A Great Deal --> Next Party or L2 5. Only Some --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T ============================== M000573 L1ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex1. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e.T and L1e1.T/L1e2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 9. RF in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e.T; FTF mode ============================== M000574 L1ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e and L1ex1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e or L1e.T ============================== M000575 L1f. Rep Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000576 L1f.T. Rep Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1f1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1f2.T 7. SHOULD STAY SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000577 L1f1.T. Rep Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f1.T. IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T ============================== M000578 L1f2.T. Rep Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T ============================== M000579 L1fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx1. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f.T and L1f1.T/L1f2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 9. RF in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f.T; FTF mode ============================== M000580 L1fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f and L1fx1 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f or L1f.T ============================== M000581 L2a. Self plcemnt-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question, see L2a.T 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 2. --> L2b 3. --> L2b 4. --> L2b 5. --> L2b 6. --> L2b 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 8. DK --> L2b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L2b ============================== M000582 L2a.T. Self plcemnt-def spending scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a.T. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question, see L2a. 1. YES, HAVE AN OPINION 5. NO, NO OPINION (HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH) --> L2b.T 8. DK --> L2b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000583 L2a1.T. Govt inc/dec def spending phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1.T. IF R DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1a.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1b.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0 in L2a.T ============================== M000584 L2a1a.T. How much reduce def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1a.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2bT/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T ============================== M000585 L2a1b.T. How much incres def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1b.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T ============================== M000586 L2ax1. 5-pt br summary defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L2ax1. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a.T, L2a1.T and L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 7. Haven't thought much (5 in L2a.T) 8. DK in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 9. RF in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode ============================== M000587 L2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEFENSE SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a and from L2a.T/L2a1.T/L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a; 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much ============================== M000588 L2b. Gore- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000589 L2b.T. Gore- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000590 L2b1.T. Gore-how much red/inc def spn ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b1.T. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2b.T ============================== M000591 L2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b.T and L2b1.T/L2b2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 9. RF in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b.T; FTF mode ============================== M000592 L2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b and L2bx1. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b or L2b.T; FTF mode ============================== M000593 L2c. Bush- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000594 L2c.T. Bush- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000595 L2c1.T. Bush-how much red/inc def spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c1.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2c.T ============================== M000596 L2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c.T and L2c1.T/L2c2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 9. RF in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c.T; FTF mode ============================== M000597 L2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c and L2cx1. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c or L2c.T; FTF mode ============================== M000598 L2d. Dem Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000599 L2d.T. Dem Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000600 L2d1.T. Dem Party-how much red/inc ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d1.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2d.T ============================== M000601 L2dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx1. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d.T and L2d1.T/L2d2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 9. RF in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d.T; FTF mode ============================== M000602 L2dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d and L2dx1. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d or L2d.T; FTF mode ============================== M000603 L2e. Rep Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000604 L2e.T. Rep Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000605 L2e1.T. Rep Party-how much inc/red ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e1.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2e.T ============================== M000606 L2ex1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex1. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e.T and L2e1.T/L2e2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 9. RF in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e.T; FTF mode ============================== M000607 L2ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e and L2ex1. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e or L2e.T; FTF mode ============================== M000608 L3(1). Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric L3(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR GOVT/PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (with endpoints reversed). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question is coded in reverse. 1. FTF standard version 2. FTF experimental version 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 ============================== M000608a L3a. Self placement-private or govt insur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 2. --> SKIP TO L4 3. --> SKIP TO L4 4. --> SKIP TO L4 5. --> SKIP TO L4 6. --> SKIP TO L4 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH --> SKIP TO L4 ============================== M000608b L3a.E. Self placement-insur scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.E for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 2. --> L4 3. --> L4 4. --> L4 5. --> L4 6. --> L4 7. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 8. DK --> L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4 ============================== M000609 L3ax. Comb. FTF versions R insurnc scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF: STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL 7 PT MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a/L3a.E. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, phone mode [3, 4 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ============================== M000610a L3a.T. Self placement-insur scale phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a1.T 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO L4.T ============================== M000610b L3a.TE. Self placement-insur scale phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.TE for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a2.T 5. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a1.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4.T ============================== M000611 L3ax.TE. Comb. Ph versions R insur scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED PHONE VERSION 1/VERSION 2 - MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a.T and L3a.TE 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000612 L3a1/a2.T. Strength of insurance plan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R FEELS THERE SHOULD BE GOVERNMENT INSURANCE PLAN/ IF R FEELS INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,0 or RF/NA in L3a.T or L3a.TE ============================== M000613 L3x1. 5-pt br summary R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x1. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built L3ax.T and L3a1.T/L3a2.T 1. Strongly - government insurance plan 2. Not strongly - government insurance plan 3. Stay the same as it is now 4. Not strongly - individual insurance 5. Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000614 L3x2. Comb.7pt/br summ of R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3ax and L3ax.T 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt insurance plan 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt insurance plan 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 ; BRANCHING: Stay the same as it is now 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - individual insurance 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000615 L4a. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question see L4a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b. 2. --> L4b. 3. --> L4b. 4. --> L4b. 5. --> L4b. 6. --> L4b. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b. 8. DK --> L4b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b. ============================== M000616 L4a.T. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question see L4a. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4a1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4a2.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b.T/L4c.T ============================== M000617 L4a1.T. How much should gov guar jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a1.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T ============================== M000618 L4a2t. How much should ppl get by on own MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD LET EACH GET AHEAD ON THEIR OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T ============================== M000619 L4x1. 5-pt br summary guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x1. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a; built from L4a.T and L4a1.T/L4a2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000620 L4x2. Comb.7pt/br summ guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a and L4x1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000621 L4b. Gore-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000622 L4b.T. Gore-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b2T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR -->L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000623 L4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength of guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4b.T ============================== M000624 L4bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b.T and L4b1.T/L4b2. 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000625 L4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b and L4bx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000626 L4c. Bush-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000627 L4c.T. Bush-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4c1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000628 L4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4c.T ============================== M000629 L4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c.T and L4c1.T/L4c2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000630 L4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c and L4cx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000631 L4d. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000632 L4d.T. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4d1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000633 L4d1/d2.T. Dem Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4d.T ============================== M000634 L4dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party guar jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx1. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d.T and L4d1.T/L4d2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000635 L4dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party gua jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d and L4dx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000636 L4e. Rep Party-guar job/std liv FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000637 L4e.T. Rep Party-guar job/std liv phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4e1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN-->NEXT PARTY OR-->L5.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> L4e1.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000638 L4e1/e2.T. Rep Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4e.T ============================== M000639 L4ex1. 5-pt br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex1. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e.T and L4e1.T/L4e2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000640 L4ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e and L4ex1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000641 L5a. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see L5a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b. 2. --> L5b. 3. --> L5b. 4. --> L5b. 5. --> L5b. 6. --> L5b. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b. 8. DK --> L5b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b. ============================== M000642 L5a.T. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see L5a. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5a1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b.T ============================== M000643 L5a1/a2.T. R-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a1/a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> L5b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5a.T ============================== M000644 L5ax1. 5-pt br summary R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax1. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a.T and L5a1.T/L5a2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it ============================== M000645 L5ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a and L5ax1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it ============================== M000646 L5b. Clinton plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5b.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000647 L5b.T. Clinton-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5b. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000648 L5b1/b2.T. Clinton-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5b.T ============================== M000649 L5bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b.T and L5b1.T/L5b2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000650 L5bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b and L5bx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000651 L5c. Gore plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000652 L5c.T. Gore-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5c1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000653 L5c1/c2.T. Gore-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5c.T ============================== M000654 L5cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c.T and L5c1.T/L5c2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000655 L5cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c and L5cx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000656 L5d. Bush plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. ============================== M000657 L5d.T. Bush-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5d1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000658 L5d1/d2.T. Bush-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5d.T ============================== M000659 L5dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d.T and L5d1.T/L5d2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000660 L5dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d and L5dx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000661 L5e. Dem Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES--> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000662 L5e.T. Dem Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5e1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5e1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR -->L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000663 L5e1/e2.T. Dem Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5e.T ============================== M000664 L5ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex1. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e.T and L5e1.T/L5e2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000665 L5ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e and L5ex1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000666 L5f. Rep Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5f.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000667 L5f.T. Rep Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5f1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5f1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000668 L5f1/f2.T. Rep Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f1/f2.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5f.T ============================== M000669 L5fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx1. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f.T and L5f1.T/L5f2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000670 L5fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f and L5fx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000671a L6. Appr/disappr affirmative action stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8 DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6.E ============================== M000671b L6.E. Appr/disappr affirmative action ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6 ============================== M000672 L6a. Strength for affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6a. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E ============================== M000673 L6b. Strength against affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6b. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E ============================== M000674 L6x. Summary affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? COMBINED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E. 1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000674a L6x1. Summary - Strength of feeling MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L6x1. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? SUMMARY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E and L6a/L6b. 1. Strongly - should have to have affirmative action 2. Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action 4. Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 5. Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000675 L7a. Inc/dec build and repair highways MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7a. BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS be increased decreased or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000676 L7b. Inc/dec welfare programs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7b. What about WELFARE PROGRAMS? (Should federal spending on WELFARE PROGRAMS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000677 L7c. Inc/dec spending on aids research MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7c. What about SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH? (Should federal spending on SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000678 L7d. Inc/dec foreign aid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7d. What about FOREIGN AID? (Should federal spending on FOREIGN AID be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000679 L7e. Inc/dec food stamps MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7e. What about FOOD STAMPS? (Should federal spending on FOOD STAMPS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000680 L7f. Inc/dec aid to poor people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7f. What about AID TO POOR PEOPLE? (Should federal spending on AID TO POOR PEOPLE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000681 L7g. Inc/dec Social Security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7g. What about SOCIAL SECURITY? (Should federal spending on SOCIAL SECURITY be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000682 L7h. Inc/dec environmental protection MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7h. What about ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION? (Should federal spending on ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000683 L7j. Inc/dec public schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7j. What about PUBLIC SCHOOLS? (Should federal spending on PUBLIC SCHOOLS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000684 L7k. Inc/dec dealing with crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7k. What about DEALING WITH CRIME? (Should federal spending on DEALING WITH CRIME be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000685 L7m. Inc/dec child care MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7m. What about CHILD CARE? (Should federal spending on CHILD CARE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000686 L7n. Inc/dec against illegal immigrants MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7n. What about TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? (Should federal spending on TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000687 L7p. Inc/dec aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7p. What about AID TO BLACKS? (Should federal spending on AID TO BLACKS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000688 L8. App/dis using surplus for tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8. Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO L9 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000689 L8a/b. Strength app/dis tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8a/b. IF R APPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L8 ============================== M000690 L8x. Summary tax cuts from surplus MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: TAX CUT FROM SURPLUS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L8 and L8a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000691 L9. App/dis surplus for Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO M1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000692 L9a/b. Strength app/dis Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9a/b. IF R APPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L9 ============================== M000693 L9x. Summary surplus for Soc Sec medcare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: USE SURPLUS TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L9 and L9a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000694 M1/M1.T. Abortion self-placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1/M1.T. FTF: Please look at page 11 of the booklet. There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. TELEPHONE: There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000695 M1a. Importance of abortion to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1a. ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000696 M1b/M1b.T. Gore-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b/M1b.T. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1c OR M2 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000697 M1b1. Gore-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b1. IF GORE'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1b/M1b.T ============================== M000698 M1c/M1c.T. Bush-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c/M1c.T. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1b OR M2 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000699 M1c1. Bush-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c1. IF GEORGE W. BUSH'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1c/M1c.T ============================== M000700 M2. App/dis abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000701 M2a. Strength abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2a. IF R FAVORS ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION/ IF R OPPOSES ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M2 ============================== M000702 M2x. Summary abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2x. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: PARENTAL CONSENT FOR ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M2 and M2a. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000703 M3. Fav/oppose prtl-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000704 M3a/b. Strength fav/opp p-b abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3a/b. IF R FAVORS BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS/ IF R OPPOSES BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M3 ============================== M000705 M3x. Summary partial-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3x. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? SUMMARY: BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M3 and M3a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000706 M4. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric M4(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR ENVIRONMENT VERSUS JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard version (M4a) 2. FTF experimental version (M4a.E) 3. PHONE version 1 (M4a.T) 4. PHONE version 2 (M4a.TE) ============================== M000707a M4a. R-jobs/envir scale FTF stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4 for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO M4b ============================== M000707b M4a.E. R-jobs/envir scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.E for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in M4(1) ============================== M000708 M4ax. Comb. FTF versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL - 7PT JOBS VS. ENVIRONMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a, M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (M4a only) ============================== M000709a M4a.T. R-jobs/envir br phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.T for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ============================== M000709b M4a.TE. R-jobs/envir phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.TE for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in M4(1) ============================== M000710 M4ax.T. Comb. Ph versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - ENVIRONMENT VS. JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a.T and M4a.TE 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (M4a.T only) ============================== M000711 M4a1/a2.T. Strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF MAINTAINING JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 5. ONLY SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 8. DK --> M4b.T/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in M4a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in M4a.TE ============================== M000712 M4a1x1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x1. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4ax.T and M4a1/a2.T 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a.T only) ============================== M000713 M4a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x2. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a and M4a1x1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a and M4a.T only) ============================== M000714 M4b. Gore-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4c. OR M5. 2. --> M4c. OR M5. 3. --> M4c. OR M5. 4. --> M4c. OR M5. 5. --> M4c. OR M5. 6. --> M4c. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4c. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4c. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000715 M4b.T. Gore-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000716 M4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4b.T ============================== M000717 M4bx1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4b.T and M4b1.T/M4b2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000718 M4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000719 M4c. Bush-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4b. OR M5. 2. --> M4b. OR M5. 3. --> M4b. OR M5. 4. --> M4b. OR M5. 5. --> M4b. OR M5. 6. --> M4b. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4b. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4b. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000720 M4c.T. Bush-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000721 M4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4c.T ============================== M000722 M4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c.T and M4c1.T/M4c2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important ============================== M000723 M4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c and M4cx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000724 M5. Fav/oppose homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5a 5. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5b 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000725 M5a. Strngth fav homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5a. IF R SAYS ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> M6a 5. NOT STRONGLY --> M6a 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M5 ============================== M000726 M5b. Strngth opp homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5b. IF R SAYS DO NOT ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in M5 ============================== M000727 M5x. Summary homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5x. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? SUMMARY: HOMOSEXUALS IN ARMED FORCES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M5 and M5a/b. 1. Strongly - should be allowed to serve 2. Not strongly - should be allowed to serve 4. Not strongly - should not be allowed to serve 5. Strongly - should not be allowed to serve 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000728 M6a. R-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a1 3. MAKE IT EASIER --> SKIP TO M6a2 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000729 M6a1. R-strength more gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a1. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 5. SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in M6a ============================== M000730 M6a2. R-strength less gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a2. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT EASIER 5. SOMEWHAT EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in M6a ============================== M000731 M6ax. Summary gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6ax. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/more difficult? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6 and M6a/b. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000732 M6a3. R-importance of gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a3. ALL GUN RESTRICTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000733 M6b. Gore plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000734 M6b1/b2. Gore-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b1/b2. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/ A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6b3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6b ============================== M000735 M6bx. Summary Gore gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6bx. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GORE POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6b and M6b1/b2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000736 M6b3. Gore-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b3. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENGTH OF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6b1/M6b2 ============================== M000737 M6c. Bush plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> M6c2 8. DK --> N1/n1.e 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000738 M6c1/c2. Bush-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c1/c2. IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6c3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6c3 8. DK --> SKIP TO N1/N1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6c ============================== M000739 M6cx. Summary Bush gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6cx. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GW BUSH POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6c and M6c1/c2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000740 M6c3. Bush-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c3. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENTH OF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6c1/M6c2 ============================== M000741a N1. Fav/opp school voucher program stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO NIa 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for N1.E ============================== M000741b N1.E. Fav/opp school voucher program ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO N2 ============================== M000742 N1x. Combined versions school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED VERSIONS - SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N1 and N1.E. 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) ============================== M000743 N1a/b. Strength fav/opp school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a/b. IF R FAVORS SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM/ IF R OPPOSES SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: an error in the instrument programming excluded for this question respondents from the standard version; only respondents from N1.E were asked N1a/b. 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 or NA in N1.E; R selected for N1 and excluded in error from N1a/b ============================== M000744 N1ax. Summary school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1ax. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build from N1x and N1a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) ============================== M000745 N2. R fav/opp English official language MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2. Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 3. NEITHER FAVOR NOR OPPOSE [VOL] 5. OPPOSE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000746 N3. R interest in school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3. Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO N4 8. DK --> SKIP TO N4 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000747 N3a. Fav/opp gov help school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3a. IF R HAS OPINION WHETHER GOVT SEE TO BLACK/WHITE KIDS IN SAME SCHOOLS: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEE TO IT THAT WHITE AND BLACK CHILDREN GO TO THE SAME SCHOOLS 5. STAY OUT OF THIS AREA AS IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER; DEPENDS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N3 ============================== M000748 N4. Fav/opp h-sexual couples adopt chldn MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N4. Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000749 N5. Fav/opp death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO N5a 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO N5b 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000750 N5a. How much favor death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5a. IF R FAVORS DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 8. DK --> P1/P1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N5 ============================== M000751 N5b. How much oppose death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5b. IF R OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in N5 ============================== M000752 N5x. Summary R position on death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5x. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (Do you favor/oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON DEATH PENALTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N5 and N5a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000753 P1. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric P1(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR WOMEN'S EQUAL ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard 2. FTF experimental 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 ============================== M000754a P1a. R plcmnt equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2,3,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. ============================== M000754b P1a.E. R plcmnt equal role scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4 in P1(1) ============================== M000755 P1ax. Comb. FTF versions R equal role sc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (P1a only) ============================== M000756a P1a.T. R equal role branch stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1,2,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ============================== M000756b P1a.TE. R equal role branch ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3 in P1(1) ============================== M000757 P1ax.T. Comb. Ph. Versions R eql role br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (P1a.T only) ============================== M000758 P1a1/a2.T. R strength equal roles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R SAYS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R SAYS A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in P1a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in P1a.TE ============================== M000759 P1a1x1. 5-pt br summary R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x1. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax.T and P1a1/a2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) ============================== M000760 P1a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x2. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax and P1a1x1 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) ============================== M000761 P1b. Gore-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000762 P1b.T. Gore-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1b. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1b1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1b1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000763 P1b1/b2.T. Gore-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b1/b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GORE FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1b.T ============================== M000764 P1bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b.T and P1b1/b2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home ============================== M000765 P1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b and P1bx1 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000766 P1c. Bush-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000767 P1c.T. Bush-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1c. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK --> P1b.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000768 P1c1/c2.T. Bush-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c1/c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1c.T ============================== M000769 P1cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c.T and P1c1/c2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; FTF mode ============================== M000770 P1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c and P1cx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000771 P2a. self placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see P2a.T 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000772 P2a.T. R-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see P2a. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M000773 P2a1.T. How much tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a1.T. IF R THINKS TOUGHER REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2a3 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2a3 8. DK --> P2a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T ============================== M000774 P2a2.T. How much are regulatns a burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a2.T. IF R THINKS REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T ============================== M000775 P2ax1. 5-pt br summary R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax1. TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-LACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a.T and P2a1/a2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it ============================== M000776 P2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a and P2ax1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much about it ============================== M000777 P2aa. How important is envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2aa. ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000778 P2b. Gore placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2bb 2. --> P2bb 3. --> P2bb 4. --> P2bb 5. --> P2bb 6. --> P2bb 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK --> SKIP TO P2c OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000779 P2b.T. Gore-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000780 P2b1.T. Gore-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b1.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T ============================== M000781 P2b2.T. Gore-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR -->P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T ============================== M000782 P2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore envir regul Numeric P2bx1. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2b.T and P2b1/b2.T. 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000783 P2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bult from P2b and P2bx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000784 P2bb. Gore-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bb. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2b; 7,8,9 or NA in P2b.T ============================== M000785 P2c. Bush placemnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2cc 2. --> P2cc 3. --> P2cc 4. --> P2cc 5. --> P2cc 6. --> P2cc 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M000786 P2c.T. Bush-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000787 P2c1.T. Bush-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T ============================== M000788 P2c2.T. Bush-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T ============================== M000789 P2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx1. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c.T and P2c1/c2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M000790 P2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c and P2cx1. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000791 P2cc. Bush-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cc. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2c; 7,8,9 or NA in P2c.T ============================== M000792 P3. R expect to vote in Nov election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3. So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO P3c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P3c 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000793 P3a. Who will R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3a. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WILL VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P3c 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P3 ============================== M000794 P3b. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3b. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: IF INTENDED PRESIDENTIAL VOTE IS NOT NONE OR DK/RF: Would you say that your preference for [GORE/BUSH/BUCHANAN/OTHER] is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 5. NOT STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 8. DK --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or 0 in P3a ============================== M000795 P3c. If R voted, who would R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3c. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WOULD VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P4 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 9 in P3; 1-4,7,8,9 or NA in P3a ============================== M000796 P3d. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3d. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: IF R NAMES PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HE WOULD VOTE FOR IF VOTING: Would you say that your preference for is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0,8,9 in P3c ============================== M000797 P4. Which party will control the House MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P4. The next couple of questions are about what you think will happen as a result of the upcoming elections. After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000798 P5. Which party will control the Senate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P5. Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000799 P6. Interest in fair treatment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6. Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, HAVE INTEREST IN QUESTION --> P6a 5. NO, HAVEN'T HAD INTEREST --> P7 8. DK --> P7 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000800 P6a. Govt should ensure Blacks equ trtment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON SHOULD SEE TO IT THAT BLACK PEOPLE GET FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS 5. THIS IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK -->P7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P6 ============================== M000801 P6a1. Strength blacks equal trtmnt jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a1. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: IF R'S POSITION IS SEE TO FAIR TREATMENT/ IF R'S POSITION IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVT'S BUSINESS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,7,8,9 in P6a ============================== M000802 P6x. Summary blacks equal treatment jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P6x. How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P6,P6a,P6a1. 1. Strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 2. Not strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 4. Not strongly - not the government's business 5. Strongly - not the government's business 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no interest (5 in P6) ============================== M000803 P7. Preferences for blacks in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7. Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7a 5. AGAINST PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> section Q as randomly selected 8. DK --> section Q as randomly selected 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000804 P7a. Strength for preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7a. IF R FAVORS PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9,0 in P7 ============================== M000805 P7b. Strength against preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7b. IF R OPPOSES PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9,0 in P7 ============================== M000806 P7x. Summary preference for blacks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P7x. What about your opinion- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? Do you favor/oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P7 and P7a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000807 Q1. Budget deficit lg/sm since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1. As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. GOTTEN SMALLER 3. GOTTEN LARGER --> SKIP TO Q1b 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000808 Q1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1a. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS SMALLER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q1 ============================== M000809 Q1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1b. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS LARGER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LARGER 5. SOMEWHAT LARGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q1 ============================== M000810 Q1x. Summary budget deficit since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1x. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller/ larger or somewhat smaller/larger? SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q1 and Q1a/b. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much larger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000811 Q2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1 INCREASED 3 DECREASED 5 STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q3 8 DK --> SKIP TO Q3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000812 Q2a. How much inc/dec aid to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2a. IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS DECREASED SINCE 1992/ IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS INCREASED SINCE 1992: A lot or somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q2 ============================== M000813 Q2x. Summary assistance to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2x. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A lot or somewhat? SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q2 and Q2a. 1. Increases a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000814 Q3. Economy better/worse compared to 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q3b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000815 Q3a. Economy much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3a. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q3 ============================== M000816 Q3b. Economy much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3b. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q3 ============================== M000817 Q3x. Summary economy since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3 and Q3a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000818 Q4. Clinton made economy better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO Q4b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000819 Q4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4a. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q4 ============================== M000820 Q4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4b. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q4 ============================== M000821 Q4x. Summary Clinton effect on US econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4x. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q4 and Q4a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000822 Q5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q5. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000823 Q6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q6b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000824 Q6a. U.S. much more secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6a. IF R SAYS U.S. MORE SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q6 ============================== M000825 Q6b. U.S much less secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6b. IF R SAYS U.S. LESS SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q6 ============================== M000826 Q6x. Summary US secure from for enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more/less secure or somewhat more/ less secure? SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q6 and Q6a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Not changed very much 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000827 Q7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000828 Q7a. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q7 ============================== M000829 Q7b. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q7 ============================== M000830 Q7x. Summ- Clinton impact on U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more/less secure or somewhat more/less secure? SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q7 and Q7a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000831 Q8. U.S. crime rate better/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q8b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000832 Q8a. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8a. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q8 ============================== M000833 Q8b. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8b. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q8 ============================== M000834 Q8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8x. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q8 and Q8a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000835 Q9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q9b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000836 Q9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q9 ============================== M000837 Q9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q9 ============================== M000838 Q9x. Summary - Clinton impact on crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q9 and Q9a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000839 Q10. Moral climate btr/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q10b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000840 Q10a.Moral climate much/smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10a. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q10 ============================== M000841 Q10b.Moral climate much/smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10b. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q10 ============================== M000842 Q10x. Summary moral climate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q10 and Q10a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000843 Q11. Clinton made moral climate btr/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q11b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000844 Q11a.Clinton made moral climate much/swht btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q11 ============================== M000845 Q11b.Clinton made moral climate much/swht wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q11 ============================== M000846 Q11x. Summary - Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11x. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q11 and Q11a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, ; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre ============================== M000847 Q14a. Angry- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000848 Q14a1. Angry- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14a ============================== M000849 Q14b. Hopeful- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000850 Q14b1. Hopeful- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14b ============================== M000851 Q14c. Afraid- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000852 Q14c1. Afraid- how often Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14c ============================== M000853 Q14d. Proud- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000854 Q14d1. Proud- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14d ============================== M000855 Q15a/Q15a.T. Clinton trait-moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15a/Q15a.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is)'' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000856 Q15b/Q15b.T. Clinton trait-really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15b/Q15b.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000857 Q15c/Q15c.T. Clinton trait-knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15c/Q15c.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000858 Q15d/Q15d.T. Clinton trait-strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15d/Q15d.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000859 Q15e/Q15e.T. Clitnon trait-dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15e/Q15e.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000860 Q15f/Q15f.T. Clinton trait-intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15f/Q15f.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000861 Q15g/Q15g.T. Clinton trait-out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15g/Q15g.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre ============================== M000862 R1. How opinionated is R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1. Some people have opinions about almost everything; other people have opinions about just some things; and still other people have very few opinions. What about you? Would you say you have opinions about almost everything, about many things, about some things, or about very few things? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALMOST EVERYTHING 2. MANY THINGS 3. SOME THINGS 4. VERY FEW THINGS ============================== M000863 R1a. Fewer or more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEWER OPINIONS 3. ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER OF OPINIONS 5. MORE OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000864 R1a1. How much more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS MORE OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just somewhat more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 5. SOMEWHAT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 8. DK --> SKIP TO R2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in R1a ============================== M000865 R1a2. More much fewer opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS FEWER OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just somewhat fewer opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT FEWER OPINIONS 5. SOMEWHAT FEWER OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R1a ============================== M000866 R1x. Summary degree R opinionated MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1x. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? Would you say that you have a lot more/fewer opinions or just somewhat more/fewer opinions? SUMMARY: DEGREE R OPINIONATED --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R1a and R1a1/R1a2. 1. A lot fewer 2. Somewhat fewer 3. About the same 4. Somewhat more 5. A lot more 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000867 R2. Does R like respnsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2. Some people like to have responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, and other people don't like to have responsibility for situations like that. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE 3. DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R2b 5. NEITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000868 R2a. How much like respnbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2a. IF R SAYS R LIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you like it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> SKIP TO R3 5. SOMEWHAT --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R2 ============================== M000869 R2b. How much dislike rsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2b. IF R SAYS R DISLIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISLIKE IT A LOT 5. DISLIKE IT SOMEWHAT 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in R2 ============================== M000870 R2x. Summary like/dislike thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2x. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? Do you like/dislike it a lot or just somewhat? SUMMARY: R LIKE/DISLIKE FOR INTENSIVE THOUGHT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R2 and R2a/b. 1. Like it a lot 2. Like it somewhat 3. Neither like it nor dislike it 4. Dislike it somewhat 5. Dislike it a lot 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000871 R3. Like simple or complex problems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3. Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve more complex problems. Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or complex? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SIMPLE 5. COMPLEX 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000872 S1. Is religion important to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1. Do you consider religion to be an important part of your life, or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. IMPORTANT 5. NOT IMPORTANT --> SKIP TO S3 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO S3 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000873 S2. How much guidance from religion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2. IF R SAYS THAT RELIGION IS IMPORTANT: Would you say your religion provides some guidance in your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOME 3. QUITE A BIT 5. A GREAT DEAL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S1 ============================== M000874 S3/S3.T. How often does R pray MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3/S3.T. FTF: Please look at page 15 of the booklet. People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000875 S4/S4.T. How often does R read the bible MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4/S4.T. FTF: Still looking at page 15 of the booklet. Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000876 S5/S5.T. Bible is word of God or men MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5/S5.T. FTF: Please look at page 16 of the booklet. Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of your choice. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a short list of statements. Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of the statement you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE BIBLE IS THE ACTUAL WORD OF GOD AND IS TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 2. THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD BUT NOT EVERYTHING IN IT SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 3. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK WRITTEN BY MEN AND IS NOT THE WORD OF GOD. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000877 X1. Attend religious services MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1. Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or funerals? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO X2 5. NO --> SKIP TO X1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO X1a 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000878 X1a. Part of a church or denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1a. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Regardless of whether you now attend any religious services do you ever think of yourself as part of a particular church or denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3 5. NO --> GO TO Y1 8. DK --> GO TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,9,0 in X1 ============================== M000879 X2. Attend religious services how often MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you go to religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERY WEEK --> X2a 2. ALMOST EVERY WEEK --> X3 3. ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH --> X3 4. A FEW TIMES A YEAR --> X3 5. NEVER --> X3 8. DK --> X3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in X1 ============================== M000880 X2a. Attend relig serv > once/week MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2a. IF R SAYS ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES 'EVERY WEEK': Would you say you go to religious services once a week or more often than once a week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONCE A WEEK 2. MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9, 0 in X1; 2-5,8,9 or NA in X2 ============================== M000881 X3. Attend church checkpoint MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric X3. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH: / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: CHECKPOINT: CHURCH ATTENDANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3a 5. NO (5 in X1) --> X3b 9. RF (9 in X1) 0. INAP, 0 in X1 ============================== M000882 X3a. Attend protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> X7 3. JEWISH --> X6a 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,9 in X3 ============================== M000883 X3b. Belong protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> SKIP TO X7 3. JEWISH --> SKIP TO X6b 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 1,0,9 in X3 ============================== M000884 X4. Denomination/other specify MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric X4. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BAPTIST --> SKIP TO X4b 2. EPISCOPALIAN/ANGLICAN/CHURCH OF ENGLAND --> SKIP TO X7 3. LUTHERAN --> SKIP TO X4c 4. METHODIST --> SKIP TO X4d 5. JUST PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 6. PRESBYTERIAN --> SKIP TO X4e 7. REFORMED --> SKIP TO X4f 8. BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X4g 9. EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X7 10. CHRISTIAN OR JUST CHRISTIAN --> SKIP TO X4h 11. CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST --> SKIP TO X7 12. CHURCH (or CHURCHES) OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X4i 13. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 14. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 15. CHURCH OF GOD --> SKIP TO X4j 16. ASSEMBLY OF GOD --> SKIP TO X7 17. CONGREGATIONALIST --> SKIP TO X7 18. HOLINESS --> SKIP TO X4k 19. PENTACOSTAL --> SKIP TO X4k 20. FRIENDS, QUAKER --> SKIP TO X7 21. ORTHODOX, e.g. Greek, Russian (SPECIFY);C --> SKIP TO X7 22. NON-DENOMINATIONAL - PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 23. MORMONS --> SKIP TO X7 24. JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES --> SKIP TO X7 25. LATTER DAY SAINTS --> SKIP TO X7 26. UNITARIAN/UNIVERSALIST --> SKIP TO X7 27. BUDDHIST --> SKIP TO X7 28. HINDU --> SKIP TO X7 29. MUSLIM/ISLAM --> SKIP TO X7 30. NATIVE AMERICAN --> SKIP TO X7 95. NA 98. DK --> SKIP TO X7 99. RF 00. INAP, 9,0 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 2,3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b 90. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO X4m ============================== M000885 X4(1). (blanked) denomination other Character X4(1). IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': IF R DENOMINATION IS 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? TEXT OF X4 DENOMINATION CODE 90 'OTHER' (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality. ============================== M000886 X4a. Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4a. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION --> X7 2. AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES IN USA --> X7 3. AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION --> X7 4. INDEPENDENT BAPTIST --> X7 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,2-99 in X4 ============================== M000887 X4b. Independent Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4b. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: IF R'S CHURCH IS INDEPENDENT BAPTIST: Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LARGER BAPTIST GROUP [SPECIFY] --> X7 2. LOCAL --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-3,7,8,9,0 in X4a ============================== M000888 X4c. Lutheran group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4c. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS LUTHERAN IN X4: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH --> X7 2. MISSOURI SYNOD --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1,2,4-99 in X4 ============================== M000889 X4d. Methodist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4d. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS METHODIST IN X4: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. UNITED METHODIST CHURCH --> X7 2. AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-3,5-99 in X4 ============================== M000890 X4e. Presbyterian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4e. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS PRESBYTERIAN IN X4: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA (FORMERLY UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-5,7-99 in X4 ============================== M000891 X4f. Reformed group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4f. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS REFORMED IN X4: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH --> X7 2. THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-6,8-99 in X4 ============================== M000892 X4g. Brethren group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4g. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BRETHREN IN X4: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN --> X7 2. THE PLYMOUTH BRETHREN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-7,9-99 in X4 ============================== M000893 X4h. Christian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4h. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R SAYS DENOMINATION IS 'CHRISTIAN' IN X4: When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ," or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> X7 2. I AM JUST A CHRISTIAN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-9,11-99 in X4 ============================== M000894 X4i. Church of Christ group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4i. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF CHRIST IN X4: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 2. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-11,13-99 in X4 ============================== M000895 X4j. Church of God group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4j. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF GOD IN X4: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANDERSON, INDIANA --> X7 2. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE --> X7 3. CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-14,16-99 in X4 ============================== M000896 X4k. (blanked) holiness/pentacostal Character X4k. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS HOLINIESS OR PENTACOSTAL IN X4: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is the church called? HOLINESS OR PENTACOSTAL TEXT (18 and 19 in X4) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [THESE QUESTIONS ARE PROBES. USE THESE AND OTHERS TO GET AS MUCH SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== M000897 X4a-j. (blanked) other Character X4a-j. IF R'S DENOMINATION SPECIFIES 'OTHER' IN X4a-X4k: TEXT OF OTHER (SPECIFY) IN DENOMINATIONAL FOLLOWUPS: --------------------------------------------------------------------- This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== M000898 X4m. (blanked) other group/denomination Character X4m. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [USE ANY OR ALL AS NECESSARY; GET AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== M000899 X4m1. Is other group christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4m1. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: Is that group Christian? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X7 5. NO --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-30,95-99 in X4 ============================== M000900 X6a. Attend Jewish group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES AND IS JEWISH IN X3a: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX` --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3a ============================== M000901 X6b. Jewish denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF JEWISH IN X3b: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3b ============================== M000902 X7. Member place of worship MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X7. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation, temple or other place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X8 or Y1 5. NO --> X8 or Y1 8. DK --> X8 or Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a ============================== M000903 X8. Born-again christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X8. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF A CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: IF R IDENTIFIES A CHRISTIAN RELIGION IN X3a, X3b, X4 OR X4m1: Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is, have you personally had a conversion experience related to Jesus Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b; 5,8,9 or NA in X4m1 ============================== M000904 X9x. Religion summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric X9x. Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else / Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? JEWISH: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what/ Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? PROTESTANT OR SOMETHING ELSE: What church or denomination is that? IF BAPTIST: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? (INDEPENDENT BAPTIST:) Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? IF LUTHERAN: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? IF METHODIST: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? IF PRESBYTERIAN: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? IF REFORMED: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? IF BRETHREN: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what?' IF 'CHRISTIAN': When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ" or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? IF CHURCH OF CHRIST: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? IF CHURCH OF GOD: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? IF PENTECOSTAL OR HOLINESS: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is that church called? IF OTHER: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? IF OTHER: Is that group Christian? RELIGION SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable summarizes the information gathered in questions X3a/b, X4, X4a-m, X4m1, X6a/b. Information collected in the open-ended responses to the religion section component questions have been hand coded into this summary variable. NOTE: in 1 case, an R whose initial religious group was identified as Protestant was discovered, upon further probing, to be Roman Catholic. Codes 010-990 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does not attend religious services) ============================== M000905 Y1(1). Month of birth MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y1(1). What is the month, day and year of your birth? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-12 98. DK 99. RF; NA ============================== M000906 Y1(2). Day of birth (blanked) Numeric Y1(2). What is the month, day and year of your birth? DAY (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blanked. ============================== M000907 Y1(3). Year of birth MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9998 Numeric Y1(3). What is the month, day and year of your birth? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== M000908 Y1x. Respondent age MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y1x. What is the month, day and year of your birth? SUMMARY - RESPONDENT AGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Age was calculated by subtracting the year of birth from 2000. For cases where R refused to give year of birth or year of birth was NA in the survey variable, a check was made of Household listing information: if age of R was included in the Household listing, it was included here from the Household listing. Codes 17-96 and: 97. 97 and older 00. NA ============================== M000909 Y2. Marital status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y2. Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife) -- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212, 1381,1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in P000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner. 1. MARRIED 2. WIDOWED 3. DIVORCED 4. SEPARATED 5. NEVER MARRIED 6. PARTNERED, NOT MARRIED [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000910 Y3. Highest grade completed MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y3. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 98. DK 99. RF; NA ============================== M000911 Y3a. Diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y3a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF EDUCATION IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-16 or NA in Y3 ============================== M000912 Y3b. Highest degree earned MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y3b. IF HIGHEST GREADE OF EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that you have earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0-12, 99 in Y3 ============================== M000913 Y3x. R educ summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y3x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that you have earned? SUMMARY: R EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y3, Y3a, Y3b. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3, 1 in Y3a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y3, 96 in Y3b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y3b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b] 8. DK [98 in Y3, 8 in Y3a; 98 in Y3b] 9. NA [99 in Y3; 9 in Y3a; 99 or NA in Y3b] ============================== M000914 Y4. Highest grade of partner MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y4. IF MARRIED OR PARTNERED: What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 98. DK 99. RF; NA; INAP, 2-5,8,9,0 in Y2 ============================== M000915 Y4a. Partner diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y4a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-17, 99 in Y4 ============================== M000916 Y4b. Partner highest degree MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y4b. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1-12, 98, 99 in Y4 ============================== M000917 Y4x. Sp educ. Summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y4x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? SUMMARY: SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y4, Y4a, Y4b. Note: 3 cases [561,1017,1719] coded 98 (DK) for number of school years in Y4 and 'no' in Y4a (no high school diploma) are coded 2 here; 3 cases [77,1057,1799] where R indicated 12 years of schooling but DK for Y4a diploma are coded 2. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y4, 1 in Y4a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y4, 96 in Y4b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y4b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y4b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y4, 2-6 in Y4b] 8. DK [98 in Y4, 8 in Y4a; 98 in Y4b] 9. NA [99 in Y4; 9 in Y4a; 99 or NA in Y4b] ============================== M000918 Y6(1). Assigned employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(1). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? ASSIGNED EMPLOYMENT SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. This variable describes the series of employment questions to which R is initially assigned according to R's self- identification of employment status. By contrast, the Y6(2) and Y6(3) employment status summary variables are built using relevant information from R's Y6(1) self-identification and also from information obtained during questioning (especially number of hours worked). Initial series assignment from multiple mentions given by R for his or her own employment status is as follows: RET ONLY or (RET and any others) -->retired series HM/ST ONLY or (HM/ST and UN/DIS/WN/TLO) -->hmkr/st series DIS ONLY or (DIS and UN/WN/TLO) -->disabled series WN/TLO ONLY -->wrkg now series Note that Rs initially assigned per Y6(1) to the RETIRED, DISABLED or HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series are redirected from within those series to the WORKING NOW series if the R was also currently working (both series completed if retired or disabled). For this reason, the WORKING NOW series appears last in codebook variables: - P000921-000931 UNEMPLOYED [UN] - P000932-000944 RETIRED [RET] - P000945-000956 PERMANENTLY DISABLED [DIS] - P000957-000967 HOMEMAKER/STUDENT [HM/ST] - P000968-000978 WORKING NOW/TEMP. LAID OFF [WN/TLO] 1. Assigned WORKING NOW series - working now (Y7-Y7j) 2. Assigned WORKING NOW series - temporarily laid off (Y7-Y7j) 3. Assigned UNEMPLOYED series (Y9-Y10h) 4. Assigned RETIRED series (Y11-Y12j) 5. Assigned PERMANENTLY DISABLED series (Y13-Y14j) 6. Assigned HOMEMAKER series (Y15-Y16j) 7. Assigned STUDENT series (Y15-Y16j) ============================== M000919 Y6(2). 2 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(2). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 2 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built using Y5, Y12g, Y14g, Y15, Y7e. This is a summary which describes R's occupation status as categorized AFTER all information has been collected. Note that case 1263 has been coded 81 rather than 18 although number of hours worked (P000974) was coded as DK; for this case, information in the thumbnail indicated that R worked only a few hours a week. 10. WORKING NOW only 15. WORKING NOW and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 16. WORKING NOW and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or more hours per week 17. WORKING NOW and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 18. WORKING NOW and student (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 20. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 40. UNEMPLOYED 50. RETIRED, no other occupation 51. RETIRED and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 60. PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working 61. PERMANENTLY DISABLED and working now, currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 70. HOMEMAKER, no other occupation 71. HOMEMAKER and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 75. HOMEMAKER and student (R volunteers), no other occupation 80. STUDENT, no other occupation 81. STUDENT and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 00. NA ============================== M000920 Y6(3). 1 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(3). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 1 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y6(2) 1. R WORKING NOW (working now or working 20 hours or more per week if also retired, permanently disabled, homemaker or student 2. R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF [20 in Y6(2)] 4. R UNEMPLOYED [40 in Y6(2)] 5. R RETIRED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [50,51 in Y6(2)] 6. R PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [60,61 in Y6(2)] 7. R HOMEMAKER, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [also nonworking Rs who are both homemakers and students-- 70,71,75 in Y6(2)] 8. R STUDENT, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week ([80,81 in Y6(2)] 0. NA ============================== M000921 Y9. R unemp: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y9. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000922 Y10a(1). 2-digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(1). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Codes 1-71 and: 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000922a Y10a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10a(2). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000923 Y10a(3). 1-digit occup summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(3). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? UNEMPLOYED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000924 Y10a(4). Prestige code (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y10a(4). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y10a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000925 Y10b. R unemp: past industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10b. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000926 Y10c. R unemp: past self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10c. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y10e 8. DK --> Y10e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 ============================== M000927 Y10d. R unemp: past employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10d. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10c ============================== M000928 Y10e. R unemp: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10e. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 ============================== M000929 Y10f. R unemp: hrs/wk 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y10f. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000930 Y10g. R unemp: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10g. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000931 Y10h. R unemp: worry about find job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10h. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10g ============================== M000932 Y11(1). Retired: month of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y11(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- MONTH: 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER 96. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA ============================== M000933 Y11(2). Retired: year of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Y11(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9996. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== M000934 Y12a(1). 2-digit occup retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000934a Y12a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12a(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000935 Y12a(3). 1-digit occup summary retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(3). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000936 Y12a(4). Prestige code (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y12a(4). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y12a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000937 Y12b. R ret: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12b. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000938 Y12c. R ret: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12c. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y12e 8. DK --> Y12e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000939 Y12d. R ret: employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12d. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12c ============================== M000940 Y12e. R ret: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12e. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y12g 8. DK --> Y12g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000941 Y12f. R ret: hours/wk work 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y12f. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF HAS HAD A JOB IN LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000942 Y12g. R ret: working for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12g. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000943 Y12h. R ret: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12h. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y12g ============================== M000944 Y12j. R ret: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12j. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y12h ============================== M000945 Y13. R disabled: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y13. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y14h 8. DK --> Y14h 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000946 Y14a(1). 2-digit occup disabled MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(1). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== M000946a Y14a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) disable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(2). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== M000947 Y14a(3). 1-digit occup summary disabled MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y14a(3). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000948 Y14a(4). Prestige code (blanked) disable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y14a(4). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y14a(2) 00.00 INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000949 Y14b. R dis: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14b. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== M000950 Y14c. R dis: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14c. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y14e 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13 ============================== M000951 Y14d. R dis: work for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14d. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14c ============================== M000952 Y14e. R dis: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14e. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y14g 8. DK --> Y14g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13 ============================== M000953 Y14f. R dis: hours/wk work 6 mnths MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y14f. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000954 Y14g. R dis: working for pay now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14g. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Rs who respond "yes" to this question are also asked the WORKING NOW series for current employment. 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e ============================== M000955 Y14h. R dis: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14h. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/ IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./ IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in Y13; 8,9 or NA in Y14e; 1,8,9 or NA in Y14g ============================== M000956 Y14j. R dis: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y14j. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/ IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./ IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW: IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14h ============================== M000957 Y15. Homemaker/student: work for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1) ============================== M000958 Y15a. Hmk/stu: work last 6 mon MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16a. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: In the last six months, did you do any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y16h 8. DK --> Y16h 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y16 ============================== M000959 Y16a(1). 2-digit occup hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y16a(1). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== M000959a Y16a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y16a(2). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== M000960 Y16a(3). 1-digit occup summary hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y16a(3). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000961 Y16a(4). Prestige code (blanked) hmk/stu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y16a(4). IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y16a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000962 Y16b. Hmk/stu: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y16b. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA in Y16a ============================== M000963 Y16c. Hmk/stu: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16c. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y16f 8. DK --> Y16f 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a ============================== M000964 Y16d. Hmk/stu: worked for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16d. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: IF R WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16c ============================== M000965 Y16f. Hmk/stu: hrs/wk wrk last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y16f. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000966 Y16h. Hmk/stu: looking for work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16h. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y16 ============================== M000967 Y16j. Hmk/stu: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16j. IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16h ============================== M000968 Y7a(1). 2-digit occup R work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y7a(1). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] ============================== M000968a Y7a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) R wk now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y7a(2). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] ============================== M000969 Y7a(3). 1-digit occup summary R work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y7a(3). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R WORKING NOW/TLO: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) ============================== M000970 Y7a(4). Prestige code (blanked) R wk now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y7a(4). IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you do?) What are your most important activities or duties? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 98.00 903,904,905 in Y7a(2) 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== M000971 Y7b. Work now/TLO: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y7b. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: What kind of (business/industry) is that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)] ============================== M000972 Y7c. Work now/TLO: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7c. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: Do you work for someone else, are you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y7e 8. DK --> Y7e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working ============================== M000973 Y7d. Work now/TLO: work for govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7d. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: IF NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Are you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y7c ============================== M000974 Y7e. Work now/TLO: hours work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y7e. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: About how many hours do you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000975 Y7f. Work now/TLO: work hours right MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7f. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: IF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED IS NOT DK/REF: Is that more hours than you want to work, fewer hours than you want to work, or generally about right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE 3. FEWER 5. ABOUT RIGHT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 996-998 in Y7e ============================== M000976 Y7g. Work now/TLO: worry lose job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7g. IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: How worried are you about losing your job in the near future: a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 3. SOMEWHAT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working ============================== M000977 Y7h. Work now: out work/layoff last 6mo MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7h. IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: Were you out of work or laid off at any time during the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working ============================== M000978 Y7j. Work now: reduction in hrs/pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7j. IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/ IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING: During the last six months, have you had a reduction in your work hours or had to take a cut in pay at any time for reasons other than illness or personal choice? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working ============================== M000979 Y17(1). Stacked - 2 digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y17(1). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? STACKED - 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(1), Y10a(1), Y12a(1), Y14a(1). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. The original 3-digit 1990 US Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect Respondents' anonymity. See CENSUS OCCUPATION Master Code. Codes 01-71 and: 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000979a Y17(1a). Stacked - 3 dig occup (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y17(1a). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - 3-DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(2), Y10a(2), Y12a(2), Y14a(2). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000980 Y17(2). Stacked - 1 digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y17(2). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(3), Y10a(3), Y12a(3), Y14a(3). This variable combines employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a coded here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000981 Y17(3). Stacked - occ prestige (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y17(3). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What is/was your main occupation? What sort of work do/did you do? What are/were your most important activities or duties? STACKED - OCCUPATION PRESTIGE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7a(4), Y10a(4), Y12a(4), Y14a(4). This variable represents employment data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are not used). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have their current occupation from Y7a represented here. Retirees who are also currently working have past occupation from Y12a represented here rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. 98.00 903,904,905 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2) 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2) 00.00. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000982 Y17(4). Stacked - industry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y17(4). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: What do/did they make or do where you work/ed? What kind of a business or industry is/was that? STACKED - OCCUPATION INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7b, Y10b, Y12b, Y14b. This variable combines industry data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for industry of employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have industry of their current occupation from Y7b coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have industry of past occupation from Y12b coded here rather than industry of current occupation in Y7b. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000983 Y17(5). Stacked - work for self MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(5). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED:/ IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Do/did you work for someone else, are/were you self- employed, or what? STACKED - WORK FOR SELF --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7c, Y10c, Y12c, Y14c. This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have description of their current occupation from Y7c coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have description of past occupation from Y12c coded here rather than for current occupation in Y7c. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000984 Y17(6). Stacked - employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(6). IF R WORKED NOT EXCLUSIVELY FOR SELF and: IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: / IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Are/were you employed by a federal, state or local government? STACKED - EMPLOYED BY GOVERNMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7d, Y10d, Y12d, Y14d. This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment in the past 6 months are omitted). The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have description of their current occupation from Y7d coded here. Retirees who are also currently working have description of past occupation from Y12d coded here rather than for current occupation in Y7d. If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13; 5,8,9,NA in Y10c/Y12c/Y14c/Y7c ============================== M000985 Y17(7). Stacked - hours per week MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y17(7). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: / IF R IS DISABLED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: About how many hours do/did you work on your job in the average week? STACKED - HOURS WORKING/WORKED PER WEEK --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7e, Y10f, Y12f, Y14f. This variable combines data for all Rs currently working or who have worked within the past six months: - Employed or temp. laid off [present employment Y7e], - Unemployed [employment within past 6 months Y10f], - Retired [employment within past 6 months Y12f], - Permanently disabled [employment within past 6 months Y14f]. Note that homemakers or students without current outside employment are coded 00 [Y16f data are NOT used]. The disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently working have data for their current occupation from Y7e coded here. For retirees, since data for number of hours worked describes recent employment within past 6 months, this may in effect describe pre-retirement employment (i.e. for very recent retirees), current employment (i.e. for working retirees at a post-retirement job that has been held in the last 6 months), or employment that is neither pre-retirement nor a current job bur rather an interim position. 1-168 996. INAP, 70,75,80,0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9; 5,8,9,NA in Y13; 5,8,9,NA in Y10e, Y12e or Y14e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M000986 Y17(8). Stacked - worr abt los/find job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(8). IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ : IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED:/ IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: How worried are you about losing your job/ not being able to find a job in the near future: A LOT, SOMEWHAT, or NOT MUCH AT ALL? STACKED - WORRIED ABOUT LOSING/FINDING JOB --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y7g, Y10h, Y12j, Y14j. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Employed or temp. laid off [Y7g], (including working retired and working disabled) - Unemployed [Y10h], - Retired and not working [Y12j], - Permanently disabled and not working [Y14j]. Note that homemakers or students without current outside employment are coded 0 [Y16j data are NOT used]. 1. A LOT 3. SOMEWHAT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y10g; 5,8,9,NA in Y12h; 5,8,9,NA in Y14h ============================== M000987 Y17(9). Stacked - job in past 6 mos. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(9). IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY / IF R IS RETIRED/ IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the past 6 months? STACKED - JOB IN PAST 6 MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y10e, Y12e, Y14e. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Unemployed [Y10e], - Retired [Y12e], - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked [Y14e] NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16a are NOT included. 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9; 5,8,9,NA in Y13 ============================== M000988 Y17(10). Stacked - looking for work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(10). IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: / IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: / IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT WORKING NOW: Are you looking for work at the present time? STACKED - LOOKING FOR WORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built from Y10g, Y12h, Y14h. This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently: - Unemployed [Y10g], - Retired, if R is not currently working [Y12h], - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked but is not currently working [Y14h]. NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16h are NOT included. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2); 1,8,9,NA in Y12g; 1,8,9,NA in Y14g ============================== M000989 Y17(11). Stacked - ever work for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17(11). IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: / IF R IS DISABLED: Have you ever done any work for pay? STACKED - EVER WORK FOR PAY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y4. Built from Y9 and Y13. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 10,15,17,18,20,50,51,70,71,75,80,81,0 in Y6(2) ============================== M000990 Y25. Anyone in HH belong to union MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25. Do you or anyone else in this household belong to a labor union? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y26 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y26 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000991a Y25a1. Who belongs to union #1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a1. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION: Who is it that belongs? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25 ============================== M000991b Y25a2. Who belongs to union #2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a2. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION Who is it that belongs? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention ============================== M000991c Y25a3. Who belongs to union #3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y25a3. IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION Who is it that belongs? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RESPONDENT 2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER 3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER 4. SOMEONE ELSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention ============================== M000992 Y26. IWR chkpt: # of Persons age 14+ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Y26. INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS R THE ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: This variable was completed by interviewers. In 67 cases, households corresponding to more than 1 adult were incorrectly coded 1 in this variable; as a result of the effect upon the skip pattern, household income was not asked. For these cases, the following revisions have been made to the original data: P000992 recoded to 5; P000993 [HH income] and P000994 [HH income summary] recoded to 00 NA; P000995 [R income] assigned the value formerly coded in P000996; P000996 recoded to 96 Inap. 1. YES, R IS ONLY HH MEMBER 14+ --> SKIP TO Y28 5. NO, THERE ARE OTHER HH MEMBERS 14+ 9. NA ============================== M000993 Y27/Y27.T. HH income - others in HH 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y27/Y27.T. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: Please look at page 18 of the booklet. Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income of all members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of income categories. Please tell me which category best describes the. total income of all members of your family living in your house in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your family's income. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 1,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA ============================== M000994 Y27x. HH income -all HHs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y27x. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+ / IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: Please look at page 18 of the booklet. Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income of all members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of income categories. Please tell me which category best describes the. total income of all members of your family living in your house in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your family's income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. SUMMARY: HOUSEHOLD INCOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] This variables combines data for Respondents from households with other members age 14 and older and data for Respondents who are the only member age 14 and older. 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA (9 in ============================== M000995 Y27a/Y27a.T. R income - others in HH 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y27a/Y27a.T. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and the rest of your family). Please look at this page and tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family. Please tell me which category best describes the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 1,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA ============================== M000996 Y28/Y28.T. R income - only HH member 14+ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y28/Y28a.T. IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 96. INAP, 5,9 in Y26 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA ============================== M000997 Y28x. R income -all HHs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y28x. IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+ / IF YES, R IS ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+: FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and the rest of your family). Please look at this page and tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income group that includes the income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: Now we are interested in the income that you yourself received in 1999, not including any of the income received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family. Please tell me which category best describes the income you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER: I am going to read you a list of all icome categories. Please tell me which category best describes the total income you had in 1999 before taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I get to your income category. SUMMARY: R INCOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?] 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 98. DK 99. Z. REFUSED 00. NA (9 in ============================== M000998 Y29. Ever think of self as wrk/mid class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29. (Not using the booklet) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y29b 8. DK --> Y29b 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M000999 Y29a. Which one (workng or middle class) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29a. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MEMBER OF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS: Which one? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MIDDLE CLASS --> Y29c 5. WORKING CLASS --> Y29e 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> Y30 8. DK --> Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y29 ============================== M001000 Y29b. If had to choose class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29b. IF R DOESN'T CONSIDER SELF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS: Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MIDDLE CLASS --> SKIP TO Y29c 5. WORKING CLASS --> SKIP TO Y29e 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO Y30 8. DK --> SKIIP TO Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1,5 or NA in Y29a ============================== M001001 Y29c. Middle class- avg or upper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29c. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS: Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AVERAGE MIDDLE 5. UPPER MIDDLE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b ============================== M001002 Y29d. Middle class - feel close to class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29d. IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS: Would you say you feel pretty close to middle class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSE --> SKIP TO Y30 5. NOT CLOSE --> SKIP TO Y30 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y30 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b ============================== M001003 Y29e. Working class - avg or upper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29e. IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS: Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AVERAGE WORKING 5. UPPER WORKING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b ============================== M001004 Y29f. Working class -feel close to class MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29f. IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS: Would you say you feel pretty close to working class people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than to people in other classes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSE 5. NOT CLOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b ============================== M001005 Y29x. Soc.class summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y29x. (Not using the booklet) There's been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? (IF YES:) Which one? (IF NO:) Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call yourself middle class or working class? (IF MIDDLE CLASS:) Would you say that you are about average middle class or that you are in the upper part of the middle class? (IF WORKING CLASS:) Would you say that you are about average working class or that you are in the upper part of the working class? SUMMARY: R SOCIAL CLASS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y29, Y29a, Y29b,Y29c,Y29e. 1. Average working class 2. Working class -- NA if average or upper 3. Upper working class 4. Average middle class 5. Middle class - NA if average or upper 6. Upper middle class 7. Other 8. DK in Y29b 9. RF in Y29b 0. NA in Y29/Y29b ============================== M001006a Y30(1). Racial group #1 self-description MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30(1). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 1 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA ============================== M001006b Y30(2). Racial group #2 self-description MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30(2). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 2 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 00. NA; INAP, no further mention ============================== M001006c Y30(3). Racial group #3 self-description MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30(3). What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? MENTION 3 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. BLACK 20. ASIAN 30. NATIVE AMERICAN 40. HISPANIC OR LATINO 50. WHITE 60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC. 70. JEWISH 75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN 76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER 79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS 80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN' 90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC. 00. NA; INAP, no further mention ============================== M001007 Y30a. Both parents born in U.S.? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y30a. Were both of your parents born in this country? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO ============================== M001008 Y30b(1). Ethnic/nationality group #1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30b(1). In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? MENTION 1 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Codes 1-89, 91-94 and: 90. None 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA ============================== M001009 Y30b(2). Ethnic/nationality group #2 MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y30b(2). In addition to being American, what do you consider your main ethnic group or nationality group? MENTION 2 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Codes 1-89,91-94 and: 90. None 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001010 Y30bx. IWR ckpt: >2 ethnic mentions? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Y30bx1. INTERVIEWER CHECKPPOINT: NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents who have identified more than one group are asked the 'choice' question Y30c. 0. NO NATIONALITY/GROUP MENTIONED 1. ONE NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUP MENTIONED 2. 2 OR MORE NATIONALITY/GROUPS MENTIONED 9. RESPONDENT REFUSED OR DK/NA ANSWER TO NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY ============================== M001010a Y30bx2. Number of ethnic groups mentioned MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30bx2. NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS MENTIONED BY R --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the exact number of mentions given by R 00. No mention (0 in Y30bx1) 01. One mention 02. Two mentions . . 06. Six mentions 96. Ethnicity question NA 98. R responded DK to ethnicity question 99. R refused ethnicity question ============================== M001011 Y30c. Choice of ethnic/nationality group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y30c. IF MORE THAN 1 NATIONALITY/ETHNIC GROUP IDENTIFIED: With which of these groups do you most closely identify? CHOICE - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP --------------------------------------------------------------------- See ETHNICITY master code. Rs giving only 1 mention to Y22 were not asked this question; their single response to Y22 has been duplicated in this variable. Note that this variable was coded according to IWR indentification of number of ethnic groups mentioned; in some instances, the IWR counted only 1 mention when in fact more than 1 was given by R. For such cases, the 'choice' variable (Y30c) was unasked. Codes 1-89,91-94 and: 90. None; neither 95. Both/all of them 96. 'American' 97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; 0,9 in Y30bx1 ============================== M001012 Y30x/Y31. Spanish or Hispanic descent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y30x/Y31. INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP MENTIONED AS MAIN GROUP? (IF NO:) Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent? IS R OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- The question about Spanish or Hispanic descent was directed to the respondent at the interviewer's discretion if the interviewer decided that R had not already mentioned a Spanish or Hispanic group in the ethnicity mentions. In a few cases, mentions coded 4,5,8,12 or 16 in Y30b(1) or Y30b(2) contradict what has been coded in this checkpoint. Note that, if R gave more than 2 mentions in Y30, the code for the specific Spanish or Hispanic group may not be represented in the 2 variables for Y30. See also Pre-Csheet.37 and Pre-Csheet.28 (P000068,P000069) and Post-Csheet.32 and Post-Csheet.33 (P000184d, P000184e). 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO Z1 8. DK --> SKIP TO Z1 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M001013 Y31a/Y31a.T. Category of Hispanic descnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y31a/Y31a.T. IF R MENTIONED SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP/ IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS SPANISH OR HISPANIC DESCENT: FTF: Please look at page 19 of the booklet and tell me which category best describes your Hispanic origin. TELEPHONE: Would you describe your Hispanic origin as Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin American, Central American, or Spanish? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [CODE SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP W/O ASKING, IF R Y31a MENTIONS ONE OF THE RESPONSE OPTIONS BELOW] 1. MEXICAN 2. PUERTO RICAN 3. CUBAN 4. LATIN AMERICAN 5. CENTRAL AMERICAN 6. SPANISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y30x/Y31 ============================== M001014 Z1. Where R grew up-ICPSR st/cntry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 998 Numeric Z1. Where was it that you grew up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNITED STATES: WHICH STATE OR STATES?] Use STATE AND COUNTRY codes 101-997 and: 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== M001015 Z2. FTF- urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Z2. FTF: Looking at page 20 of the booklet. Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For telephone format, see Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T 1. ON A FARM 2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE) 4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000) 5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000) 6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY 7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000) 8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY 9. DK 0. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M001016 Z2.T. Phone -urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2.T. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. ON A FARM 3. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 5. IN A CITY 7. OR, IN A SUBURB OF A CITY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode ============================== M001017 Z2a. Phone -urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2a.T. IF R BROUGHT UP IN A CITY: TELEPHONE: Were you mostly brought up in. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE 3. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY 50,000-100,000 5. IN A LARGE CITY, 100,000-500,000 7. OR, IN A VERY LARGE CITY, OVER 500,000 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,7,8,9,0 in Z2.T ============================== M001018 Z2b. Phone - urbanicity where grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2b.T. IF R BROUGHT UP IN A SUBURB OF A CITY: TELEPHONE: Were you mostly brought up in. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST] For FTF format, see Z2. 1. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY (100,000 TO 500,000 PEOPLE) 5. OR IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000 PEOPLE) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,5,8,9,0 in Z2.T ============================== M001019 Z2x. Comb. Summary where R grew up MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z2x. FTF: Looking at page 20 of the booklet. Looking at this list, please tell me where you were mostly brought up? TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a list of categories. Please tell me which category best describes where you were mostly brought up? Were you mostly brought up in. SUMMARY: SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GREW UP --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z2 and Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T. 1. ON A FARM 2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM 3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE) 4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000) 5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000) 6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY 7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000) 8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M001020a Z3(1). Mos. -how long lived in community MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z3(1). (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-23 and: 96. ALL MY LIFE 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001020b Z3(2). Yrs. -how long lived in community MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric Z3(2). (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? YEARS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-89 and: 995. INAP, 96 in Z3(1) 997. NA 998. DK 999. RF ============================== M001020c Z3x. Summ. - how long lived in community MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z3x. (Not using the booklet) How long have you lived in your present (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)? SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN COMMUNITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z3(1) and Z3(2). 0. O-11 months 1. 12-23 months 2. 2 years . . 89. 89 years 96. 'All my life' 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001021a Z4(1)/Z4(1).T. Mos.-length resid in home MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z4(1)/Z4(1).T. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-23 and: 96. ALL MY LIFE 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001021b Z4(2)/Z4(1).T. Yrs.-length resid in home MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric Z4(2)/Z4(2).T. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? YEARS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-100 and: 995. INAP, 96 in Z4(1)/Z4(1).T 997. NA 998. DK 999. RF ============================== M001021c Z4x. Summ. - length residence in home MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 97 Numeric Z4x. FTF: How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)? TELEPHONE: How long have you lived in your current home? SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN HOME --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z4(1)/Z4(1).T and Z4(2)/Z4(2).T. 0. O-11 months 1. 12-23 months 2. 2 years . . 89. 89 years 96. 'All my life' 97. NA 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001022 Z5. Does R family own/rent home MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z5. (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OWN HOUSE 5. PAY RENT 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M001023 Z8. Does R have children MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z8. These are the last few questions. Often we find that people who have children or commute great distances have less time to participate in politics. How about you? Do you have any children? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (INCLUDE STEP AND ADOPTED CHILDREN) 1. YES 3. YES, STEPCHILDREN/ADOPTED [VOL] 5. NO --> SKIP TO Z9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Z9 9. RF 0. NA ============================== M001024 Z8a. How many children R has under 18 MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Z8a. IF R HAS ANY CHILDREN: How many children do you have under 18? --------------------------------------------------------------------- O. --> SKIP TO Z9 1-25. 95. NA 96. INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Z8 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001025 Z8b. R's children under 18 living w/R MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Z8b. IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: How many of them live with you at least half of the time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- O. --> SKIP TO Z9 1-25. 95. NA 96. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001026a Z8c(1). Mention 1 minor child age MD1: EQ 95, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z8c(1). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a 98. DK 99. RF ============================== M001026b Z8c(2). Mention 2 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(2). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026c Z8c(3). Mention 3 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(3). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026d Z8c(4). Mention 4 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(4). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026e Z8c(5). Mention 5 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(5). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026f Z8c(6). Mention 6 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(6). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026g Z8c(7). Mention 7 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(7). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001026h Z8c(8). Mention 8 minor child age MD: EQ 95 Numeric Z8c(8). IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD: What are the ages of your children? MENTION 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-17 95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention ============================== M001027 Z9. How many miles R drives per day MD1: EQ 998, MD2: GE 999 Numeric Z9. (And finally), about how many miles do you drive in a typical day? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-996 997. 997 and more 998. DK 999. NA ============================== M001028 ZZ0. Education estimate if missed in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ0. IF HIGHEST GRADE AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING / IF HIGHEST GRADE <12 AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING: ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO WAY OF BEING 100% ACCURATE, PLEASE GIVE YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE RESPONDENT'S PROBABLE APPROXIMATE EDUCATION LEVEL [IF YOU FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN 2 CHOICES, SELECT 'OTHER' AND EXPLAIN] --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LOW - PROBABLY LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 2. PROBABLY HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 3. AT LEAST SOME COLLEGE 4. OTHER (SPECIFY) 0. NA; INAP, education data not missing ============================== M001029 ZZ1. IWR obs: R gender Numeric ZZ1. R's sex is: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE 2. FEMALE ============================== M001030 ZZ2. FTF IWR obs: R race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric ZZ2. FTF: R's race is: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WHITE 2. BLACK 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M001031a ZZ3(1). FTF: #1 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(1). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode ============================== M001031b ZZ3(2). FTF: #2 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(2). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention ============================== M001031c ZZ3(3). FTF: #3 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(3). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention ============================== M001031d ZZ3(4). FTF: #4 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(4). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention ============================== M001031e ZZ3(5). FTF: #5 others present during IW MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric ZZ3(5). FTF: Others present at time of interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention ============================== M001032 ZZ4. IWR obs: R cooperation MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ4. R's cooperation was: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR 5. VERY POOR 0. NA ============================== M001033 ZZ5. IWR obs: R informed about politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ5. R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA ============================== M001034 ZZ6. IWR obs: R intelligence MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ6. R's apparent intelligence: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA ============================== M001035 ZZ7. IWR obs: R suspicious MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ7. How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS 2. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS 3. VERY SUSPICIOUS 0. NA ============================== M001036 ZZ8. IWR obs: R interest in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ8. Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA ============================== M001037 ZZ9. IWR obs: R sincerity MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ9. How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETE SINCERE --> ZZ10 3. USUALLY SINCERE --> ZZ9a 5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE --> ZZ9a 0. NA ============================== M001038 ZZ9a. IWR: obs: insincere in what part(blanked) Character ZZ9a. IF NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE: Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you doubted R's sincerity? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER] This variable is blanked. ============================== M001039 ZZ10. IWR obs: R report income correctly MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ10. FTF: Do you feel R reported income accurately? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, THINK R REPORTED INCOME CORRECTLY 2. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME INCORRECTLY 3. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME DISHONESTLY 4. R REFUSED INCOME Q's 0. NA; INAP, phone mode ============================== M001040 ZZ10a. IWR obs: est income -surv inc off MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric ZZ10a. IF R DID NOT REPORT INCOME OR IWR SUSPECTS DID NOR REPORT CORRECTLY: If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's family income is (before taxes in 1999). --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999 2. B. $5,000-$9,999 3. C. $10,000-$14,999 4. D. $15,000-$24,999 5. E. $25,000-$34,999 6. F. $35,000-$49,999 7. G. $50,000-$64,999 8. H. $65,000-$74,999 9. J. $75,000-$84,999 10. K. $85,000-$94,999 11. M. $95,000-$104,999 12. N. $105,000-$114,999 13. P. $115,000-$124,999 14. Q. $125,000-$134,999 15. R. $135,000-$144,999 16. S. $145,000-$154,999 17. T. $155,000-$164,999 18. U. $165,000-$174,999 19. V. $175,000-$184,999 20. W. $185,000-$194,999 21. X. $195,000-$199,999 22. Y. $200,000 and over 97. DK 98. Y. Impossible to estimate 00. NA; INAP, 1 in ZZ10; phone mode ============================== M001041a ZZ11(1). Mention 1 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(1). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA ============================== M001041b ZZ11(2). Mention 2 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(2). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041c ZZ11(3). Mention 3 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(3). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041d ZZ11(4). Mention 4 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(4). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041e ZZ11(5). Mention 5 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(5). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041f ZZ11(6). Mention 6 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(6). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041g ZZ11(7). Mention 7 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(7). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041h ZZ11(8). Mention 8 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(8). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001041j ZZ11(9). Mention 9 - R reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(9). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY) 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; no further mention ============================== M001042 Pre.Rand.A4/A5. Order-Gore,GWB lik/dis MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.A4/A5. Order of Gore and Bush in Pre A4-A5 Likes/dislikes --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore first 2. GW Bush first 9. NA ============================== M001043 Pre.Rand.C1b. Pos-Gore in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1b. Position of Gore in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: ============================== M001044 Pre.Rand.C1c. Pos-GW Bush in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1c. Position of GW Bush in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA ============================== M001045 Pre.Rand.C1d. Pos-Buchanan in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1d. Position of Buchanan in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA ============================== M001046 Pre.Rand.C1e. Pos-Nader in thermoms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1e. Position of Nader in Pre Thermometers C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and: 9. NA ============================== M001047 Pre.Rand.C1f/g. Pos-Mccain, Bradley ther MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1f/g. Position of McCain and Bradley in Pre Thermometers C1f-C1g / C1f.T-C1g.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. McCain 6th name, Bradley 7th name 2. Bradley 6th name, McCain 7th name 9. NA ============================== M001048 Pre.Rand.C1h/k. Pos-Cheney,Liebermn ther MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C1h/k. Position of Lieberman and Cheney in Pre Thermometers C1h-C1j / C1h.T-C1j.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Lieberman 8th name, Cheney 9th name 2. Cheney 8th name, Lieberman 9th name 9. NA ============================== M001049 Pre.Rand.C2. Order-parties in therms MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.C2. Order of 3 major parties in Pre thermometers C2a-C2c --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic 1st, Republican 2nd, Reform 3rd 2. Democratic 1st, Reform 2nd, Republican 3rd 3. Republican 1st, Democratic 2nd, Reform 3rd 4. Republican 1st, Reform 2nd, Democratic 3rd 5. Reform 1st, Democratic 2nd, Republican 3rd 6. Reform 1st, Republican 2nd, Democratic 3rd 9. NA ============================== M001050 Pre.Rand.D1/D3. Order-parties in lik/dis MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.D1/D3. Order of 2 major parties in Pre 'Likes-Dislikes' D1-D2/D3-D4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic party first (D1-D2), Republican party 2nd (D3-D4) 2. Republican Party first (D1-D2), Democratic party 2nd (D3-D4) 9. NA ============================== M001051 Pre.Rand.F1-F3. Order-Gore, GWB, Buchn MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1-F3. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Affects series F1,F2,F3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd 5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd 9. NA ============================== M001052 Pre.Rand.F1a. Pos-angry -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1. Pre: Position of Angry among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001053 Pre.Rand.F1b. Pos-hopeful -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001054 Pre.Rand.F1c. Pos-afraid -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1c. Pre: Position of Afraid among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001055 Pre.Rand.F1d. Pos-proud -Gore affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F1d. Pre: Position of Proud among Gore Affects F1a-F1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001056 Pre.Rand.F2a. Pos-angry -GW Bush affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2a. Pre: Position of Angry among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001057 Pre.Rand.F2b. Pos-hopeful -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001058 Pre.Rand.F2c. Pos-afraid -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2c. Pre: Position of Afraid among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001059 Pre.Rand.F2d. Pos-proud -GWB affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F2d. Pre: Position of Proud among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001060 Pre.Rand.F3a. Pos-angry -Buchnn affects MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3a. Pre: Position of Angry among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001061 Pre.Rand.F3b. Pos-hopeful -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3b. Pre: Position of Hopeful among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001062 Pre.Rand.F3c. Pos-afraid -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3c. Pre: Position of Afraid among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001063 Pre.Rand.F3d. Pos-proud -Buchnn affcts MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.F3d. Pre: Position of Proud among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA ============================== M001064 Pre.Rand.G3-G5. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/con MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.G3-G5. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements G3-G5 / G3.T-G5.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton placement was always first. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 9. NA ============================== M001065 Pre.Rand.G8-G10.E. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/c MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.G8-10.E. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Liberal-Conservative placements G8.E-G10.E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton placement was always first. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th ============================== M001066 Pre.Rand.K2-K4. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2-K4. Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Traits series K2,K3,K4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd 4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd 5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd 6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd 9. NA ============================== M001067 Pre.Rand.K2a. Order-moral -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2a. Pre: Order of Moral among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001068 Pre.Rand.K2b. Order-cares -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001069 Pre.Rand.K2c. Order-knowldg -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001070 Pre.Rand.K2d. Order-leader -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001071 Pre.Rand.K2e. Order-dishon -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001072 Pre.Rand.K2f. Order-intell -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001073 Pre.Rand.K2g. Ord-out touch -Gore traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K2g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Gore traits K2a-K2g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001074 Pre.Rand.K3a. Order-moral -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3a. Pre: Order of Moral among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001075 Pre.Rand.K3b. Order-cares -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001076 Pre.Rand.K3c. Order-knowldg -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001077 Pre.Rand.K3d. Order-leader -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3d. Pre: Order of Leadership among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001078 Pre.Rand.K3e. Order-dishon -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001079 Pre.Rand.K3f. Order-intell -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001080 Pre.Rand.K3g. Ord-out touch -GWB traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K3g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA ============================== M001081 Pre.Rand.K4a. Ord-moral -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4a. Pre: Order of Moral among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001082 Pre.Rand.K4b. Ord-cares -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001083 Pre.Rand.K4c. Ord-knowl -Buchanan traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001084 Pre.Rand.K4d. Ord-leader -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001085 Pre.Rand.K4e. Ord-dishon -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001086 Pre.Rand.K4f. Ord-intell -Buchann traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001087 Pre.Rand.K4g. Ord-out touch-Buchnn traits MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.K4g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA; Question dropped ============================== M001088 Pre.Rand.L1c/L1d. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L1c/L1d. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Services/Spending placements L1c-L1d / L1c-L1d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name 2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name 9. NA ============================== M001089 Pre.Rand.L1e/L1f. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L1e/L1f. Pre: Order of major parties among Services/Spending placements L1e-L1f / L1e-L1f.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th 2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th 9. NA ============================== M001090 Pre.Rand.L2b/L2c. Order-Gore,GWB def sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L2b/L2c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Defense Spending placements L2b-L2c / L2b.T-L2c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001091 Pre.Rand.L2d/L2e. Order-parties defse sp MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L2d/L2e. Pre: Order of major parties among Defense Spending placements L2d-L2e / L2d.T-L2e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th 2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th 9. NA ============================== M001092 Pre.Rand.L4b/L4c. Order-Gore,GWB guarjob MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L4b/L4c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Guaranteed Jobs placements L4b-L4c / L4b.T-L4c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001093 Pre.Rand.L4d/L4e. Order-parties guar job MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L4d/L4e. Pre: Order of major parties among Guaranteed Jobs placements L4d-L4e / L4d.T-L4e.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th 2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th 9. NA ============================== M001094 Pre.Rand.L5c/L5d. Ord-Gore,GWB aid blcks MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L5c/L5d. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Aid to Blacks placements L5c-L5d /L5c.T-L5d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name 2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name 9. NA ============================== M001095 Pre.Rand.L5e/L5f. Order-parties aid blks MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L5e/L5f. Pre Order of major parties among Aid to Blacks placements L5e-L5f /L5e.T-L5f.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton's name was always first. 1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th 2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th 9. NA ============================== M001096 Pre.Rand.L7b. Order-welfare -fed spendng MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7b. Order of Welfare among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001097 Pre.Rand.L7c. Order-aids resch-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7c. Order of Aids Research among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001098 Pre.Rand.L7d. Order-forgn aid -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7d. Order of Foreign Aid among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001099 Pre.Rand.L7e. Order-food stps -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7e. Order of Food Stamps among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001100 Pre.Rand.L7f. Order-aid poor -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7f. Order of Aid to Poor among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001101 Pre.Rand.L7g. Order-soc sec -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7g. Order of Soc Security among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001102 Pre.Rand.L7h. Ord-env protect -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7h. Order of Env Protection among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001103 Pre.Rand.L7j. Ord-publ schls -fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7j. Order of Public Schls among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001104 Pre.Rand.L7k. Ord-deal w/crime-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7k. Order of Deal w/Crime among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001105 Pre.Rand.L7m. Order-child care-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7m. Order of Child Care among Pre Federal spendinging items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001106 Pre.Rand.L7n. Order-border sec-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7n. Order of Border Security amng Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001107 Pre.Rand.L7p. Order-aid blacks-fed spend MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.L7p. Order of Aid to Blacks among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a). Codes 2-13 and: 9. NA ============================== M001108 Pre.Rand.M1b/M1c. Ord-Gore-GWB abortion MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M1b/M1c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Abortion placements M1b-M1c / M1b.T-M1c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001109 Pre.Rand.M4b/M4c. Ord-Gore-envir/jobs MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M4b/M4c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environment-Jobs placements M4b-M4c / M4b.T-M4c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001110 Pre.Rand.M6b/M6c. Ord-Gore-gun restrictn MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.M6b/M6c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush for Gun restriction placement M6b-M6c --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001111 Pre.Rand.P1b/P1c. Ord-Gore-women's role MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.P1b/P1c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Women's Role placements P1b-P1c / P1b.T-P1c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001112 Pre.Rand.P2b/P2c. Ord-Gore-envir reg MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.P2b/P2c. Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environmental regulation placements P2b-P2c / P2b.T-P2c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name 2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name 9. NA ============================== M001113 Pre.Rand.Q14a. Ord-angry-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14a. Pre: Order of Angry among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001114 Pre.Rand.Q14b. Ord-hopeful-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14b. Pre: Order of Hopeful among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001115 Pre.Rand.Q14c. Ord-afraid -Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14c. Pre: Order of Afraid among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001116 Pre.Rand.Q14d. Ord-proud-Clinton affcts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q14d. Pre: Order of Proud among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-4 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001117 Pre.Rand.Q15a. Ord-moral-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15a. Pre: Order of Moral among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001118 Pre.Rand.Q15b. Ord-cares-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15b. Pre: Order of Really Cares among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001119 Pre.Rand.Q15c. Ord-knowl-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15c. Pre: Order of Knowledgeable amng Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001120 Pre.Rand.Q15d. Ord-leader-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15d. Pre: Order of Leadership among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001121 Pre.Rand.Q15e. Ord-dishon-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15e. Pre: Order of Dishonest among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001122 Pre.Rand.Q15f. Ord-intell-Clinton traits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15f. Pre: Order of Intelligent among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001123 Pre.Rand.Q15g. Ord-out touch-Clint trait MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Rand.Q15g. Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-7 and: 9. NA 0. Question administered in Post ============================== M001201 A1. R interest in campaigns MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you were very much interested, somewhat interested, or not much interested in following the political campaigns this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED 3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001202 A2. R watched programs about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2. Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A3 8. DK --> SKIP TO A3 9. RF --> SKIP TO A3 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001203 A2a. How many programs R watched about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2a. IF R WATCHED PROGRAMS ABOUT CAMPAIGN: Would you say you watched a good many, several, or just one or two? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD MANY 3. SEVERAL 5. JUST ONE OR TWO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in A2 ============================== M001204 A3. Does R ever discuss politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3. Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4 8. DK --> SKIP TO A4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001205 A3a. How often does R discuss politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric A3a. IF R DISCUSSES POLITICS: How many days in the past week did you talk about politics with family or friends? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-7 96. NONE (NO DAYS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9 in A3; no Post interview ============================== M001206 A4. Does R recall names of House candidates MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, REMEMBER 5. NO, DON'T REMEMBER --> SKIP TO B1 8. DK --> SKIP TO B1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001207 A4a1. Hse name recall 1 - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric A4a1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no Post interview ============================== M001208 A4b1. Hse party recall 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no Post interview ============================== M001209 A4(1)x1. Actual party of recall 1 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(1)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a1 ============================== M001210 A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(2)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a1 and A4b1. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA/RF for candidate name and NA/RF for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4 ============================== M001211 A4a2. Hse name recall 2 - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric A4a2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M001212 A4b2. Hse party recall 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 2nd RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M001213 A4(2)x1. Actual party of recall 2 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(2)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 2nd RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a2 ============================== M001214 A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(2)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 2nd RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a2 and A4b2. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention ============================== M001215 A4a3. Hse name recall 3 - cand code MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4a3. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M001216 A4b3. Hse party recall 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4b3. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention ============================== M001217 A4(3)x1. Actual party of recall 3 MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4(3)x1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other 0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a3 ============================== M001218 A4(3)x2. Accuracy of recall 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A4(3)x2. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who ran in the November election from this district? Who were they? What is party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A4a3 and A4b3. 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention ============================== M001219 B1. Party talked to R about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1. As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate. Did anyone from one of the political parties call you up or come around and talk to you about the campaign this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B1b 8. DK --> SKIP TO B1b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001220 B1a. Party that spoke to R about campgn MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1a. IF SOMEONE FROM PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT CAMPAIGN: Which party was that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 5. REPUBLICANS 6. BOTH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1 ============================== M001221 B1b. Anyone else talk to R about cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1b. Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) call you up or come around and talk to you about supporting specific candidates in this last election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001222 B1c. Party send R mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1c. Did anyone from one of the political parties send you mail about the campaign this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B1D 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001223 B1c1. Party that sent mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1c1. IF POLITICAL PARTY SENT MAIL: Which party was that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 5. REPUBLICANS 6. BOTH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1c ============================== M001224 B1d. Anyone else send mail about campaign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1d. Other than someone from the two major parties, did anyone (else) send you mail about supporting specific candidates in this last election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001225 B2. Did R try to influence vote of others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2. We would like to find out about some of the things people do to help a party or a candidate win an election. During the campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for or against one of the parties or candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001226 B3. Did R display button/sticker/sign MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3. Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001227 B4. Did R go to meetings/rallies etc. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B4. Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches, dinners, or things like that in support of a particular candidate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001228 B5. Did R do any other campaign work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B5. Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001229 B6. Did R contribute to candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B6. During an election year people are often asked to make a contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to an individual candidate running for public office? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B7 8. DK --> SKIP TO B7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001230 B6a. Party of candidate - R contribution MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B6a. IF R GAVE MONEY TO INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE: Which party did that candidate belong to? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. OTHER (SPECIFY) 6. BOTH DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AND REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE (VOL) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B6 ============================== M001231 B7. Did R give money to party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B7. Did you give money to a political party during this election year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B8 8. DK --> SKIP TO B8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001232 B7a. Party - R contribution MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B7a. IF R GAVE MONEY TO POLITICAL PARTY: To which party did you give money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. OTHER (SPECIFY) 6. BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B7 ============================== M001233 B8. Did R give to group for/against candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B8. Did you give any money to any other group that supported or opposed candidates? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001234 B9. Did anyone talk to R about registering or voting MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B9. During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about registering to vote or getting out to vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, SOMEONE DID 5. NO, NO ONE DID 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001235 B10. Did moral/relig groups discuss cmpaign w/R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B10. Were there any groups concerned with moral or religious issues that tried to encourage you to vote in a particular way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, THERE WERE GROUPS 5. NO, NO GROUPS TRIED TO ENCOURAGE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001236 B11. Clergy provide election information MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B11. Was information about candidates, parties, or political issues made available in your place of worship before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK RESPONSE] 1. YES 5. NO, NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE 7. NO, DON'T GO TO CHURCH [VOL] --> C1 8. DK --> C1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001237 B12. Did clergy encourage R to vote for cand or prty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B12. IF R DID NOT INDICATE NON-ATTENDANCE IN B11: Did the clergy or other church leaders at your place of worship encourage you to vote for a particular candidate or party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO C1 8. DK --> SKIP TO C1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in B11 ============================== M001238 B12a1. Clergy endorsement 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a1. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 1 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12 ============================== M001239 B12a2. Clergy endorsement 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a2. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 2 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12; no further mention ============================== M001240 B12a3. Clergy endorsement 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B12a3. IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY: Which candidate? MENTION 3 - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?] PRESIDENT: 01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore) 02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush) 03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader) 05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore) 06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush) SENATE: 11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent 12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent 13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate 14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate 15. Republican Senate challenger candidate 16. Republican Senate challenger candidate HOUSE: 31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent 32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent 33. Democratic House incumbent candidate 34. Republican House incumbent candidate 35. Democratic House challenger candidate 36. Republican House challenger candidate OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC: 71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office 72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office 73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level 74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level 80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level 81. Democratic Party 82. Republican Party 85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential 86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential 89. Other party OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC: 90. Vote on particular issue 91. 'Just to vote' 94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate 95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given but party NA) 96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor organized supporters of specific candidates 97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12a; no further mention ============================== M001241 C1. Did R vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C1. In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [INTERVIEWER: PLEASE READ ALL OPTIONS] 1. I DID NOT VOTE (IN THE ELECTION THIS NOVEMBER). 2. I THOUGHT ABOUT VOTING THIS TIME, BUT DIDN'T. 3. I USUALLY VOTE, BUT DIDN'T THIS TIME. 4. I AM SURE I VOTED --> SKIP TO C3 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001242 C2. Was R registered MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C2. IF R DID NOT VOTE: Were you registered to vote in this election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO C9(2) 6. VOL: NOT REQUIRED TO REGISTER IN R'S STATE --> SKIP TO C9(2) 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9(2) 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9(2) 0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1 ============================== M001243 C3. Registered in county of IW? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C3. IF R IS REGISTERED/ IF R VOTED: Your residence is located in County. Are you registered to vote in County? / Your residence is located in Washington D.C. Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, REGISTERED IN (PRELOAD COUNTY) --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, /WASHINGTON D.C ELSE GO TO C9(1)) 5. NO, REGISTERED IN OTHER COUNTY --> SKIP TO C3a 8. DK --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1) 9. RF --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1) 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 5, 6, 8, 9 or NA in C2 ============================== M001244 C3a1. State of registration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C3a1. IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.: In what county and state are you registered? STATE OF REGISTRATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- ICPSR state code 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C3 ============================== M001244a C3a2. County of registration (blank) Character C3a2. IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.: In what county and state are you registered? COUNTY OF REGISTRATION (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve the confidentiality of the respondent. ============================== M001245 C4. Did R vote on election day or before MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C4. IF R VOTED: Did you vote on election day -- that is, November 7th 2000, or did you vote at some time before this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELECTION DAY --> SKIP TO C5 5. SOME TIME BEFORE THIS --> C4a 8. DK --> SKIP TO C5 9. RF --> SKIP TO C5 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1 ============================== M001246 C4a. How long before election did R vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C4a. IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY: How long before November 7th did you vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?] 01. Less than one week, 1-6 days 02. One week; 7 days 03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days 04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days 05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days 06. One month; 29-31 days 07. More than one month; 32-60 days 11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS 12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS 91. More than a few days -- NFS 92. More than a few weeks --NFS 97. Other 98. DK; not sure 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4 ============================== M001247 C4b. Did R vote in person or absentee MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C4b. IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY: Did you vote in person or by absentee ballot? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. IN PERSON --> SKIP TO C5 5. ABSENTEE BALLOT --> SKIP TO C5 7. R VOLUNTEERS: BY MAIL [OREGON ONLY] --> SKIP TO C5 8. DK --> SKIP TO C5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4 ============================== M001248 C5. Did R vote for President? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C5. IF R VOTED: How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, VOTED FOR PRESIDENT 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR PRESIDENT --> SKIP TO C9 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1 ============================== M001249 C6. R vote cast for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C6. IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT: Who did you vote for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE --> SKIP TO C6a 3. GEORGE W. BUSH --> SKIP TO C6a 5. PAT BUCHANAN --> SKIP TO C6a 6. RALPH NADER --> SKIP TO C6a 2. HOWARD PHILLIPS - CONSTITUTION PARTY CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO C6a 4. HARRY BROWN - LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO C6a 7. R REPORTS VOTING FOR SELF --> SKIP TO C6a 8. DK --> SKIP TO C9 9. RF --> SKIP TO C9 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C5 ============================== M001250 C6a. How strong R support Pres cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C6a. IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: Would you say that your preference for (IF NAME GIVEN: ) / (IF OTHER SPECIFY: this candidate) was strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 ============================== M001251 C7. Timing of Pres vote decision MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C7. IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: How long before the election did you decide that you were going to vote the way you did? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE IF NECESSARY "WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN A FEW DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION, A WEEK, OR LONGER THAN THAT?] 01. Knew all along/from the first; always vote for the same party; before the convention/nomination (no mention of Gore/Bush/ Buchanan/Nader); before the primaries; 9 months or more 02. Before the convention because of Gore's/ Bush's/ Buchanan's/ Nader's candidacy; as soon as Gore/Bush/Buchanan/Nader said he would run; "months before"; "early on"; "long time/quite a bit before the election" 03. At the time of the Republican convention/ when Bush was nominated; just after the Republican convention; 3 months; July; "a few months";"2-3 months" 04. During the Democratic convention when Gore was nominated; just after the Democratic convention; 4 months; August 05. After the convention(s); during the campaign (NFS); 2 months; "a couple of months"; September 06. Five to seven weeks before the election 07. One month; three weeks; October; after the Presidential debates 08. About two weeks before the election; "ten days" 09. In the last few days of the campaign; the last part of it 10. On election day 11. During/after the primaries (not codeable in 02); "several months"; 5-8 months 12. After the vice-presidential debate 97. Other 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 ============================== M001252a C8(1). If R cld have cast more than one vote -1st MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(1). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6 ============================== M001252b C8(2). If R cld have cast more than one vote -2nd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(2). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention ============================== M001252c C8(3). If R cld have cast more than one vote -3rd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C8(3). IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF: If you could have cast more than one vote in the Presidential election this (past) November, is there any other candidate you would have found acceptable and have voted for? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention ============================== M001253a C9(1). Hse ckpt: vote in/out county MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric C9(1). CHECKPOINT: VOTE IN COUNTY OF INTERIVEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 3. R DID NOT VOTE (AND DK IF VOTED) 4. WASHINGTON DC 9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREAT AS WITHIN COUNTY) 0. INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001253b C9(2). Hse ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names MD: EQ 0 Numeric C9(2). IF R VOTED: CHECKPOINT: RANDOM ORDER OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes, for House vote and nonvoter House preference, the order in which names appeared on the FTF ballot card or the order in which names were read in Telephone administration. NOTE: in VT01 and VA05, the independent incumbent candidate was randomized, in the FTF ballot card and in the order of names in the Telephone wording, as if the candidate were a major party candidate: VT01 candidate Bernie Sanders was randomized as if a Democratic name, and in VA05 Virgil Goode Jr. was randomized as if a Republican name (no Democratic name was preloaded for VT01 and no Republican name was preloaded for VA05). All other ind/3rd-party candidate names appearing on the FTF ballot card or included in Telephone wording appear last in order. NOTE: ind/3rd-party candidate names are included in response codes/question wording whenever they have been preloaded; ind/3rd-party names are preloaded only for candidates who have been identified as especially viable. See note concerning randomization failure in P000262. 1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD) 2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD) 0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C. ============================== M001254 C9a/C11a.T. In-county: vote for House? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9a/C11a.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: FTF: Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this district. How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? TELEPHONE: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) ============================== M001255 C9b(1)/C11bx1.T. In-county House vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9b(1)/C11bx1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate from that party ran in R's district. CODE 6 NOTE: In 8 cases where R resided in county of interview, R did not select one of the names from the district of the interview location but provided a name which was later identified as belonging to another congressional district. These cases have been coded 6 in P001255 but the candidate code and party identification according to the other district are coded in P001256 and P001257. In Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) these cases are coded as a vote outside CD of interview. TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T ============================== M001257 C9b(3)/C11bx.T. In-House vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C9b(3)/C11bx.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. Democratic 2. Republican 3. Other (3rd party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T ============================== M001258 C10a/C12a.T. Out-county: vote for House? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10a/C12a.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 7. R VOLUNTEERS: NO RACE IN STATE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) ============================== M001259 C10b1/C12b1.T. Out- House vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C10b1/C12b1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,39). VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW: DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY) 81. Democratic candidate 82. Republican candidate DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 83. Democratic incumbent 84. Republican incumbent 85. Democratic challenger 86. Republican challenger ALL DISTRICTS: 80. Third party or independent candidate ** 91. Democrat--no name given 92. Republican--no name given 97. Name not on candidate list (name unidentified with party or candidate or CD not identified) 98. DK --> C14a 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T ============================== M001260 C10b2/C12b2.T. Out- House vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10b2/C12b2.T. IF R VOTED: IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK --> C14a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T ============================== M001261 C10c/C12c.T. Out- party ment of Hse vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10c/C12c.T. IF R VOTED: IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: Which party was that? PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH HOUSE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 5. REPUBLICAN 7. OTHER: SPECIFY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T ============================== M001262 C10x1/C12x1.T. Summ- Hose vote cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C10x1/C12x1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: IN-COUNTY FTF: Who did you vote for? OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C9b(2)/C11bx2.T and C10b1/C12b1.T. ** IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW (CODES 81-92): DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: 81. Democratic candidate 82. Republican candidate DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 83. Democratic incumbent 84. Republican incumbent 85. Democratic challenger 86. Republican challenger ALL OUT OUT-OF-COUNTY DISTRICTS: 80. Third party or independent candidate ** 91. Democrat--no name given 92. Republican--no name given 97. Name not on candidate list 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C9(1); 5,8,9,NA in C9a/C11a.T or 5,7,8,9, NA in C10a/C12a.T ============================== M001263 C10x2/C12x2.T. Summary- House vote party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C10x2/C12x2.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS: IN-COUNTY FTF: Who did you vote for? OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C10x1/C12x1.T 1. Democratic 2. Republican 3. Other (independent and 3rd party) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001264 C13(1). Sen ckpt: vote in/out county MD: EQ 0 Numeric C13(1). IF R VOTED: SENATE CHECKPOINT: RACE IN STATE OF INTERVIEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- For identification of states without races, see the Senate type race variable (P000204). 1. Race in state of interview 2. No race in state of inerview ============================== M001265 C13(2). Sen ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric C13(2). SENATE CHECKPOINT: R VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW 3. R DID NOT VOTE/DK IF VOTED 4. WASHINGTON DC 9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREATED AS WITHIN COUNTY) 0. INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001266 C13a/C15a.T. In-county: vote for Senate? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C13a/C15a.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or 2, 3, 4, 0 in C13(2) ============================== M001267 C13b1/C15bx1.T. In county - Senate vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C13b1/C15bx1.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate from that party ran in R's district. MISSOURI NOTE: In 4 cases in Missouri (IDs 581,1071,1072,1507) Rs voted for Mel Carnihan (deceased). Because this name was not included in the preload, these responses were coded 7. TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. --> D1 3. --> D1 4. --> D1 5. D1 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> D1 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T ============================== M001268 C13b2/C15bx2.T. In county -Sen vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C13b2/C15bx2.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T ============================== M001269 C13b3/C15bx3.T. In county- Sen vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C13b3/C15bx3.T. IF R VOTED: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF VOTED FOR SENATE: FTF: Who did you vote for? TELEPHONE: Did you vote for (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T ============================== M001270 C14a/C16a.T. Out-county:vote for Senate? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14a/C16a.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD] 1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE --> D1 7. R VOLUNTEERS: NO RACE IN STATE OF VOTE --> D1 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2) ============================== M001271 C14b1/C16b1.T. Out of county - Sen vote -cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14b1/C16b1.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes 08,10,11,12,13,14,15,16). CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 80. Third party or independent Senate candidate 81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 82. Republican candidate in open Senate race 83. Democratic Senate incumbent 84. Republican Senate incumbent 85. Democratic Senate challenger 86. Republican Senate challenger 91. Democrat - no name given 92. Republican - no name given 97. Name given not on candidate list for this race (name not identified with candidate or party, or CD not identified) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T ============================== M001272 C14b2/C16b2.T. Out of county - Senate vote party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14b2/C16b2.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? Which party was that? OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T ============================== M001273 C14c/C16c.T. Out of county- party of Sen vote MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C14c/C16c.T. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Which party was that? PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH SENATE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT --> D1 5. REPUBLICAN --> D1 7. OTHER: SPECIFY: --> D1 8. DK --> D1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T ============================== M001274 C14x1/C16x1.T. Summ- Sen vote - cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14x1/C16x1.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- **IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 80. Third party or independent Senate candidate 81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 82. Republican candidate in open Senate race 83. Democratic Senate incumbent 84. Republican Senate incumbent 85. Democratic Senate challenger 86. Republican Senate challenger 91. Democrat - no name given 92. Republican - no name given 97. Name given not on candidate list for this race; 'outside' name not identified with candidate or party, or 'outside' CD not identified) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1); 5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T ============================== M001275 C14x2/C16x2.T. Summary- Sen vote - party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric C14x2/C16x2.T. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C14x1/C16x1.T 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1); 5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T ============================== M001276 C17. Nonvoter - prefer any Pres cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17. IF R DID NOT VOTE: How about the election for President? Did you prefer one of the candidates for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1 ============================== M001277 C17a. Nonvoter- Pres cand preferred MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17a. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT: Who did you prefer? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W. BUSH 5. PAT BUCHANAN 6. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C17 ============================== M001278 C17b. Nonvoter-strength Pres cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C17b. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT: IF NAMED PREFERENCE IS NOT DK/RF: Would you say your preference for this candidate was strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C17a ============================== M001279 C18/C18.T. Nonvoter-prefer Hse cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18/C18.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: FTF: Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this district. How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? TELEPHONE: How about the election for the House of Representatives in Washington? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD CARD] 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1) ============================== M001280 C18a/C18a.T. Nonvoter-Hse cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18a/C18a.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. 5. 7. Other - specify 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T ============================== M001281 C18a1/C18a1.T.Nonvotr-Hse cand pref code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric C18a1/C18a1.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T ============================== M001282 C18a2/C18a2.T.Nonvoter-Hse cand pref pty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C18a2/C18a2.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the candidate, ?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T ============================== M001283 C19a/C19.T. Nonvoter-pref Senate cand? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19a/C19.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: How about the election for the United States Senate? Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD BALLOT CARD] 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or; 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2) ============================== M001284 C19b/C19a.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19b/C19a.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the ballot card/ read over the phone. The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. 3. 4. 5. 7. OTHER; SPECIFY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T ============================== M001285 C19b1/C19a1.T. Nonvotr-Sen cand pref code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 97 Numeric C19b1/C19a1.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent** 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 14. Republican Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 16. Republican Senate challenger 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T ============================== M001286 C19b2/C19a2.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref pty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C19b2/C19a2.T. IF R DID NOT VOTE: IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE: IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE: FTF: Which candidate did you prefer? TELEPHONE: Did you prefer (the Democrat, , or) (the Republican, ) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the candidate,?) (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the candidate,?) NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the instrument). TELEPHONE: The order in which the names of the major party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)]. If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list, his/her name was read last. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T ============================== M001287 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================== M001288 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================== M001289 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================== M001290 (Blank) Numeric . THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK --------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================== M001291 C20. How fair was November election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric C20. Please continue thinking about the November election. In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted fairly. In other countries, people believe that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking of the presidential election we've just had, do you believe it was very fair, somewhat fair, neither fair nor unfair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. VERY FAIR 2. SOMEWHAT FAIR 3. NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR 4. SOMEWHAT UNFAIR 5. VERY UNFAIR 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; interview or portion of interview administered before question added ============================== M001292 D1a/D1a.T. Thermometer Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1a/D1a.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) BILL CLINTON TELEPHONE: Our first person is Bill Clinton. Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton? THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001293 D1b/D1b.T. Thermometer Gore MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1b/D1b.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) AL GORE TELEPHONE: The next person is AL GORE. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - AL GORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001294 D1c/D1c.T. Thermometer GW Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1c/D1c.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) GEORGE W. BUSH TELEPHONE: The next person is GEORGE W. BUSH. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001295 D1d/D1d.T. Thermometer Nader MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1d/D1d.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) RALPH NADER TELEPHONE: The next person is RALPH NADER. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001296 D1e/D1e.T. Thermometer Jesse Jackson MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1e/D1e.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) JESSE JACKSON TELEPHONE: The next person is JESSE JACKSON. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - JESSE JACKSON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001297 D1f/D1f.T. Thermometer former Pres Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1f/D1f.T. FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH TELEPHONE: The next person is FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001298 D1g/D1g.T. Thermometer Dem House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1g/D1g.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Democratic House candidate; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001299 D1h/D1h.T. Thermometer Rep House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1h/D1h.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Republican House candidate; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001300 D1j/D1j.T. Thermometer retiring Hse rep MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1j/D1j.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF HOUSE INCUMBENT IS NOT RUNNING: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, retiring House Representative; no Post interview; Washington DC 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001300a D1jx. Checkpt:Hse retiree also Sen cand? MD: EQ 9 Numeric D1jx. CHECKPOINT: IS RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE ALSO THE SENATE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. House retiree is not also Senate candidate 1. House retiree is also the Senate Democratic candidate 2. House retiree is also the Senate Republican candidate 9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview ============================== M001301 D1k/D1k.T. Thermometer Dem Senate cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1k/D1k.T. IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.: IF SENATE RACE IN STATE: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE: IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no Post interview; Washington D.C.; 1 in D1jx. 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001302 D1m/D1m.T. Thermometer Rep Senate cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1m/D1m.T. IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.: IF SENATE RACE IN STATE: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE: IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no Post interview; Washington D.C.; 2 in D1jx 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001303 D1n/D1n.T. Thermometer Ind House cand MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D1n/D1n.T. IF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS VT01 OR VA05: FTF: (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) TELEPHONE: The next person is . (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?) THERMOMETER - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly administered as the 2nd-4th names. D1e and D1f were administered as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no incumbent Independent House candidate (VT01, VA05); no Post interview or Washington D.C.; 0,9 in D1nx. 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001303a D1nx. Checkpoint: VT01 or VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric D1nx. CHECKPOINT: VT01 OR VA05 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. CD OF INTERVIEW IS NEITHER VT01 NOR VA05 1. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VT01 2. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VA05 9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview ============================== M001304 D2a. Thermometer supreme court MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2a. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE SUPREME COURT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001305 D2b. Thermometer Congress MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2b. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CONGRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001306 D2c. Thermometer military MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2c. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001307 D2d. Thermometer federal govt in Wash DC MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2d. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001308 D2e. Thermometer blacks MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2e. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001309 D2f. Thermometer whites MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2f. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001310 D2g. Thermometer conservatives MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2g. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001311 D2h. Thermometer liberals MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2h. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - LIBERALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001312 D2j. Thermometer labor unions MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2j. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001313 D2k. Thermometer big business MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2k. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001314 D2m. Thermometer poor people MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2m. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001315 D2n. Thermometer people on welfare MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2n. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - PEOPLE ON WELFARE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001316 D2p. Thermometer Hispanics MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2p. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001317 D2q. Thermometer Chrstn Fundamentalists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2q. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001318 D2r. Thermometer women's movement MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2r. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001319 D2s. Thermometer older people MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2s. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001320 D2t. Thermometer environmentalists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2t. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - ENVIRONMENTALISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001321 D2u. Thermometer homosexuals MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2u. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - GAY MEN AND LESBIANS, THAT IS, HOMOSEXUALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001322 D2v. Thermometer Christian Coalition MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2v. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - THE CHRISTIAN COALITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001323 D2w. Thermometer Catholics MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2w. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001324 D2x. Thermometer Jews MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2x. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - JEWS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001325 D2xx. Thermometer Protestants MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2xx. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - PROTESTANTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001326 D2y. Thermometer feminists MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2y. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - FEMINISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== M001327 D2z. Thermometer Asian-americans MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 996 Numeric D2z. (How would you rate:) THERMOMETER - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 996. INAP, no Post interview 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ E0. Next I would like to ask you some questions about the candidate(s) who ran in this district for the U.S. House of Representatives. ============================== M001328 E1. Like anything- Dem House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VTO1: Was there anything in particular that you liked about , the Democratic candidate (VT01: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES --> SKIP TO E1a 5. NO --> SKIP TO E2 7. R VOLUNTEERS: I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE --> E3 or E5a 8. DK --> SKIP TO E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Democratic candidate in House race ============================== M001329 E1a(1). #1 like Dem House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E1a(1). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no Post IW ============================== M001330 E1a(2). #2 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(2). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001331 E1a(3). #3 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(3). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001332 E1a(4). #4 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(4). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001333 E1a(5). #5 like Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E1a(5). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001334 E2. Dislike anything- Dem House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E2. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VTO1: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about , the Democratic candidate (VT01: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E2a 5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E3 8. DK --> SKIP TO E3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP,0, 7 in E1; Democratic candidate in House race; Washington D.C. ============================== M001335 E2a(1). #1 dislike Dem House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E2a(1). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no Post IW ============================== M001336 E2a(2). #2 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(2). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001337 E2a(3). #3 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(3). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001338 E2a(4). #4 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(4). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001339 E2a(5). #5 dislike Dem House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E2a(5). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001340 E3. Like anything- Repub House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VA05: Was there anything in particular that you liked about , the Republican candidate (VA05: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING LIKED --> SKIP TO E3a 5. NO, NOTHING LIKED --> SKIP TO E4 7. R VOLUNTEERS: I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE --> SKIP TO E3 or E5a 8. DK --> SKIP TO E4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Republican candidate in House race; Washington D.C. ============================== M001341 E3a(1). #1 like Repub House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E3a(1). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no Post IW ============================== M001342 E3a(2). #2 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(2). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001343 E3a(3). #3 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(3). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001344 E3a(4). #4 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(4). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001345 E3a(5). #5 like Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E3a(5). IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001346 E4. Dislike anything- Repub House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E4. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/ IF VA05: Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about , the Republican candidate (VA05: ) for the U.S. House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series was administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E4a 5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED --> SKIP TO E5 8. DK --> SKIP TO E5a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 7 in E3 ============================== M001347 E4a(1). #1 dislike Repub House candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric E4a(1). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no Post IW ============================== M001348 E4a(2). #2 dislike repun House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(2). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001349 E4a(3). #3 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(3). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001350 E4a(4). #4 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(4). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001351 E4a(5). #5 dislike Repub House candidate MD: EQ 0 Numeric E4a(5). IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE: (What was that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001352 E5. Checkpt: number of Hse cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF HOUSE CANDIDATES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. One House candidate in candidate list 2. Two or more House candidates in candidate list 9. Washington DC 0. No Post IW ============================== M001353a E5a(1). 2 cands- either cand incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5a(1). IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates, / or /(VA05: ), was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 1. YES, --> E6 2. YES, --> E6 3. YES --> E6 4. BOTH [VOL] --> E6 5. NO, NEITHER WAS [VOL] --> E6 7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL] --> E6 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in E5 ============================== M001353b E5a(2). Cand iden as incum- 2 cand race MD: EQ 0 Numeric E5a(2). IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if either of these candidates, / (VT01: or /(VA05: ), was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 2 CANDIDATE RACE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name. 30. INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE (VA05/VT01) 31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 35. DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 36. REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 39. NONINCUMBENT INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE 90. "BOTH" 00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5a(1) ============================== M001354 E5b(1). 1 cand- is candidate incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric E5b(1). IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 1. YES 5. NO 7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL] 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 9, 0 in E5 ============================== M001355 E5b(2). Cand iden as incum- 1 cand race MD: EQ 0 Numeric E5b(2). IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: Do you happen to know if was already in the U.S. House of Representatives before the election? INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 1 CANDIDATE RACE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T KNOW"?] 31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE 33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE 00. INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5b(1) ============================== M001356 E6. Party control House before election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E6. Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the House of Representatives in Washington BEFORE the election (this/last) month? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?) [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. THE DEMOCRATS 5. THE REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001357 E7. Party control Senate before election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E7. Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the U.S. Senate BEFORE the election (this/last) month? --------------------------------------------------------------------- (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?) [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. THE DEMOCRATS 5. THE REPUBLICANS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001358 F1. Appr/dissapr House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1. In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way Representative has been handling job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE --> SKIP TO F1a 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP TO F1b 8. DK --> F2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001359 F1a. Strength approve House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1a. IF R APPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE STONGLY --> SKIP TO F2 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO F2 8. DK --> SKIP TO F2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F1 ============================== M001360 F1b. Strength disappr House incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1b. IF R DISAPPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in F1 ============================== M001361 F1x. Summary- approve/disapp Hse incumb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1x. In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way Representative has been handling job? Do you approve strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVE RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from F1 and F1a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in F1 or F1a/b 9. RF in F1a or F1a/b 0. NA ============================== M001362 F2. Special action by incumbent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2. Do you happen to remember anything special that Representative has done for the people in district while has been in Congress? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001363 F3. R know #yrs Hse incumbent has serv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3. Do you happen to know about how many years has been in the House of Representatives? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, R KNOWS --> SKIP TO F3a 5. NO --> SKIP TO F3b 8. DK --> SKIP TO F3b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001364 F3a. #yrs House incumbent has been in of MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric F3a. IF R SAYS KNOWS HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE: (About how many?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Actual number coded. 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F3 ============================== M001365 F3b. Incumbent more/less 12 yrs in offic MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3b. IF R DK HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE: Would you say less than 12 years, about 12 years, or more than 12 years? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. LESS THAN 12 YEARS 3. ABOUT 12 YEARS 5. MORE THAN 12 YEARS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in F3 ^^^^ ============================== M001366 F4. House incumb kept in touch w/distric MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F4. How good a job would you say U.S. Representative does of keeping in touch with the people in your district -- does (he/she) do a very good job, fairly good, fairly poor, or a very poor job of keeping in touch with the people in this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. FAIRLY GOOD 3. FAIRLY POOR 4. VERY POOR 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001367 F5. R follows govt and public affairs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F5. Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election going on or not. Others aren't thatinterested. Would you say you follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, some of the time, only now and then, or hardly at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOST OF THE TIME 2. SOME OF THE TIME 3. ONLY NOW AND THEN 4. HARDLY AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001368 G1a/G1a.T. R placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a/G1a.T. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> G2b 2. LIBERAL --> G2b 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> G2b 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 6. CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> G2b 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b ============================== M001369 G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1b. IF R LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL 3. CONSERVATIVE 5. MODERATE [VOL] 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 in G1a/G1a.T; no Post interview ============================== M001370 G1x. 3-category lib-con summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1x. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1a/G1a.T and G1b. This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF administration in previous years. Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a/G1a.T,G1b. 1. Liberal (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1) 3. Moderate (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA) 5. Conservative (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3) 7. Refused to choose (0/8,7/9) 8. DK (0/8,8) 9. NA/RF to entire question series (RF/NA,0) 0. NA to follow up question G4aa (0/8,NA); No Post IW ============================== M001371 G2/G2.T. Clinton placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2/G2.T. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001372 G3/G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3/G3.T. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001373 G3a/G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con placemnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a/G3a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G3/G3.T ============================== M001374 G4/G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4/G4.T. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001375 G4a/G4a.T. Bush-certain lib-con placemnt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a/G4a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G4/G4.T ============================== M001376 G5/G5.T. Buchanan placemnt lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5/G5.T. FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001377 G5a/G5a.T. Buchanan-certain lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a/G5a.T. IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF BUCHANAN IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G5/G5.T ============================== M001378 G6. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G6. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001378a G6(1)/G6(1).T. Dem Hse cand placemt-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6(1)/G6(1).T. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1g): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1g ============================== M001378b G6.(2)/G6(2).T. #1 incum Ind cand place MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6(2)/G6(2).T. IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n ============================== M001379a G6a1/G6a1.T. Dem Hse cand-crtn lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a1/G6a1.T. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G6(1)/G6(1).T ============================== M001379b G6a2/G6a2.T. #1 incum Ind cand-crtn lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a2/G6a2.T. IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN ============================== M001380a G7.(1)/G7(1).T. Rep Hse cand placmnt-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7(1)/G7(1).T. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS IN HOUSE RACE: IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1h): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1h ============================== M001380b G7.(2)/G7(2).T. #2 incum Ind cand-lib MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7(2)/G7(2).T. IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n): FTF: Where would you place on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about ? (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05. FTF: The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n ============================== M001381a G7a1/G7a1.T. Rep Hse cand-certn lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a1/G7a1.T. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(1)/G7(1).T ============================== M001381b G7a2/G7a2.T. #2 incum Ind cand lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a2/G7a2.T. IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE): IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(2)/G7(2).T ============================== M001382 G8/G8.T. Dem Party placemnt lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8/G8.T. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001383 G9/G9.T. Repub Party placement lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9/G9.T. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001384 G10/G10.T. Reform Party placemnt lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10/G10.T. FTF: Where would you place the Reform Party on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about the Reform Party? (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001385 G11a. R placement- services/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b or G11c 2. --> G11b or G11c 3. --> G11b or G11c 4. --> G11b or G11c 5. --> G11b or G11c 6. --> G11b or G11c 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b or G11c 8. DK --> G11b or G11c 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode (see Post Admin. 1); no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> G11b or G11c ============================== M001386 G11a.T. R placemnt-services/spend branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11a1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11a2.T 5. CONTINUE AT PRESENT LEVEL --> G11a3.T 8. DK --> G11a3.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode (see Post Admin. 1); no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> G11a3.T ============================== M001387 G11a1.T. How much reduce services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a1.T. IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> G11b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> G11b.T 8. DK --> G11b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T ============================== M001388 G11a2.T. How much increase servics/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> G11b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> G11b.T 8. DK --> G11b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T ============================== M001389 G11a3.T. If serv/spend changed, would favor inc/dec MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a3.T. IF R THINKS SERVICES/SPENDING SHOULD STAY SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE 3. DECREASE 5. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3 in G11a.T; FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001390 G11ax. PH Summary R serv/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11ax1. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME:) If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11a.T, G11a1.T, G11a2.T, G11a3.T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (0/5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (0/5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) ============================== M001390a G11ax. Summary R serv/spend scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think the government should provide fewer services, many more services, or continue providing services at the present level, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT:) If the level of services and spending were to be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11a and G11ax1. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP,no Post IW ============================== M001391 G11b. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G11b. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR SERVICES/SPENDING HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, services/spending placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, services/spending placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001391a G11b1. Dem Hse candidate on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in VT01, FTF respondents were administered G11b(2). Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001391b G11b2. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VT01: ) on this issue? [DON'T PROBE DK] --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in districts other than VT01, FTF respondents were administered G11b(1). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001392a G11b(1).T. Dem Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] PHONE: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in VT01, Phone respondents were administered G11b(2).T. Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001392b G11b(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2.T. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about (VT01: )? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] PHONE: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name: in districts other than VT01, Phone respondents were administered G11b(1).T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11b1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11b2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001393a G11b1(1).T. Dem cand- how much reduce services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T ============================== M001393b G11b1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbnt Hse cand- how much red MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b1(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T ============================== M001394a G11b2(1).T. Dem Hse cand-how much incrsease ser/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T ============================== M001394b G11b2(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b2(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T ============================== M001395a G11b3(1).T. Dem Hse cnd- if serv/spnd chnged, inc/dec MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b3(1).T. IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T ============================== M001395b G11b3(2).T. #1 Ind inc Hse cand- if chnged, incr/decr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b3(2).T. IF R THINKS VT01 IND HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T ============================== M001396 G11bx1. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11bx1. TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11b1/G11b2.T, G11b1(1)/G11b1(2).T, G11b2(1).T/G11b2(2).T, G11b3(1).T/G11b3(2).T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Democratic candidate and not VT01; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW ============================== M001396a G11bx2. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11bx2. FTF: Where would you place on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from and G11b1/G11b2 and G11bx1. 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Democratic candidate and not VT01; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW ============================== M001397a G11c1. Repub House candidate on services/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in VA05, FTF respondents were administered G11c(2). Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001397b G11c2. #2 Ind inc Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VA05: ) on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2) were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in districts other than VA05, FTF respondents were administered G11c(1). 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G12 2. --> G12 3. --> G12 4. --> G12 5. --> G12 6. --> G12 7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G12 8. DK --> G12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001398a G11c(1).T. Rep Hse cand on services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/ G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in VA05, Phone respondents were administered G11c(2).T Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11c1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11c2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001398b G11c(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2.T. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER: TELEPHONE: What about (VA05: )? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] FTF: The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/ G11c(2).T were administered was randomized. In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate was administered in place of a Republican candidate name: in districts other than VA05, Phone respondents were administered G11c(1).T 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> G11c1.T 3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> G11c2.T 5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b; candidate coded 997 in thermometer ============================== M001399a G11c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand- how much reduce services/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T ============================== M001399b G11c1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much reduc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c1(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T ============================== M001400a G11c2(1).T. Rep Hse cand-how much incrsease serv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T ============================== M001400b G11c2(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incre MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c2(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T ============================== M001401a G11c3(1).T. Rep Hse cand- if serv/spend chngd, inc/de MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c3(1).T. IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T ============================== M001401b G11c3(2).T. #2 Ind incumbt Hse cand- if srv/spd chang MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11c3(2).T. IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED: TELEPHONE: If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 3. DECREASE --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 5. NEITHER --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 8. DK --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T ============================== M001402 G11cx1. PH Summary Rep cand services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11cx1. TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPENDING REPUB HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G11c1/G11c2.T, G11c1(1)/G11c1(2).T, G11c2(1).T/G11c2(2).T, G11c3(1).T/G11c3(2).T. 1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0) 2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0) 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3) 4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA) 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1) 6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0) 7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0) 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Republican candidate and not VA05; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW ============================== M001402a G11cx2. Summary Rep cand services/spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11cx2. FTF: Where would you place on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about ? Do you think would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending, provide many services even if it means an increase in spending, or continue services at the present level? (IF REDUCE:) Do you think would like to reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (IF INCREASE:) Do you think would like to increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were to be changed, do you think would be more in favor of an increase or a decrease? SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND REPUBLICAN HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL 2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME 3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE 4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME 5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE 6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME 7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL 8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA) 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Republican candidate and not VA05; candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW ============================== M001403 G12/G12.T. R placement- abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12/G12.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. TELEPHONE: There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001404 G12a. How important is abortion issue to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12a. ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 9, 0 in G12/G12.T ============================== M001405 G12b. Checkpoint: number of cands/VT01/VA05 MD: EQ 9 Numeric G12b. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05 FOR ABORTION HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- In VT01, abortion placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement. In VA05, abortion placement of the independent House incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement. 1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race 2. Democratic candidate only in House race 3. Republican candidate only in House race 4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic candidate; Republican challenger 5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican candidate; Democratic challenger 9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C. ============================== M001405a G12b1/G12b1.T. Dem Hse cand placmt on abortion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1/G12b1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF DEM CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12c or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12c or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12c or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12c or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12c or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1g ============================== M001405b G12b2/G12b2.T. #1 Ind inc cand plac on abort MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b2/G12b2.T. IF VT01: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VT01: ) (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12c or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12c or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12c or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12c or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12c or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1n ============================== M001406a G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T. Dem Hse cand-cetainty of plcmt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(1)/G12b(1).T ============================== M001406b G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T. #1 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(2)/G12b(2).T ============================== M001407a G12c1/G12c1.T. Rep Hse cand placmt on abortion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1/G12c1.T. IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VT01, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) and G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12b or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12b or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12b or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12b or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12b or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1h ============================== M001407b G12c2/G12c2.T. #2 Ind inc cand placmt on abort MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c2/G12c2.T. IF VA05: IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER: FTF: Where would you place (VA05: ) (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about (VA05: ) (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DK] G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized. TELEPHONE: The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. --> G12b or G13 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. --> G12b or G13 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. --> G12b or G13 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. --> G12b or G13 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> G12b or G13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in Dln ============================== M001408a G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand-certainty of plct MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(1)/G12c(1).T ============================== M001408b G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T. #2 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T. IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VA05 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK: How certain are you of 's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(2)/G12c(2).T ============================== M001409 G13. R thinks of themself as Republican or Democrat MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G13. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat or Republican? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 3. REPUBLICAN 5. NEITHER [VOL] 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001410 H1. R better/worse off in last year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP H1b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP H2 8. DK --> SKIP H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered ' section H in Post ============================== M001411a H1a. How much better off in last yer financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1a. IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION BETTER IN LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP H2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP H2 8. DK --> SKIP H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1 ============================== M001411b H1b. How much worse off last year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1b. IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION WORSE IN LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1 ============================== M001412 H1x. Summary of R's financial situation in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. The same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H1 or H1a/b 9. RF in H1 or H1a/b 0. NA; INAP, no Post IW; R selected for administration in the Pre ============================== M001412a H1x1. Pre/Post Summary of R financial situation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x1. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? COMBINED PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. Built from Pre E1x and Post H1x 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. The same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001413 H2. Put off medical or dental treatmnt in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2. In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered section H in Post ============================== M001413a H2x. Pre/Po: Put off medical or dental treatment MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2x. In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? COMBINED PRE/POST: MEDICAL OR DENTAL TREATMENT POSTPONED --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. Built from Pre E2 and Post H2. 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001414 H3. R expects next year to be better/worse financial MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip H3b 5. THE SAME --> Skip H4 8. DK --> Skip H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered section H in Post ============================== M001415 H3a. How much better off next year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3a. IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE BETTER IN NEXT YEAR: Much better off or somewhat better off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP H4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP H4 8. DK --> Skip H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3 ============================== M001416 H3b. How much worse off next year financially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3b. IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE WORSE IN NEXT YEAR: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3 ============================== M001417 H3x. Summary: R financial expectations in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3x. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H3 or H3a/b 9. RF in H3 or H3a/b 0. NA; INAP, no post IW; administered in Pre ============================== M001417a H3x1. Pre/Po: Financial situation in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H3x1. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here/there) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better or somewhat better? Much worse or somewhat worse? PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001418 H4. How afraid is R of assault in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4. How afraid are you that a member of your family, or a close friend, or you yourself might be the victim of an assault during the coming year? Would you say you are very afraid, somewhat afraid, a little bit afraid, or not afraid? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The respondent was randomly selected to be administered section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post. NOTE: due to an error in the application logic, this variable was administered only to cases selected for Post administration of questions H1-H3. 1. VERY AFRAID 3. SOMEWHAT AFRAID 5. A LITTLE BIT AFRAID 7. NOT AFRAID 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, logic error; no Post interview ============================== M001419 J1. R's attitude about serving on jury duty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J1. If you were selected to serve on a jury, would you be happy to do it or would you rather not serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HAPPY TO DO IT 5. RATHER NOT SERVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001420 J2a. Less govt, or more things government should do MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2a. ONE, the less government, the better; OR TWO, there are more things that government should be doing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. THE LESS GOVERNMENT THE BETTER 2. MORE THINGS GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE DOING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001421 J2b. Strong govt to handle cmplx prbls or free mrket MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2b. ONE, we need a strong government to handle today's complex economic problems; OR TWO, the free market can handle these problems without government being involved. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. NEED A STRONG GOV'T TO HANDLE COMPLEX ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 2. FREE MARKET CAN HANDLE WITHOUT GOV'T INVOLVEMENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001422 J2c. Reason govt is bigger- meddlesome or big prblms MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2c. ONE, the main reason government has become bigger over the years is because it has gotten involved in things that people should do for themselves; OR TWO, government has become bigger because the problems we face have become bigger. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE IT'S INVOLVED IN THINGS PEOPLE SHOULD HANDLE THEMSELVES 2. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE PROBLEMS BIGGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001423 J2d. Better cooperative or self-reliant MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J2d. ONE, it is more important to be a cooperative person who works well with others; OR TWO, it is more important to be a self-reliant person able to take care of oneself. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"] 1. MORE IMPT. TO BE COOPERATIVE 2. MORE IMPT. TO BE SELF-RELIANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001424 J3. # times R watched jeopardy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J3. Now I'd like to ask you a few short questions about television viewing, because what you watch often determines what political advertising you will see. How many times in the last week have you watched "Jeopardy"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 97. R VOLUNTEERS,"NEVER WATCHES TELEVISION" --> SKIP TO J 8 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001425 J4. # times R watched wheel of fortune MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J4. How many times in the last week have you watched "Wheel of Fortune"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 ============================== M001426 J5. # times R watched morning news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J5. How many times in the last week have you watched morning news programs such as "Today," "Good Morning America," or "The Early Show"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 ============================== M001427 J6. # times R watched daytime talk show MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric J6. How many times in the last week have you watched daytime television talk shows such as "Oprah Winfrey," "Rosie O'Donnell," or "Jerry Springer"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES 95. EVERY DAY 96. NEVER, NOT AT ALL 98. DON'T KNOW 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 ============================== M001428 J7. Network news program R watches most MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J7. Which of the network news programs do you watch most often - "World News Tonight" on ABC, "NBC Nightly News," "The CBS Evening News," or some other network news program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ABC 3. NBC 5. CBS 6. WATCH NO NETWORK NEWS PROGRAM [VOL] 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3 ============================== M001429 J8. How much can you trust the media MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J8. How much of the time do you think you can trust the media to report the news fairly? Just about always, most of the time, only some of the time, or almost never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME 4. ALMOST NEVER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001430 J9. Does R listen to political talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9. There are a number of programs on radio in which people call in to voice their opinions about politics. Do you ever listen to political talk radio programs of this type? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, LISTEN --> GO TO J9a 5. NO, DON'T LISTEN --> GO TO J10 8. DK --> GO TO J10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001431 J9a. How often does R listen to talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9a. IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO: How often do you listen to those programs -- every day, most days, once or twice a week, or only occasionally? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERYDAY 2. MOST DAYS 3. ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK 4. ONLY OCCASIONALLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9 ============================== M001432 J9b. How closely does R listen to talk radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J9b. IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO: Some people listen carefully to these talk radio programs while others just keep them on in the background while they do other things. How about you? When you turn on a political talk radio program, would you say you pay very close attention, fairly close attention, occasional attention, or very little attention? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CLOSE ATTENTION 2. FAIRLY CLOSE ATTENTION 3. OCCASIONAL ATTENTION 4. VERY LITTLE ATTENTION 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9 ============================== M001433 J10. Does R have Internet or WWW access MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J10. Do you have acces to the Internet or the World Wide Web? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> J11 8. DK --> J11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001434 J10a. Has R seen election info on Internet MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J10a. IF R HAS ACCESS TO THE INTERNET: Have you seen any information about this election campaign on the (Internet/Web)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J10 ============================== M001435 J11. Important differences b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J11. Do you think there are any important differences in what the Republicans and Democrats stand for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, DIFFERENCES 5. NO, NO DIFFERENCES 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001436a J11a1(1). #1 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric J11a1(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 1 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11 ============================== M001436b J11a1(2). #1 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric J11a1(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 1 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 8. DK (998 in J11a1(1)) 9. RF (999 in J11a1(1)) 0. NA (995 in J11a1(1)); Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11 ============================== M001436c J11a2(1). #2 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a2(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 2 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436d J11a2(2). #2 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a2(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 2 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436e J11a3(1). #3 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a3(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 3 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436f J11a3(2). #3 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a3(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 3 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436g J11a4(1). #4 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a4(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 4 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436h J11a4(2). #4 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a4(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 4 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436j J11a5(1). #5 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a5(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 5 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436k J11a5(2). #5 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a5(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 5 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436m J11a6(1). #6 difference b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a6(1). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 6 - DIFFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code. Codes 001-985 and: 990. Other comments 000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001436n J11a6(2). #6 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems MD: EQ 0 Numeric J11a6(2). IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS: What are those differences? MENTION 6 - PARTY REFERENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."] 1. Democratic party mention 2. Democratic Presidential candidate 4. Republican Presidential candidate 5. Republican Party mention 6. Other party mentioned instead 7. Unclear party reference-- some substantive area of party difference 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further mention; no Post IW ============================== M001437 K1a. Whites influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1a. The first group is WHITES. Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001438 K1b. Blacks influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1b. What about BLACKS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001439 K1c. Hispanics influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1c. What about HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001440 K1d. Asian-Americans influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1d. What about ASIAN AMERICANS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001441 K1e. Jews influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1e. What about JEWS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001442 K1f. Protestants influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1f. What about PROTESTANTS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001443 K1g. Catholics influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1g. What about CATHOLICS? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001444 K1h. Men influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1h. What about MEN? (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001445 K1j. Women influence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1j. And the last group is WOMEN. (Would you say they have too much influence, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE 2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT 3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001446a K2a. Identify Trent Lott -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a.E; no Post interview ============================== M001446b K2a.E. Identify Trent Lott -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview ============================== M001447 K2ax. Summary identify Trent Lott MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2ax. The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? SUMMARY: TRENT LOTT OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2a/K2a.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER 5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8. R makes no attempt to guess 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001448 K2a1.E. Identify Trent Lott- DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2a1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: The first name is TRENT LOTT. What job or political office does he NOW hold? CHECKPOINT: LOTT - PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview ============================== M001449a K2b. Identify William Rehnquist -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b.E; no Post interview ============================== M001449b K2b.E. Identify William Rehnquist -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview ============================== M001450 K2bx. Summary identify William Rehnquist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2bx. WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) SUMMARY: REHNQUIST OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2b/K2b.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001451 K2b1.E. Identify William Rehnquist - DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2b1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist] (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview ============================== M001452a K2c. Identify Tony Blair -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c.E; no Post interview ============================== M001452b K2c.E. Identify Tony Blair-experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview ============================== M001453 K2cx. Summary identify Tony Blair MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2cx. TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) SUMMARY: BLAIR OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2c/K2c.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT BRITAIN 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001454 K2c1.E. Identify Tony Blair - DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2c1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: TONY BLAIR (What job or political office does he NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview ============================== M001455a K2d. Identify Janet Reno -standard MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d.E; no Post interview ============================== M001455b K2d.E. Identify Janet Reno -experimental MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview ============================== M001456 K2dx. Summary identify Janet Reno MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2dx. JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) SUMMARY: RENO OFFICE RECOGNITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/ [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Built from K2d/K2d.E Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG 8.R makes no attempt to guess 9.RF 0.NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001457 K2d1.E. Identify Janet Reno -DK probe used MD: EQ 0 Numeric K2d1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS: JANET RENO (What job or political office does she NOW hold?) CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"] Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E battery with "Don't Know" probes. 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview ============================== M001458 K3a. In what state does Bush live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3a. What U.S. state does George W. Bush live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001459 K3a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K3a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001460 K3b. What is Bush's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K3b. What is George W. Bush's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001461 K3b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K3b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001462 K4a. What state is Gore from MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4a. What U.S. state is Al Gore from originally? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001463 K4a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K4a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001464 K4b. What is Gore's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K4b. What is Al Gore's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001465 K4b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K4b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001466 K5a. In what state does Cheney live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K5a. What U.S. state does Dick Cheney live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001467 K5a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K5a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001468 K5b. What is Cheney's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K5b. What is Dick Cheney's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001469 K5b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K5b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001470 K6a. In what state does Lieberman live MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K6a. What U.S. state does Joseph Lieberman live in now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 1. CONNECTICUT 2. TENNESSEE 3. TEXAS 4. WYOMING 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001471 K6a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K6a1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001472 K6b. What is Lieberman's religion MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K6b. What is Joseph Lieberman's religion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"] 0. NONE 1. BAPTIST 2. METHODIST 3. JEWISH 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001473 K6b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer MD: EQ 0 Numeric K6b1. CHECKPOINT: PROBE USED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001474 K7. Volunteer work in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K7. Many people say they have less time these days to do volunteer work. What about you, were you able to devote any time to volunteer work in the last 12 months or did you not do so? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001475 K8. Are people trustworthy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K8. Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOST PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED 5. CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001476 K9. People take advantage or act fairly MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K9. Do you think most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance or would they try to be fair? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TAKE ADVANTAGE 5. TRY TO BE FAIR 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001477 K10. People helpful or selfish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K10. Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are just looking out for themselves? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TRY TO BE HELPFUL 5. JUST LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001478 K11. Fav/opp laws protect against job discrm homosexu MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11. Recently there has been a lot of talk about job discrimination. Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO K11b 8. DK --> SKIP TO K12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001479 K11a. How much favor law protecting homosexuals MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11a. IF R FAVORS PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION: Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR STRONGLY --> K12 5. FAVOR NOT STRONGLY --> K12 ============================== M001480 K11b. How much oppose law protecting homosexuals MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11b. IF R OPPOSES PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION: Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OPPOSE STRONGLY 5. OPPOSE NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in K11 ============================== M001481 K11x. Summary protctng homosxls against job discrim MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K11x. Recently there has been a lot of talk about job discrimination. Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination? (IF FAVOR/OPPOSE:) Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly?/ Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bult from K11 and K11a/b 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in K11 or K11a/b 9. RF in K11 or K11a/b 0. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== M001482 K12a. R placmnt crime -address social prblms/punish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M001482a K12a.T. R placmnt crime -address social prbl/punish MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a.T. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME --> K12a1.T 3. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED --> K12a2.T 5. DO SOMETHING IN BETWEEN --> K12a3.T 8. DK --> K13a3.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> K13a3.T ============================== M001483 K12a1.T. How much btr is approach -adressing social MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a1.T. IF R'S OPINION IS TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS: TELEPHONE: Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> K13 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> K13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T ============================== M001484 K12a2.T. How much btr is approach -punishing crimls MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a2.T. IF R'S OPINION IS TO MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT AND PUNISHED: TELEPHONE: Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> K13 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> K13 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T ============================== M001485 K12a3.T. If had to choose, which approach is better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12a3.T. IF R'S OPINION IS 'SOMETHING IN BETWEEN'/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH: TELEPHONE: If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADDRESSING SOCIAL PROBLEMS 5. MAKING SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 9 in K12a.T ============================== M001486 K12ax1. PH Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12ax1. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? BRANCHING SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K12a.T, K12a1.T, K12a2.T, K12a3.T. 1. MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS 4. IN-BETWEEN 5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS 6. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 7. MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post IW 0. Haven't thought much ============================== M001486a K12ax2. Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K12ax2. TELEPHONE: How about you? Do you think that the best way to reduce crime is to address social problems or to make sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that we should do something in between, or haven't you thought much about this? (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the social problems that cause crime is a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce crime? (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to choose, which way would you say is better at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and punished? SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K12 and K12ax1 1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 2. SCALE: 2/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS 3. SCALE: 3/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS 4. SCALE: 4/ IN-BETWEEN 5. SCALE: 5/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS 6. SCALE: 6/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 7. SCALE: 7/ MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post IW 0. Haven't thought much ============================== M001487 K13. How worried is R about nuclear war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K13. How worried are you about our country getting into a nuclear war at this time? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Through an error in the survey application program, this variable was administered only to telephone Rs. 1. VERY WORRIED 3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED 5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001488 K14. How worried is R about conventional war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K14. How worried are you about our country getting into a conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear weapons are not used? Are you very worried, somewhat worried, or not worried at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Through an error in the survey application program, this variable was administered only to FTF Rs. 1. VERY WORRIED 3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED 5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001489 K15a. Campn fin- protect govt from infl or individ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K15a. Which is closer to the way you think, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTECT GOVERNMENT FROM EXCESSIVE INFLUENCE 5. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF INDIVIDUALS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS ============================== M001490 K16. How should the financing of campaigns change MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K16. In general, which of the following statements best represents what you feel about the way political campaigns are financed in this country: it needs to be completely overhauled, it needs major changes, it needs minor changes, or it is basically fine the way it is? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY OVERHAULED 3. MAJOR CHANGES 5. MINOR CHANGES 7. FINE THE WAY IT IS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001491 L5. Worked on community issue in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5. During the past 12 months, have you worked with other people to deal with some issue facing your community? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001492 L6. Contacted public official to express in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6. During the past twelve months, have you telephoned, written a letter to, or visited a government official to express your views on a public issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001493 L7. Attend commun meeting about issue in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7. During the past twelve months, did you attend a meeting about an issue facing your community or schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001494 L8. Is R a member of any organizations MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8. Here is a list of some organizations people can belong to. There are labor unions, associations of people who do the same kinds of work, fraternal groups such as Lions or Kinterviewanis, hobby clubs or sports teams, groups working on political issues, community groups, and school groups. Of course, there are lots of other types of organizations, too. Not counting membership in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of any of these kinds of organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> L9 8. DK --> L9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001495 L8a. How many organizations is R currently a member MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric L8a. How many organizations are you currently a member of? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NO ORGANIZATIONS --> L9 1. ONE ORGANIZATION --> L8b 2-96. ORGANIZATIONS --> L8bb 97. 97 OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS --> L8bb 98. DK --> L8bb 99. RF; NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L8 ============================== M001496 L8b. 1 org-how many hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8b. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a ============================== M001497 L8c. 1 org-do orgs try to influence government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8c. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a ============================== M001498 L8d. 1 org-does org try to influence schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8d. IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> L9 5. NO --> L9 8. DON'T KNOW --> L9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a ============================== M001499 L8bb. 2+ org-how many hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8bb. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organizations? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a ============================== M001500 L8cc. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8cc. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a ============================== M001501 L8dd. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8dd. IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY: Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a ============================== M001502 L8x1. Summary hours per week spent for org MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric L8x1. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: If you average across the past twelve months, about how many hours per week did you spend doing things with or for your organization(s)? SUMMARY: NUMBER OF HOURS/WEEK WITH ORGANIZATIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of hours coded and: 96. NONE (NO HOURS) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a ============================== M001503 L8x2. Summary org influence schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x2. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence government?/ Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence government? SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE GOVERNMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a ============================== M001504 L8x3. Summary org influence government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x3. IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS: Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence schools/ Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to influence schools? SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE SCHOOLS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a ============================== M001505 L9. Contributed to church or charity in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9. Many people are finding it more difficult to make contributions to church or charity as much as they used to. How about you -- were you able to contribute any money to church or charity in the last 12 months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001506 L10. Taken part in Protest or march in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L10. Aside from a strike against your employer, in the past twelve months, have you taken part in a protest, march, or demonstration on some national or local issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001507 L10a. How many times protested/marched MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L10a. IF R TAKEN PART IN PROTEST, MARCH OR DEMONSTRATION ON LOCAL ISSUE: About how many times was that -- once, two or three times, or four times or more? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONCE 2. TWO OR THREE 4. FOUR TIMES OR MORE 7. CAN'T REMEMBER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L10 ============================== M001508 M3a/M3a.T. Blks should overcome prejudice w/o favors MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3a/M3a.T. 'Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001509 M3b/M3b.T. Blacks have gotten less than they deserve MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3b/M3b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001510 M3c/M3c.T. If blks wld try harder they cld be welloff MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3c/M3c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001511 M3d/M3d.T. Past discrim impacts blks today MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3d/M3d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) 'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001512 N1. R have opinion on strength of federal govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1. Now I'd like to ask you about your feelings toward the federal government. Some people are afraid the government in Washington is getting too powerful for the good of the country and the individual person. Others feel that the government in Washington is not getting too strong. Do you have an opinion on this or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> N2 8. DK --> N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001513 N1a. Govt is getting too powerful or not too strong MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a. IF R HAS AN OPINION: What is your feeling, do you think the government is getting too powerful or do you think the government is not getting too strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT TOO POWERFUL --> SKIP TO N1b 5. GOVERNMENT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG 7. OTHER; DEPENDS (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO N2 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in N1 ============================== M001514 N1a1. Should govt become more powerful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a1. IF R THINKS GOVT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG: Do you think the government should become more powerful or should it stay the way it is? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BECOME MORE POWERFUL --> N1b 5. STAY THE WAY IT IS --> N2 8. DK --> N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a ============================== M001515 N1b. Which party favors a strong federal govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1b. IF R THINKS GOVT TOO POWERFUL IN N1a/ IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD BECOME MORE POWERFUL IN N1a1: Which party do you think is more likely to favor a powerful government in Washington -- the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them on this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. NO DIFFERENCE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a; 5, 8, 9 or NA in N1a1 ============================== M001516 N2a/N2a.T. Does R have good undrstdg of pol issues MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2a/N2a.T. ' I feel that I have a pretty good understanding of the important political issues facing our country. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001517 N2b/N2b.T. R well-qulfd to participate in politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2b/N2b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001518 N2c/N2c.T. Could do good job in public office MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2c/N2c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office as most other people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office as most other people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001519 N2d/N2d.T. Better informed about govt than most MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2d/N2d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.) ' I think that I am better informed about politics and government than most people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' I think that I am better informed about politics and government than most people. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001520 N3. Does R believe their vote matters MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3. So many other people vote in the national election that it doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not. (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; question not implemented at time of interview ============================== M001521 P1a/P1a.T. Society needs to give everyone equal oppr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a/P1a.T. ' Our society should do whatever is necessary to make sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001522 P1b/P1b.T. We've pushed equal rights too far MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b/P1b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001523 P1c/P1c.T. We don't give everyone equal chance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c/P1c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' One of the big problems in this country is that we don't give everyone an equal chance. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' One of the big problems in this country is that we don't give everyone an equal chance. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001524 P1d/P1d.T. Better if we worried less about equality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1d/P1d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001525 P1e/P1e.T. OK if some people have more chances than MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1e/P1e.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001526 P1f/P1f.T. We'd have fewr probs if people treated eq MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1f/P1f.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' If people were treated more equally in this country we would have many fewer problems. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: 'If people were treated more equally in this country we would have many fewer problems.' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001527 Q1a/Q1a.T. Public officials don't care MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1a/Q1a.T. ' Public officials don't care much what people like me think. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001528 Q1b/Q1b.T. People dont have say in govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1b/Q1b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' People like me don't have any say about what the government does. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' People like me don't have any say about what the government does. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001529 Q1c/Q1c.T. Politics too complicated MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1c/Q1c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001530 Q2a/Q2a.T. New morals are causing society breakdown MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2a/Q2a.T. ' The newer lifestyles are contributing to the breakdown of our society. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001531 Q2b/Q2b.T. Should adjust views to chgd moral behav MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2b/Q2b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our view of moral behavior to those changes. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our view of moral behavior to those changes. ' Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001532 Q2c/Q2c.T. Less prblms if emphasize trad family ties MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2c/Q2c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' This country would have many fewer problems if there were more emphasis on traditional family ties. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' This country would have many fewer problems if there were more emphasis on traditional family ties. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001533 Q2d/Q2d.T. Should tolerate other's morality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2d/Q2d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet) ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live according to their own moral standards, even if they are very different from our own. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) TELEPHONE: ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live according to their own moral standards, even if they are very different from our own. ' (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with this statement?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE SOMEWHAT 3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT 5. DISAGREE STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001534 Q3a. How much can govt be trusted MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3a. How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Washington to do what is right -- just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME 4. NEVER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001535 Q4. How much of taxes does govt waste MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4. Do you think that people in government waste a lot of the money we pay in taxes, waste some of it, or don't waste very much of it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WASTE A LOT 3. WASTE SOME 5. DON'T WASTE VERY MUCH 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001536 Q5. Govt run by big intersts or for benefit of all MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q5. Would you say the government is pretty much run by a few big interests looking out for themselves or that it is run for the benefit of all the people? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOV'T RUN BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS 5. GOV'T RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001537 Q6. How many in govt are crooked MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6. Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are crooked, not very many are, or do you think hardly any of them are crooked? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. QUITE A FEW ARE CROOKED 3. NOT VERY MANY ARE CROOKED 5. HARDLY ANY ARE CROOKED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001538 Q7. Elections make govt pay attention MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7. How much do you feel that having elections makes the government pay attention to what the people think -- good deal, some, or not much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD DEAL 3. SOME 5. NOT MUCH ============================== M001539 Q8. Attn govt pays to people when making decisions MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8. Over the years, how much attention do you feel the government pays to what people think when it decides what to do -- a good deal, some, or not much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD DEAL 3. SOME 5. NOT MUCH 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001540 R1a. Close to whites FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1a. FTF: WHITES CLOSE TO GROUP - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001541 R1a.T. Close to whites phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a.T. TELEPHONE: What about whites? Do you feel particularly close to whites? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001542 R1b. Close to poor people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1b. FTF: POOR PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - POOR PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001543 R1b.T. Close to poor people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1b.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) poor people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001544 R1c. Close to Asian Americans FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1c. FTF: ASIAN AMERICANS CLOSE TO GROUP - ASIAN AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001545 R1c.T. Close to Asian americans phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1c.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) Asian Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001546 R1d. Close to liberals FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1d. FTF: LIBERALS CLOSE TO GROUP - LIBERALS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001547 R1d.T. Close to liberals phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1d.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) liberals (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001548 R1e. Close to elderly FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1e. FTF: THE ELDERLY CLOSE TO GROUP - THE ELDERLY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001549 R1e.T. Close to elderly phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1e.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) the elderly (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001550 R1f. Close to blacks FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1f. FTF: BLACKS CLOSE TO GROUP - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001551 R1f.T. Close to blacks phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1f.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) blacks (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001552 R1g. Close to labor unions FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1g. FTF: LABOR UNIONS CLOSE TO GROUP - LABOR UNIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001553 R1g.T. Close to labor unions phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1g.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) labor unions (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001554 R1h. Close to feminists FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1h. FTF: FEMINISTS CLOSE TO GROUP - FEMINISTS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001555 R1h.T. Close to feminists phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1h.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) feminists (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001556 R1j. Close to southerners FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1j. FTF: SOUTHERNERS CLOSE TO GROUP - SOUTHERNERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001557 R1j.T. Close to southerners phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1j.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) southerners (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001558 R1k. Close to business people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1k. FTF: BUSINESS PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - BUSINESS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001559 R1k.T. Close to business people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1k.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) business people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001560 R1m. Close to young people FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1m. FTF: YOUNG PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - YOUNG PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001561 R1m.T. Close to young people phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1m.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) young people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001562 R1n. Close to conservatives FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1n. FTF: CONSERVATIVES CLOSE TO GROUP - CONSERVATIVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001563 R1n.T. Close to conservatives phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1n.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) conservatives (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001564 R1p. Close to Hispanic-Americans FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1p. FTF: HISPANIC-AMERICANS CLOSE TO GROUP - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001565 R1p.T. Close to Hispanic-Americans ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1p.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) Hispanic-Americans (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001566 R1q. Close to women FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1q. FTF: WOMEN CLOSE TO GROUP - WOMEN --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001567 R1q.T. Close to women phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1q.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) women (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001568 R1r. Close to working-class FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1r. FTF: WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE CLOSE TO PEOPLE - WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001569 R1r.T. Close to working-class phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1r.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) working-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001570 R1s .Close to middle-class FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1s. FTF: MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE CLOSE TO GROUP - MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001571 R1s.T. Close to middle-class phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1s.T. TELEPHONE: (What about) middle-class people (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001572 R1t. Close to men FTF MD: EQ 0 Numeric R1t. FTF: MEN CLOSE TO GROUP - MEN --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Mentioned by R 5. Not mentioned by R 0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview ============================== M001573 R1t.T. Close to men phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1t.T. TELEPHONE: What about) men (Do you feel particularly close to them?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in the wrong mode. In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic although administered FTF. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview ============================== M001574 R2a/R2a.T. Hardworking- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2a/R2a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites in general on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. HARDWORKING RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001575 R2b/R2b.T. Hardworking- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2b/R2b.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001576 R2c/R2c.T. Hardworking- Hispanic-America MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2c/R2c.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate: Hispanic Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001577 R2d/R2d.T. Hardworking- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2d/R2d.T. FTF: Still looking at page 8 of the booklet, Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) HARDWORKING RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. HARDWORKNG 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. LAZY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001578 R3a/R3a.T. Intelligence- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3a/R3a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. INTELLIGENT RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001579 R3b/R3b.T. Intelligence- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3b/R3b.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001580 R3c/R3c.T. Intelligence- Hispanic-Americ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3c/R3c.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001581 R3d/R3d.T. Intelligence- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3d/R3d.T. FTF: Still looking at page 9 of the booklet, Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate: Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) INTELLIGENT RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INTELLIGENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNINTELLIGENT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001582 R4a/R4a.T. Trustworthy- whites MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4a/R4a.T. FTF: Where would you rate whites in general on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other. TRUSTWORTHY RATING - WHITES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001583 R4b/R4b.T. Trustworthy- blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4b/R4b.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate blacks on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - BLACKS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001584 R4c/R4c.T. Trustworthy- Hispanic-America MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4c/R4c.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001585 R4d/R4d.T. Trustworthy- Asian-American MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R4d/R4d.T. FTF: (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet), Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale? TELEPHONE: Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.) TRUSTWORTHY RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TRUSTWORTHY 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. UNTRUSTWORTHY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001586 R5a. Independence or respect for elders MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5a. Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have: INDEPENDENCE OR RESPECT FOR ELDERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INDEPENDENCE 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. RESPECT FOR ELDERS 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001587 R5b. Obedience or self-reliance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5b. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) OBEDIENCE OR SELF-RELIANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OBEDIENCE 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. SELF-RELIANCE 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001588 R5c. Curiosity or good manners MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5c. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) CURIOSITY OR GOOD MANNERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CURIOSITY 3. BOTH [VOL] 5. GOOD MANNERS 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001589 R5d. Considerate or well behaved MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R5d. (Please tell me which one you think is more important for a child to have:) BEING CONSIDERATE OR WELL BEHAVED --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BEING CONSIDERATE 3. BOTH 5. WELL BEHAVED 7. NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001590 S1. Budget deficit lar/smal since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1. As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. GOTTEN SMALLER 3. GOTTEN LARGER --> SKIP TO S1b 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO S2 8. DK --> SKIP TO S2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001591 S1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1a. IF BUDGET DEFICIT SMALLER SINCE 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH SMALLER --> SKIP TO S2 5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER --> SKIP TO S2 ============================== M001591a S1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1b. IF BUDGET DEFICIT LARGER SINCE 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LARGER 5. SOMEWHAT LARGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S1 ============================== M001592 S1x. Summary - budget deficit since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1x. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S1 and S2a/b. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much stronger ============================== M001592a S1x1. Summary pre & post - budget deficit MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1x1. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? COMB SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q1s and Post S1x. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much stronger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001593 S2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO S3 8. DK --> SKIP TO S3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001594 S2a. Spend poor a lot/somwhat more/less MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2a. IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR INCREASED SINCE 1992/ IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR DECREASED SINCE 1992: A lot or somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S2 ============================== M001595 S2x. Summary - spending on poor since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2x. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S2 and S2a. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001595a S2x1. Summary pre & post - spending on poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2x1. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A little or a lot? COMB. SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q2x and Post S2x. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001596 S3. Economy better/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S3b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S4 8. DK --> SKIP TO S4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001597 S3a. Economy much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3a. IF U.S. ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S4 8. DK --> SKIP TO S4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3 ============================== M001598 S3b. Economy much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3b. IF U.S. ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3 ============================== M001599 S3x. Summary - economy since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S3, S3a, S3b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001599a S3x1. Summary pre & post - econ since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q3x and Post S3x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001600 S4. Clinton made economy better/worse since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO S4b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO S5 8. DK --> SKIP TO S5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001601 S4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S5 8. DK --> SKIP TO S5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4 ============================== M001602 S4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4 ============================== M001603 S4x. Summary - Clinton made econ better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4x. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S4, S4a, S4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001603a S4x1. Summary pre & post - Clinton made econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4x1. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q4x and Post S4x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001604 S5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001604a S5x. Clinton admin hurt/help R economically? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5x. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q5 and Post S5. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post interview ============================== M001605 S6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO S6b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO S7 8. DK --> SKIP TO ->S7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001606 S6a. U.S. much/somewhat more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6a. IF U.S. MORE SECURE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S7 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S7 ============================== M001607 S6b. U.S. much/somewhat less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6b. IF U.S LESS SECURE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S6 ============================== M001608 S6x. Summary - U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S6, S6a, S6b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001608a S6x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S6x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q6x and Post S6x. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001609 S7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO S7b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO S8 8. DK --> SKIP TO S8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001610 S7a. Clinton made much/smwht more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S8 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO S8 8. DK --> SKIP TO S8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7 ============================== M001611 S7b. Clinton made much/smwhat less secur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7 ============================== M001612 S7x. Summ-Clinton impact on U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7x. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S7, S7a, S7b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001612a S7x1. Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on secur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S7x1. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q7x and Post S7x. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No change 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001613 S8. U.S. crime rate better/wors since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S8b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S9 8. DK --> SKIP TO S9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001614 S8a. U.S. crime rate much/smwht better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8a. IF U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S9 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S9 8. DK --> SKIP TO S9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8 ============================== M001615 S8b. U.S. crime rate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8b. IF U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8 ============================== M001616 S8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8x. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S8, S8a, S8b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001616a S8x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S8x1. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q8x and Post S8x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001617 S9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S9b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO S10 8. DK --> SKIP TO S10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001618 S9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht bettr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S10 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S10 8. DK --> SKIP TO S10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9 ============================== M001619 S9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S.S CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9 ============================== M001620 S9x. Summ-Clinton impact on crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9x. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S9, S9a, S9b. 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001620a S9x1.Summ pre & post - Clinton impact on crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S9x1. Would you say that the Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q9x and Post S9x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001621 S10. Moral climate better/worse since 92 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S10b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO S11 8. DK --> SKIP TO S11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001622 S10a.Moral climate much/smwht better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10a. IF U.S MORAL CLIMATE BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S11 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S11 8. DK --> SKIP TO S11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10 ============================== M001623 S10b. Moral climate much/smwht worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S10b. IF U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10 ============================== M001624 S10x. Summary - moral climate since 92 Numeric S10x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S10, S10a, S10b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001624a S10x1. Summ pre & post - moral climate since 92 Numeric S10x1. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/ (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q10x and Post S10x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001625 S11. Clinton made moral climate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO S11b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO S14 8. DK --> SKIP TO S14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post ============================== M001626 S11a. Clinton made moral clim mch/s better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11a. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO S14 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO S14 8. DK --> SKIP TO S14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11 ============================== M001627 S11b. Clinton made moral clim mch/s worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11b. IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11 ============================== M001628 S11x. Summ-Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11x. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from S11, S11a, S11b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW ============================== M001628a S11x1.Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S11x1. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q11x and Post S11x. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001629 S14a. Clinton makes R angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001629a S14ax. Summ pre & post Clinton - angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14ax. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY COMB.PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14a and Post S14a. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001630 S14a1. How often Clinton makes R angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14a ============================== M001630a S14a1x. Summ pre & post - how often angry MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14a1x. How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTEN AFFECT - ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14a1 and Post S14a1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001631 S14b. Clinton makes R hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001631a S14bx. Summ pre & post Clinton -hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14bx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14b and Post S14b. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001632 S14b1. How often Clinton make R hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14b ============================== M001632a S14b1x. Summ pre & post - how often hopeful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14b1x. How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14b1 and Post S14b1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001633 S14c. Clinton makes R afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001633a S14cx. Summ pre & post Clinton - afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14cx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14c and Post S14c. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001634 S15c1. How often Clinton makes R afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S14c ============================== M001634a S14c1x. Summ pre & post - how often afraid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14c1x. How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14c1 and Post S14c1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001635 S14d. Clinton makes R proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001635a S14dx. Summ pre & post Clinton - proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14dx. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14d and Post S14d. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001636 S14d1. How often Clinton makes R proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14d ============================== M001636a S14d1x. Summ pre & post - how often proud MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S14d1x. How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q14d1 and Post S14d1. 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001637 S15a. Clinton trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15a. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001637a S15ax. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15ax. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15a and Post S15a. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001638 S15b. Clinton trait-cares about people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15b. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001638a S15bx. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait-cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15bx. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - CARES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15b and Post S15b. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001639 S15c. Clinton trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15c. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001639a S15cx. Summ pre & post-Clinton knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15cx. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15c and Post S15c. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001640 S15d. Clinton trait-strong leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15d. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001640a S15dx. Summ pre & post-Clinton leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15dx. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15d and Post S15d. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001641 S15e. Clinton trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15e. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001641a S15ex. Summ pre & post-Clinton dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15ex. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15e and Post S15e. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001642 S15f. Clinton trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15f. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001642a S15fx. Summ pre & post-Clinton-intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15fx. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15f and Post S15f. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001643 S15g. Clinton trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15g. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects and traits battery (S14-S15). If R did not get selected for the affects/traits battery in the Post election instrument they were assigned to administration in the Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa. The order in which Clinton affects were asked was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001643a S15gx. Summ pre & post-Clinton out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S15gx. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Q15g and Post S15g. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW ============================== M001644 T1. Did R watch a Pres debate on tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T1. Did you watch a televised presidential debate between Al Gore and George W. Bush? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, WATCHED --> SKIP TO T1a 5. NO, DIDN'T WATCH --> SKIP TO T2 8. DK --> SKIP TO T2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post ============================== M001645 T1a. Did R watch an entire or just part of debate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T1a. IF R WATCHED PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: Did you watch an entire debate or just part of it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WATCHED ENTIRE DEBATE 5. JUST PART OF IT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T1 ============================== M001646 T2. Did R listen to campaign speeches or diss on radio MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T2. Did you listen to any speeches or discussions about the campaign on the radio? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO T2a 5. NO --> SKIP TO T3 8. DK --> SKIP TO T3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001647 T2a. How much did R listen to radio speeches & diss MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T2a. IF R LISTENED TO RADIO CAMPAIGN PROGRAMS: Would you say you listened to a good many, several, or just one or two? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GOOD MANY 3. SEVERAL 5. JUST ONE OR TWO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T2 ============================== M001648 T3/T3.T. How much attention to Pres campaign news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T3/T3.T. FTF: Looking at page 12 in the booklet: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001649 T4/T4.T. How much attention to Cong campaign news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T4/T4.T. FTF: (Still on page 12 in the booklet) In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is, the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: In general, how much attention did you pay to news about the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is, the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001650 T5/T5.T. Two parties, no labels, or new party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T5/T5.T. FTF: Looking at page 13 of the booklet: Here is a question about political parties. Which of the following outcomes regarding political parties best represents what you would like to see happen? You can just tell me the number of the outcome you choose. TELEPHONE: Which one of the following outcomes regarding political parties best represents what you would like to see happen? ONE, a continuation of the two party system of Democrats and Republicans. TWO, elections in which candidates run as individuals without party labels or THREE, the growth of one or more parties that could effectively challenge the Democrats and Republicans? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ..A CONTINUATION OF THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM OF DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS? 2. ...ELECTIONS IN WHICH CANDIDATES RUN AS INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT PARTY LABELS? 3. ...THE GROWTH OF ONE OR MORE PARTIES THAT COULD EFFECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS? 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001651 T6. Is R satisfied with US Democracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric T6. On the whole, are you satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the United States? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable was added 11/10/2000. 1. SATISFIED 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 3. NOT VERY SATISFIED 4. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; interview administered before question added ============================== M001652 V1. Bush effect on US economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1. As you will remember, former President George Bush (George W. Bush's father) was elected in November 1988. The next several questions ask you to think about his four years as President. Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO V1b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO V2 7. DK ANYTHING ABOUT BUSH SR. [VOL.] --> SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001653 V1a. How much better Bush made economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1a. IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V2 8. DK --> SKIP TO V2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1 ============================== M001654 V1b. How much worse Bush made economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1b. IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1 ============================== M001655 V1x. Summary: Bush effect on economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V1x. Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON 1988-1992 ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V1, V1a, V1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW ============================== M001656 V2. Bush made US more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2. Would you say that the Bush administration made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TOV2b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V3 8. DK --> SKIP TO V3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001657 V2a. Bush made US how much more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO V3 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO V3 8. DK --> SKIP TO V3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2 ============================== M001658 V2b. Bush made US how much less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2 ============================== M001659 V2x. Summary: Bush effect on security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V2x. Would you say that the Bush administration made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON U.S. SECURITY 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V2, V2a, V2b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. No difference 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW ============================== M001660 V3. Bush effect on US crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3. Would you say that the Bush administration made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO V3b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V4 8. DK --> SKIP TO V4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001661 V3a. Bush made crime rate how mch better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V4 8. DK --> SKIP TO V4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3 ============================== M001662 V3b. Bush made crime rate how much worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3 ============================== M001663 V3x. Summary: Bush effect on crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V3x. Would you say that the Bush administration made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/ Much less secure or somewhat less secure? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON U.S. CRIME 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V3, V3a, V3b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW ============================== M001664 V4. Bush effect on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4. Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO V4b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO V5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001665 V4a. Bush moral climate how much better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4a. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO V5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO V5 8. DK --> SKIP TO V5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4 ============================== M001666 V4b. Bush moral climate how much worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4b. IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4 ============================== M001667 V4x. Summary: Bush effect on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V4x. Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference either way? Much better or somewhat better?/ Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON MORAL CLIMATE 1988-1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bult from V4, V4a, V4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW ============================== M001668 V5a. Bush trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5a. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001669 V5b. Bush trait - cares about people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5b. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001670 V5c. Bush trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5c. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL ============================== M001671 V5d. Bush trait - strong leadership MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5d. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001672 V5e. Bush trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5e. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001673 V5f. Bush trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5f. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001674 V5g. Bush trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric V5g. Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe former President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview ============================== M001675 Y5. Is R currently working MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y5. Are you currently working? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> Y7 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001676a Y6a. Why is R not working, reason 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6a. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5 ============================== M001676b Y6b. Why is R not working, reason 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6b. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention ============================== M001676c Y6c. Why is R not working, reason 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y6c. IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1] 1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY 2. UNEMPLOYED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY 3. RETIRED --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY 4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY 5. HOMEMAKER --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY 6. STUDENT --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention ============================== M001677 Y7. Workers: How satisfied is R with work MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: On the whole, how satisfied are you with the work you do? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY SATISFIED 2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 ============================== M001678 Y7a. WRKS: Does R spend work time with people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y7a. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5. OR BY YOURSELF 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 ============================== M001679 Y8. WRKS: Rs coworkers looking out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION ---> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5 ============================== M001680 Y8a. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8a. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 ============================== M001681 Y8b. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8b. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 ============================== M001682 Y8c. WRKS: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8c. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL --> Z1 2. QUITE WELL --> Z1 3. NOT TOO WELL --> Z1 4. NOT WELL AT ALL --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW --> Z1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 ============================== M001683 Y8d. WRKS:Racial diversity of Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y8d. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING: Thinking about the diversity of your workplace, are the people who work where you work all White, mostly white, about half and half, mostly Black, or all Black? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL WHITE 2. MOSTLY WHITE 3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF 4. MOSTLY BLACK 5. ALL BLACK 7. R VOLUNTEERS: OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8 ============================== M001684 Y10. Laid off:Does R spend days alone/with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: When you are working, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5. OR BY YOURSELF 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c ============================== M001685 Y11. LOff: Rs coworkers just looking out for selves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION ---> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c ============================== M001686 Y11a. LOff: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11a. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 ============================== M001687 Y11b. LOff:Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11b. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 ============================== M001688 Y11c. LOFF: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y11c. IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL --> Z1 2. QUITE WELL --> Z1 3. NOT TOO WELL --> Z1 4. NOT WELL AT ALL --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW --> Z1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11 ============================== M001689 Y15. Retired:Does R spend days alone/with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y15. IF R IS RETIRED: Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during the day with other people or were you pretty much by yourself? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5 OR BY YOURSELF 8 DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c ============================== M001690 Y16. RET:Rs coworker look out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16. IF R IS RETIRED: For these next few questions please continue thinking about your last job. I'm going to ask you about the people you saw regularly at work. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they were just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION --> Z1 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c ============================== M001691 Y16a. RET:Did Rs coworkers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16a. IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say those people you saw regularly at work tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 ============================== M001692 Y16b. RET:Were Rs coworkers respectful MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16b. IF R IS RETIRED: (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at work) Would you say that they treated others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 ============================== M001693 Y16c. RET: Does honest describe Rs coworkers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y16c. IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say that honest described the people you worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y16 ============================== M001694 Y17x. Summary: R work with others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y17x. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: In your current position, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?/ When you are working, do you spend time during the day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?/ Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during the day with other people or were you pretty much by yourself? SUMMARY: R WORK WITH OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 WITH OTHER PEOPLE 5 OR BY YOURSELF ============================== M001695 Y18x. Summary: co-workers look out for selves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18x. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they were just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS LOOK OUT FOR SELVES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION --> Z1 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; no Post IW ============================== M001696 Y18ax. Summary: co-workers try to take advantage MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18ax. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ Would you say those people you see regularly at work try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ Would you say those people you saw regularly at work tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TAKE ADVANTAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW ============================== M001697 Y18bx. Summary: co-workers treat others w/respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18bx. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at work) Would you say that they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/ (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at work) Would you say that they treated others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TREAT OTHERS WITH RESPECT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW ============================== M001698 Y18cx. Summary: co-workers honest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y18cx. IF R CURRENTLY WORKING / IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF / IF R IS RETIRED: Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?/ Would you say that honest describes the people you work with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?/ Would you say that honest described the people you worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS HONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x; no Post IW ============================== M001699 Z1. Person R discusses politics with: name 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z1. Now let's shift our attention to another area. From time to time, people discuss government, elections and politics with other people. I'd like to ask you about the people with whom you discuss these matters. These people might or might not be relatives. Can you think of anyone? R IDENTIFIES NAME 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z25 8. DK -->Z25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001700 Z3. Person R discusses politics with: name 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z3. Is there anyone else you talk with about these matters? R IDENTIFIES NAME 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001701 Z5. Person R discusses politics with: name 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z5. Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? R IDENTIFIES NAME 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001702 Z7. Person R discusses politics with: name 4 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z7. Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)? R IDENTIFIES NAME 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Z9 8. DK --> Z9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 ============================== M001703 Z9. Is name 1 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z10 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z9a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z9a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001704 Z9a. Is name 1 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001705 Z9b. Is name 1 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9b. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 ============================== M001706 Z9c. Does name 1 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9c. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 ============================== M001707 Z9d. Is name 1 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z9d. IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9 ============================== M001708 Z10. How often does R discuss politics w/name 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z10. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001709 Z11. How much does name 1 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z11. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001710 Z12. How name 1 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z12. I have another question about the first person you have named. How do you think voted in the election? Do you think he/she voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think didn't vote? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001711 Z13. Is name 2 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z14 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z13a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z13a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001712 Z13a. Is name 2 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001713 Z13b. Is name 2 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13b. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 ============================== M001714 Z13c. Does name 2 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13c. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 ============================== M001715 Z13d. Is name 2 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z13d. IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13 ============================== M001716 Z14. How often does R discuss politics w/name 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z14. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001717 Z15. How much does name 2 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z15. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001718 Z16. How name 2 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z16. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE [SPECIFY] 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3 ============================== M001719 Z17. Is name 3 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z18 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z17a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z17a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 ============================== M001720 Z17a. Is name 3 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 ============================== M001721 Z17b. Is name 3 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17b. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 ============================== M001722 Z17c. Does name 3 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17c. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 ============================== M001723 Z17d. Is name 3 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z17d. IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17 ============================== M001724 Z18. How often does R discuss politics w/name 3 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z18. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY, OR 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 ============================== M001725 Z19. How much does name 3 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z19. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5 ============================== M001726 Z20. How name 3 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z20. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) [SPECIFY] 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001727 Z21. Is name 4 relative MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21. Is a spouse or partner, other relative, or unrelated to you by blood or marriage? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER (A PARTNER IS LIKE A SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED) --> SKIP TO Z22 3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR --> SKIP TO Z21a 5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE --> SKIP TO Z21a 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 ============================== M001728 Z21a. Is name 4 male or female MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21a. IF NECESSARY: Is male or female? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22 5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 ============================== M001729 Z21b. Is name 4 coworker MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21b. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Is a co-worker? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21 ============================== M001730 Z21c. Does name 4 go to church with R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21c. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Do you and go to the same place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21 ============================== M001731 Z21d. Is name 4 a neighbor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z21d. IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE: Does live in your neighborhood? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO ============================== M001732 Z22. How often does R discuss politics w/name 4 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z22. When you talk with , do you discuss political matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OFTEN 3. SOMETIMES 5. RARELY, OR 7. NEVER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 ============================== M001733 Z23. How much does name 4 know about politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z23. Generally speaking, how much do you think knows about politics? Would you say: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK - DON'T PROBE 9. RF - DON'T PROBE 0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7 ============================== M001734 Z24. How name 4 voted in election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z24. Do you think voted for Al Gore, George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't vote?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 3. GEORGE W BUSH 5. SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) 7. DIDN'T VOTE 8. INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL] 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001735 Z25. Has R worked with neighbor on common issue/year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z25. Now, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in your neighborhood. During the past twelve months, have you worked with others from your neighborhood to deal with a common issue or problem? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001736 Z26. How satisfied is R with neighbrhood MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z26. On the whole, how satisfied are you with your neighborhood? Would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY SATISIFIED 2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED 3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001737 Z27. Are neighbors just looking out for themselves MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27. I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you regularly see in your neighborhood. In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they are just looking out for themselves all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001738 Z27a. Do neighbors try to take advantage of others MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27a. Would you say those people you see regularly in your neighborhood try to take advantage of others all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 2. MOST OF THE TIME 3. SOME OF THE TIME 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001739 Z27b. Do neighbors treat others w/respect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Z27b. (Again, thinking about those people you see in your neighborhood) Would you say they treat others with respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL OF THE TIME 3. MOST OF THE TIME 5. SOME OF THE TIME 7. HARDLY EVER 8. NEVER 98. DK - DON'T PROBE 99. RF - DON'T PROBE 00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1 ============================== M001740 Z27c. Does honest describe neighbors MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z27c. Would you say that honest describes the people in your neighborhood extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8 DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001741 Z27d. What is the racial diversity of neighborhood MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z27d. Thinking about the diversity of your neighborhood, are the people who live where you live all White, mostly white, about half and half, mostly Black, or all Black? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALL WHITE 2. MOSTLY WHITE 3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF 4. MOSTLY BLACK 5. ALL BLACK 7. R VOLUNEERS: OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001742 Z28. How satisfying is Rs life MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Z28. In general, how satisfying do you find the way you're spending your life these days? Would you call it completely satisfying, pretty satisfying, or not very satisfying? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETELY SATISFYING 3. PRETTY SATISFYING 5. NOT VERY SATISFYING 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001743a ZZ1(1). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(1). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001743b ZZ1(2). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(2). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention ============================== M001743c ZZ1(3). Others present for interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ1(3). Others present at time of interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHLDREN UNDER 6 2. OLDER CHILDREN 3. SPOUSE 4. OTHER RELATIVES 5. OTHER ADULTS 7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL 9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention ============================== M001744 ZZ2. Rs cooperation MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ2. R's cooperation was: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY GOOD 2. GOOD 3. FAIR 4. POOR 5. VERY POOR 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001745 ZZ3. Rs knowledge of politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ3. R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001746 ZZ4. Rs apparent intelligence MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ4. R's apparent intelligence: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001747 ZZ5. How suspicious did R seem MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ5. How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS 3. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS 5. VERY SUSPICIOUS 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001748 ZZ6. How great Rs interest in IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ6. Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY HIGH 2. FAIRLY HIGH 3. AVERAGE 4. FAIRLY LOW 5. VERY LOW 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001749 ZZ7. How sincere did R seem MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ7. How sincere did R seem in his/her answers? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. COMPLETE SINCERE --> ZZ11 3. USUALLY SINCERE --> ZZ7a 5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE --> ZZ7a 0. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001750 ZZ7a. Areas IWR doubted sincerity Character ZZ7a. IF R NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE: Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you doubted R's sincerity? (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER] This response was blanked to preserve the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== M001751a ZZ11(1). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(1). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751b ZZ11(2). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(2). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751c ZZ11(3). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(3). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751d ZZ11(4). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(4). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751e ZZ11(5). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(5). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751f ZZ11(6). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(6). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001751g ZZ11(7). Rs reaction to IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric ZZ11(7). R's reaction to interview: MENTION 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL 11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG 12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED 13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS 15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED. AFTER STARTING IW, R MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW 20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD EYESIGHT ETC. IW WAS HARD FOR R 22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS SLOW READER. IW WAS HARD FOR R 30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW 31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES, OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. 40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS 41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT 45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS 50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET 70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT) 80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK 00. NA; INAP, no Post interview ============================== M001752 Post-Rand.C9(2). MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Rand.C9(2). Order of Dem and Repub names in Vote section --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD) 2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD) 0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C. ============================== M001753 Post-Rand.D2b-D2d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.D1b-D1d. Order of Gore, GW Bush and Nader in Post Thermometers D1b-D1d --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after Clinton (1st name) On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Nader 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Nader 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Nader 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Nader 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Nader 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Nader 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW ============================== M001754 Post-Rand.D2g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1g. Order of Democratic House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no Democratic candidate ============================== M001755 Post-Rand.D2h. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1h. Order of Republican House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no Republican candidate ============================== M001756 Post-Rand.D2j. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1j. Order of Retiring House Representative in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; no retiring House representative ============================== M001757 Post-Rand.D2k. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1k. Order of Democratic Senate candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state ============================== M001758 Post-Rand.D2m. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1m. Order of Republican Senate candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no race in state ============================== M001759 Post-Rand.D2n. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D1n. Order of Independent Incumbent House candidate in Post Thermometers D1g-D1n --------------------------------------------------------------------- This var represents candidates in VT01 and VA05. D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 7-12 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA; INAP, no independent incumbent House candidate ============================== M001760 Post-Rand.D3a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2a. Order of Supreme Court in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001761 Post-Rand.D3b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2b. Order of Congress in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001762 Post-Rand.D3c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2c. Order of the Military in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001763 Post-Rand.D3d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2d. Order of the Federal Govt in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001764 Post-Rand.D3e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2e. Order of Blacks in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001765 Post-Rand.D3f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2f. Order of Whites in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001766 Post-Rand.D3g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2g. Order of Conservatives in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001767 Post-Rand.D3h. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2h. Order of Liberals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001768 Post-Rand.D3j. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2j. Order of Labor Unions in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001769 Post-Rand.D3k. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2k. Order of Big Business in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001770 Post-Rand.D3m. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2m. Order of Poor People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001771 Post-Rand.D3n. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2n. Order of People on Welfare in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001772 Post-Rand.D3p. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2p. Order of Hispanics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001773 Post-Rand.D3q. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2q. Order of Christian Fund in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001774 Post-Rand.D3r. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2r. Order of Women's Movement in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001775 Post-Rand.D3s. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2s. Order of Older People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001776 Post-Rand.D3t. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2t. Order of Environmentalists in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001777 Post-Rand.D3u. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2u. Order of Homosexuals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001778 Post-Rand.D3v. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2v. Order of Christian Coalition in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001779 Post-Rand.D3w. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2w. Order of Catholics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001780 Post-Rand.D3x. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2x. Order of Jews in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001781 Post-Rand.D3xx. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2xx. Order of Protestants in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: ============================== M001782 Post-Rand.D3y. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2y. Order of Feminists in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001783 Post-Rand.D3z. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Rand.D2z. Order of Asian-Americans in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-24 and: 00. Inap, no Post interview 99. NA ============================== M001784 Post-Rand.E1/E3. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.E1/E3. Post: Order of Democratic/Republican House candidates in 'Likes-Dislikes' E1-E2/E3-E4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate first, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate first, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001785 Post-Rand.G3-G5. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G3-G5. Post: Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Liberal- Conservative placements G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after Clinton (1st name). On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th 2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th 3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th 4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th 5. Buchanan 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th 6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001786 Post-Rand.G6-G7. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G6-G7. Post: Order of Democratic and Republican House candidates in Liberal-Conservative Placements G6-G7/G6.T-G7.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore, GW Bush, and Buchanan. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 5th, Republican House candidate 6th 2. Republican House candidate 5th, Democratic House candidate 6th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ^ ============================== M001787 Post-Rand.G8-G10. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G8-G10. Post: Order of Democratic, Republican, and Reform parties in Liberal-Conservative Placements G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan, the Democratic House candidate, and the Republican House candidate. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Reform Party 9th 2. Democratic Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Republican Party 9th 3. Republican Party 7th, Democratic Party 8th, Reform Party 9th 4. Republican Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th 5. Reform Party 7th , Democratic Party 8th, Republican Party 9th 6. Reform Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001788 Post-Rand.G11b/c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G11b/c. Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in Services-Spending placements G11b-G11c/G11b.T-G11c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001789 Post-Rand.G12b/c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.G12b/c. Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in Abortion placements G12b-G12c/G12b.T-G12c.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd 2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001790 Post-Rand.R2b-R2d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R2b-R2d. Post: Order of racial groups Hardworking R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001791 Post-Rand.R3b-R3d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R3b-R3d. Post: Order of racial groups Intelligent R3b-R3d/R3b.T-R3d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001792 Post-Rand.R4b-R4d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.R4b-R4d. Post: Order of racial groups Trustworthy R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- These names were randomly administered after whites. On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. 1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th 4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th 6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001793 Post-Rand.S14a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14a. Post: Order of Angry in Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001794 Post-Rand.S14b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14b. Post: Order of Hopeful Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001795 Post-Rand.S14c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14c. Post: Order of Afraid Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001796 Post-Rand.S14d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S14d. Post: Order of Proud Clinton affects S14a-S14d --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-4 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001797 Post-Rand.S15a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15a. Post: Order of Moral in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001798 Post-Rand.S15b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15b. Post: Order of Really Cares in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001799 Post-Rand.S15c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15c. Post: Order of Knowlegeable in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001800 Post-Rand.S15d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15d. Post: Order of Leadership in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001801 Post-Rand.S15e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15e. Post: Order of Dishonest in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001802 Post-Rand.S15f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15f. Post: Order of Intelligent in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001803 Post-Rand.S15g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.S15g. Post: Order of Out of Touch in Clinton traits S15a-S15g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE ============================== M001804 Post-Rand.V5a. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5a. Post: Order of Moral in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001805 Post-Rand.V5b. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5b. Post: Order of Really Cares in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001806 Post-Rand.V5c. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5c. Post: Order of Knowledgeable in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001807 Post-Rand.V5d. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5d. Post: Order of Leadership in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001808 Post-Rand.V5e. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5e. Post: Order of Dishonest in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001809 Post-Rand.V5f. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5f. Post: Order of Intelligent in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================== M001810 Post-Rand.V5g. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Rand.V5g. Post: Order of Out of Touch in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented here. Codes 1-7 and: 0. Inap, no Post interview 9. NA ============================ ============================== M021001 STUDY.1. 2002 'Panel' or Fresh Cross Resp Numeric STUDY.1 'Panel'/Fresh Cross -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 'Panel' case 2. Fresh cross-section case ============================== M021002 STUDY.2. 2002 Pre Only or Pre and Post Numeric STUDY.2 Pre-only or Pre-and-Post -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Pre interview only 2. Pre interview and Post interview ============================== M021100 HHLISTING.0. FRESH CROSS Selection Table Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.0 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household Selection Table -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from all household members who are eligible adults.(An eligible adult is a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or older). A Selection Table was randomly assigned to all households in the Fresh Cross sample component. After a complete listing of the HH was taken, each eligible adult was assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of gender and age [beginning with the oldest male as number 1, males numbered by increments of 1 according to descending age; females numbered by descending age starting with the number one higher than that assigned to the youngest male]. The interviewer then used the Selection Table to determine the "Number" of the eligible adult to be interviewed. There were 8 different selection tables. #PERSONS PERSON SELECTED (person "Number") --------------------------------- A B1 B2 C D E1 E2 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 1 2 2 2 4 3 5 5 6 or more 1 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 1. Selection Table A1 2. Selection Table B1 3. Selection Table B2 4. Selection Table C 5. Selection Table D 6. Selection Table E1 7. Selection Table E2 8. Selection Table F 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021101a HHLISTING.1a. 1st HH List Gend-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.1a IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 1st HH member gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the first household member mentioned in the household listing of all adult household members. The household listing was provided by a household member ('informant'). The first name in the household listing corresponds to the informant. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021101b HHLISTING.1b. 1st HH List Age-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.1b IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 1st HH member age -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the first household member mentioned in the household listing (informant). Ages 18-90 and: 00. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021101c HHLISTING.1c. 1st HH List Citiz-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.1c IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 1st HH member citizen -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the first household member mentioned in the household listing (informant). 1. Yes, a citizen 5. No, not a citizen 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021101d HHLISTING.1d. 1st HH List Pers#-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.1d IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 1st HH member Person Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the first household member mentioned in the household listing (informant). This represents the 'Person number' (if any) assigned to this household member, according to the numbering process used to number eligible household members while administering the Selection Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0). 1. HH member is eligible person 1 2. HH member is eligible person 2 3. HH member is eligible person 3 4. HH member is eligible person 4 5. HH member is eligible person 5 6. HH member is eligible person 6 0. NA INAP. Not an eligible household member; 'Panel' case ============================== M021102a HHLISTING.2a. 2nd HH List Gend-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.2a IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 2nd HH member gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the second household member mentioned in the household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided by a household member or informed contact, of all adult household members. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021102b HHLISTING.2b. 2nd HH List Age-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.2b IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 2nd HH member age -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the second household member mentioned in the household listing. Ages 18-90 and: 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021102c HHLISTING.2c. 2nd HH List Citiz-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.2c IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing -2nd HH member citizen -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the second household member mentioned in the household listing. 1. Yes, a citizen 5. No, not a citizen 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021102d HHLISTING.2d. 2nd HH List Pers#-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.2d IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 2nd HH member Person Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the second household member mentioned in the household listing. This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household member, according to the numbering process used to number eligible household members while administering the Selection Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0). 1. HH member is eligible person 1 2. HH member is eligible person 2 3. HH member is eligible person 3 4. HH member is eligible person 4 5. HH member is eligible person 5 6. HH member is eligible person 6 0. NA INAP. Not an eligible household member; No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021102e HHLISTING.2e. 2nd HH List Relat-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.2e IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 2nd HH member Relationship to Informant -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the second household member mentioned in the household listing. The description was provided by informant. 01. Wife 02. Husband 03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner 04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner 11. Daughter/stepdaughter 12. Son/stepson 14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband 15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife 16. Foster son 21. Mother 22. Father 31. Grandmother 32. Grandfather 41. Sister 42. Brother 51. Niece 52. Nephew 61. Aunt 62. Uncle 70. Roommate /friend 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021103a HHLISTING.3a. 3rd HH List Gend-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.3a IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 3rd HH member gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the third household member mentioned in the household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided by a household member or informed contact, of all adult household members. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021103b HHLISTING.3b. 3rd HH List Age-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.3b IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 3rd HH member age -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the third household member mentioned in the household listing. Ages 18-90 and: 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021103c HHLISTING.3c. 3rd HH List Citiz-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.3c IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing -3rd HH member citizen -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the third household member mentioned in the household listing. 1. Yes, a citizen 5. No, not a citizen 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021103d HHLISTING.3d. 3rd HH List Pers#-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.3d IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 3rd HH member Person Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the third household member mentioned in the household listing. This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household member, according to the numbering process used to number eligible household members while administering the Selection Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0). 1. HH member is eligible person 1 2. HH member is eligible person 2 3. HH member is eligible person 3 4. HH member is eligible person 4 5. HH member is eligible person 5 6. HH member is eligible person 6 0. NA INAP. Not an eligible household member; No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021103e HHLISTING.3e. 3rd HH List Relat-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.3e IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 3rd HH member Relationship to Informant -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the third household member mentioned in the household listing. The description was provided by informant. 01. Wife 02. Husband 03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner 04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner 11. Daughter/stepdaughter 12. Son/stepson 14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband 15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife 16. Foster son 21. Mother 22. Father 31. Grandmother 32. Grandfather 41. Sister 42. Brother 51. Niece 52. Nephew 61. Aunt 62. Uncle 70. Roommate /friend 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021104a HHLISTING.4a. 4th HH List Gend-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.4a IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 4th HH member gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided by a household member or informed contact, of all adult household members. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021104b HHLISTING.4b. 4th HH List Age-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.4b IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 4th HH member age -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the household listing. Ages 18-90 and: 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021104c HHLISTING.4c. 4th HH List Citiz-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.4c IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing -4th HH member citizen -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the household listing. 1. Yes, a citizen 5. No, not a citizen 0. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021104d HHLISTING.4d. 4th HH List Pers#-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.4d IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 4th HH member Person Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the household listing. This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household member, according to the numbering process used to number eligible household members while administering the Selection Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0). 1. HH member is eligible person 1 2. HH member is eligible person 2 3. HH member is eligible person 3 4. HH member is eligible person 4 5. HH member is eligible person 5 6. HH member is eligible person 6 0. NA INAP. Not an eligible household member; no further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021104e HHLISTING.4e. 4th HH List Relat-FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.4e IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household listing - 4th HH member Relationship to Informant -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the household listing. The description was provided by informant. 01. Wife 02. Husband 03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner 04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner 11. Daughter/stepdaughter 12. Son/stepson 14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband 15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife 16. Foster son 21. Mother 22. Father 31. Grandmother 32. Grandfather 41. Sister 42. Brother 51. Niece 52. Nephew 61. Aunt 62. Uncle 70. Roommate /friend 00. NA INAP. No further members of Household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021105 HHLISTING.5. Number Adults -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.5 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Number of adults in Household -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. One adult in Household 2. Two adults in Household 3. Three adults in Household 4. Four adults in Household 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021106 HHLISTING.6. Num Elig Adults-FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.6 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Number of eligible adults in Household -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. One eligible adult in Household 2. Two eligible adults in Household 3. Three eligible adults in Household 4. Four eligible adults in Household 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021107 HHLISTING.7. Number children-FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Number of children in Household -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. No children in Household 01. One child in Household 02. Two children in Household 03. Three children in Household 04. Four children in Household 05. Five children in Household 06. Six children in Household 99. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021107a HHLISTING.7. Age 1st child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7a IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 1st child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021107b HHLISTING.7b. Age 2nd child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7b IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 2nd child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; no additional children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021107c HHLISTING.7c. Age 3rd child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7c IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 3rd child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; no additional children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021107d HHLISTING.7d. Age 4th child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7d IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 4th child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; no additional children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021107e HHLISTING.7e. Age 5th child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7e IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 5th child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; no additional children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021107f HHLISTING.7f. Age 6th child -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 99 HHLISTING.7f IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Age of 6th child -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age 1-17 and: 00. Under 1 year old 99. NA INAP. No children in household; no additional children in household; 'Panel' case ============================== M021108 HHLISTING.8. R Person No. -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.8 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: R Person Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the person number assigned to R in the Household Listing for administration of the Selection Table. 1. R is person numbered 1 2. R is person numbered 2 3. R is person numbered 3 4. R is person numbered 4 0. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021109 HHLISTING.9. HH Composition -FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0 HHLISTING.9 IF FRESH-CROSS CASE: Household composition -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The HH composition code is derived from information provided in the household listing. "Adults" are 18 years of age or older; all individuals included in the HH composition codes below refer to adults. 10. 1 adult male HHR 11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative 12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 20. 1 adult female HHR 21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative 22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living at home are under 18 40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative 50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives 51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative 52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives 55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives 60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative 65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and non relatives 70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative 85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives 90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 00. NA INAP. 'Panel' case ============================== M021201 Sample.1. FIPS State Code Numeric Missing eq 99 Sample.1 FIPS State Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state identified for the Post instrument preload. 01. Alabama 02. Alaska 04. Arizona 05. Arkansas 06. California 08. Colorado 09. Connecticut 10. Delaware 11. Washington DC 12. Florida 13. Georgia 15. Hawaii 16. Idaho 17. Illinois 18. Indiana 19. Iowa 20. Kansas 21. Kentucky 22. Louisiana 23. Maine 24. Maryland 25. Massachusetts 26. Michigan 27. Minnesota 28. Mississippi 29. Missouri 30. Montana 31. Nebraska 32. Nevada 33. New Hampshire 34. New Jersey 35. New Mexico 36. New York 37. North Carolina 38. North Dakota 39. Ohio 40. Oklahoma 41. Oregon 42. Pennsylvania 44. Rhode Island 45. South Carolina 46. South Dakota 47. Tennessee 48. Texas 49. Utah 50. Vermont 51. Virginia 53. Washington 54. West Virginia 55. Wisconsin 56. Wyoming 99. NA ============================== M021201a Sample.1a. ICPSR State Code Numeric Missing eq 99 Sample.1a ICPSR State Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state identified for the Post instrument preload. 01. Connecticut 02. Maine 03. Massachusetts 04. New Hampshire 05. Rhode Island 06. Vermont 11. Delaware 12. New Jersey 13. New York 14. Pennsylvania 21. Illinois 22. Indiana 23. Michigan 24. Ohio 25. Wisconsin 31. Iowa 32. Kansas 33. Minnesota 34. Missouri 35. Nebraska 36. North Dakota 37. South Dakota 40. Virginia 41. Alabama 42. Arkansas 43. Florida 44. Georgia 45. Louisiana 46. Mississippi 47. North Carolina 48. South Carolina 49. Texas 51. Kentucky 52. Maryland 53. Oklahoma 54. Tennessee 55. Washington DC 56. West Virginia 61. Arizona 62. Colorado 63. Idaho 64. Montana 65. Nevada 66. New Mexico 67. Utah 68. Wyoming 71. California 72. Oregon 73. Washington 99. NA ============================== M021201b Sample.1b. State Abbreviation Character Sample.1b State abbreviation (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state identified for the Post instrument preload. ============================== M021202 Sample.2. Congressional District Number Numeric Missing eq 99 Sample.2 Congressional District Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the congressional district identified for the Post instrument preload. Codes 1-52 and: 77. Washington DC 99. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M021202a Sample.2a. FIPS State and District Numeric Missing eq 9999 Sample.2a FIPS State code and Congressional District Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state and district identified for the Post instrument preload. The first 2 digits are FIPS state code; last 2 digits are Congressional district number. 1100=Washington DC 9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M021202b Sample.2b. ICPSR State and District Numeric Missing eq 9999 Sample.2b ICPSR State code and Congressional District Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state and district identified for the Post instrument preload. The first 2 digits are ICPSR state code; last 2 digits are Congressional district number. 5500=Washington DC 9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M021202c Sample.2c. State Abbrev and District Character Sample.2c State Abbreviation and Congressional District Number (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the state and district identified for the Post instrument preload. "DC00"=Washington DC. "9999" corresponds to 1 in Summary.1 INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M021203 Census region Numeric Sample.3 Census region -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Sample.2. 1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT) 2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI) 3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV) 4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY) ============================== M021204 2000 Census Urban/Rural Classification Numeric Missing eq 0 Sample.4 2000 Census Urban/Rural Classification -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes. 1. Urban 2. Rural 0. NA ============================== M021205 2000 Census FIPS County code Numeric Missing eq 0 Sample.5 2000 Census FIPS County code (state and county) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes. This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. 00000. NA ============================== M021206 2000 Census Place code Numeric Missing eq 0 Sample.6 2000 Census Place code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes. This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. 00000. NA INAP. No defined Census Place ============================== M021207 2000 Census MSA code Numeric Missing eq 0 Sample.7 2000 Census MSA code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes. This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. 0000. NA INAP. Location not in MSA ============================== M021208 2000 Census Tract Numeric Missing eq 0 Sample.8 2000 Census Tract -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes. This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. 0000.00 NA ============================== M022000 PreAdmin.0. Form of Pre interview Numeric Missing eq 0 PreAdmin.25 Form of 2002 Pre Interview -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aside from various randomly assigned wording and placement/order options, the following content options were randomly assigned to 1/2 samples in the Pre: 1- either K1 series or K2 series of Federal budget spending items (increase/decrease) 2- L2 general income inequality as open end (L2a/L2b)or as closed series (L2c/L2d) [each has wording variants] 3- Income inequality questions for either race (P1 series) or gender (P2 series) [each series includes wording variants] 01. K1 spending - L2OPEN - P1RACE 02. K1 spending - L2OPEN - P2GENDER 03. K1 spending - L2CLOSED - P1RACE 04. K1 spending - L2CLOSED - P2GENDER 06. K2 spending - L2OPEN - P1RACE 06. K2 spending - L2OPEN - P2GENDER 07. K2 spending - L2CLOSED - P1RACE 08. K2 spending - L2CLOSED - P2GENDER 00. NA ============================== M022001 PreAdmin.1. Release Numeric PreAdmin.1 Pre Release number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1st third 2. 2nd third 3. remainder ============================== M022002 PreAdmin.2. Mode Numeric PreAdmin.2 Pre Mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Telephone ============================== M022003 PreAdmin.3. Number of calls Numeric Missing eq 99 PreAdmin.3 Pre number of calls -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-25 99. NA ============================== M022004 PreAdmin.4. Result Numeric PreAdmin.4 Pre Result -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There were no partials in the 2002 Pre. 1. Completed interview ============================== M022005 PreAdmin.5. Language Numeric PreAdmin.5 Pre language -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. English ============================== M022006 PreAdmin.6. Verification Numeric PreAdmin.6 Pre interview verification -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing facility. 5. No verification ============================== M022007 PreAdmin.7. Evaluation Numeric PreAdmin.7 Pre interview evaluation -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing facility. 5. No evaluation ============================== M022008 PreAdmin.8. Tape recorded Numeric PreAdmin.8 Pre interview tape-recorded -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Tape recorded 5. Not tape recorded ============================== M022009 PreAdmin.9. Interviewed in parts Numeric PreAdmin.9 Pre interview in parts -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions) 5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session) ============================== M022010 PreAdmin.10. Number of parts Numeric Missing eq 9 PreAdmin.10 IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS: Pre number of parts -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-5 9. NA INAP. Not interviewed in parts (5 in PreAdmin.9) ============================== M022011 PreAdmin.11. Number of interviewers Numeric Missing eq 9 PreAdmin.11 Pre number of interviewers -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5). 9. NA ============================== M022012a PreAdmin.12a. Beginning month Numeric PreAdmin.12a Pre interview - beginning month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November ============================== M022012b PreAdmin.12b. Beginning day Numeric PreAdmin.12b Pre interview - beginning day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-31 ============================== M022012c PreAdmin.12c. Beginning month and day Character PreAdmin.12c Pre interview - beginning month and day (MMDD) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a character variable ============================== M022012d PreAdmin.12d. Days before election Numeric Missing eq 0 PreAdmin.12d Pre Interview - Number of days before election -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on beginning date of interview. The 2002 national elections were held November 5. 00. NA ============================== M022013a PreAdmin.13a. Ending month Numeric PreAdmin.13a Pre interview - ending month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November ============================== M022013b PreAdmin.13b. Ending day Numeric PreAdmin.13b Pre interview - ending day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-31 ============================== M022013c PreAdmin.12c. Ending month and day Character PreAdmin.13c Pre interview - ending month and day (MMDD) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a character variable ============================== M022014 PreAdmin.14. Pre Address given Numeric PreAdmin.14 Pre payment address given? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No ============================== M022015 PreAdmin.15. Payment mode Numeric PreAdmin.15 IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Pre payment mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Check INAP. 5 in PreAdmin.14 ============================== M022016 PreAdmin.16. Payment amount Numeric PreAdmin.16 IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Pre payment amount -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 50. Fifty dollars INAP. 5 in PreAdmin.14 ============================== M022017a PreAdmin.17a. Month payment mailed Numeric PreAdmin.17a IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Date Pre payment mailed - month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November INAP. 5 in PreAdmin.14 ============================== M022017b PreAdmin.17b. Day payment mailed Numeric PreAdmin.17b IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Date Pre payment mailed - day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-31 INAP. 5 in PreAdmin.14 ============================== M022018 PreAdmin.18. Pre Interview Lengt Numeric Missing eq 0 PreAdmin.18 Pre Interview Length -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is length in minutes. 0. NA ============================== M022019 PreAdmin.19. Pre Interviewer IW Number Numeric Missing eq 0 PreAdmin.19 Pre Interviewer's Interview Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This represents the Nth interview of the interviewer. 0. NA ============================== M022020 PreAdmin.20. Pre Persuasion letter sent Numeric PreAdmin.20 Pre Persuasion letter sent -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No letter sent 1. Pre persuasion letter sent ============================== M022021 PreAdmin.21. Date of Pre Persuasion Lett Character PreAdmin.21 Date of Pre Persuasion Letter -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a character variable MMDD. INAP. No Pre persuasion letter ============================== M022022 PreAdmin.22. Type Pre Persuasion Letter Numeric PreAdmin.22 Type of Pre Persuasion letter sent -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For types 21, 22 and 24, increased compensation ($40) was offered in the persuasion letter. 11. 'Panel' Busy 12. 'Panel' Health 13. 'Panel' No Contact 14. 'Panel' Reluctant 21. Fresh Cross Busy 22. Fresh Cross Health 23. Fresh Cross No Contact 24. Fresh Cross Reluctant 30. Special INAP. No Pre persuasion letter ============================== M022023 PreAdmin.23. Second Persuasion Letter Character PreAdmin.23 2nd Persuasion Letter sent -------------------------------------------------------------------------- At a late stage of the Pre production period (on October 28, 2002), a special letter offering final maximum compensation ($50) was sent to 872 'panel' cases which were not yet completions. This letter was in addition to the persuasion letter described in PreAdmin.22. (Note: Fresh cross cases were also offered $50 late in the Pre production period, but these offers were made by telephone). 0. 2nd letter not sent 1. 2nd persuasion letter sent October 28, 2002 INAP. Fresh Cross case ============================== M022024 IWR.1. Pre IWR of Record Numeric Missing eq 0 PreIWR.1 PRE Interviewer of Record -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer ID number is coded and: 000. NA ============================== M022025 IWR.2. Pre IWR Gender Numeric Missing eq 0 PreIWR.2 PRE Interviewer Gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA ============================== M022026 IWR.3. Pre IWR Education Level Numeric Missing eq 0 PreIWR.3 PRE Interviewer Education Level (highest education) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D 0. NA ============================== M022027 IWR.4. Pre IWR Race Numeric Missing eq 0 PreIWR.4 PRE Interviewer Race -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 5. Other 0. NA ============================== M022027a IWR.4a. Pre IWR Ethnicity Numeric Missing eq 9 PreIWR.4a PRE Interviewer Ethnicity -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 0. No ethnicity mentioned 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA ============================== M022028 IWR.5. Pre IWR languages Numeric Missing eq 9 PreIWR.5 PRE Interviewer Languages -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 0. No languages spoken 1. Spanish 7. Other 9. NA ============================== M022029 IWR.6. Pre IWR experience Numeric Missing eq 99 PreIWR.6 PRE Interviewer Experience -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 00. None 01. 1 Year or less 02. 13-23 Months 03. 2 years 04. 4 years 05. 5 years 06. 6 years 07. 7 years 08. 8 years 09. 9 years 99. NA ============================== M022030 IWR.7. Pre IWR Age Numeric Missing eq 0 PreIWR.7 PRE Interviewer Age (age groups) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Pre interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 61-64 years 8. 65-79 years 0. NA ============================== M022401 PreRand.C1. RANDOMIZATION C1 PRE THERM Numeric PreRand.C1 RANDOMIZATION C1 PRE THERMOMETER SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Pre interview thermometer questions (C1 series). Two orderings were possible. 1. Order C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r 2. Order C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j ============================== M022402 PreRand.H5J5. RANDOMIZATION PRE H5/J5 Numeric PreRand.H5J5 RANDOMIZATION PRE H5/J5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either H4 or J5 in the Pre (alternate placements for President Bush performance on the economy). 1. H5 administered in the Pre interview 2. J5 administered in the Pre interview ============================== M022403 PreRand.H7. ORDER OF TEXT - PRE H7 Numeric PreRand.H7 ORDER OF TEXT - PRE H7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre question H7 (party that would perform better on the economy) with either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first. 1. Democrats first, Republicans second 2. Republicans first, Democrats second ============================== M022404 PreRand.J4R1. RANDOMIZATION PRE J4/R1 Numeric PreRand.J4R1 RANDOMIZATION PRE J4/R1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either J4a and J4d or else R1a and R1d in the Pre (alternate placements for patriotism items). 1. J4 administered in the Pre interview 2. R1 administered in the Pre interview ============================== M022405 PreRand.K1K2. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1/K2 Numeric PreRand.K1K2 RANDOMIZATION PRE K1/K2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either the K1 Federal spending items or the K2 Federal spending items. (If R was administered K1 in the Pre, then questions corresponding to K2 were asked in the Post; if R was administered K2 in the Pre, then questions corresponding to K1 were asked in the Post.) 1. R administered K1 in the Pre 2. R administered K2 in the Pre ============================== M022406 PreRand.K1. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1 SERIES Numeric PreRand.K1 RANDOMIZATION PRE K1 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Pre K1 series Federal spending items. Two orderings were possible. 1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h 2. K1a,g,e,b,c,f,h,d INAP. Not administered K1 in the Pre ============================== M022407 PreRand.K1d. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1d WORD Numeric PreRand.K1d RANDOMIZATION PRE K1d WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item K1d in the Pre. 1. "Public schools" 2. "Big city schools" INAP. Not administered K1 in the Pre ============================== M022408 PreRand.K1g. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1g WORD Numeric PreRand.K1g RANDOMIZATION PRE K1g WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item K1g in the Pre. 1. "Homeland security" 2. "War on terrorism" INAP. Not administered K1 in the Pre ============================== M022409 PreRand.K2. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2 SERIES Numeric PreRand.K2 RANDOMIZATION PRE K2 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Pre K2 series Federal spending items. Two orderings were possible. 1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h 2. K1a,g,c,d,e,f,h,b INAP. Not administered K2 in the Pre ============================== M022410 PreRand.K2b. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2b WORD Numeric PreRand.K2b RANDOMIZATION PRE K2b WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item K2b in the Pre. 1. "Poor people" 2. "Working poor" INAP. Not administered K2 in the Pre ============================== M022411 PreRand.K2h. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2h WORD Numeric PreRand.K2h RANDOMIZATION PRE K2h WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item K2h in the Pre 1. "Poor children" 2. "Black children" INAP. Not administered K2 in the Pre ============================== M022412 PreRand.L2. L2 RANDOM SELECTION Numeric PreRand.L2 L2 RANDOM SELECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. 1. L2a open-end ("better") 2. L2b open-end ("worse") 3. L2c closed series ("better") 4. L2d closed series ("worse") ============================== M022413 PreRand.L2c. RANDOM PRE L2c SERIES Numeric PreRand.L2c RANDOMIZATION PRE L2c SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Pre L2c closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why some people have better jobs/income). Two orderings were possible. 1. L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 2. L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 INAP. R not selected for L2c series ============================== M022414 PreRand.L2d. RANDOM PRE L2d SERIES Numeric PreRand.L2d RANDOMIZATION PRE L2d SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Pre L2d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why some people have worse jobs/income). Two orderings were possible. 1. L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 2. L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 INAP. R not selected for L2d series ============================== M022415 PreRand.L9a/b. RANDOM PRE L9a/b WORDING Numeric PreRand.L9a/b RANDOMIZATION PRE L9a/b WORDING ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered L9a/L9b (party better for the rich/poor) with wording "poor" first and "rich" second or vice versa. (Data in L9a are data for "poor" wording regardless of order; data in L9b are data for "rich" wording regardless of order). 1. "Poor" first, "rich" second 2. "Rich" first, "poor" second ============================== M022416 PreRand.L11a/b. RANDOM PRE L11a/b WORD Numeric PreRand.L11a/b RANDOMIZATION PRE L11b/c ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered L11b first and L11c second, or L11c first and L11b second in the Pre (appropriateness of amount paid by rich/poor). 1. L11b ("rich") first, L11c ("poor") second 2. L11c ("poor") first, L11b ("rich") second ============================== M022417 PreRand.M1d. ORDER OF TEXT - PRE M1d Numeric PreRand.M1d ORDER OF TEXT - PRE M1d -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first. 1. Democrats first, Republicans second 2. Republicans first, Democrats second ============================== M022418 PreRand.M2. RANDOM- M2 SERIES WORDING Numeric PreRand.M2 RANDOMIZATION - M2 SERIES WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series were randomly assigned to the same wording). 1. "Congress passed" 2. "Bush signed" ============================== M022419 PreRand.P1P2. P1/P2 RANDOM SELECTION Numeric PreRand.P1P2 P1/P2 RANDOM SELECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P2j,k,m 1. Series 1: P1 series "whites better jobs/income" wording 2. Series 2: P1 series "blacks worse jobs/income" wording 3. Series 3: P2 series "women worse jobs/income" wording 4. Series 4: P2 series "men better jobs/income" wording ============================== M022420 PreRand.P1. RANDOMIZATION PRE P1 SERIES Numeric PreRand.P1 RANDOMIZATION PRE P1 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered a P1 (race) income inequality series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned. This order was used regardless of which P1 series was administered ("whites better/higher" or "blacks worse/lower"). 1. P1a,c,d,e,f,g 2. P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g INAP. Not assigned to a P1 series ============================== M022421 PreRand.P1k/m. RANDOM PRE P1k/m WORDING Numeric PreRand.P1k/m RANDOMIZATION PRE P1k/m WORDING ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered P1k/P1m (party better for whites/blacks) with wording "whites" first and "blacks" second or vice versa. (Data in P1k are data for "whites" wording regardless of order; data in P1m are data for "blacks" wording regardless of order). 1. "Whites" first, "blacks" second 2. "Blacks" first, "whites" second INAP. Not assigned to a P1 series ============================== M022422 PreRand.P2. RANDOMIZATION PRE P2 SERIES Numeric PreRand.P2 RANDOMIZATION PRE P2 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered a P2 (gender) income inequality series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned. This order was used regardless of which P2 series was administered ("women worse/lower" or "men better/higher"). 1. P2a,c,d,e,f,g 2. P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g INAP. Not assigned to a P2 series ============================== M022423 PreRand.P2k/m. RANDOM PRE P2k/m WORDING Numeric PreRand.P2k/m RANDOMIZATION PRE P2k/m WORDING ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered P2k/P2m (party better for women/men) with wording "women" first and "men" second or vice versa. (Data in P2k are data for "women" wording regardless of order; data in P2m are data for "men" wording regardless of order). 1. "Women" first, "men" second 2. "Men" first, "women" second INAP. Not assigned to a P2 series ============================== M022424 PreRand.Q1Q4. RANDOM ORDER Q1-Q2/Q3-Q4 Numeric PreRand.Q1Q4 RANDOMIZED ORDER Q1-Q2/Q3-Q4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. 1. Q2-Q4 first, Q1-Q2 second 2. Q1-Q2 first, Q3-Q4 second INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M022425 PreRand.Q3d. RANDOM ORDER PRE Q3d SERIES Numeric PreRand.Q3d RANDOMIZED ORDER PRE Q3d SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Pre 'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned. 1. Q3d1,d2,d5,d6 2. Q3d5,d6,d1,d2 INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M022426 PreRand.Q3g. RANDOMIZED PRE Q3g WORDING Numeric PreRand.Q3g RANDOMIZED PRE Q3g WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. 1. "Handling war on terrorism" 2. "Responded to attack of September 11" ============================== M022427 PreRand.Q4a4. RANDOMIZED ORDER Q4a4/Q4a5 Numeric PreRand.Q4a4 RANDOMIZED ORDER Q4a4/Q4a5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre. 1. Q4a4 first, Q4a5 second 2. Q4a5 first, Q4a4 second INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023001 A1. How Much Attn to Campaigns Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the political campaigns so far this year? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very much interested 3. Somewhat interested 5. Not much interested 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023002 A6. How Many Days Watched Natl News Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 A6. How many days in the PAST WEEK did you watch the NATIONAL network news on TV? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None 01. One Day 02. Two Days 03. Three Days 04. Four Days 05. Five Days 06. Six Days 07. Every Day 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA ============================== M023003 A7. Num Days Local Aft/Early Eve News Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 A7. How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you watch the local TV news shows, either in the late afternoon or in the early-evening? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None 01. One Day 02. Two Days 03. Three Days 04. Four Days 05. Five Days 06. Six Days 07. Every Day 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA ============================== M023004 A10. Num Days Read Newsp in Past Wk Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 A10. How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you read a daily newspaper? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None 01. One Day 02. Two Days 03. Three Days 04. Four Days 05. Five Days 06. Six Days 07. Every Day 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA ============================== M023005 A12. App/disapp Bush Handling Job as Pre Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A12. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023006 A12a. Bush Job as Pres- Approve/Disapp Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A12a. IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:/ IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in A12 ============================== M023006x A12x. Summary - Bush job as Pres Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A12x. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? APPROVAL - GEORGE W. BUSH JOB AS PRESIDENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A12 and A12a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know (A12 or A12a) 9. Refused (A12 or A12a) 0. NA (A12 or A12a) ============================== M023007 B1. How Much R Cares Who Wins House Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B1. As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care VERY MUCH, PRETTY MUCH, NOT VERY MUCH or NOT AT ALL? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very much 2. Pretty much 3. Not very much 4. Not at all 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023008 B2. Approve/Disapp Congress Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B2. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023009 B2a. Congress Appr/Disapp How Much Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B2a. IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:/ IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in B2 ============================== M023009x B2x. Summary - Approve Congress Job Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B2x. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from B2 and B2a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know (B2 or B2a) 9. Refused (B2 or B2a) 0. NA (B2 or B2a) ============================== C1. I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100 degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel unfavorable and cool toward the person. Rating right at the 50 degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold. You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023010 C1a. George W. Bush Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1a. The first person is: George W. Bush Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023011 C1b. Cheney Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1b. (The next person is:) Dick Cheney (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: DICK CHENEY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023012 C1c. Gore Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1c. (The next person is:) Al Gore (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: AL GORE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023013 C1d. Lieberman Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1d. (The next person is:) Joseph Lieberman (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: JOSEPH LIEBERMAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023014 C1e. Nader Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1e. (The next person is:) Ralph Nader (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: RALPH NADER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023015 C1f. Bill Clinton Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1f. (The next person is:) Bill Clinton (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: BILL CLINTON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023016 C1h. Colin Powell Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1h. (The next person is:) Colin Powell (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: COLIN POWELL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023017 C1j. Ashcroft Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1j. (The next person is:) John Ashcroft (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: JOHN ASHCROFT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023018 C1m. Jackson Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1m. (The next person is:) Jesse Jackson (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: JESSE JACKSON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023019 C1p. Laura Bush Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1p. (The next person is:) Laura Bush (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: LAURA BUSH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023020 C1r. Hillary Clinton Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 C1r. (The next person is:) Hillary Clinton (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: HILLARY CLINTON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023021 D2. Better One Party Control or Split Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D2. Do you think it is better when ONE PARTY CONTROLS both the presidency and Congress, better when CONTROL IS SPLIT between the Democrats and Republicans, or DOESN'T MATTER? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Better When One Party Controls Both 3. Better When Control Is Split 5. It Doesn't Matter 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023022 F1. R 7Pt Scale Lib-Con Self-Placement Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 F1. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL, MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE, CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought much about this? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Extremely Liberal 02. Liberal 03. Slightly Liberal 04. Moderate; Middle of the Road 05. Slightly Conservative 06. Conservative 07. Extremely Conservative 08. Don't know 09. Refused 90. Haven't thought much [Do Not Probe] 00. NA ============================== M023023 F1a. If R Had to Choose Liberal/Conserv Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 F1a. IF R LIB-CON SCALE SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/DK: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or a CONSERVATIVE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Liberal 3. Conservative 5. Moderate {VOL} 7. R Refuses to Choose 8. Don't know 0. NA INAP. 1-3,5-7,9,0 in F1 ============================== M023024 F1x. Summary - Lib-Con Self-Placement Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 F1x. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL, MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE, CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or a CONSERVATIVE? SUMMARY - LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from F1 and F1a 1. Liberal (01/02/03;. or 90/04/08;1) 3. Moderate (90/04/08;5 or 04;7/8/0) 5. Conservative (05/06/07;. or 90/04/08;3) 7. Refused to choose (90/08;7 or 09;.) 8. DK (90/08;8) 0. NA to F1; 08,90 in F1 and 0 in F1a ============================== M023025 G1. R Better/Worse Off in Last Year Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are BETTER OFF, WORSE OFF, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Better 3. Worse 5. Same 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023026 G1a. R How Much Bett/Wrs Off in Last Yr Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1a. IF R IS BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:/ IF R IS WORSE OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO: (Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT [better/worse] off? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Better 2. Somewhat Better 3. Same (5 in G1) 4. Somewhat Worse 5. Much Worse 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in G1 ============================== M023027 H1. US Economy Better/Worse in Last Yr Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H1. Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten BETTER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or gotten WORSE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Better 3. Same 5. Worse 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023028 H1a. How Much US Econ Bet/Wrs in Last Yr Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H1a. IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER:/ IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN WORSE: (Would you say) MUCH [better/worse] or SOMEWHAT [better/ worse]? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Better 2. Somewhat Better 3. Same (3 in H1) 4. Somewhat Worse 5. Much Worse 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in H1 ============================== M023029 H5. Approve/Disapp Bush on Economy Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H5. IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION: Do you APROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING THE ECONOMY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approval of the President's performance on the economy was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in the Pre. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for J5 administration ============================== M023030 H5a. How Much Appr/Disapp Bush on Econ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H5a. IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION: IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/ IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in H5; R selected for J5 administration ============================== M023031 H7. Which Pty Bettr Handle Economy Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H7. Which party do you think would do a better job of HANDLING THE NATION'S ECONOMY... the [Democrats/Republicans], the [Republicans/Democrats], or wouldn't there be much difference between them? {IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order of "Democrats" and "Republicans" in question text is randomized. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Wouldn't Be Much Difference/no Difference 7. Neither Party {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023032 H9. US Position Stronger/Weaker in Last Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H9. Turning to some other issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown WEAKER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or has it grown STRONGER? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Weaker 3. Stayed about the Same 5. Stronger 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023033 H12. Agree/Dis US Should Stay Home Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H12. Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with this statement: 'This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world.' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Agree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023034 H13. Appr/Dis Bush Handling Forgn Relat Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H13. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023035 H13a. How Much App/Dis Bush on Foreign R Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H13a. IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS:/ IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in H13 ============================== M023035x H13x. Summary: Bush on Foreign Relations Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 H13x. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON FOREIGN RELATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H13 and H13a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know (H13 or H13a) 9. Refused (H13 or H13a) 0. NA (H13 or H13a) ============================== M023036 J1. R Consider Self Dem/Rep/Ind Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J1. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 3. Independent 4. Other Party {VOL} {SPECIFY} 5. No Preference {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023037 J1a. Strength R Considers Self Dem/Rep Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J1a. IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A DEMOCRAT:/ IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A REPUBLICAN: Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strong 5. Not Very Strong 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 3-5,8,9,0 in J1 ============================== M023038 J1b. Is R Closer to Dem/Rep Party Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J1b. IF R IDENTIFIES AS INDEPENDENT/OTHER PARTY/NO PREFERENCE/DK: Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Closer to Republican 3. Neither {VOL} 5. Closer to Democratic 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,2,9,0 in J1 ============================== M023038x J1x. Party Identification Summary Numeric Missing eq 7, ge 8 J1x. Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what? Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]? / Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? SUMMARY - PARTY IDENTIFICATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from J1, J1a, J1b. Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a code of 5 or 8 in J1 and a code of 3,8,9,0 in J1b AND also showed little or no interest in politics in response to the following survey questions: PRE question A1.(interest in campaigns, 5), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race outcome, 4), POST question C1x (nonvoter, 5), POST question F5 (follow public affairs, 4 ); respondents who showed an interest in politics were coded 3 in J1x. 0. Strong Democrat 1. Weak Democrat 2. Independent-Democrat 3. Independent-Independent 4. Independent-Republican 5. Weak Republican 6. Strong Republican 7. Other; minor party; refuses to say 8. Apolitical 9. NA 0 in J1 ============================== M023039 J4a. Has R Shown Flag in Past 12 Months Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J4a. IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION: In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement at J4a,d or R1a,d. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for R1 administration ============================== M023040 J4d. Things about US Make R Ashamed(1) Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J4d. IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION: Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this statement: 'There are some things about America today that make me feel ashamed of America.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement at J4a,d or R1a,d. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for R1 administration ============================== M023041 J5. Approve/Disapprove Bush on Economy Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J5. IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION: Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING THE ECONOMY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approval of the President's performance on the economy was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in the Pre. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for H5 administration ============================== M023042 J5a. How Much Appr/Disapp Bush on Econ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J5a. IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION: IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/ IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for H5 administration; 8,9,0 in J5 ============================== M023042x J5x. Summary: GW Bush on Economy Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J5x. Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is HANDLING THE ECONOMY? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON ECONOMY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This summarizes data from H5 and J5 placements. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== J6. Now I am going to read a statement and ask you whether you agree or disagree. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023043 J6a. Poor Have Same Chance at Fair Trial Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 J6a. 'In the U.S. today, a poor person has the same chance of getting a fair trial as a wealthy person does'. Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== K1. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs. For each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to see spending INCREASED or DECREASED. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023044 K1a. Highways-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1a. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: The first program is : Building and repairing highways. If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on building and repairing highways be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME? FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== M023045 K1b. AIDS Research- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1b. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: (What about) spending on AIDS research? (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AIDS RESEARCH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== M023046 K1c. Welfare- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1c. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: (What about) welfare programs? (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: WELFARE PROGRAMS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== M023047a K1d1. Public Schools- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1d1. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING: (What about) [public schools/big-city schools]? (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PUBLIC SCHOOLS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023047b K1d2. Big City Schools -Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1d2. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING: (What about) [public schools/big-city schools]? (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BIG CITY SCHOOLS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023048 K1e. Crime- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1e. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: (What about) dealing with crime? (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: DEALING WITH CRIME -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== M023049 K1f. Child Care- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1f. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: (What about) child care? (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: CHILD CARE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== M023050a K1g1. Homeland Security-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1g1. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING: (What about) [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]? (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: HOMELAND SECURITY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023050b K1g2. Terrorism-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1g2. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING: (What about) [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]? (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: THE WAR ON TERRORISM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023051 K1h. Unemp Insurance-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K1h. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES: (What about) unemployment insurance? (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K2 series ============================== K2. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs. For each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to see spending INCREASED or DECREASED. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023052 K2a. Environmental Protect-Federal Spend Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2a. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: The first program is : environmental protection If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on environmental protection be INCREASED, DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME? FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023053a K2b1. Aid To Poor People-Federal Spend Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2b1. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING: (What about) [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]? (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO POOR PEOPLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023053b K2b2. Aid To Working Poor-Federal Spend Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2b2. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WORKING POOR' WORDING: (What about) [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]? (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO THE WORKING POOR -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023054 K2c. Foreign Aid-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2c. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: (What about) foreign aid? (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: FOREIGN AID -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023055 K2d. Social Security-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2d. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: (What about) Social Security? (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: SOCIAL SECURITY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023056 K2e. Border Security- Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2e. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: (What about) tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration? (Should federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023057 K2f. Aid to Blacks-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2f. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: (What about) aid to blacks? (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO BLACKS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023058 K2g. Infant Mortality-Federal Spending Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2g. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: (What about) preventing infant mortality? (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series ============================== M023059a K2h1. Early Ed For Poor- Federal Spend Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2h1. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING (What about) [pre-school and early education for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black children]? (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR POOR CHILDREN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023059b K2h2. Early Ed For Blacks- Federal Spend Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 K2h2. IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING (What about) [pre-school and early education for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black children]? (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?) FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR BLACK CHILDREN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each wording. Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal spending series was randomly assigned. Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st): K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Increased 2. Decreased 3. Kept about the same 4. Cut out entirely {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023060 L1a. Last 20 Yrs Change in Inc Inequal Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L1a. Now on a different topic. Do you think the difference in incomes between rich people and poor people in the United States today is LARGER, SMALLER, or ABOUT THE SAME as it was 20 years ago? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Larger 3. Smaller 5. About the same 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023061 L1a1. How Much Change in Income Inequal Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L1a1. IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/ IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO: (Would you say the difference in incomes is) MUCH [larger/smaller] or SOMEWHAT [larger/smaller]? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much larger 2. Somewhat larger 3. About the same (3 in L1a) 4. Somewhat smaller 5. Much smaller 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in L1a ============================== M023062 L1a2. Is Change in Inc Inequal Good/Bad Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 7 L1a2. IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/ IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO: Do you think this is A GOOD THING, A BAD THING, or haven't you thought about it? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Good thing 3. Bad thing 7. Haven't thought 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in L1a ============================== M023063 L2a. Why do Some Have Better Jobs/Income Numeric L2a. IF R SELECTED FOR L2a ADMINISTRATION: In America today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than others do. WHY do you think that is -- why do some Americans have better jobs and higher incomes than others do? REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOME -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not the text itself represents substantive response or opinion (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or refusal etc.). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Text present 5. No text present INAP. R not selected for L2a administration ============================== M023064 L2b. Why do Some Have Worse Jobs/Income Numeric L2b. IF R SELECTED FOR L2b ADMINISTRATION: In America today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than others do. WHY do you think that is -- why do some Americans have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do? REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/LOWER INCOME -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not the text itself represents substantive response or opinion (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or refusal etc.). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Text present 5. No text present INAP. R not selected for L2b administration ============================== L2c. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than others do. I'm going to read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023065a L2c1. Why Bett Jobs:more able to learn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c1. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065b L2c2. Why Bett Jobs:discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c2. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds some people back.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065c L2c3. Why Bett Jobs: don't work as hard Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c3. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people just don't work as hard.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065d L2c4. Why Bett Jobs:no chance at good ed Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c4. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good education.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2.Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065e L2c5. Why Bett Jobs:choose low-pay jobs Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c5. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065f L2c6. Why Bett Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c6. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped high-income workers more.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== M023065g L2c7. Why Bett Jobs:God made some differ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2c7. IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible: L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7 2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2c administration ============================== L2d. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than others do. I'm going to read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023066a L2d1. Why Wrse Jobs:more able to learn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d1. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066b L2d2. Why Wrse Jobs:discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d2. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds some people back.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066c L2d3. Why Wrse Jobs:some don't work hard Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d3. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people just don't work as hard.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066d L2d4. Why Wrse Jobs:no chance at good ed Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d4. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good education.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066e L2d5. Why Wrse Jobs:choose low-pay jobs Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d5. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066f L2d6. Why Wrse Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d6. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped high-income workers more.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023066g L2d7. Why Wrse Jobs:God made some differ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L2d7. IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another.' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do ?) REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Two orderings L2d series items were possible: L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7 L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7 Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5, c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3, d4,d5,d6,d7. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R not selected for L2d administration ============================== M023067 L9a. Party Better for Poor People Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L9a. Which political party do you think is generally better for [poor/rich] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them? PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR POOR PEOPLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor" second). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023068 L9b. Party Better for Rich People Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L9b. And which party do you think is generally better for [rich/poor] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them? PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR RICH PEOPLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor" second). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== L11. Next are a few questions about federal income taxes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023069 L11a. R Pay Right Amount in Taxes Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L11a. Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU SHOULD? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. More than should pay 3. About right 5. Less than should pay 7. Don't pay at all {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023070 L11b. Rich Pay Right Amount in Taxes Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L11b. What about rich people? Do you feel rich people are asked to pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND; 2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. More than should pay 3. About right 5. Less than should pay 7. Don't pay at all {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023071 L11c. Poor Pay Right Amount in Taxes Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 L11c. What about poor people? Do you feel poor people are asked to pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND; 2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. More than should pay 3. About right 5. Less than should pay 7. Don't pay at all {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023072 M1a. Attention to Corporate Scandals Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M1a. Over the last year, investigations into a number of large corporations such as Enron have found top executives to have exaggerated profits through shady accounting procedures. The executives received huge bonuses, but their companies went bankrupt and workers lost their jobs and retirement savings. How much attention would you say you've paid to those stories -- QUITE A LOT, SOME, JUST A LITTLE, or NONE AT ALL? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Quite a lot 2. Some 3. Just a little 4. None 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023073 M1a2. Made R Angry- Corporate Scandals Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M1a2. IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS: Have these stories ever made you angry? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 4,8,9,0 in M1a ============================== M023074 M1a3. How Many COs Affected by Scandal Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 7 M1a3. IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS: How common do you think this problem is today: would you say it affects NEARLY ALL large U.S. companies, MANY, SOME, or JUST A FEW? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Nearly all 2. Many 3. Some 4. Just a few 7. Haven't thought about {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 4,8,9,0 in M1a ============================== M023075 M1d. Which Pty Bett to Deal w/ Corp Scan Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M1d. Which party do you think would do a better job making sure that these problems do not continue to happen, the [DEMOCRATS/ REPUBLICANS], the [REPUBLICANS/DEMOCRATS], or WOULDN'T THERE BE MUCH DIFFERENCE between them? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Wouldn't be much difference 7. Neither {VOL} 8 Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023076 M2a. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-Combined Wording Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2a. As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a big tax cut last year. Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this something you haven't thought about? FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from M2a1 and M2a2. See notes M2a1/M2a2. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 90. Haven't thought about ============================== M023076a M2a1. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-Cong Wording Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2a1. IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING: As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a big tax cut last year. Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this something you haven't thought about? FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: CONGRESS WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series were randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 90. Haven't thought about INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023076b M2a2. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-GW Bush Wording Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2a2. IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING: As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a big tax cut last year. Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this something you haven't thought about? FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: PRESIDENT BUSH WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 90. Haven't thought about INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023077 M2b. How Much Favor/Opp Tax Cut Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2b. IF R FAVORED TAX CUT LAST YEAR:/ IF R OPPOSED TAX CUT LAST YEAR: Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes M2a1/M2a2. 1. Strongly 5. Not strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 7,8,9,90,0 in M2a ============================== M023077x M2bx. Summary 2001 Tax Cut:Combined Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 6 M2bx. As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a big tax cut last year. Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this something you haven't thought about? Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY - APPROVE LAST YEAR'S TAX CUT (COMBINED WORDING) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M2a and M2b. See notes M2a1/M2a2. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a) 7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a) 8. Don't know in M2a or M2b 9. Refused in M2a or M2b 0. NA in M2a or M2b ============================== M023078 M2c. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Comb Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2c. Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from M2c1 and M2c2. See notes M2c1/M2c2. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} ============================== M023078a M2c1. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Cong Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2c1. IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING: Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023078b M2c2. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Pres Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2c2. IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING: Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023079 M2e. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Comb Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2e. What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from M2e1 and M2e2. See notes M2e1/M2e2. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} ============================== M023079a M2e1. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Cong Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2e1. IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING: What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023079b M2e2. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Pres Word Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2e2. IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING: What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush signed] last year? REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee randomly assigned to the same wording). Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 00. NA 80. Don't remember {VOL} INAP. R not selected for this wording ============================== M023080 M2n. How Important is Tax Cut Issue Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2n. How important is this issue to you personally - VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL? IMPORTANCE OF TAX CUT TO R -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes M2a1/M2a2. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023081 M2p. Has Tax Cut Issue Made R Angry Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 M2p. Has this issue ever made you angry? TAX CUT EVER MADE R ANGRY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes M2a1/M2a2. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023082 N1. Is Religion Important to R Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N1. Now, on another topic. . . Do you consider religion to be an IMPORTANT part of your life, or NOT? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Important 5. Not important 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023083 N1a. Religion Provide Guidance to R Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N1a. IF R CONSIDERS RELIGION IMPORTANT: Would you say your religion provides SOME guidance in your day- to-day living, QUITE A BIT of guidance, or A GREAT DEAL of guidance in your day-to-day life? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Some 3. Quite a bit 5. A great deal 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 0,5,8,9 in N1 ============================== M023084 N3. Does R Attend Relig Service Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N3. Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms, or funerals? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023085 N3a. How Often Attend Relig Services Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N3a. IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you go to religious services EVERY WEEK, ALMOST EVERY WEEK, ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH, A FEW TIMES A YEAR, or NEVER? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Every week 2. Almost every week 3. Once or twice a month 4. A few times a year 5. Never 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in N3 ============================== M023086 N3a1. Once a Wk/More Often Attend Relig Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N3a1. IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES EVERY WEEK: Would you say you go to religious services ONCE A WEEK or MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Once a week 2. More often than once a week 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in N3; 2-5,8,9,0 in N3a ============================== M023087 N4. Activities At Place of Worship Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N4. Aside from attending services, in the PAST SIX MONTHS have you been an active member at your place of worship - I mean, have you done things like serve on committees, give time for special projects, or help organize meetings? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023088 N4a. Plan/Chair Meeting at Place Worship Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N4a. IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP: As part of these activities, have you planned or chaired a meeting (in the last six months)? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in N4 ============================== M023089 N4b. Presentation at Place Worship Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 N4b. IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP: (As part of these activities,) have you given a presentation or speech (in the last six months)? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in N4 ============================== P1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: Now for some other questions. Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America today, [blacks/whites] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [whites/blacks] do. I'm going to read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023090 P1a1. Whites Bett Jobs:more able to lrn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1a1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023090a P1a2. Blacks Wrse Jobs: less able to lrn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1a2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023091 P1b1. Whites Bett Jobs: discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1b1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds blacks back'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023091a P1b2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1b2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds blacks back'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023092 P1c1. Whites Bett Jobs:blacks don't work Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1c1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks just don't work as hard'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023092a P1c2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:blacks don't work Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1c2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks just don't work as hard'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023093 P1d1. Whites Bett Jobs:chance at educ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1d1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023093a P1d2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:chance at educ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1d2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023094 P1e1. Whites Bett Jobs:blacks opt lowpay Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1e1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023094a P1e2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:blacks opt lowpay Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1e2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023095 P1f1. Whites Bett Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1f1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped whites more'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023095a P1f2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1f2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped whites more'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023096 P1g1. Whites Bett Jobs:God made some dif Missing Numeric eq 0, ge 8 P1g1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023096a P1g2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:God made some dif Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1g2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another'. (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?) BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race ============================== M023097 P1j. Blacks same Chance at Fair Trial Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1j. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following: 'In the U.S. today, a black person has the same chance of getting a fair trial as a white person does.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This question was asked of respondents assigned to either series for income inequality by race (P1) Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for gender inequality series P2 ============================== M023098 P1k. Which party better for Whites Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1k. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: Which political party do you think is generally better for [white/black] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM? PARTY BETTER FOR WHITES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in P1k and "white" in P1m) This question was asked of respondents assigned to either series for income inequality by race (P1) Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference between them 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for gender inequality series P2 ============================== M023099 P1m. Which party better for Blacks Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P1m. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES: And which party do you think is generally better for [black/white] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM? PARTY BETTER FOR BLACKS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in P1k and "white" in P1m) This question was asked of respondents assigned to either series for income inequality by race (P1) Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference between them 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for gender inequality series P2 ============================== P2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: Now for some other questions. Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America today, [women/men] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [men/women] do. I'm going to read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023100 P2a1. Women Wrse Jobs:less able to learn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2a1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because men have more in-born ability to learn' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023100a P2a2. Men Bett Jobs:more able to learn Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2a2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because men have more in-born ability to learn' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023101 P2b1. Women Wrse Jobs:discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2b1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds women back' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023101a P2b2. Men Bett Jobs:discrimination Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2b2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because discrimination holds women back' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023102 P2c1. Women Wrse Jobs:women don't work Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2c1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women just don't work as hard' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023102a P2c2. Men Bett Jobs:women don't work hrd Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2c2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women just don't work as hard' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023103 P2d1. Women Wrse Jobs:chance at educ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2d1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUCATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023103a P2d2. Men Bett Jobs: chance at educ Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2d2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023104 P2e1. Women Wrse Jobs:women opt low pay Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2e1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women just choose low-paying jobs' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023104a P2e2. Men Bett Jobs:women opt low pay Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2e2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because women just choose low-paying jobs' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023105 P2f1. Women Wrse Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2f1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped men more' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023105a P2f2. Men Bett Jobs:govt policies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2f2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because government policies have helped men more' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023106 P2g1. Women Wrse Jobs:God made some diff Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2g1. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023106a P2g2. Men Bett Jobs:God made some diff Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2g2. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING: [The first is:/(Next:)] 'Because God made people different from one another' (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?) REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender ============================== M023107 P2j. Women Same Chance at Fair Trial Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2j. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following: 'In the U.S. today, a woman has the same chance of a getting a fair trial as a man does.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1 ============================== M023108 P2k. Which Party Better for Women Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2k. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: Which political party do you think is generally better for [women/men] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM? PARTY BETTER FOR WOMEN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference between them 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1 ============================== M023109 P2m. Which Party Better for Men Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 P2m. IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES: And which party do you think is generally better for [men/women] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM? PARTY BETTER FOR MEN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income inequality series. Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were administered in one of two possible orders: P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g OR P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Democrats 3. Republicans 5. Not much difference between them 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for income inequality by race series P1 ============================== M023110 Q1. Did R Vote in 2000 Pres Election Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q1. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Now I'd like to ask you a few questions about the 2000 Presidential election. In 2000 George W. Bush ran on the Republican ticket against Al Gore for the Democrats, and Ralph Nader as a third party candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? {DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes, voted 5. No, didn't vote 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023111 Q1a. Who did R vote for in 2000 Pres Ele Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q1a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: IF R VOTED IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: Which one did you vote for? {DO NOT PROBE DK RESPONSE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Al Gore 3. George W. Bush 5. Ralph Nader 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 5,8,9 in Q1 ============================== M023112 Q2a. Remember 2000 Election Controversy Numeric Q2a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Whether or not you voted, you might remember that the 2000 presidential election ended in a big controversy. What do you remember most about that? 2000 ELECTION: OPENEND RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not the text itself represents substantive response or opinion (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or refusal etc.). Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Text present 5. No text present INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023113 Q2c. 2000 Pres Election Fair or Unfair Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q2c. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Fair 5. Unfair 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023114 Q2c1. How Fair/Unfair 2000 Election Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q2c1. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS FAIR / IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS UNFAIR: Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Strongly 5. Not strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 8,9,0 in Q2c ============================== M023114x Q2cx. Summary: 2000 Pres Elect Fair Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q2cx. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR? Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]? SUMMARY: FAIRNESS OF 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q2c and Q2c1. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was fair 2. Not strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was fair 3. Not strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was unfair 4. Strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was unfair 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== Q3. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Now for another topic. As you know, on September 11th 2001, a group of terrorists took control of several U.S. commercial airplanes and crashed them into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023115 Q3b. Did R See World Trade Ctr Collapse Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3b. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Did you happen to see the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on live television AS IT WAS ACTUALLY HAPPENING? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes 5. No 7. R witnessed in person 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023116 Q3c. What Terrorists Wanted to Accom Numeric Q3c. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: What do you think the terrorists were trying to accomplish by their actions? 9/11 TERRORISTS: OPENEND RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not the text itself represents substantive response or opinion (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or refusal etc.). 1. Text present 5. No text present INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== Q3d. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Now I'm going to read you a short list of explanations people have suggested for September 11. I would like you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is in explaining the September 11th attack. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023117a Q3d1. 9/11 Reason - US Support Israel Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3d1. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: [The first is:/(What about:)] 'The United States' support of Israel.' (Would you say that U.S. support of Israel is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?) REASON FOR 9/11: US SUPPORT OF ISRAEL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Pre 'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned: Q3d1,d2,d5,d6 Q3d5,d6,d1,d2 Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023117b Q3d2. 9/11 Reason - 1991 War w/ Iraq Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3d2. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: [The first is:/(What about:)] 'Desert Storm, the U.S. war against Iraq and Saddam Hussein in 1991' (Would you say that Desert Storm is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?) REASON FOR 9/11: DESERT STORM, US WAR AGAINST IRAQ IN 1991 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Pre 'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned: Q3d1,d2,d5,d6 Q3d5,d6,d1,d2 Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023117c Q3d5. 9/11 Reason - Religious War Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3d5. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: [The first is:/(What about:)] 'To carry out a religious war' (Would you say that a religious war is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?) REASON FOR 9/11: TO CARRY OUT A RELIGIOUS WAR -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Pre 'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned: Q3d1,d2,d5,d6 Q3d5,d6,d1,d2 Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023117d Q3d6. 9/11 Reason - US Immoral Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3d6. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: [The first is:/(What about:)] 'Because the terrorists believe that America is immoral' (Would you say that this belief about America is VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?) REASON FOR 9/11: TERRORISTS BELIEVE AMERICA IS IMMORAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Pre 'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned: Q3d1,d2,d5,d6 Q3d5,d6,d1,d2 Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very important 3. Somewhat important 5. Not important at all 7. Statement isn't true {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023118 Q3e. How Likely Another Terrorist Attack Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3e. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: How likely do you think it is that the U.S. will suffer an attack as serious as the one in New York and Washington some time in the next 12 months? Would you say VERY LIKELY, SOMEWHAT LIKELY, SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY, or VERY UNLIKELY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Very Likely 2. Somewhat Likely 3. Somewhat Unlikely 4. Very Unlikely 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023119 Q3g. Appr/Dis Bush-9-11Resp/Terrorism Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3g. All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]? GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL COMBINED WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from Q3g1 and Q3g2. Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023119a Q3g1a. Appr/Dis Bush-War on Terrorism Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3g1a. IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING: All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]? GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - HANDLING WAR ON TERRORISM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023119b Q3g1b. Appr/Dis Bush-9-11Response Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3g1b. IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING: All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]? GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACKS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve 5. Disapprove 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023119c Q3g2. How Much App/Dis Bush-9-11/Terror Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3g2. IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM: / IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM: (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Q3g. 1. Strongly 5. Not Strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 8,9,0 in Q3g ============================== M023119x Q3gx. Summary:App Bush on Terrorism/9-11 Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3gx. All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON TERRORISM/SEPT 11 RESPONSE (COMBINED) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2. Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023119y Q3gx1. Summary:App Bush on War on Terr Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3gx1. IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING: All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is handling the war on terrorism? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'WAR ON TERRORISM' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2. Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for alternate wording ============================== M023119z Q3gx2. Summary:App Bush on 9-11 Response Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q3gx2. IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING: All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush has responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]? (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'RESPONSE TO 9/11' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2. Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh cross-section were asked only Q3g questions. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for alternate wording ============================== Q4a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: After the September 11 terrorist attacks, President Bush declared a war on terrorism. A first step was to launch air strikes against the Taliban government of Afghanistan that was providing aid and protection to Osama bin Laden and the Al-Quaeda terrorists responsible for the September 11 attacks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023120 Q4a4. War in Afghanistan Worth Cost Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q4a4. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Taking everything into account, do you think the U.S. war against the Taliban government in Afghanistan was WORTH THE COST or NOT? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Worth it 5. Not worth it 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023121 Q4a5. Does R Think Bin Laden is Alive Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q4a5. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Do you think Osama bin Laden is still alive? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023122 Q4a6. Does R Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q4a6. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are discussing the possibility of taking military action against Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something you haven't thought about? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 01. Favor 05. Oppose 07. Other; depends {VOL} {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 90. Haven't thought about it 00. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023123 Q4a7a. How Much Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Q4a7a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: IF R FAVORS OR OPPOSES MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ: Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Strongly 5. Not strongly 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 7,8,9,0,90 in Q4a6 ============================== M023123x Q4a7x. Summary:Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 6 Q4a7x. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are discussing the possibility of taking military action against Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something you haven't thought about? Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY? SUMMARY: FAVOR/OPPOSE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q4a6 and Q4a7a. Pre 'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a) 7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a) 8. Don't know in M2a or M2b 9. Refused in M2a or M2b 0. NA in M2a or M2b INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023124 R1a. Has R Shown Flag in Past 12 Mo Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 R1a. IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION: In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1) Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement at J4a,d or R1a,d. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for J4 administration ============================== M023124x R1ax. Summary:Flag Display in Past 12 Mo Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 R1ax. In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing? COMBINED J4a/R1a: PATRIOTIC DISPLAY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This summarized data from Pre placements, J4a and R1a. See notes R1a. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023125 R1d. Things about US Make R Ashamed (2) Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 R1d. IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION: Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this statement: 'There are some things about America today that make me feel ashamed of America.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1) Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement at J4a,d or R1a,d. Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede Pre survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for J4 administration ============================== M023125x R1dx. Summary: US Make R Ashamed Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 R1dx. Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this statement: 'There are some things about America today that make me feel ashamed of America.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE? COMBINED J4a/R1a: ASHAMED OF AMERICA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This summarizes data from both Pre placements, J4d and R1d. See notes R1d. 1. Agree 3. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Disagree 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023126a Y1a. Month of Birth - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 89 Y1a. IF FRESH CROSS: Now, on a different topic. What is the month, day and year of your birth? MONTH OF BIRTH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023126c Y1c. Year of Birth - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 8889 Y1c. IF FRESH CROSS: Now, on a different topic. What is the month, day and year of your birth? YEAR OF BIRTH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1912-1984 8889. Refused INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023126x Y1x. Summary: Respondent's Age Numeric Missing eq 889, ge 999 Y1x. Now, on a different topic. What is the month, day and year of your birth? SUMMARY: RESPONDENT AGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Calculated from year of birth Y1c. Age of' Panel 'respondent included by adding 2 years to age recorded for 2000 Study. 889. Refused 999. NA ============================== M023127 Y2. R Marital Status - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y2. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse - or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER MARRIED? MARITAL STATUS 2002 FRESH CROSS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Married 2. Widowed 3. Divorced 4. Separated 5. Never married 6. Partnered, not married {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023127a Y2. R Marital Status -' Panel '2000 status Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y2a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse - or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER MARRIED? 2000 MARITAL STATUS FOR 'PANEL' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is 2000 data for 2002' Panel 'respondents. 1. Married 2. Widowed 3. Divorced 4. Separated 5. Never married 6. Partnered, not married {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023128 Y3. R Highest Grade of School - FRESH CR Numeric Missing eq 88, ge 89 Y3. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: What is the highest grade of school or year of college you completed? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 years 13-16 years 17. 17+ years 88. Don't know 89. Refused 99. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023129 Y3a. R High School Diploma - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y3a. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: IF R HAS 0-12 YRS OF ED. OR IF HIGHEST ED. LEVEL IS DK/RF/NA: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 13-17 in Y3;' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023130 Y3b. R Highest Degree - FRESH CROS Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 Y3b. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET: IF R HAS MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF EDUCATION: What is the highest degree that you have earned? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None (no degree) 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA INAP. 00-12 in Y3;' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023131 Y3x. Summary: R Education Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 9 Y3x. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET: What is the highest grade of school or year of college you completed? Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that you have earned? SUMMARY - R EDUCATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Education summary data from the 2000 study has been added for' Panel 'respondents. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3, 1 in Y3a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y3, 00 in Y3b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y3b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b] 9. Refused 0. NA in Y3, Y3a or Y3b ============================== M023132 Y4. R Employment Status - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 999 Y4. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you unemployed, retired, (a homemaker), (a student), or what? {MULTIPLE RESPONSES} FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The maximum number of mentions was 3 (1 case). 001. working now 002. temporarily laid off 003. unemployed 004. retired 005. permanently disabled 006. homemaker 007. Student 014. working now and retired 016. working now and homemaker 046. retired and homemaker 146. working now retired and homemaker 999. Refused 000. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023132x Y4x. Pre/Post Employment Status Summary Numeric Missing eq 0 Y4x. We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what? {MULTIPLE RESPONSES} 2002 PRE (FRESH CROSS) AND POST ('PANEL') EMPLOYMENT STATUS SUMMARY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Pre Y4 (Fresh Cross) and Post Y4 (Panel; duplicates data found in P025183). 001. Working now 002. Temporarily laid off 003. Unemployed 004. Retired 005. Permanently disabled 006. Homemaker 007. Student 014. Working now and retired 016. Working now and homemaker 017. Working now and student 026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker 034. Unemployed and retired 035. Unemployed and permanently disabled 036. Unemployed and homemaker 045. Retired and permanently disabled 046. Retired and homemaker 047. Retired and student 067. Homemaker and student 146. Working now, retired, and homemaker 167. Working now, homemaker, and student 467. Retired, homemaker, and student 000. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview (Panel only) ============================== M023133 Y6. Labor Union Membership - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y6. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: Does anyone in this household belong to a labor union? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023133a Y6. Labor Union Membership 2000 Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y6(1). IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: Does anyone in this household belong to a labor union? 'PANEL' - 2000 HOUSEHOLD UNION MEMBERSHIP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is 2000 data for' Panel 'respondents. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross Respondent ============================== M023134 Y6a. Who Belongs to Labor Union - FRESH Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 Y6a. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: IF SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION: Who is it that belongs? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The maximum number of mentions was 2. 01. Respondent 02. Respondent's spouse 03. Other family member {SPECIFY} 04. Someone else {SPECIFY} 12. Respondent and spouse 14. Respondent and other family member 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in Y6;' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023134a Y6a(1). 2000 Who Belongs to Labor Union Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y6a(1). IF 'PANEL': IF SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION: Who is it that belongs? 'PANEL': 2000 UNION MEMBERSHIP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This summarizes 2000 data for' Panel 'Rs. 1. Respondent 2. Respondent's spouse 3. Someone else 4. R and spouse 5. R and someone else 6. R's spouse and someone else 7. R, spouse, and someone else 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. Fresh Cross respondent ============================== M023135 Y7. Religious Preference - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 Y7. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC, JEWISH, or something else? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None/Atheist/Agnostic 01. Protestant 02. Roman Catholic 03. Jewish 07. Other {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023136 Y7a. Religious Denomination FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 88, ge 89 Y7a. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER": What church or denomination is that? {CODE MENTION. IF UNSURE CODE "OTHER" AND SPECIFY R'S RESPONSE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. Non-denominational Christian 01. Baptist 02. Episcopalian/Anglican/Church of England 03. Lutheran 04. Methodist 05. Just Protestant; Protestant DK/NA type 06. Presbyterian 07. Reformed 08. Brethren 09. Evangelical United Brethren 10. Christian or Just Christian 11. Christian Scientist 12. Church (Or Churches) of Christ 13. United Church of Christ 14. Disciples of Christ 15. Church of God 16. Assembly of God 17. Congregationalist 18. Holiness 19. Pentecostal 20. Friends, Quaker 21. Orthodox, E.g. Greek, Russian {SPECIFY} 22. Non-denominational - Protestant 23. Mormons 24. Jehovah's Witnesses 25. Latter Day Saints 26. Unitarian/universalist 27. Seventh day Adventist 30. Christian NA denomination 35. Buddhist 45. Hindu 55. Muslim/islam 65. Native American 87. Other {SPECIFY} 88. Don't know 89. Refused 99. NA INAP. 00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7;' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023137 Y7a1. Southern Baptist/Oth (FRESH CROSS) Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Y7a1. IF FRESH CROSS: IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER": IF R IDENTIFIES AS BAPTIST: 2000: Is that SOUTHERN BAPTIST or SOMETHING ELSE? 2002: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data from 2000 has been added for' Panel 'cases. 1. Southern Baptist 7. Something else 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7; 00,02-87,88,89,99 in Y7a; Panel Respondent ============================== M023138 Y7x1. R Religion Summary 1 Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 Y7x1. 2002: Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC, JEWISH, or something else? 2000: (IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:) Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? / (IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:) Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? RELIGION SUMMARY 1 - 'PANEL' (2000) AND CROSS (2002) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002: Built from Y7 and Y7a. 2000: Built from 2000 Summary variable. Note the change in question flow, which especially affects cases coded 0. In 2000, code 0 includes cases of Rs who said they did not attend church and who then answered 'No' when asked if they thought of themselves as part of a church or denomination. 00. None incl. atheist/agnostic 01. Protestant 02. Roman Catholic 03. Jewish 07. Other {SPECIFY} 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA INAP. R refused or NA whether attends church (2000) ============================== M023138a Y7x2. R Religion Summary 2 Numeric Missing eq 88, ge 89 Y7x2. 2002: Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC, JEWISH, or something else? What church or denomination is that? 2000: (IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:) Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? What church or denomination is that? / (IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:) Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? What Church or Denomination is that? RELIGION SUMMARY 2 - 'PANEL' (2000) AND CROSS (2002) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fresh Cross: Built from Y7 and Y7a. Panel: Built from 2000 Religious identification summary. Please note the change in question flow, which especially affects cases coded 'None (incl. agnostic/atheist'. 00. Non-denominational Christian 01. Baptist 02. Episcopalian/anglican/church of England 03. Lutheran 04. Methodist 05. Just Protestant; Protestant DK/RF/NA denomination; other Protestant 06. Presbyterian 07. Reformed 08. Brethren 09. Evangelical United Brethren 10. Christian or Just Christian 11. Christian Scientist 12. Church (Or Churches) of Christ 13. United Church of Christ 14. Disciples of Christ 15. Church of God 16. Assembly of God 17. Congregationalist 18. Holiness 19. Pentecostal 20. Friends, Quaker; Anabaptist; Mennonite 21. Orthodox, E.g. Greek, Russian {SPECIFY} 22. Non-denominational - Protestant 23. Mormons 24. Jehovah's Witnesses 25. Latter Day Saints 26. Unitarian/universalist 27. Seventh day Adventist 30. Christian NA denomination 32. Roman Catholic 35. Buddhist 40. Jewish 45. Hindu 55. Muslim/islam 65. Native American 77. Other {SPECIFY} 80. None incl. agnostic/atheist (in 2000, includes cases of Rs who said they did not attend church and who then answered 'No' when asked if they thought of themselves as part of a church or denomination) 88. Don't know 89. Refused 99. NA INAP. R refused or NA whether attends church (2000) ============================== M023139 Z1. How Long in Community - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 888, ge 889 Z1. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: How long have you lived in your present community? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Years are rounded to the next highest year if months are more than 6. 000. Less than 1 year 001. 13-18 months 002. 19-24 months; 2 years 003-097 years 098. All my life 888. Don't know 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023139a Z1a. 2000 Study Num Years in Community Numeric Missing eq 888, ge 889 Z1a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: 'PANEL' RESPONDENTS: 2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN COMMUNITY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is' Panel 'respondent's reported status in 2000. 000. Less than 1 year 001. 13-18 months 002. 19-24 months; 2 years 003-097 years 098. All my life 888. Don't know 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section respondent ============================== M023140 Z2. How Long in Home - FRESH CROSS Numeric Missing eq 888, ge 889 Z2. IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT: How long have you lived in your current home? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Years are rounded to the next highest year if months are more than 6. Note: case ID 1128 has indicated a number of years greater in R's home than in R's community. 000. Less than 1 year 001. 13-18 months 002. 19-24 months; 2 years 003-097 years 098. All my life 888. Don't know 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023140a Z2a. 2000 Study Num Years in House-'PANEL' Numeric Missing eq 888, ge 889 Z2a. IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT: 'PANEL' RESPONDENTS: 2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN HOUSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is' Panel 'respondent's reported status in 2000. 000. Less than 1 year 001. 13-18 months 002. 19-24 months; 2 years 003-097 years 098. All my life 888. Don't know 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. Fresh Cross-Section Respondent ============================== M023141 Z3. Family Own Home or Rent Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z3. {IF 'PANEL': Now on a different topic.} (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Own house 5. Pay rent 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023142 Z4. R Have Money in Stock Market Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z4. Do you personally (or jointly with a spouse), have any MONEY INVESTED IN THE STOCK MARKET RIGHT NOW -- either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023143 Z5b. Family Medicare Benefits Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z5b. Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY receive payments from: Medicare? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023144 Z5c. Family Medicaid Benefits Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z5c. Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY receive payments from: Medicaid? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023145 Z5g. Family Retirement Account/Pension Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z5g. Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY have retirement savings either in a pension plan or a retirement account, like an IRA? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== Z6. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. The next questions are about the total income of all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before taxes and other deductions. The figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M023146 Z6a. Is Fam Income More/Less than 50K Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z6a. Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than $50,000? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Less than $50,000 3. More than $50,000 7. Income was (about) $50,000 {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023147 Z6b. Category Fam Income More Than 50K Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z6b. IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS MORE THAN $50,000: Which category best describes your total household income: $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. $50,000-$64,999 3. $65,000-$84,999 5. More than $84,999 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,7,8,9,0 in Z6a ============================== M023148 Z6c. Category Fam Income Less Than 50K Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z6c. IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS LESS THAN $50,000: Which category best describes your total household income: $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. $0-$14,999 3. $15,000-$34,999 5. $35,000-$49,999 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 3,7,8,9,0 in Z6a ============================== M023149 Z6x. Summary: Household Income Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 Z6x. We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. The next questions are about the total income of all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before taxes and other deductions. The figure should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income. Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than $50,000? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?} Which category best describes your total household income: $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?} Which category best describes your total household income: $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999? SUMMARY - HOUSEHOLD INCOME -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Z6a, Z6b and Z6c. 01. $0 -$14,999 02. $15,000-$34,999 03. $35,000-$49,999 04. Just about $50,000 [VOL] 05. $50,000-$64,999 06. $65,000-$84,999 07. More than $84,999 08. Less than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorizaton 09. More than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorization 88. Don't know household income (8 in Z6a) 89. Refused household income (9 in Z6a) 00. NA (0 in Z6a) ============================== M023150 Z7x. Race Summary Numeric Missing eq 88, ge 89 Z7x. What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent? SUMMARY: RESPONDENT RACE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Constructed from Z7a-Z7e, text of Z7f, and Z9. For' Panel 'cases, data from 2000 are included. 01. Black only mentioned 02. Asian/Pacific Islander only mentioned 03. Native American only mentioned 04. Hispanic only mentioned 05. White only mentioned 12. Black and Asian/Pacific Islander mentioned 13. Black and Native American mentioned 14. Black and Hispanic mentioned 15. Black and White mentioned 23. Asian/Pacific Islander and Native American mentioned 24. Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic mentioned 25. Asian/Pacific Islander and White mentioned 34. Native American and Hispanic mentioned 35. Native American and White mentioned 45. Hispanic and White mentioned 77. Other (not codeable elsewhere) including 3 or more racial groups 88. Don't know 89. Refused 99. NA ============================== M023150a Z7a. Mention Black: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7a. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023150b Z7b. Mention Asian: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7b. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION ASIAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023150c Z7c. Mention Native Am: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7c. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION NATIVE AMERICAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023150d Z7d. Mention Hispanic: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7d. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION HISPANIC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023150e Z7e. Mention White: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7e. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION WHITE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023150f Z7f. Mention Other: R Racial Groups Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z7f. IF FRESH CROSS: What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you? {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} MENTION OTHER -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. Mentioned 5. Not mentioned 8. Don't know 9. Refused to answer question 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023151 Z9. R Hispanic Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z9. IF FRESH CROSS: {IF HISPANIC OR LATINO MENTIONED FOR RACE, CODE AND DO NOT ASK, OTHERWISE ASK:} Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Panel 'data from the 2000 Study have been included. 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. ' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023152 Z9a. Type Hispanic R Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 Z9a. IF FRESH CROSS: IF R IDENTIFIES AS BEING OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT: Would you describe your Hispanic origin as MEXICAN, PUERTO RICAN, CUBAN, LATIN AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICAN, or SPANISH? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Panel 'data from the 2000 Study have been included. 1. Mexican 2. Puerto Rican 3. Cuban 4. Latin American 5. Central American 6. Spanish 7. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in Z9;' Panel 'Respondent ============================== M023153 Z10. R Gender Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 9 Z10. {ASK ONLY IF UNSURE, OTHERWISE CODE WITHOUT ASKING:} Finally, are you MALE or FEMALE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M023154 ZZ4. IWR: R Cooperation Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ4. R's cooperation was: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very good 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 5. Very poor 0. NA ============================== M023155 ZZ5. IWR: R Level of Information Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ5. R's general level of information about politics and public affairs seemed: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very high 2. Fairly high 3. Average 4. Fairly low 5. Very low 0. NA ============================== M023156 ZZ6. IWR: R Intelligence Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ6. R's apparent intelligence: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very high 2. Fairly high 3. Average 4. Fairly low 5. Very low 0. NA ============================== M023157 ZZ7. IWR: How Suspicious Was R Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ7. How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the interview?: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Not at all suspicious 3. Somewhat suspicious 5. Very suspicious 0. NA ============================== M023158 ZZ8. IWR: R Interest in Interview Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ8. Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very high 2. Fairly high 3. Average 4. Fairly low 5. Very low 0. NA ============================== M023159 ZZ9. IWR: How Sincere Was R Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ9. How sincere did R seem to be in his/her answers? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Completely sincere 3. Usually sincere 5. Often seemed to be insincere 0. NA ============================== M023160 ZZ9a. IWR: Parts Where Doubt R Sincerity Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ9a. IF IWR REPORTED THAT R WAS USUALLY SINCERE:/ IF IWR REPORTED THAT R OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE: Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you doubted R's sincerity? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 0. NA INAP. 1,0 in ZZ9 ============================== M023161 ZZ10. IWR: R Reported Income Accurately Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 ZZ10. Do you feel R reported income accurately? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes, think R reported correctly 2. No, think R reported incorrectly 3. Refused income questions 5. No, think R reported dishonestly 8. Don't know 0. NA ============================== M023162 ZZ10a. IWR: Estimate R Family Income Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 888888 ZZ10a. IF IWR DID NOT FEEL R REPORTED INCOME CORRECTLY :/ IF R REFUSED INCOME QUESTIONS OR DK/NA IF REPORTED CORRECTLY: If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's family income is (before taxes in 2001). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded in 1000s of dollars (range 10,000-90,000) 888888. DK 000000. NA INAP. 1 in ZZ10 ============================== M023163 ZZ11a. IWR: Estimate R Age Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 98 ZZ11a. What would you estimate R's age to be? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 18-96 and: 97. 97 and older 98. Hard to guess {SPECIFY} 00. NA ============================== M023164 ZZ11b. IWR: Estimate R Education Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 ZZ11b. What would you estimate R's level of education to be? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Low - probably less than high school diploma 2. Probably has a high school diploma but probably no college 3. Probably a little college 4. Probably a college degree 8. Hard to guess {SPECIFY} 0. NA ============================== M023165a ZZ12a. IWR:IW Rxns- Negative General Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12a. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} NEGATIVE - GENERAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "Negative - general" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165b ZZ12b. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Long Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12b. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} NEGATIVE - TOO LONG -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "Negative - too long" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165c ZZ12c. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Complicated Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12c. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "Negative - too complicated" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165d ZZ12d. IWR:IW Rxns-Boring/Tedious Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12d. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165e ZZ12e. IWR:IW Rxns-Wanted to Stop Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12e. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE INTERVIEW COMPLETED -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R wanted to stop before interview completed. After starting the interview R made comments indicating he/she regretted having agreed to be interviewed" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165f ZZ12f. IWR:IW Rxns- Ill/Deaf/Tired Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12f. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R ILL/DEAF/TIRED ETC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc.; interview was obviously hard for R" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165g ZZ12g. IWR:IW Rxns-Confused Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12g. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R CONFUSED BY QUESTIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was confused by questions "couldn't understand the scales"; interview was obviously hard for R" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165h ZZ12h. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack of Knowledge Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12h. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF KNOWLEDGE/SUITABILITY FOR INTERVIEWING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/ embarrassment over lack of knowledge or own suitability for interview" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165j ZZ12j. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack Political Knwldg Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12j. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/ embarrassment over lack of POLITICAL knowledge" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165k ZZ12k. IWR:IW Rxns-Agitated by Process Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12k. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R AGITATED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R was agitated or stressed by interview PROCESS" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165m ZZ12m. IWR:IW Rxns-Angry at Content Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12m. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R ANGRY ABOUT INTERVIEW CONTENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R became angry at interview CONTENT" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165n ZZ12n. IWR:IW Rxns-Sampling Concerns Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12n. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} R CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSE/BIAS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R became concerned about sampling purpose or bias: 'why do you come to the old folks home?' 'why THIS neighborhood?' 'why/why not blacks/Hispanics?' 'why me?' etc." 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165p ZZ12p. IWR:IW Rxns- Positive Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12p. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} POSITIVE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "R appeared to enjoy the interview (R was "cooperative" /"interested"/"pleasant" etc.)" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023165q ZZ12q. IWR:IW Rxns- Neutral/None Numeric Missing eq 0 ZZ12q. R's reaction to interview {MULTIPLE MENTIONS} NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order in which mentions were made is not available. 1. "Neutral or no feedback (1st mention only)" 5. Not checked by interviewer 0. NA ============================== M023168 PROB1. Problem 1 Recorded Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 9 PROB1. Is there any difficulty administering an interview by phone to this R? {EXAMPLES: hard of hearing, illness that makes it difficult for R to stay on the phone very long, etc.} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes {SPECIFY} 5. No 9. Refused 0. NA ============================== M024000 PostAdmin.0. Form of Post interview Numeric PostAdmin.25 Form of 2002 Post Interview -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aside from various randomly assigned wording and placement/order options, the following content options were randomly assigned to 1/2 samples in the Post: 1- either D3 or D4 Bush Traits questions 2- either K4 or K5 social trust item 3- either L1 series or L2 series Federal spending items 4- either M5 affirmative action or M6 equal pay items 5- M11 general income inequality as openend (M11c/M11d)or as closed series (M11a/M11b) [each has wording variants] Note that for the spending items and income inequality options, the alternate option had been assigned to the pre. 01. D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 02 D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed 03. D3 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open 04. D3 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed 05. D3 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open 06. D3 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed 07. D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 08. D3 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open 09. D3 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed 10. D3 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 11. D3 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed 12. D3 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open 13. D3 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed 14. D3 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open 15. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open 16. D3 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed 17. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open 18. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed 19. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 20. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed 21. D4 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open 22. D4 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed 23. D4 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open 24. D4 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed 25. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 26. D4 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open 27. D4 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed 28. D4 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open 29. D4 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed 30. D4 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open 31. D4 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed 32. D4 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open 33. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open 34. D4 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed 35. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed 36. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024001 PostAdmin.1. Release Numeric PostAdmin.1 Post Release number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. There was a single release in the Post INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024002 PostAdmin.2. Mode Numeric PostAdmin.2 Post Mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Telephone INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024003 PostAdmin.3. Number of calls Numeric PostAdmin.3 Post number of calls -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-25 ============================== M024004 PostAdmin.4. Result Numeric PostAdmin.4 Post Result -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because few cases were ever removed from callback status, most cases with final disposition "never available" may be considered as, in fact, refusals. 01. Completion 05. Refusal 60. Phone Not in service or new number 61. No contact - no answer/answering device/busy/barrier 68. "Never Available"/refusals ============================== M024005 PostAdmin.5. Language Numeric PostAdmin.5 Post language -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. English INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024006 PostAdmin.6. Verification Numeric PostAdmin.6 Post interview verification -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing facility. 5. No verification INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024007 PostAdmin.7. Evaluation Numeric PostAdmin.7 Post interview evaluation -------------------------------------------------------------------------- There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing facility. 5. No evaluation INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024008 PostAdmin.8. Tape recorded Numeric PostAdmin.8 Post interview tape-recorded -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Tape recorded 5. Not tape recorded INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024009 PostAdmin.9. Interviewed in parts Numeric PostAdmin.9 Post interview in parts -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions) 5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session) INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024010 PostAdmin.10. Number of parts Numeric PostAdmin.10 IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS: Post number of parts -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-5 INAP. Interview not conducted in parts; no Post interview ============================== M024011 PostAdmin.11. Number of interviewers Numeric PostAdmin.11 Post number of interviewers -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5). INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024012a PostAdmin.12a. Beginning month Numeric PostAdmin.12a Post interview - beginning month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024012b PostAdmin.12b. Beginning day Numeric PostAdmin.12b Post interview - beginning day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-30 INAP. No Post interview ============================== M0242012c PostAdmin.12c. Beginning month and day Character PostAdmin.12c Post interview - beginning month and day (MMDD) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a character variable ============================== M024012d PostAdmin.12d. Days after election Numeric Missing eq 0 PostAdmin.12d Post Interview - Number of days after election -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on beginning date of interview 00. NA ============================== M024013a PostAdmin.13a. Ending month Numeric PostAdmin.13a Post interview - ending month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024013b PostAdmin.13b. Ending day Numeric PostAdmin.13b Post interview - ending day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-30 INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024013c PostAdmin.12c. Ending month and day Character PostAdmin.13c Post interview - ending month and day (MMDD) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a character variable ============================== M024014 PostAdmin.14. Pre Address given Numeric PostAdmin.14 Post payment address given? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024015 PostAdmin.15. Payment mode Numeric PostAdmin.15 IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Post payment mode -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Check INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview ============================== M024016 PostAdmin.16. Payment amount Numeric PostAdmin.16 IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Post payment amount -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 50. Fifty dollars INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview ============================== M024017a PostAdmin.17a. Month payment mailed Numeric PostAdmin.17a IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Date Post payment mailed - month -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview ============================== M024017b PostAdmin.17b. Day payment mailed Numeric PostAdmin.17b IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN: Date Post payment mailed - day -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-31 INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview ============================== M024018 PostAdmin.18. Pre Interview Length Numeric Missing eq 0 PostAdmin.18 Post Interview Length -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is length in minutes. 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024019 PostAdmin.19. Pre Interviewer IW Number Numeric Missing eq 0 PostAdmin.19 Post Interviewer's Interview Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The interviewer's interviews are numbered by beginning date. 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024020 PostAdmin.20. Post persuasion letter Numeric PostAdmin.20 Post Persuasion letter -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No persuasion letters were sent in the Post 1. No persuasion letter sent in the Post INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024024 IWR.1. Post IWR of Record Numeric Missing eq 0 PostIWR.1 POST Interviewer of Record -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer ID number is coded and: 000. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024025 IWR.2. Post IWR Gender Numeric Missing eq 0 PostIWR.2 POST Interviewer Gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. Male 2. Female 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024026 IWR.3. Post IWR Education Level Numeric Missing eq 0 PostIWR.3 POST Interviewer Education Level (highest education) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024027 IWR.4. Post IWR Race Numeric Missing eq 0 PostIWR.4 POST Interviewer Race -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 5. Other 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024027a IWR.4a. Post IWR Ethnicity Numeric Missing eq 9 PostIWR.4a POST Interviewer Ethnicity -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 0. No ethnicity mentioned 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024028 IWR.5. Post IWR languages Numeric Missing eq 9 PostIWR.5 POST Interviewer Languages -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 0. No languages spoken 1. Spanish 7. Other 9. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024029 IWR.6. Post IWR experience Numeric Missing eq 99 PostIWR.6 POST Interviewer Experience -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 00. None 01. 1 Year or less 02. 13-23 Months 03. 2 years 04. 4 years 05. 5 years 06. 6 years 07. 7 years 08. 8 years 09. 9 years 99. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024030 IWR.7. Post IWR Age Numeric Missing eq 0 PostIWR.7 POST Interviewer Age (age groups) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Post interviewer of record. Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by interviewers. 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 61-64 years 8. 65-79 years 0. NA INAP. No Post interview ============================== M024201 PostSummary.1. Flag misassigned preload Numeric PostSummary.1 FLAG - MISSASSIGNMENT IN PRELOAD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable flags 1 case where the preload district assignment was incorrect, and 2 cases where the preload county was misidentified but for which district assignment was still correct. 1. District preload incorrect (NY03 correct; NY04 preloaded) 2. County preload incorrect (district correct) 3. No preload misassignment ============================== M024202 PostSummary.2.' Panel 'Flag - candidate same Numeric PostSummary.2 Panel: 2002 House candidate preload names same as 2000 preload names? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This determines whether the House candidate name (s) preloaded into the 2002 Post instrument were the same as the House candidate names that had been preloaded into the ANES 2000 Post. Note: Due to redistricting, district number for nonmovers may not be the same in 2000-2002; names of candidates were compared to construct this summary. 00. Neither 2002 Democratic candidate preload name nor 2002 Republican candidate preload name was preloaded in 2000 01. 2002 Democratic preload name same as in 2000 02. 2002 Republican preload name same as in 2000 03. Both Democratic and Republican candidates same 2000-2002 04. 2002 Democratic Retiring Representative name was preloaded in 2000 as Democratic candidate name 05. 2002 Republican Retiring Representative name was preloaded in 2000 as Democratic candidate name 15. Democrat preload same and 2002 retiring Republican was preloaded in 2000 24. Republican preload same and 2002 retiring Democrat was preloaded in 2000 INAP. Fresh cross case ============================== M024202a Summary.2a ' Panel '- 2000 district number -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Due to redistricting, district number for nonmovers may not be the same in 2002 as it was in 2000. 9996=case with misidentified district number in 2000 INAP. Fresh cross case ============================== M024401 PostRand.C1. Rand C1a/C1b Voter Turnout Numeric PostRand.C1 RANDOMIZED PREASSIGNMENT - C1a/C1b VOTER TURNOUT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly preassigned to either C1a or C1b in the Pre (alternate versions of vote turnout question). 1. C1a 2. C1b INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024402 PostRand.Vote. Rand Order-Dem/Rep Cands Numeric PostRand.Vote RANDOMIZED ORDER - DEM/REPUB CANDIDATE NAMES IN VOTE SECTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order to which the names of major party candidates were randomly preassigned for reading in the text of House and Senate vote-choice and nonvoter preference questions. This preassigned order did not actually apply if only a single major party candidate ran (major party candidate name always read before any independent/third-party name, if any). 1. Democratic name first, Republican name second 2. Republican name first, Democratic name second INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024403 PostRand.D1. Rand of D1 Thermometers Numeric PostRand.D1 RANDOMIZATION OF D1 THERMOMETERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer). Note: This is a randomly pre-assigned order; not all thermometers apply to every respondent. 1. D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k 2. D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024404 PostRand.D2. Rand of D2 Thermometers Numeric PostRand.D2 RANDOMIZATION OF D2 THERMOMETERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders. 1. D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z 2. D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024405 PostRand.D3/D4. Rand Select D3/D4 Traits Numeric PostRand.D3/D4 RANDOMIZED SELECTION D3/D4 TRAITS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. 1. R administered D3 traits 2. R administered D4 traits INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024406 PostRand.D3. Rand Order D3 Bush Traits Numeric PostRand.D3 RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D3 BUSH TRAITS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders. 1. D3a,b,c,d 2. D3a,d,c,b INAP. R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024407 PostRand.D4. Rand Order D4 Bush Traits Numeric PostRand.D4 RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D4 BUSH TRAITS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders. 1. D4a,b,c,d 2. D4a,d,c,b INAP. R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024408 PostRand.G1a/b. Rand Order of G1a/b Numeric PostRand.G1a/b RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF G1a/b -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly preassigned to be administered major party liberal-conservative House candidate placements with either the Democrat or Republican first. 1. G1a Democratic House cand 1st, G1b Republican House cand 2nd 2. G1b Republican House cand 1st, G1a Democratic House cand 2nd INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024409 PostRand.K4/K5. Rand Selection of K4/K5 Numeric PostRand.K4/K5 RANDOMIZED SELECTION K4/K5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5 (trust in people). 1. K4 selected (people take advantage) 2. K5 selected (people try to be helpful) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024410 PostRand.L1/L2. Rand Assign L1/L2 Fed Sp Numeric PostRand.L1/L2 RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT L1/L2 FEDERAL SPENDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: - K1 series in Pre, L2 series in Post - K2 series in Pre, L1 series in Post This variable describes the Post assignment based on this randomized selection. Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending, Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending, Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2. 1. L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre) 2. L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024411 PostRand.L1. Rand Post L1 Series Numeric PostRand.L1 RANDOMIZATION POST L1 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Post L1 series Federal spending items. Two orderings were possible. 1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j 2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e INAP. R selected for Post L2 series; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024412 PostRand.L1e. Rand Post L1e Wording Numeric PostRand.L1e RANDOMIZATION POST L1e WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item L1e in the Pre. 1. "Public schools" 2. "Big city schools" INAP. R selected for Post L1 series; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024413 PostRand.L1h. Rand Post L1h Wording Numeric PostRand.L1h RANDOMIZATION POST L1h WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item L1h in the Pre. 1. "Homeland security" 2. "War on terrorism" INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024414 PostRand.L2. Rand Post L2 Series Numeric PostRand.L2 RANDOMIZATION POST L2 SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Post L2 series Federal spending items. Two orderings were possible. 1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j 2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024415 PostRand.L2c. Rand Post L2c Wording Numeric PostRand.L2c RANDOMIZATION POST L2c WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item L2c in the Pre. 1. "Poor people" 2. "Working poor" INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024416 PostRand.L2j. Rand Post L2j Wording Numeric PostRand.L2j RANDOMIZATION POST L2j WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the random assignment of wording in Federal spending item L2j in the Pre. 1. "Poor children" 2. "Black children" INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024417 PostRand.M5/M6. Randomized Assign M5/M6 Numeric PostRand.M5/M6 RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M5/M6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following: - P1 income inequality by race in Pre; M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre; M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post This variable describes the Post assignment based on this randomized selection. Note: this Pre/Post randomization description applies regardless of which alternative wording of P1/P2 was randomly selected in the Pre. 1. M5a,b,c,d asked in Post (P1 in pre) 2. M6a,b,c,d asked in Post (P2 in Pre) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024418 PostRand.M5a/b. Random Order M5a/b Numeric PostRand.M5a/b RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M5a/b -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican Party) in random order. 1. M5a Democratic Party first, M5b Republican Party second 2. M5b Republican Party first, M5a Democratic Party second INAP. R selected for M6a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024419 PostRand.M6a/b. Random Order M6a/b Numeric PostRand.M6a/b RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M6a/b -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered equal pay for women items M6a (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican Party) in random order. 1. M6a Democratic Party first, M6b Republican Party second 2. M6b Republican Party first, M6a Democratic Party second INAP. R selected for M5a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024420 PostRand.M7. Random Post M7 Wording Numeric PostRand.M7 RANDOMIZATION POST M7 WORDING -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions). 1. "Estate tax" 2. "Death tax" INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024421 PostRand.M7c/e. Random Order M7c/e Numeric PostRand.M7c/e RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M7c/e -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered estate tax items M7c (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican Party) in random order. 1. M7c Democratic Party first, M7e Republican party second 2. M7e Republican Party first, M7c Democratic party second INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024422 PostRand.M9b/c. Random Order of M9b/c Numeric PostRand.M9b/c RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M9b/c -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were administered M9b and M9c items on level of taxation in random order. 1. M9b taxes paid by rich first, M9c taxes paid by poor second 2. M9c taxes paid by poor first, M9b taxes paid by rich second INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024423 PostRand.M11. Randomized Assignment M11 Numeric PostRand.M11 RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following combinations of general income inequality questions: - Pre L2a (open "better"), Post M11c (closed list "better") - Pre L2b (open "worse"), Post M11d (closed list "worse") - Pre L2c (closed list "better"), Post M11a (open "better") - Pre L2d (closed list "worse"), Post M11b (open "worse") This variable describes the Post assignment based on this randomized selection. Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d). 1. Post M11c administered (Pre L2a) 2. Post M11d administered (Pre L2b) 3. Post M11a administered (Pre L2c) 4. Post M11b administered (Pre L2d) INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024424 PostRand.M11c. Rand Post M11c Series Numeric PostRand.M11c RANDOMIZATION POST M11c SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Post M11c closed-list income inequality items (reasons why some people have better jobs/income). Two orderings were possible. 1. M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7 2. M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7 INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024425 PostRand.M11d. Random Post M11d Series Numeric PostRand.M11d RANDOMIZATION POST M11d SERIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable describes the order of administration of Post M11d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why some people have worse jobs/income). Two orderings were possible. 1. M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7 2. M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7 INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024500a Cand.0a. House Type Race Numeric Missing eq 97, ge 99 Cand.0a House Type Race -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race. INCUMBENT RUNNING 12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger 13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger 14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed 19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers 21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger 23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger 24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed 29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers 31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger 32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger 34. Other incumbent running - unopposed 35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers SPECIAL TYPE RACE DUE TO REDISTRICTING 40. Dem and Repub incumbents running - no other candidate 41. 2 Democratic incumbents running - no other candidate 42. 2 Republican incumbents running - no other candidate 43. Dem and Repub incumbents running - other candidate(s) 44. Dem non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree 45. Repub non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree 46. Dem and Rep candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree 47. Dem and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree 48. Rep and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree 49. Dem, Rep and other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed 52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed 53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed 55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands 56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates 57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates 59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands 61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed 62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed 63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed 65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands 66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates 67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates 69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands LOUISIANA DISTRICT 05 ONLY 80. Rep incumbent not running - Democr and 2 Repub candidates 97. Washington DC 99. Correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024500b Cand.0b. Senate Type Race Numeric Missing eq 97 Cand.0b Senate Type Race -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. INCUMBENT RUNNING 12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger 13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger 14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed 19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers 21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger 23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger 24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed 29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers 31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger 32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger 34. Other incumbent running - unopposed 35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed 52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed 53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed 55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands 56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates 57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates 59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands 61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed 62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed 63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed 65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands 66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates 67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates 69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands LOUISIANA ONLY 80. Democratic incumbent running - 2 Republican challengers NO RACE IN STATE 81. Democratic incumbents, no race in state 82. Republican incumbents, no race in state 83. Democratic and other incumbent, no race in state 84. Republican and other incumbent, no race in state 85. Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state 86. 2 Other incumbents - no race 97. Washington DC INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M024501 Cand.1. House Democratic Candidate Name Character Cand.1 Democratic House candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024502 Cand.2. Cand Code-House Democratic cand Numeric Cand.2 Candidate code - Democratic House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger INAP. No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024503 Cand.3. House Democratic Cand Gender Numeric Cand.3 Democratic House candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024504 Cand.4. House Republican Candidate Name Character Cand.4 Republican House candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024505 Cand.5. Cand Code-House Republican cand Numeric Cand.5 Candidate code - Republican House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger INAP. No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024506 Cand.6. House Republican Cand Gender Numeric Cand.6 Republican House candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024507 Cand.7. House Ind/3rd Party Cand Name Character Cand.7 Independent/3rd-Party House candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race. The 2nd Republican candidate is represented here. INAP. No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024508 Cand.8. Cand Code-House Ind/3rd Pty cand Numeric Cand.8 Candidate code -Independent/3rd-Party House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race. The 2nd Republican candidate is represented here. 32. 2nd Republican candidate in open House race (LA05 ONLY) 37. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - non incumbent 39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01) INAP. No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024509 Cand.9. House Ind/3rd Pty Cand Gender Numeric Cand.9 Independent/3rd-Party House candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race. The 2nd Republican candidate is represented here. 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024510 Cand.10. House Ind/3rd Party Cand Party Character Cand.10 Independent/3rd-Party House candidate party (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race. The 2nd Republican candidate is represented here. INAP. No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024511 Cand.11. House Retiring Rep Name Character Cand.11 Retiring House representative name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024512 Cand.12. Cand Code-House Retiring Rep Numeric Cand.12 Candidate code - Retiring House representative -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 41. Democratic Representative retiring (district with open race) 42. Republican Representative retiring (district with open race) INAP. No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024512a Cand.2a. Ret Hse Rep running for Senate Numeric Cand.12a Is Retiring House representative also Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: for cases coded 1-2, thermometer was asked only once (for House retiree). 1. House retiree is running as Democratic Senate cand in 2002 2. House retiree is running as Republican Senate cand in 2002 3. House retiree is not running as Senate cand in 2002 INAP. No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024513 Cand.13. House Retiring Rep Gender Numeric Cand.13 Retiring House representative gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024514 Cand.14. Senate Democratic Cand Name Character Cand.14 Democratic Senate candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024515 Cand.15. Cand Code-Senate Dem Candidate Numeric Cand.15 Candidate code - Democratic Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 03. Democratic Senate incumbent 05. Democratic Senate challenger INAP. No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024516 Cand.16. Senate Democratic Cand Gender Numeric Cand.16 Democratic Senate candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024517 Cand.17. Senate Republican Cand Name Character Cand.17 Republican Senate candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024518 Cand.18. Cand Code-Senate Repub Cand Numeric Cand.18 Candidate code - Republican Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02. Republican candidate in open Senate race 04. Republican Senate incumbent 06. Republican Senate challenger INAP. No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024519 Cand.19. Senate Republican Cand Gender Numeric Cand.19 Republican Senate candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024520 Cand.20. Senate Ind/3rd Party Cand Name Character Cand.20 Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here. INAP. No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state; 2002 Post interview ============================== M024521 Cand.21. Cand Code-Senate Ind/3rd Pty Numeric Cand.21 Candidate code - Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here. 06. Republican Senate challenger (LA only) 07. 3rd-Party or Independent Senate candidate - non incumbent INAP. No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state; 2002 Post interview ============================== M024522 Cand.22. Senate Ind/3rd Pty Cand Gender Numeric Cand.22 Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here. 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state; 2002 Post interview ============================== M024523 Cand.23. Party Senate Ind/3rd Pty Cand Character Cand.23 Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate party (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here. INAP. No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state; 2002 Post interview ============================== M024524 Cand.24. Cand Code-2002 House Winner Numeric Cand.24 2002 House Election Winner - candidate code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01) INAP. Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524a Cand.24a. 2002 House Winner-Party Numeric Cand.24a 2002 House Election Winner - Party -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other INAP. Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524b Cand.24b. 2002 Dem House Cand Percen Numeric Cand.24b Vote % Dem House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com INAP. No Democratic House candidate (incl. Washington DC); correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524c Cand.24c. 2002 Rep House Cand Percent Numeric Cand.24c Vote % Rep House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com INAP. No Democratic House candidate (incl. Washington DC); correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524d Cand.24d. 2002 Ind/3rd Hse Cand Percent Numeric Cand.24d Vote % Ind/3rd Party House candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com. This includes the vote percentage of the independent/third party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that the Post instrument preload included, for several districts, 1 independent/3rd party candidate name; that candidate is represented here even if he/she did not finally receive more than 5% of the vote. Note: in a few districts, more than 1 independent/3rd-party candidate received more than 5% of the vote; besides an independent/3rd-party candidate described in Cand24.d-Cand.24f: LA02 - Additional Republican candidate 11% (Sullivan) LA05 - Additional Republican candidate 24% (Fletcher) SC02 - United Citizens Party candidate 6% (Legg) SC05 - Constitution Party candidate 6% (FaFemine) INAP. No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524e Cand.24e. 2002 Ind/3rd Hse Cand Name Character Cand.24e Ind/3rd Party House candidate name -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com. This includes the independent/third party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that the Post instrument preload included, for several districts 1 independent/3rd party candidate name; that candidate is represented here even if he/she did not finally receive more than 5% of the vote. INAP. No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024524f Cand.24f. 2002 Hse Ind/3rd Party Character Cand.24f Ind/3rd Party House candidate party -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com. This includes the independent/third party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that the Post instrument preload included, for several districts 1 independent/3rd party candidate name; that candidate is represented here even if he/she did not finally receive more than 5% of the vote. INAP. No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1) ============================== M024525 Cand.25. Cand Code-2002 Senate winner Numeric Cand.25 2002 Senate Election Winner - candidate code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 02. Republican candidate in open Senate race 03. Democratic Senate incumbent 04. Republican Senate incumbent 05. Democratic Senate challenger 06. Republican Senate challenger INAP. No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024525a Cand.25a. 2002 Senate Winner-Party Numeric Cand.25a 2002 Senate Election Winner - Party -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com 1. Democrat 5. Republican 7. Other INAP. No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M024525b Cand.25b. 2002 Dem Senate Cand Percent Numeric Cand.25b Vote % Dem Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com INAP. No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; Washington DC ============================== M024525c Cand.25c. 2002 Rep Senate Cand Percent Numeric Cand.25c Vote % Rep Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com INAP. No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; Washington DC ============================== M024525d Cand.25d. 2002 Ind Senate Cand Percent Numeric Cand.25d Vote % Ind/3rd party Senate candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: CNN.com. This includes the vote percentage of the independent/third party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that the Post instrument preload included 2 states for each of which an independent/third party candidate name was included in the preload; both of these preloaded independent/3rd party candidate names are represented here, including the MN candidate who did not finally receive more than 5% of the vote. KS: Libertarian candidate [Rosile] LA: 2nd Republican candidate [Terrell] MN: Reform party [Moore] MS: Reform candidate [O'Hara] OK: Independent candidate [Germalic] VA: Independent candidate [Spannaus] LA Note: Louisiana had multiple Republican challengers to the Senate running Democratic incumbent in the 2002 election; the Republican candidate who seemed to be the leading challenger was preloaded as 'the' Republican candidate in the instrument, and 1 additional Republican candidate was included in the preload fields otherwise reserved for independent/3rd party candidate. Also, in addition to the 2nd Republican candidate whose vote percentage is represented in Cand.25d, Louisiana had a 4th candidate with over 5% of the vote (a 3rd Republican candidate, [Perkins] who received 10% of the vote). VA Note: In Virginia, an additional Independent candidate [Hornberger] received 7% of the vote. INAP. No independent/3rd party Senate candidate with more than 5% of vote; no race in state; Washington DC ============================== M024526 Cand.26. Junior Senator Status Numeric Cand.26 Junior Senator Status 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Junior Senator prior to the 2002 election (107th Congress). 0. Junior Senator not running or retiring in 2002 1. Junior Senator running in 2002 2. Junior Senator retiring in 2002 INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024526a Cand.26. Junior Senator Party Numeric Cand.26a Junior Senator Party 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Junior Senator prior to the 2002 election (107th Congress). 1. Democratic 5. Republican 7. Other INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024527 Cand.27. Senior Senator Status in 2002 Numeric Cand.27 Senior Senator Status 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Senior Senator prior to the 2002 election (107th Congress). 0. Senior Senator not running or retiring in 2002 1. Senior Senator running in 2002 2. Senior Senator retiring in 2002 INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024527a Cand.27a. Senior Senator Party Numeric Cand.27a Senior Senator Party 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This describes the Senior Senator prior to the 2002 election (107th Congress). 1. Democratic 5. Republican 7. Other INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024528 Cand.28. Junior Senator Name Character Cand.28 Junior Senator name (alpha) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024529 Cand.29. Junior Senator Code Numeric Cand.29 Junior Senator code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RACE IN STATE 03. Democratic Senate Running Incumbent 04. Republican Senate Running Incumbent JUNIOR SENATOR WITH TERM NOT UP (NOT RUNNING FOR RETIRING) 11. Democratic Junior Senator 12. Republican Junior Senator 13. Independent/3rd-Party Junior Senator JUNIOR SENATOR RETIRING 21. Retiring Democratic Junior Senator in state with open race 22. Retiring Republican Junior Senator in state with open race 23. Retiring Ind/3rd Party Junior Senator in state w/ open race INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024530 Cand.30. Junior Senator Gender Numeric Cand.30 Junior Senator gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024531 Cand.31. Senior Senator Name Character Cand.31 Senior Senator Name -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024532 Cand.32. Senior Senator Code Numeric Cand.32 Senior Senator Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RACE IN STATE 03. Democratic Senate Running Incumbent 04. Republican Senate Running Incumbent SENIOR SENATOR RETIRING 27. Retiring Democratic Senior Senator in state with open race 28. Retiring Republican Senior Senator in state with open race 29. Retiring Ind/3rd Party Senior Senator in state w/ open race SENIOR SENATOR WITH TERM NOT UP (NOT RUNNING FOR RETIRING) 17. Democratic Senior Senator 18. Republican Senior Senator 19. Independent/3rd Party Senior Senator INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024533 Cand.33. Senior Senator Gender Numeric Cand.33 Senior Senator gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024534 Cand.34. Retiring Senator Name Character Cand.34 Retiring Senator Name -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INAP. No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024535 Cand.35. Retiring Senator Code Numeric Cand.35 Retiring Senator Code -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21. Retiring Democratic Junior Senator in state with open race 22. Retiring Republican Junior Senator in state with open race 23. Retiring Ind/3rd Party Junior Senator in state w/ open race 27. Retiring Democratic Senior Senator in state with open race 28. Retiring Republican Senior Senator in state with open race 29. Retiring Ind/3rd Party Senior Senator in state w/ open race INAP. No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M024536 Cand.36. Retiring Senator Gender Numeric Cand.36 Retiring Senator gender -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female INAP. No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW ============================== M025001 A1. How Much Attn to Campaigns Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the political campaigns so far this year? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very much interested 3. Somewhat interested 5. Not much interested 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025002 A2. Watch Campaign TV Programs Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A2. Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025003 A3. R Discuss Politics w/ Family/Friends Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 A3. Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025004 A3a. How Often Discuss Politics Numeric Missing eq 8, ge 9 A3a. IF R DISCUSSED POLITICS WITH FAMILY OR FRIENDS IN PAST WEEK: How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you talk about politics with family or friends? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. None 01. One Day 02. Two Days 03. Three Days 04. Four Days 05. Five Days 06. Six Days 07. Every Day 08. Don't know 09. Refused 99. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in A3; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025005 B1. Parties Talk to R About Campaign Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B1. As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate. Did anyone from one of the POLITICAL PARTIES call you up or come around and talk to you about the campaign this year? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025006 B1a. Which Party Talked to R About Campa Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B1a. IF POLITICAL PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN: Which party was that? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrats 5. Republicans 6. Both 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in B1; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025007 B2. R Try to Influence Vote of Others Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B2. We would like to find out about some of the things people do to help a party or a candidate win an election. During the campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why they should vote for or against one of the parties or candidates? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025008 B3. R Display Campaign Button/Sticker Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B3. Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025009 B4. R Attend Candidate Meetings/Rallies Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B4. Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches, dinners, or things like that in support of a particular candidate? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025010 B5. R Do Other Work for Party or Cand Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B5. Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or candidates? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025011 B6. Did R Give Money to Candidate Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B6. During an election year people are often asked to make a contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to AN INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE running for public office? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025012 B7. Did R Give Money to Party Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B7. Did you give money to A POLITICAL PARTY during this election year? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025013 B8. R Give Money to Any Other Group Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B8. Did you give any money to ANY OTHER GROUP that supported or opposed candidates? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025014 B9. Anyone Talk to R About Reg/Vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 B9. During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about REGISTERING TO VOTE or GETTNG OUT TO VOTE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes, someone did 5. No, no one did 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025015a C1a. R Turnout Traditional Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C1a. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. How about you--did you vote in the elections this November? R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the Pre (alternate version for R turnout). Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Yes, voted 5. No, didn't vote 6. R refused to say whether voted 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for version 2 of R turnout (C1b); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025015b C1b. R Turnout Experimental Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C1b. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the Pre (alternate version for R turnout). Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. I did not vote (in the election this November) 2. I thought about voting this time but didn't 3. I usually vote but didn't this time 4. I am sure I voted 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for version 1 of R turnout (C1a); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025016 C1x. Summary:R 2002 Election Turnout Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C1x. VERSION 1: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. How about you--did you vote in the elections this November? VERSION 2: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? SUMMARY: R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C1a and C1b. 1. R reported voting in 2002 election 5. R reported not voting in 2002 election 8. R did not know whether voted in 2002 election 9. R refused to say whether voted in 2002 election 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025017 C2. Was R Registered to Vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C2. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR NA/REFUSED IF VOTED: Were you registered to vote in this election? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 6. VOL: Not required to register in R's state 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025018 C2a. R Registered in County Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 7 C2a. IF R VOTED:/ IF R IS REGISTERED NONVOTER: {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:} Your residence is located in county. Are you registered to vote in county? {IF LOUISIANA:} Your residence is located in parish? Are you registered to vote in parish? {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:} Your residence is located in Washington D.C. Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.? R REGISTERED IN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRELOADED: NAME OF COUNTY OR WASHINGTON DC (ALASKA: OTHER UNITS; IN METROPOLITANA AREAS SOMETIMES IDENTIFIED READS: " city") 1. Yes, registered in 5. No, registered elsewhere 7. Not registered elsewhere but District misassignment (see Summary.1) 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C2; 9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025018a C2aa. Preloaded FIPS county Numeric C2aa. PRELOADED COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The first 2 digits are FIPS state code; last 3 digits are FIPS county code. This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. 11000=Washington DC INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025019 C2a1. County Registered if Not Residence Numeric Missing eq 0 C2a1. IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER: IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: In what county and state are you registered? STATE OF REGISTRATION - R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIPS state code. 00. NA INAP. 9,0 in C1x; 5,6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025019a C2a2. District of outside registration Numeric Missing eq 99 C2a2. IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER: IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: In what county and state are you registered? DISTRICT OF REGISTRATION-R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA INAP. 6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025020 C2ax. Summary:R Vote/Registration Status Numeric C2ax. VERSION 1: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. How about you--did you vote in the elections this November? / VERSION 2: In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot of people were not able to vote because they weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time. Which of the following statements best describes you: One, I did not vote (in the election this November); Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't; Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or Four, I am sure I voted? Were you registered to vote in this election? {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:} Your residence is located in county. Are you registered to vote in county? {IF LOUISIANA:} Your residence is located in parish? Are you registered to vote in parish? {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:} Your residence is located in Washington D.C. Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.? SUMMARY: R VOTE/REGISTRATION STATUS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C1x, C2, C2a. 1. R voted, registered in county (includes 7 in C2a) 2. R voted, registered outside county /DK/RF/NA where registered 3. R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted 4. Washington DC: R voted, registered in Washington DC 5. Washington DC: R voted, registered outside or DK/RF/NA where 6. Washington DC: R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025021 C4. Did R Vote on Election Day Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C4. IF R VOTED: Did you vote ON ELECTION DAY -- that is, November 5, 2002, or did you vote at SOME TIME BEFORE this? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. On election day 5. Some time before this 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025022 C4a1. R Voted How Long Before Election Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C4a1. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY: How long before November 5th did you vote? {PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Less than one week, 1-6 days 02. One week; 7 days 03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days 04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days 05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days 06. One month; 29-31 days 07. More than one month; 32-60 days 11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS 12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS 87. Other 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025023 C4a2. R Vote Absentee Ballot or in Perso Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C4a2. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY: Did you vote IN PERSON or by ABSENTEE BALLOT? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. In person 5. Absentee ballot 7. R VOLUNTEERS: by mail {OREGON ONLY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025024 C11a. Did R Vote for House Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C11a. IF R VOTED AND NOT WASHINGTON D.C. How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes, voted for House of Representatives 5. No, didn't vote for House of Representatives 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025025 C11a1. In County R Vote House of Represe Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C11a1. IF R VOTED: IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Who did you vote for? Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [/]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual district. In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate preload fields. Independent/3rd-party candidate names were read after any major party names. Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican candidate read first. Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. 5. 3. 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025025x C11ax. Cand Code-House Vote In County Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C11ax. IF R VOTED: IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Who did you vote for? Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [/]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE - IN COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual district. In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate preload fields. Independent/3rd-party candidate names were read after any major party names.Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican candidate read first. Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 31. Democratic House candidate in open race 32. Republican House candidate in open race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent 38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent 39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025026 C11a2. Outside Cand R Vote House of Repr Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C11a2. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Who did you vote for? HOUSE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in 1 case, R's 'outside' candidate was in the same congressional district as district of residence (1 case coded 33). DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger ALL DISTRICTS: 80. Third party or independent candidate 81. Democrat--no name given 82. Republican--no name given 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025027 C11a2a. Outside Party R Vote House of Re Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C11a2a. IF R VOTED: IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Which party was that? PARTY OF HOUSE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's party. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025028a C11x1. Cand Code-House Vote Summary Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C11x1. IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC / IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Who did you vote for? Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [/]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? / Who did you vote for? Which party was that? CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C11ax, C11a2. 31. Democratic House candidate in open race 32. Republican House candidate in open race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent 38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent 39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent OUTSIDE DISTRICT 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger 80. Third party or independent candidate 81. Democrat--no name given 82. Republican--no name given 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025028b C11x2. Cand Pty House Vote Summary Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C11x2. IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC / IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY: IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Who did you vote for? Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [/]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? / Who did you vote for? Which party was that? CANDIDATE PARTY HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C11ax, C11a2. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025029 C15. Summary-Senate Race Status Numeric C15. IF R VOTED: SUMMARY: SENATE RACE STATUS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Registered in county and race in state 2. Registered in county and no race in state 3. Registered outside county or DK/RF/NA where registered (incl. Washington DC) 4. Washington DC and registered in Washington DC INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025030 C15a. Did R Vote Senate Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C15a. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:/ IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW: How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE? Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes, voted for Senate 5. No, didn't vote for Senate 7. R VOLUNTEERS: no race in state of vote (R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE) 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025031 C15a1. In County Cand R Senate Vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C15a1. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [/]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican candidate read first. Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate preload fields. Independent/3rd-party candidate names were read after any major party names. Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. 5. 3. 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025031a C15ax. Cand - in-county senate vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C15ax. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE - IN COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 02. Republican candidate in open Senate race 03. Democratic Senate incumbent 04. Republican Senate incumbent 05. Democratic Senate challenger 06. Republican Senate challenger 07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent 08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent 09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger NAME NOT ON CANDIDATE LIST 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025032 C15a2. Outside Cand R Senate Vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C15a2. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Who did you vote for? SENATE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If R voted outside county of interview but within the same state, the regular candidate code is used here (as found in C15ax, codes 1-9). 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger 80. Third party or independent candidate 81. Democrat--no name given 82. Republican--no name given 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025033 C15a2a. Outside Party R Vote Senate Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C15a2a. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW: IF R VOTED FOR SENATE: Which party was that? PARTY OF SENATE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's party. 1. Democratic 5. Republican 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025034 C15ax1. Summary - Senate Vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C15ax1. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE / IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW: ED FOR SENATE: CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C15ax, C15a2. 01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 02. Republican candidate in open Senate race 03. Democratic Senate incumbent 04. Republican Senate incumbent 05. Democratic Senate challenger 06. Republican Senate challenger 07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent 08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent 09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW: STATE WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY) 71. Democratic candidate 72. Republican candidate STATE WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT: 73. Democratic incumbent 74. Republican incumbent 75. Democratic challenger 76. Republican challenger ALL STATES: 80. Third party or independent candidate 81. Democrat--no name given 82. Republican--no name given 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025034x C15ax2. Cand party - all Senate vote Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C15ax2. IF R VOTED: IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE / IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW: ED FOR SENATE: CANDIDATE PARTY SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from C15ax, C15a2. 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN 3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate) 7. Name not on candidate list for this race 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025035 C18a. Nonvoter Prefer House Cand Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C18a. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in Washington? Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,2,4,5,6 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025036 C18a1. House Cand Nonvoter Prefers Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C18a1. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES: Who did you prefer? Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [/ ]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican candidate read first. Note: in LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate preload fields. Independent/3rd-party candidate names were read after any major party names. Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. 5. 3. 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025037 C18ax1. Nonvoter Hse pref cand code Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C18ax1. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.: IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES: NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic House candidate in open race 32. Republican House candidate in open race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent 38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent 39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025038 C18ax2. Sen race in state of IW? Numeric C19. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: RACE IN STATE OF IW? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. State with race 2. State with no race (including Washington DC) INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025039 C19a. Nonvoter Prefer Senate Candidate Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C19a. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE: How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE? Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025040 C19a1. Senate Cand Nonvoter Prefers Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C19a1. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE: R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES: Who did you prefer? Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [/ ]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [/]) (or the candidate, ) (or someone else?)? NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican candidate read first. Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate preload fields. Independent/3rd-party candidate names were read after any major party names. 1. 5. 3. 7. Other {SPECIFY} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025041 C19ax. Nonvoter Sen pref cand code Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 88 C19ax. IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED: IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE: R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES: NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code 6 includes the 2nd Republican Senate candidate in Louisiana (included in code 3 in C19a). 01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 02. Republican candidate in open Senate race 03. Democratic Senate incumbent 04. Republican Senate incumbent 05. Democratic Senate challenger 06. Republican Senate challenger 07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent 08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent 09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent 85. Name not on candidate list 88. Don't know 89. Refused 00. NA INAP. 5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025042 C20. Congr Elections Conducted Fairly Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 C20. In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted fairly. In other countries, people believe that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking of the Congressional elections we've just had, do you believe they were VERY FAIR, SOMEWHAT FAIR, NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR, SOMEWHAT UNFAIR, or VERY UNFAIR? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very fair 2. Somewhat fair 3. Neither fair nor unfair 4. Somewhat unfair 5. Very unfair 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== D1. I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100 degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel unfavorable and cool toward the person. Rating right at the 50 degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold. You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M025043 D1a. George W. Bush Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1a. The first person is: George W. Bush Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025044 D1g. Dem House Cand Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1g. IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No Democratic House candidate; error in district assignment preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025045 D1h. Rep House Cand Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1h. IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE NAME -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No Republican House candidate; error in district assignment preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025046 D1j. Retiring House Representative Therm Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1j. IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No retiring House representative; error in district assignment preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025047 D1k. Dem Senate Cand Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1k. IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE: IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If Democratic Senate candidate was also House retiree, then only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j). Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No Democratic Senate candidate; Democratic Senate candidate is also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025048 D1m. Repub Senate Cand Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1m. IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE: IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If Republican Senate candidate was also House retiree, then only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j). Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No Republican Senate candidate; Republican Senate candidate is also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025049 D1m1. LA05 ONLY: 2nd Repub Senate Cand T Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1m1. IF R LIVES IN LOUISIANA: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED LA 2ND REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate. Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. Not Louisiana (no 2nd Republican Senate candidate); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025050 D1n. Ind/3rd Party House Cand Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D1n. IF INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY HOUSE CAND.:/ IF LA05: (The next person is:) (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?) {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED INDEPEN./3RD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates facing a Democrat in an open race; for LA05, this variable represents the 2nd Republican candidate. Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st thermometer): D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1 Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No independent/3rd-party House candidate and not LA05; no 2002 Post interview ============================== D2. Still using the thermometer, how would you rate: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M025051 D2a. Supreme Court Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2a. (How would you rate:) the Supreme Court? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: THE SUPREME COURT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025052 D2b. Congress Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2b. (How would you rate:) Congress? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: CONGRESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025053 D2c. Military Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2c. (How would you rate:) the Military? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: THE MILITARY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025054 D2d. Federal Govt Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2d. (How would you rate:) the federal government in Washington? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025055 D2e. Blacks Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2e. (How would you rate:) blacks? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: BLACKS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025056 D2f. Whites Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2f. (How would you rate:) whites? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: WHITES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025057 D2g. Conservatives Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2g. (How would you rate:) conservatives? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: CONSERVATIVES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025058 D2h. Liberals Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2h. (How would you rate:) liberals? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: LIBERALS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025059 D2j. Labor Unions Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2j. (How would you rate:) labor unions? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: LABOR UNIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025060 D2k. Big Business Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2k. (How would you rate:) big business? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: BIG BUSINESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025061 D2m. Poor People Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2m. (How would you rate:) poor people? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: POOR PEOPLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025062 D2n. People on Welfare Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2n. (How would you rate:) people on welfare? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PEOPLE ON WELFARE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025063 D2p. Hispanics Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2p. (How would you rate:) Hispanics (Hispanic-Americans)? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025064 D2q. Christian Fundamentalists Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2q. (How would you rate:) Christian fundamentalists? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025065 D2r. Elderly Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2r. (How would you rate:) older people (the elderly)? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025066 D2s. Environmentalists Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2s. (How would you rate:) environmentalists? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: ENVIRONMENTALISTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025067 D2t. Gay Men and Lesbians Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2t. (How would you rate:) gay men and lesbians, that is, homosexuals? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: GAY MEN AND LESBIANS (HOMOSEXUALS) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025068 D2u. Catholics Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2u. (How would you rate:) Catholics? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: CATHOLICS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025069 D2v. Jews Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2v. (How would you rate:) Jews? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: JEWS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025070 D2w. Protestants Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2w. (How would you rate:) Protestants? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: PROTESTANTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025071 D2y. Feminists Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2y. (How would you rate:) feminists? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: FEMINISTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025072 D2z. Asian-Americans Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2z. (How would you rate:) Asian-Americans? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: ASIAN-AMERICANS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025073 D2za. News Media Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2za. (How would you rate:) the news media? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: THE NEWS MEDIA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025074 D2zb. Catholic Church Thermometer Numeric Missing eq 887, ge 888 D2zb. (How would you rate:) the Catholic Church? {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?} THERMOMETER RATING: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two possible orders: D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z / D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 0-100. 887. Don't recognize 888. Don't know where to rate 889. Refused 999. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== D3. I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe George W. Bush. For each, please tell me whether the word or phrase describes him. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M025075 D3a. Bush Trait -Leadership Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D3a. IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL? GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D3a,b,c,d D3a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025076 D3b. Bush Trait - Moral Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D3b. IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he is MORAL'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: MORAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D3a,b,c,d D3a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025077 D3c. Bush Trait - Out of Touch Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D3c. IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he is OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D3a,b,c,d D3a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025078 D3d. Bush Trait - Knowledgeable Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D3d. IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he is KNOWLEDGEABLE'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: KNOWLEDGEABLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D3a,b,c,d D3a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== D4. I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe George W. Bush. For each, please tell me whether the word or phrase describes him. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M025079 D4a. Bush Trait - Leader Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D4a. IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL? GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D4a,b,c,d D4a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025080 D4b. Bush Trait -Cares Abt People Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D4b. IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELLl, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D4a,b,c,d D4a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025081 D4c. Bush Trait - Dishonest Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D4c. IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he is DISHONEST'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: DISHONEST -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D4a,b,c,d D4a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025082 D4d. Bush Trait - Intelligent Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 D4d. IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS: What about 'he is INTELLIGENT'? (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?) GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: INTELLIGENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush traits questions. George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible sequential orders: D4a,b,c,d D4a,d,c,b Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Extremely Well 2. Quite Well 3. Not Too Well 4. Not Well at All 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025083 E1. Before Election Party w/House Most Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 E1. Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the House of Representatives in Washington BEFORE the election [this/last] month? {IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?} {DON'T PROBE DK} -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The Democrats 5. The Republicans 7. About equal; above even; about the same [VOL] 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== M025084 F5. R Follow Politics and Public Affairs Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 F5. Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election going on or not. Others aren't that interested. Would you say you follow what's going on in government and public affairs MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, ONLY NOW AND THEN, or HARDLY AT ALL? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Most of the time 2. Some of the time 3. Only now and then 4. Hardly at all 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No 2002 Post interview ============================== G1. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================== M025085 G1a. Dem Hse Cand Liberal-Conservative Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1a. IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01: IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER: When it comes to politics, do you think of []? Do you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE? REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: if R indicated nonrecognition of the Republican House candidate's name in the D1h thermometer, then this question was not asked. Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name second or vice versa. (Data in G1b are data for Republican House candidate regardless of order; data in G1a are data for Democratic House candidate regardless of order). Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case level identification of randomization assigned. 1. Liberal 2. Conservative 3. Moderate 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. No Republican House candidate; wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025091 G1b1. Rep Hse Cand Liberal-How Strong Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1b1. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER: IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL: Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG liberal? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes G1b. 1. Strong liberal 5. Not very strong liberal 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 2,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025092 G1b2. Rep Hse Cand Conservative-How Stro Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1b2. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER: IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE: Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY STRONG conservative? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes G1b. 1. Strong conservative 5. Not very strong conservative 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025093 G1b3. Rep Hse Cand Mod/DK -More Lib or C Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1b3. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER: IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK: Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a CONSERVATIVE? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes G1b. 1. Liberal 2. Conservative 3. Moderate {VOL} 7. Can't choose; neither {VOL} 8. Don't know 9. Refused 0. NA INAP. 1,2,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002 Post interview ============================== M025094 G1bx. Summary - Rep Hse cand Lib-Con Numeric Missing eq 0, ge 8 G1bx. IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE: IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER: When it comes to politics, do you think of [