Version 02 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1986 PRE-POST STUDY (1986.TV) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1986 POST-ELECTION STUDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS WARREN E. MILLER AND THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 8678 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1986, WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES, UNDER THE OVERALL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER; SANTA TRAUGOTT WAS DIRECTOR OF STUDIES IN 1986. NEITHER THE COLLECTOR OF THE ORIGINAL DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS (file int1986.cbk) ---------------------- >> 1986 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1986 SURVEY CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION >> 1986 OCCUPATION CODING >> 1986 STUDY SPECIFICATIONS >> 1986 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1986 WORKING PAPERS SERIES >> LIST OF REPORTS FROM ANES 1985 PILOT STUDY >> PILOT STUDY REPORTS ANES 1983 >> 1986 DESCRIPTION OF VOTE VALIDATION OFFICE ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES >> 1986 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1986 ICPSR PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1986 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK (file nes1986.cbk) -------- 1986 variables APPENDICES (file app1986.cbk) ---------- >> TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON THE SAMPLING DESIGN OF THE 1986 NATIONAL POST-ELECTION STUDY >> 1980 CENSUS DEFINITIONS >> NES 1986 PARTY CANDIDATE NOTE >> NES 1986 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> NES 1986 IMPORTANT PROBLEMS >> NES 1986 EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION RECODES >> 1980 CENSUS OCCUPATION CODES >> 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY CODES >> NES 1986 NATIONALITY NOTE >> NES 1986 STATE AND COUNTRY NOTE >> NES 1986 CITIES NOTE >> 1986 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY DESCRIPTION THE NES/CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1986, WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, UNDER THE GENERAL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER. SANTA TRAUGOTT IS THE DIRECTOR OF STUDIES. THIS IS THE NINETEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES, AND IS THE FIFTH STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION GRANTS (NOS. SOC77-08885 AND SES-8341310) PROVIDING LONG-TERM SUPPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES. SINCE 1978, THE NES ELECTION STUDIES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY A NATIONAL BOARD OF OVERSEERS, THE MEMBERS OF WHICH MEET SEVERAL TIMES A YEAR TO PLAN CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MAJOR STUDY COMPONENTS. BOARD MEMBERS DURING THE 1986 PLANNING PHASE INCLUDED: RAYMOND E. WOLFINGER, CHAIR, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY; MORRIS P. FIORINA, HARVARD UNIVERSITY; STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE, YALE UNIVERSITY; RICHARD A. BRODY, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; STANLEY FELDMAN, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; EDIE N. GOLDENBERG, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN; GARY C. JACOBSON, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO; STANLEY KELLEY, JR., PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; DONALD R. KINDER, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN; WARREN E. MILLER, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, EX OFFICIO. THE 1986 STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE INCLUDED SEVERAL BOARD MEMBERS (KELLEY, CHAIR; FELDMAN, FIORINA, JACOBSON, MILLER, EX OFFICIO; AND WOLFINGER) AND TWO OTHER SCHOLARS, DR. THOMAS MANN, AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION; AND JOHN ZALLER, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY. A PILOT STUDY WAS CARRIED OUT IN THE SUMMER OF 1985 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING NEW INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE 1986 ELECTION STUDY. ITEMS APPEARING FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 1986 WHICH WERE PRETESTED IN THE 1985 PILOT ARE ON RACIAL ATTITUDES, POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, AND MORAL TOLERANCE. DATA FROM THE PILOT STUDY ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (ICPSR #8476). RESULTS FROM THE PILOT STUDY WERE USED BY THE PLANNING COMMITTEE IN FORMULATING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD ABOUT STUDY CONTENT FOR THE 1986 ELECTION STUDY. (SEE THE LIST OF 1985 PILOT STUDY REPORTS.) >> 1986 SURVEY CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION MUCH OF THE CONTENT OF THE OFF-YEAR POST-ELECTION SURVEYS IS CONSTRAINED BY THE REQUIREMENTS OF REPEATING "CORE"-- I.E., THOSE ITEMS WHICH HAVE BEEN ASKED IN PREVIOUS ELECTION STUDIES AND WHICH THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, ACTING FOR AND IN RESPONSE TO THE COMMUNITY OF NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY USERS, HAS DETERMINED TO BE CENTRAL TO THE NES PROGRAM OF RESEARCH. CORE ITEMS INCLUDE ATTENTION TO MEDIA, INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN, PARTY LIKES AND DISLIKES, RECALL OF AND LIKES AND DISLIKES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES, CONTACT WITH INCUMBENT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THOSE CHALLENGING THEM FOR ELECTION, FEELING THERMOMETERS FOR GROUPS AS WELL AS POLITICAL FIGURES, EVALUATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT, RESPONDENT'S OWN POSITION ON ISSUES AND RESPONDENT'S PLACEMENT OF THE PRESIDENT AND CANDIDATES ON THESE ISSUES, LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE AND PARTISAN IDENTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTRATION AND VOTING, AND AN EXTENSIVE ARRAY OF DEMOGRAPHIC MEASURES. "NEW" CONTENT IN 1986 REFLECTED SOME OF THE THEMES TESTED EXTENSIVELY IN THE 1985 PILOT STUDY-- VALUES (SEE THE MORAL TRADITIONALISM BATTERY, Q.P5A-P5H), POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE (Q.H2-H4) AND ATTITUDES ON RACIAL POLICY AS WELL AS MORE GENERAL ATTITUDES CONCEPTUALIZED AS ANTECEDENT TO THESE OPINIONS ON RACIAL QUESTIONS. (FOR A LIST OF PAPERS PRESENTING PILOT COMMMITTEE ANALYSES OF THESE QUESTIONS, PLEASE REFER TO PG. XI, LIST OF REPORTS FROM THE ANES PILOT STUDY 1985.) BECAUSE THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE INTEREST IN CONTENT WHICH ADDED UP TO SIGNIFICANTLY MORE MINUTES THAN IS PRESENTLY CONSIDERED TO BE THE LIMIT OF RESPONDENT "BURDEN" -- I.E., 75 MINUTES-- IT WAS DECIDED TO USE TWO FORMS IN ADMINISTERING THE 1986 NES. FORMS A AND B DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER IN THAT FORM A CONTAINS UNIQUE MATERIAL FOR PRESIDENTIAL EVALUATION --TRAITS, AFFECTS, RETROSPECTIVE (AND PROSPECTIVE) ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS, WHILE THE QUESTIONS UNIQUE TO FORM B ARE BASICALLY ABOUT RACIAL ATTITUDES. ABOUT 3/4 OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS COMMON MATERIAL, I.E., INCLUDED ON BOTH FORMS. THE CODEBOOK INDICATES WHETHER A VARIABLE IS UNIQUE TO A FORM. >> 1986 OCCUPATION CODING IN THE 1986 ELECTION STUDY, THE OCCUPATION CODING IS BASED ON THE 1980 CENSUS BUREAU THREE DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE, AND HAS BEEN RELEASED IN SOMEWHAT LESS DETAIL THAN IN YEARS PAST. THE DATASET INCLUDES A TWO-DIGIT CODE, WITH 71 CATEGORIES CORRESPONDING TO CENSUS BUREAU OCCUPATIONAL GROUPINGS. THOSE WHO HAVE NEED OF THE FULL OCCUPATION CODE FOR THEIR RESEARCH SHOULD CONTACT THE NES PROJECT STAFF FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH ACCESS TO THESE DATA MAY BE PROVIDED. CONFIDENTIALITY RECODING. FOR SOME YEARS, THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES HAVE NOT RELEASED INFORMATION FOR CENSUS TRACTS OR MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS. PERMISSION TO USE THE MORE DETAILED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FOR SCHOLARLY RESEARCH PURPOSES MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS. MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS IS AVAILABLE FROM THE NES PROJECT STAFF. OPEN-ENDED MATERIALS. TRADITIONALLY, THE ELECTION STUDIES HAVE CONTAINED SEVERAL MINUTES OF OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES (FOR EXAMPLE, THE PARTY LIKES AND DISLIKES QUESTIONS, B1-B4 IN THIS STUDY). THESE QUESTIONS ARE CODED BY THE SRC CODING SECTION. OTHER SCHOLARS HAVE DEVELOPED ALTERNATIVE OR SUPPLEMENTAL CODING SCHEMES FOR THESE QUESTIONS (FOR EXAMPLE, THE LEVELS OF CONCEPTUALIZATION, RELEASED AS ICPSR #8151). THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS WISHES TO ENCOURAGE THESE EFFORTS BUT IN WAYS WHICH RESPECT THE NES AND SRC OBLIGATION TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY AND ANONYMITY OF RESPONDENTS. CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH INDIVIDUALS MAY HAVE ACCESS IN ANN ARBOR TO THESE MATERIALS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES HAVE BEEN WORKED OUT AND THOSE INTERESTED SHOULD CONTACT THE NES PROJECT STAFF FOR FURTHER DETAILS. USE OF PROBES. SRC INTERVIEWERS ARE INSTRUCTED TO PROBE AMBIGUOUS OR TERSE RESPONDENT ANSWERS WITH A LIMITED SET OF STANDARD PHRASES, AND TO RECORD USE OF THESE PROBES WHENEVER THEY OCCUR. IN THIS YEAR'S STUDY, WE HAVE CODED THE USE OF PROBES IN SEVERAL PLACES IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE, PERHAPS MOST NOTABLY ON CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS FOR 7-POINT ISSUE SCALES. AUXILIARY INFORMATION. SAMPLING AND FIELD ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS RELEASE OF THE DATA. FOR THE FIRST TIME, SOME INFORMATION ABOUT INTERVIEWERS HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE FILE, SUCH AS AGE, RACE, EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE. (SEE VARIABLES V860037-V860040.) VALIDATED VOTE. AS IN 1978, 1980 AND 1984, NES DETERMINED WHETHER RESPONDENTS VOTED, BY REFERENCE TO REGISTRATION AND VOTING RECORDS IN LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. ADDITIONAL ITEMS FOR 1986 CONCERN THE OFFICE WHERE REGISTRATION/VOTE RECORDS WERE KEPT, INCLUDING THE TYPE AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE VOTE/ REGISTRATION RECORDS. OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE SCORES. DUE TO THE COLLAPSING OF CENSUS BUREAU OCCUPATION CODES, OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE SCORES ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC USE FILE. THOSE WHO HAVE NEED OF THE FULL OCCUPATION CODES AND RELATED PRESTIGE SCORES FOR THEIR RESEARCH SHOULD CONTACT THE NES PROJECT STAFF FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH ACCESS TO THESE DATA MAY BE PROVIDED. FORMS. THE TWO FORMS, A-B, WERE COMBINED INTO ONE QUESTIONNAIRE, WITH ROUTING FOR FORM A AND B RESPONDENTS TAKING PLACE BY MEANS OF CHECKPOINTS. (VARIABLES V860042 AND V960046 CONTAIN DATA ON FORM ADMINISTRATION). TO AVOID CLUSTERING OF RESPONDENTS BY FORM, SAMPLE ADDRESSES FOR EACH SEGMENT WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO FORM A AND FORM B. RESPONSE RATE AND FIELD PERIOD. THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS STUDY IS 67.7%. THE STUDY WAS IN THE FIELD UNTIL JANUARY 31, ALTHOUGH 67% OF THE INTERVIEWS WERE TAKEN BY NOVEMBER 25, 80% BY DECEMBER 7, AND 93% BY DECEMBER 31. A STAFF TECHNICAL PAPER "RESPONSE EFFECTS IN THE 1986 ELECTION STUDY," IS BEING PRODUCED AND WILL BE AVAILABLE BY EARLY SUMMER. (SEE THE LIST OF WORKING PAPERS AND TECHNICAL REPORTS.) WRONG RESPONDENTS. FIVE RESPONDENTS WERE DETERMINED TO BE WRONGLY SELECTED. THE USUAL REASON FOR THE ERRONEOUS SELECTION IS THAT THE INTERVIEWER DID NOT FIND OUT UNTIL THE DEMOGRAPHIC SECTION ABOUT THE PRESENCE OF ANOTHER ADULT IN THE HOUSEHOLD. THE INTERVIEW NUMBERS OF THESE RESPONDENTS ARE: 551, 847, 954, 1992, AND 2176. CANDIDATE CARDS AND BALLOT LISTS. THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF EACH SAMPLE AREA WAS DETERMINED BY THE SRC SAMPLING SECTION. THE NES STUDY STAFF COMPILED INFORMATION FOR EACH SAMPLE POINT ABOUT CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR, SENATE AND THE CONGRESS. USING CANDIDATE LISTS INCORPORATING THESE NAMES, INTERVIEWERS PRE-EDITED THEIR QUESTIONNAIRES SO THAT THE CORRECT CANDIDATE NAMES COULD BE READ TO RESPONDENTS AT VARIOUS POINTS IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE. FOR THE VOTE CHOICE QUESTIONS (V860266, V860270, V860274) THE RESPONDENT USED A "BALLOT CARD" SHOWING THE CORRECT NAMES OF CANDIDATES FOR RACES IN THE RESPONDENTS DISTRICT. THE CANDIDATE CARDS AND BALLOT LISTS ARE REPRODUCED IN THE APPENDIX SECTION OF THE CODEBOOK. >> 1986 STUDY SPECIFICATIONS RESPONSE INTERVIEW ELIGIBLE* N RATE LENGTH SAMPLE FORM A 1086 67.5 74.1 83.8 FORM B 1090 67.9 74.7 83.3 TOTAL 2176 67.7 74.4 83.6 *ELIGIBLE SAMPLE IS THE PROPORTION OF SAMPLE ADDRESSES WHICH WERE DETERMINED TO BE OCCUPIED BY ONE OR MORE U.S. CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE. >> 1986 SAMPLING INFORMATION THE 1980 SAMPLING FRAME WAS DESIGNATED, SELECTED AND LISTED JOINTLY BY NORC AND SRC. THE SAMPLE UNIVERSE INCLUDES ALL U.S. HOUSEHOLDS IN THE 48 COTERMINOUS STATES, ALASKA AND HAWAII. (CIVILIAN HOUSEHOLDS RESIDING ON MILITARY BASES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE UNIVERSE AS DEFINED BY NES.) THE 1980 NORC/SRC NATIONAL SAMPLE IS A MULTI-STAGE AREA PROBABILITY DESIGN. THAT IS, IN A SERIES OF HIERARCHICAL STEPS, GEOGRAPHICALLY DEFINED SAMPLING UNITS OF DECREASING SIZE ARE SELECTED WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONATE TO THEIR TOTAL OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT COUNT. THE OVERALL SAMPLING FRACTION IS 1:25,389. THE NATIONAL SAMPLE INCLUDES A FIRST STAGE SELECTION OF SMSA'S, COUNTIES AND COUNTY GROUPS (PRIMARY AREAS), A SECOND STAGE SELECTION OF AREA SEGMENTS (HOUSING UNIT CLUSTERS DEFINED BY CENSUS BLOCKS OR SUBSAMPLED PARTS OF SELECTED CENSUS ENUMERATION DISTRICTS), A THIRD STAGE SAMPLING OF (LISTED) HOUSING UNITS FROM THE SELECTED AREA SEGMENTS, AND, FOR THE NES SAMPLE, A FINAL STAGE OF RANDOMLY SELECTING A RESPONDENT FROM THE ELIGIBLE MEMBERS OF THE SAMPLE HOUSEHOLDS. IN THIS SAMPLE, PRIMARY AREAS CONSIST OF COUNTIES, SMSA'S, INDEPENDENT CITIES, AND IN NEW ENGLAND, PARTS OF COUNTIES. EIGHTY-FOUR PRIMARY AREAS WERE SELECTED AT THE FIRST STAGE. PRIOR TO SELECTION, PRIMARY AREAS WERE GROUPED INTO 84 STRATA. THE STRATA WERE FORMED BY GROUPING METROPOLITANAND NON-METROPOLITAN PAS WITHIN EACH OF THE FOUR CENSUS REGIONS. WITHIN EACH REGION, ADDITIONAL VARIABLES WERE USED TO DEFINE STRATA. THE STRATIFYING VARIABLES INCLUDED WITHIN-REGION GEOGRAPHY AND SIZE; SIZE WAS MEASURED BY THE 1980 CENSUS COUNTY OF OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS. ONE PSU (PRIMARY SELECTION UNIT) WAS SELECTED FROM EACH STRATUM USING A CONTROLLED SELECTION PROCEDURE. SIXTEEN OF THE SELECTIONS ARE "SELF-REPRESENTING". THAT IS, THERE IS ONE AND ONLY ONE SELECTION FROM THAT STRATA BECAUSE THE ENTIRE STRATA IS COMPRISED OF AN SMSA. FOR EXAMPLE, NEW YORK AND CHICAGO SMSA'S ARE SELF-REPRESENTING. TECHNICALLY, THESE ARE NOT PSUS SINCE THERE IS NO SELECTION AS SUCH INVOLVED. FOR THIS REASON THE 84 UNITS IN THE FIRST STAGE OF THE SAMPLE SELECTIONS ARE REFERRED TO IN SUBSEQUENT DESCRIPTIONS AS PRIMARY AREAS, RATHER THAN PSUS. FOR THE 1980 DESIGN, THE DESIGNATED SECOND STAGE SAMPLING UNITS (SSUS OR SEGMENTS) ARE COMPRISED OF CENSUS BLOCKS IN METROPOLITAN PRIMARY AREAS (OR ENUMERATION DISTRICTS IN SOME RURAL AREAS). THIS REPRESENTS A CHANGE FOR SRC WHICH IN 1970 USED AN INTERMEDIATE STEP OF SELECTING A STRATIFIED SAMPLE OF MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS OR "PLACES" BEFORE SELECTING THE SMALLER BLOCK OR ED UNITS. SAMPLING OF SECOND STAGE UNITS WAS PERFORMED WITH PROBABILITIES PROPORTIONATE TO MEASURES OF SIZE (MOS) -- THE TOTAL OCCUPIED HOUSING COUNT FOR THE AREA. BEFORE SECOND STAGE SELECTION TOOK PLACE, SSUS WERE ORDERED OR IMPLICITLY STRATIFIED USING A THREE STEP PROCEDURE. FIRST, IN MULTI-COUNTY PRIMARY AREAS, THE SSUS WERE ORDERED BY COUNTY ACCORDING TO GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND POPULATION SIZE OF THE COUNTY. THIRTY-SIX OF THE EIGHTY-FOUR PRIMARY AREAS FELL IN STATES WHERE DATA WERE AVAILABLE FOR THE MEDIAN PER CAPITA INCOME FOR EACH MCD. IN THESE AREAS, EACH MCD WAS CLASSIFIED INTO ONE OF THREE POPULATION SIZE, AND ONE OF THREE INCOME SIZE, CATEGORIES. IN ALL PRIMARY AREAS, THE FINAL STRATIFICATION STEP WAS TO ORDER INDIVIDUAL CENSUS BLOCKS AND ENUMERATION DISTRICTS ACCORDING TO GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION. THE SECONDARY SELECTIONS (SEGMENTS) WERE MADE USING A SYSTEMATIC SELECTION PROCEDURE. WITHIN THE 6 LARGEST PRIMARY AREAS, A VARYING NUMBER OF SEGMENTS CAN BE SELECTED, FROM 6 TO ABOUT 25. IN ALL OTHER PRIMARY AREAS, SIX SECONDARY SELECTIONS WERE MADE. THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A SEGMENT IS 50 OCCUPIED HOUSEHOLDS, BUT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF HOUSING UNIT LISTINGS IN A SEGMENT IS ABOUT 92. IN ORDER TO MAKE MANAGEABLE THE SUBSEQUENT STEP OF LISTING THE HOUSING UNITS FROM WHICH SAMPLE SELECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE, THE SRC SAMPLE DESIGN FURTHER DIVIDES THE SEGMENTS INTO SEGMENT PARTS, WHICH ARE IDENTIFIABLE UNITS WITHIN THE SEGMENT WITH A MEASURE OF SIZE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 TO 20 HUS -- FOR EXAMPLE, A CITY BLOCK. EACH HU IN AN ACTIVE SEGMENT PART IS THEN LISTED AS A SAMPLE "LINE," AND FINAL HOUSEHOLD SELECTIONS ARE MADE WITH A RANDOM START AND A SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING PROCEDURE. ONCE A HOUSEHOLD IS SELECTED, ALL PERSONS RESIDING THERE ARE LISTED BY THE INTERVIEWER, AND A RESPONDENT IS CHOSEN, USING A SELECTION TABLE FROM THE POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN THE HOUSEHOLD. (SEE VARIABLES V86007 AND V860014.) EVERY HOUSEHOLD IN THE UNITED STATES HAS AN EQUAL PROBABILITY OF FALLING INTO THE SAMPLE. HOWEVER, ALL RESPONDENTS ARE NOT SELECTED WITH EQUAL PROBABILITY. FOR EXAMPLE, ONCE A HOUSEHOLD IS SELECTED, AN ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH THREE ELIGIBLE PERSONS HAS ONLY ONE-THIRD THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION AS THE PERSON WHO IS THE ONLY ELIGIBLE PERSON IN HIS/HER HOUSEHOLD. TECHNICALLY, RESPONDENTS OUGHT TO BE WEIGHTED IN ALL ANALYSES BY THE INVERSE OF THEIR SELECTION PROBABILITY. NES STAFF HAS TRADITIONALLY COMPARED FREQUENCIES RUN WEIGHTED AND UNWEIGHTED ON VARIABLES OF INTEREST AND CONCLUDED THAT THE DIFFERENCES IN DISTRIBUTIONS (TYPICALLY VERY MINOR) DO NOT JUSTIFY THE ADDED COMPLEXITIES OF WEIGHTING. THIS IS THE CASE FOR 1986 AS WELL. FINALLY, THE FULL 1980 NATIONAL SAMPLE HAS 84 PRIMARY SELECTIONS, ONE FROM EACH STRATA. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR FLEXIBILITY IN SAMPLE DESIGN AND FOR EFFICIENCY IN STAFFING PRIMARY AREAS, THE SAMPLE DESIGN ALLOWS FOR USE OF 1/2, 2/3, 5/6 OR ALL OF THE NONSELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS. THIS FEATURE ALLOWS A SMALLER NUMBER OF PRIMARY AREAS TO BE USED FOR SMALLER SAMPLE SIZES, ENABLING MORE OPTIMAL COST/ STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY THAN WOULD RESULT IF THE SAMPLE WERE SPREAD ACROSS THE FULL 84 PRIMARY AREAS. IN PREVIOUS SRC SAMPLES, DESIRED INCREASES IN SAMPLE SIZE WERE HANDLED BY GENERATING ADDITIONAL LINES WITHIN A STANDARD SET OF SEGMENTS. IN THE CURRENT SAMPLING FRAME, ADDITIONAL PRIMARY AREAS AND/OR SEGMENTS WITHIN THE LARGEST PRIMARY AREAS ARE SELECTED TO INCREASE SAMPLE SIZE. IN 1986 THE NES USED THE 2/3 SAMPLE OPTION, WHICH MEANS THAT ALL OF THE 16 SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS AND 45 (2/3 OF 68) OF THE NON-SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS WERE USED, FOR A TOTAL OF 61 PRIMARY AREAS. IN ADDITION TO FLEXIBILITY IN THE NUMBER OF PRIMARY AREAS WHICH MAY BE USED IN A SAMPLE, THE SRC SAMPLE DESIGN ALSO ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBILITY IN THE NUMBER OF SEGMENTS USED WITHIN SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS WHERE THE NUMBER OF SEGMENTS RANGES FROM 6 TO 25 IS PROPORTIONATE TO THE NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS IN THE PRIMARY AREAS. THE NUMBER OF SEGMENTS IN EACH OF THE NON-SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY ARES IS EXACTLY 6. THERE ARE 426 SEGMENTS IN THE SAMPLE (OF WHICH 416 YIELDED AT LEAST ONE INTERVIEW); 156 FROM SELF-REPRESENTING AREAS AND 270 FROM THE REMAINING ONE. WITH 2176 INTERVIEWS, THERE ARE 5.1 INTERVIEWS ON AVERAGE PER SEGMENT. THE SAMPLE IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE APPENDIX ENTITLED "TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON THE SAMPLING DESIGN OF THE 1986 NATIONAL POST-ELECTION STUDY". >> 1986 WORKING PAPERS SERIES GIOVANNA MORCHIO AND MARIA SANCHEZ. "CREATION OF A FILTER VARIABLE TO BE USED WHEN ANALYZING QUESTIONS ABOUT CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES IN THE 1982 INTEGRATED PERSONAL/ISR CATI/BERKELEY, CATI DATASET: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 1. ANN ARBOR: CPS, FERUARY 28, 1984. 40 PAGES. GIOVANNA MORCHIO AND MARIA SANCHEZ. "COMPARISON OF THE MICHIGAN METHOD OF DISTRICT ASSIGNMENT ON THE TELEPHONE WITH THE PERSONAL INTERVIEW SIMULATED DATA: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 2. ANN ARBOR: CPS, MARCH 2, 1984. 10 PAGES. NES STAFF. "QUESTIONS AND VERSIONS IN NES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 3. ANN ARBOR: CPS, AUGUST, 1984. 10 PAGES. NES STAFF. "WEEKLY FIELD REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, JAN. 11 - AUGUST 3, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 4. ANN ARBOR: CPS, AUGUST, 1984. 4 PAGES. SANTA TRAUGOTT. "SAMPLE WEIGHTING IN NES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 5. ANN ARBOR: CPS, 6 PAGES. SANTA TRAUGOTT. "SAMPLE WEIGHTING IN NES PRE-POST RESEARCH ELECTION SURVEY." WORKING PAPER NO. 6. ANN ARBOR: CPS, APRIL, 1985. JOHN BREHM. "ANALYSIS OF RESULT CODE DISPOSITION FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING BY TIME IN FIELD." WORKING PAPER NO. 7. ANN ARBOR: CPS, AUGUST, 1985. JOHN BREHM. "REPORT ON CODING OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS SERIES IN THE 1984 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY." WORKING PAPER NO. 8. ANN ARBOR: CPS, JUNE, 1985. GIOVANNA MORCHIO, MARIA SANCHEZ AND SANTA TRAUGOTT. "MODE DIFFERENCES: DK RESPONSES IN THE 1984 POST-ELECTION SURVEY." WORKING PAPER NO. 9. ANN ARBOR: CPS, NOVEMBER, 1985. >> LIST OF REPORTS FROM THE ANES 1985 PILOT STUDY PAMELA JOHNSTON CONOVER AND STANLEY FELDMAN. MORALITY ITEMS ON THE 1985 PILOT STUDY. MAY, 1986. PAMELA JOHNSTON CONOVER AND STANLEY FELDMAN. 1985 PILOT STUDY MEASURES ON CIVIC OBLIGATION. MAY, 1986. SHANTO IYENGAR. WHITHER POLITICAL INFORMATION. MAY, 1986. GARY JACOBSON. NEW CONGRESSIONAL QUESTIONS FROM 1985 PILOT STUDY. MAY, 1986. TOM JESSOR AND DAVID O. SEARS. RACIAL CONFLICT IN THE 1985 NES PILOT STUDY. MAY, 1986. DONALD R. KINDER AND LYNN M. SANDERS. REVITALIZING THE MEASUREMENT OF WHITE AMERICANS' RACIAL ATTITUDES: A REPORT TO THE NES 1985 PILOT STUDY COMMITTEE AND NES BOARD. MAY, 1986. DAVID O. SEARS AND LEONIE HUDDY. SOCIAL IDENTITIES AND POLITICAL DISUNITY AMONG WOMEN. MAY, 1986. DAVID O. SEARS AND LEONIE HUDDY. INTEREST GROUP BEHAVIOR AMONG OLDER PEOPLE. MAY, 1986. RICHARD SOBEL. FROM JOB PARTICIPATION TO OCCUPATIONAL INVOLVEMENT TO POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. OCTOBER 20, 1986. JACK L. WALKER AND FRANK BAUMGARTNER. A NEW QUESTION ON GROUP AFFILIATIONS IN THE 1986 NES PILOT STUDY. MAY 20, 1986. JACK WALKER. SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF GROUP AFFILIATION. MAY 27, 1986. JOHN ZALLER. ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION ITEMS IN THE 1985 NES PILOT STUDY. JUNE, 1986. STAFF MEMORANDA: JOHN BREHM AND SANTA TRAUGOTT. SIMILARITY AND REPRESENTATIVENESS OF 1985 PILOT HALF-SAMPLES. MARCH 17, 1986. SANTA TRAUGOTT. STAFF EVALUATION OF THE DATA COLLECTION AND DOCUMENTATION FOR THE 1985 PILOT STUDY. MAY 19, 1986. >> PILOT STUDY REPORTS ANES 1983 SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY AND THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE. 1. "MEASURING PERSONAL ECONOMIC WELL-BEING" FROM STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE AND JOHN MARK HANSEN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 2. "GROUP ECONOMIC WELL-BEING AND POLITICAL CHOICE" FROM DONALD R. KINDER, STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE AND JOHN MARK HANSEN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 3. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS FROM STANLEY FELDMAN RE: REPORT ON VALUES IN THE 1983 PILOT STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 4. MEMO TO NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM DAVID O. SEARS, LEONIE HUDDY, LYNITTA SCHAFFER RE: NES PILOT STUDY OF VALUES, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 5. "PRESIDENTIAL TRAITS" FROM DONALD R. KINDER, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 6. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM PAMELA JOHNSTON CONOVER AND STANLEY FELDMAN RE: THE INCLUSION OF ITEMS MEASURING EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO THE ECONOMY IN THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 22, 1983. 7. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM JOHN MARK HANSEN AND STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE RE: PARTICIPATION OUTSIDE ELECTIONS, DATED OCTOBER 24, 1983. 8. "GROUP CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE 1983 NES PILOT STUDY" FROM DAVID O. SEARS, TOM JESSOR AND MARTIN GAHART, DATED OCTOBER 24, 1983. 9. "MONITORING GROUP INTEREST" FROM ETHEL KLEIN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 10. MEMO TO NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM JON KROSNICK RE: NES PILOT STUDY OF ISSUE POSITION CENTRALITY MEASURES, DATED OCTOBER 21, 1983. 11. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STEVEN ROSENSTONE AND STANLEY FELDMAN RE: DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION AND EVENT MONITORING COMPONENTS OF THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 12. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STEVEN ROSENSTONE RE: STUDYING POLITICAL ACTIVATION ON THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 18, 1983. 13. MEMO TO 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND NES BOARD FROM DONALD R. KINDER RE: MEASURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANDIDATE IMPRESSIONS, DATED OCTOBER 26, 1983. 14. MEMO TO DONALD KINDER, CHAIR, NES 1984 DESIGN COMMITTEE FROM RICHARD A. BRODY RE: PRESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS IN THE CONTINUOUS MONITORING DATA COLLECTION, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 1983. 15A. MEMO TO DON KINDER, CHAIR, 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM MERRILL SHANKS RE: PERCEPTIONS OF STRENGTH FOR INDIVIDUAL CANDIDACIES: MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVES FOR ANALYSES OF "MOMENTUM" AND "STRATEGIC VOTING", DATED OCTOBER 26, 1983. 15B. VARIABLES ON PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES. 16. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STANLEY FELDMAN RE: VALUES AND THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 17. MEMO TO 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM DONALD R. KINDER RE: MEASURING THE PUBLIC'S VIEW OF THE NATION'S CONDITION IN THE 1984 ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 25, 1983. >> 1986 DESCRIPTION OF VOTE VALIDATION OFFICE ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES The Election Administration dataset is part of the 1987 Vote Validation Study. In order to better understand the results of the individual voter record search, an interview was conducted with the Election Administration official in charge of the election office pertaining to our sample. This interview used a structured questionnaire which was designed to gather information in three areas: 1) How registration and voting records were kept and updated; 2) levels of office staffing and consequent ease of registration and 3) interviewer evaluation of office organization, efficiency and cooperation. Interviews were obtained with officials in 166 offices. Offices varied greatly in size, record keeping procedures, level of computerization, and in the ease with which access was given to our interviewer. The number of registration records in a given office ranged all the way from Los Angeles with 2 million records to a township in Michigan with 800. Almost 80% of the offices are fully, partially or in the process of being computerized. Voting records were unavailable in offices coded 68 and 76 and 79 on variable 882502 (Sample Address Office ID); they had being packed and stored (in office 68) or burned (in office 76), or sent to the Secretary of State's office for processing (office 79). For the most part office officials and supporting personnel were very cooperative and gave our interviewers wide access to their records. In a few instances they claimed only a state resident could have such access or the interviewer was barred from seeing the actual record, since it contained confidential information, i.e., birth date. The section of the questionnaire dealing with registration opportunities (office hours and staffing) while accurate as far as it goes, is probably inadequate to portray the variety of staffing and scheduling strategies encountered. This portion of the questionnaire is to be extensively revised in 1988. The original election administration dataset of 166 records was expanded so that information from the appropriate election office can be attached to the record of each of the 2176 respondents in the 1986 Post election study. The individual respondent case ID was added to the election administration dataset, after expansion, to facilitate merging of the Election Administration interview information with the 1986 post election survey file. Assuming that both files are in 1986 election survey case ID sort order, the two files can be easily merged. (Users may also request the original file of 166 records.) Users should be aware of the following special situations. Fifty one respondents gave us in 1986 an address different than their sample address for their registration address. We attempted to validate these people at the office appropriate for the address where they told us they were registered. Information about this situation is coded in variable 882042, Validation Office ID, and variable 882043, Relation of Sample Address Office to Validation Office. The office information for these 51 respondents which is attached to their case ID in the expanded election administration file is the one appropriate for the sample address, as recorded in variable 882502. Some respondents (N=15) in this category turned out to be registered at nearby offices pertaining to sample segments which also happened to fall into our sample. (They are coded 3 on variable 882043.) these cases, users might desire to substitute for the election administration information in that respondent's file (which, as noted above, pertains to the sample segment in which the respondent actually lives, as opposed to that in which he/she is registered) the election office data corresponding to his/her registration information. Please contact NES Study Staff for information about how to do this. A number of respondents in the 1986 election study were not validated for any of several reasons; for example, they told us they were not registered and did not vote; and/or they did not give us their name. In these cases, office data was attached to respondents based on their sample address. >> 1986 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1986 ICPSR PROCESSING INFORMATION THE DATA COLLECTION WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCESSING PROCEDURES FOR CLASS I DATA COLLECTIONS. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR ILLEGAL OR INCONSISTENT CODE VALUES WHICH, WHEN FOUND, WERE RECODED TO OSIRIS MISSING DATA VALUES. EXTENSIVE CONSISTENCY CHECKS WERE PERFORMED. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "<" AND ">" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. >> 1986 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 860001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER-8678 860004 CASE ID OF RESPONDENT SAMPLING INFORMATION 860005 SEGMENT NUMBER 860006 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CODE 860007 SELECTION TABLE 860008 REFUSAL CONVERSION INDICATOR 860009 DATE OF INTERVIEW 860010 PERSUASION LETTER REQUESTED 860011 FINAL CALL NUMBER 860012 FINAL RESULT CODE HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 860013 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD 860014 NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE ADULTS 860015 NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER SIX YEARS OLD 860016 NUMBER OF CHILDREN SIX TO NINE YEARS OLD 860017 NUMBER OF CHILDREN TEN TO THIRTEEN YEARS OLD 860018 NUMBER OF CHILDREN FOURTEEN TO SEVENTEEN YEARS OLD PERSONAL INFORMATION 860019 IF R IS FEMALE, HAS R LEGALLY CHANGED NAME 860020 PHONE NUMBER OBTAINED 860021 IS R'S NUMBER LISTED IN THE PHONE DIRECTORY 860022 IS INTERVIEW ADDRESS ONLY PLACE OF RESIDENCE 860023 CAN INTERVIEW BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 860024 PRIMARY AREA NAMES 860025 CENSUS REGION 860026 FIPS STATE AND COUNTY CODE 860027 FIPS 80 SMSA CENSUS CODE 860028 FIPS 80 SCSA CENSUS CODE 860029 POPULATION SIZE: PLACE OF INTERVIEW LOCATION 860030 ACTUAL POPULATION OF INTERVIEW LOCATION 860031 BELT CODE 860033 CENSUS ENUMERATION, 1980 860032 1980 CENSUS TRACT 860034 MINOR CIVIL DIVISION 860035 CENSUS PLACE CODE 860036 SAMPLING ERROR CODE INTERVIEWER INFORMATION 860037 SUMMARY: INTERVIEWER/RESPONDENT RACE 860038 INTERVIEWER'S EDUCATION 860039 INTERVIEWER'S AGE BRACKETED 860040 INTERVIEWER'S YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 860041 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 860042 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: SUMMARY VARIABLE ELECTION INFORMATION 860043 TYPE OF CONGRESSIONAL RACE 860044 TYPE OF SENATORIAL RACE 860045 TYPE OF GOVERNOR RACE 860046 FORM TYPE 860047 ICPSR STATE CODE 860048 FIPS STATE CODE 860049 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CODE 860050 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF R'S WHO VOTED OUTSIDE SAMPLING CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 860051 PRIMARY AREA CODE POST-ELECTION INFORMATION 860052 INTERVIEWER'S INTERVIEW NUMBER 860053 DATE COMPLETED-MONTH 860054 DATE COMPLETED-DAY 860055 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 860056 LENGTH OF PRE-EDITING 860057 LENGTH OF POST-EDITING 860058 BEGINNING TIME-LOCAL THE MEDIA AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE 860059 WAS R INTERESTED IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS THIS YEAR 860060 DID R LISTEN TO ANYTHING ABOUT CAMPAIGNS ON THE RADIO 860061 HOW MANY CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS DID R LISTEN TO 860062 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPERS 860063 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DID R PAY TO THE ARTICLES ABOUT CAMPAIGN 860064 DID R WATCH ANY PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN ON TELEVISION 860065 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DID R PAY TO TV ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN DOES R DISCUSS POLITICS 860066 DOES R EVER DISCUSS POLITICS WITH FAMILY/FRIENDS 860067 HOW OFTEN DOES R DISCUSS POLITICS WITH FAMILY/FRIENDS 860068 HOW MANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK DID R TALK POLITICS WITH FAMILY/FRIENDS 860069 HOW MANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK DID R READ A DAILY NEWSPAPER 860070 HOW MANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK DID R WATCH NATIONAL NEWS ON TV R LIKES/DISLIKES DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860071 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: FORM #1 860072 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860073 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860074 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860075 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860076 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 860077 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 860078 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860079 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860080 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860081 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860082 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 860083 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION R LIKES/DISLIKES REPUBLICAN PARTY 860084 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 860085 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860086 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860087 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860088 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 860089 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 860090 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 860091 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860092 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860093 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860094 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 860095 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION R'S ASSESSMENT OF CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT 860096 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF WAY REAGAN HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT 860097 DOES R APPROVE STRONGLY OR NOT STRONGLY 860098 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF WAY REAGAN HANDLING THE ECONOMY 860099 DOES R APPROVE STRONGLY OR NOT STRONGLY 860100 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF WAY CONGRESS IS HANDLING ITS JOB 860101 DOES R APPROVE STRONGLY OR NOT STRONGLY CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS 860102 DID R CARE ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS 860103 DOES R REMEMBER CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 860104 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S NAME-FIRST MENTION 860105 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860106 WHO WERE THEY-FIRST MENTION 860107 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860108 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S NAME-SECOND MENTION 860109 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860110 WHO WERE THEY-SECOND MENTION 860111 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860112 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S NAME-THIRD MENTION 860113 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE'S PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860114 WHO WERE THEY-THIRD MENTION 860115 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-THIRD MENTION SENATORIAL ELECTIONS 860116 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: SENATE RACE #1 860117 DOES R REMEMBER THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES 860118 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S NAME-FIRST MENTION 860119 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860120 WHO WERE THEY-FIRST MENTION 860121 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-FIRST MENTION 860122 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S NAME-SECOND MENTION 860123 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860124 WHO WERE THEY-SECOND MENTION 860125 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-SECOND MENTION 860126 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S NAME-THIRD MENTION 860127 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE'S PARTY-THIRD MENTION 860128 WHO WERE THEY-THIRD MENTION 860129 DID R CORRECTLY IDENTIFY CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY-THIRD MENTION FEELING THERMOMETER - POLITICAL FIGURES 860130 FEELING THERMOMETER-RONALD REAGAN 860131 FEELING THERMOMETER-DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE-CANDIDATE 1 860132 FEELING THERMOMETER-REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE-CANDIDATE 1 860133 FEELING THERMOMETER-US SENATE INCUMBENT-CANDIDATE 1 860134 FEELING THERMOMETER-US SENATE INCUMBENT-CANDIDATE 2 860135 FEELING THERMOMETER-US SENATE INCUMBENT-CANDIDATE 3 860136 FEELING THERMOMETER-DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 860137 FEELING THERMOMETER-REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 860138 FEELING THERMOMETER-LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE 860139 FEELING THERMOMETER-MARIO CUOMO 860140 FEELING THERMOMETER-ROBERT DOLE 860141 FEELING THERMOMETER-JACK KEMP 860142 FEELING THERMOMETER-PAT ROBERTSON 860143 FEELING THERMOMETER-GARY HART 860144 FEELING THERMOMETER-GEORGE BUSH 860145 FEELING THERMOMETER-JESSE JACKSON 860146 FEELING THERMOMETER-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860147 FEELING THERMOMETER-REPUBLICAN PARTY 860148 FEELING THERMOMETER-POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL 860149 FEELING THERMOMETER-BLACKS 860150 FEELING THERMOMETER-CONSERVATIVES 860151 FEELING THERMOMETER-LABOR UNIONS 860152 FEELING THERMOMETER-WOMEN'S MOVEMENT 860153 FEELING THERMOMETER-LIBERALS 860154 FEELING THERMOMETER-PEOPLE ON WELFARE 860155 FEELING THERMOMETER-BLACK MILITANTS 860156 FEELING THERMOMETER-POOR PEOPLE FEELING THERMOMETER - CODER CHECKPOINTS 860157 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860158 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860159 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860160 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860161 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860162 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860163 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860164 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860165 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.B12J PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860166 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS CUOMO PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860167 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS DOLE PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860168 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS KEMP PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860169 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS ROBERTSON PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860170 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS HART PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860171 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS BUSH PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860172 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS JACKSON PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860173 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860174 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860175 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860176 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE BLACKS PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860177 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE CONSERVATIVES PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860178 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE LABOR UNIONS PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860179 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860180 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE LIBERALS PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860181 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE PEOPLE ON WELFARE PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860182 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE BLACK MILITANTS PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 183 CODER CHECKPOINT - WERE POOR PEOPLE PROBED BY INTERVIEWER R LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 860184 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 860185 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE- FIRST MENTION 860186 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE- SECOND MENTION 860187 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE- THIRD MENTION 860188 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE- FOURTH MENTION 860189 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 860190 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE-FIRST MENTION 860191 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE-SECOND MENTION 860192 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE-THIRD MENTION 860193 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE-FOURTH MENTION R LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 860194 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 860195 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE- FIRST MENTION 860196 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE- SECOND MENTION 860197 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE- THIRD MENTION 860198 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE- FOURTH MENTION 860199 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 860200 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE-FIRST MENTION 860201 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE-SECOND MENTION 860202 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE-THIRD MENTION 860203 WHAT DID R DISLIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE-FOURTH MENTION MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES 860204 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO R IN CAMPAIGN FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-FIRST MENTION 860205 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO R IN CAMPAIGN FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-SECOND MENTION 860206 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO R IN CAMPAIGN FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-THIRD MENTION 860207 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IMPORTANT ISSUE 860208 WHAT WAS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO R 860209 DID R PREFER PARTICULAR CANDIDATE BECAUSE OF ISSUE 860210 WHICH CANDIDATE DID R PREFER 860211 CANDIDATE R NAMED IDENTIFICATION OF HOUSE CANDIDATES 860212 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: TYPE OF RACE 860213 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: WAS CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 860214 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: CANDIDATE NUMBER CODE 860215 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: CANDIDATE NAMED 860216 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: WAS EITHER CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 860217 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: WHICH CANDIDATE WAS ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 860218 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: CANDIDATE NAMED CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 860219 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: TYPE OF RACE 860220 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 860221 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT PERSONALLY 860222 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT SPOKE 860223 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S STAFF/OFFICE 860224 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 860225 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 860226 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT ON RADIO 860227 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT ON TELEVISION 860228 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT IN OTHER WAYS 860229 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 860230 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DISTRICT 860231 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 860232 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 860233 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 860234 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 860235 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 860236 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 860237 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE ON RADIO 860238 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 860239 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 860240 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 860241 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 860242 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 860243 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE W.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SPOKE 860244 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 860245 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 860246 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 860247 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE ON RADIO 860248 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 860249 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 860250 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 860251 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 860252 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 860253 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SPOKE 860254 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 860255 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 860256 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 860257 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE ON RADIO 860258 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 860259 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 860260 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE VOTING SECTION: VOTERS 860261 DID R VOTE IN THE 1986 ELECTION 860262 IS R REGISTERED REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/INDEPENDENT/OTHER 860263 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT CURRENT ADDRESS 860264 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: STATE OF VOTER REGISTRATION 860265 DID R VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE 860266 FOR WHICH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE DID R VOTE 860267 R'S VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-CANDIDATE NAMED 860268 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: SENATE RACE 2 860269 DID R VOTE FOR A SENATE CANDIDATE 860270 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATE 860271 R'S VOTE FOR SENATE CANDIDATE-CANDIDATE NAMED 860272 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: GOVERNOR RACE 860273 DID R VOTE FOR A GOVERNOR CANDIDATE 860274 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR 860275 R'S VOTE FOR GOVERNOR-CANDIDATE NAMED VOTING SECTION: NON-VOTERS 860276 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN THIS ELECTION 860277 IS R REGISTERED AS A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/ INDEPENDENT/OTHER 860278 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT PRESENT ADDRESS 860279 DID R PREFER A CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 860280 WHICH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE DID R PREFER 860281 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - CANDIDATE NAMED 2000 NON-CAMPAIGN CONTACTS WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 860282 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER EVER CONTACT U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT/OFFICE 860283 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT-TO EXPRESS OPINION 860284 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT-TO SEEK INFORMATION 860285 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT-TO SEEK HELP WITH PROBLEM 860286 DID R GET RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT/OFFICE 860287 HOW SATISFIED WAS R WITH RESPONSE FROM INCUMBENT 860288 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 860289 DID PERSON/GROUP GET RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT/OFFICE 860290 HOW SATISFIED WAS PERSON/GROUP WITH RESPONSE FROM INCUMBENT 860291 HOW HELPFUL WOULD HOUSE INCUMBENT BE WITH ANOTHER PROBLEM 860292 ANYTHING SPECIAL DONE BY HOUSE INCUMBENT FOR DISTRICT/PEOPLE 860293 HOW WELL DOES HOUSE INCUMBENT KEEP IN TOUCH WITH DISTRICT 860294 DOES R AGREE WITH WAY HOUSE INCUMBENT HAS VOTED 860295 DOES R REMEMBER A BILL HOUSE INCUMBENT VOTED ON 860296 DID R AGREE/DISAGREE WITH WAY HOUSE INCUMBENT VOTED R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 860297 IS R REPUBLICAN, DEMOCRAT, INDEPENDENT OR OTHER 860298 IS R A STRONG REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT 860299 R THINK OF SELF AS CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860300 SUMMARY: R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 860301 HOW OFTEN DOES R FOLLOW GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC AFFAIRS 860302 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - FIRST MENTION 860303 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - SECOND MENTION 860304 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - THIRD MENTION 860305 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IMPORTANT PROBLEMS 860306 WHAT IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 860307 HOW GOOD A JOB IS GOVERNMENT DOING WITH THIS PROBLEM 860308 WHICH PARTY WOULD GET GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH PROBLEM PARTY CONTACTS WITH R DURING THE CAMPAIGN 860309 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 860310 WHICH PARTY CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN 860311 DID ANYONE ELSE CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 860312 WHICH CANDIDATE DID THE CONTACT SUPPORT - 1ST MENTION 860313 WHICH CANDIDATE DID THE CONTACT SUPPORT - 2ND MENTION R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITIES 860314 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS' VOTE CHOICES 860315 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 860316 DID ANYONE ELSE TRY INFLUENCING R'S VOTE 860317 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 860318 DID R WORK FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE 860319 DID R USE $1 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OPTION ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN R'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL PARTIES 860320 DID R CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY/ISSUE/CANDIDATE 860321 DID R GIVE MONEY TO A SPECIFIC CANDIDATE 860322 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY 860323 DID R GIVE MONEY TO A SPECIFIC POLITICAL PARTY 860324 WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO 860325 DID R GIVE MONEY TO POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUPS R CONTACTED ABOUT VOTING 860326 WAS R CONTACTED ABOUT VOTING OR REGISTERING TO VOTE R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING 860327 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE ENVIRONMENT 860328 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON FINANCIAL AID FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS 860329 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON SOCIAL SECURITY 860330 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON FOOD STAMPS 860331 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON CONTRA AID 860332 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE UNEMPLOYED 860333 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON SCI/SPACE RESEARCH 860334 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON AID TO BLACKS 860335 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860336 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860337 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860338 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860339 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860340 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860341 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860342 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H1H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER R'S RECOGNITION OF POLITICAL FIGURES 860343 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE OF GEORGE BUSH 860344 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE OF CASPAR WEINBERGER 860345 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE OF WILLIAM REHNQUIST 860346 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE/JOB OF PAUL VOLCKER 860347 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE OF ROBERT DOLE 860348 DOES R KNOW THE POLITICAL OFFICE OF TIP O'NEILL 860349 DOES R KNOW WHICH PARTY HAD THE MOST MEMBERS IN THE U.S. HOUSE BEFORE THE ELECTIONS 860350 DOES R KNOW WHICH PARTY HAD THE MOST MEMBERS IN THE SENATE BEFORE THE ELECTIONS 860351 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H3 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860352 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS H4 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S JOB 860353 DOES R APPROVE U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENTS' HANDLING OF JOB 860354 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT STRONGLY OR NOT VERY STRONGLY R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION 860355 DOES R FEEL BETTER/WORSE FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO 860356 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE OFF DOES R FEEL 860357 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT-FORM #2 860358 WILL R BE BETTR/WRSE OFF FINANCIALLY A YEAR FROM NOW 860359 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE OFF WILL R BE A YEAR FROM NOW 860360 HAS R WATCHED BUDGET MORE CLOSELY THIS YEAR 860361 HOW MUCH MORE CLOSELY HAS R WATCHED BUDGET 860362 HAS R'S INCOME STAYED AT/ABOVE/BELOW COST OF LIVING 860363 HOW MUCH HAS R'S INCOME RISEN ABOVE/FALLEN BEHIND THE COST OF LIVING R'S OPINION ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 860364 SOCIETY SHOULD ASSURE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED 860365 EQUAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN PUSHED TOO FAR IN THIS COUNTRY 860366 A PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY IS THAT WE DON'T GIVE EVERYONE AN EQUAL CHANCE 860367 WE SHOULD WORRY LESS ABOUT EQUALITY 860368 IT IS NOT A PROBLEM IF PEOPLE HAVE UNEQUAL CHANCES 860369 THE COUNTRY WOULD HAVE FEWER PROBLEMS IF PEOPLE TREATED EQUALLY STATE'S FINANCIAL SITUATION 860370 DOES R THINK THE STATE'S ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER/ WORSE/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 860371 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE IS THE STATE'S ECONOMY R'S OPINIONS ON ECONOMIC CONDITION OF COUNTRY 860372 DOES R THINK THE NATION'S ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER/ WORSE/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 860373 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE IS THE NATION'S ECONOMY 860374 DOES R THINK THE FEDERAL ECONOMIC POLICY HAS MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER/WORSE/UNCHANGED 860375 HOW MUCH BETTR/WORSE DOES R THINK THE ECONOMY HAS BECOME 860376 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: FORM #3 UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFLATION 860377 DOES R THINK THE NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER/WORSE/STAYED THE SAME 860378 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE HAS THE NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BECOME 860379 DOES R THINK THE NATIONAL INFLATION RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER/WORSE/STAYED THE SAME 860380 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE HAS THE NATIONAL INFLATION RATE BECOME 860381 DOES R SEE THE ECONOMY GETTING BETTER/WORSE IN THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS R'S VIEWS ON THE NATIONAL BUDGET 860382 IS R WORRIED ABOUT THE NATIONAL BUDGET DEFICIT 860383 WHO DOES R THINK IS MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BUDGET DEFICIT 860384 WHICH PARTY DOES R THINK IS MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BUDGET DEFICIT POSITIONS ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE 860385 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-R 860386 IF R HAD TO CHOOSE, WOULD R CONSIDER SELF A LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE 860387 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REAGAN 860388 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE U.S. HOUSE 860389 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE U.S. HOUSE 860390 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SENATE 860391 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SENATE 860392 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-SENATOR WITH UNEXPIRED TERM 860393 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860394 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 860395 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860396 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1AA PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860397 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860398 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860399 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860400 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860401 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860402 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860403 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860404 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.K1J PROBED BY INTERVIEWER POSITIONS ON MORE/LESS DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE 860405 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-R 860406 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REAGAN 860407 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE U.S. HOUSE 860408 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE U.S. HOUSE 860409 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/ INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 860410 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SENATE 860411 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SENATE 860412 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860413 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 860414 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 860415 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860416 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860417 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860418 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860419 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860420 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860421 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860422 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860423 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1J PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860424 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L1K PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860425 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: FORM #4 POSITIONS ON MINORITY AID SCALE 860426 MINORITY AID SCALE-R 860427 MINORITY(BLACKS) AID SCALE-R POSITIONS ON INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE 860428 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-R 860429 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REAGAN 860430 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE HOUSE 860431 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE HOUSE 860432 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE/INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 860433 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SENATE 860434 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SENATE 860435 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860436 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 860437 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 860438 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860439 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860440 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860441 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860442 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860443 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860444 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860445 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860446 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5J PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860447 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L5K PROBED BY INTERVIEWER POSITIONS ON MORE/LESS GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING 860448 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-R 860449 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-REAGAN 860450 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE HOUSE 860451 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE HOUSE 860452 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE/INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 860453 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SENATE 860454 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SENATE 860455 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 860456 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 860457 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 860458 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860459 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860460 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860461 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860462 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860463 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860464 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860465 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6H PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860466 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6J PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860467 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L6K PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860468 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FORM #5 POSITION ON RACIAL DISCRIMINATION 860469 DOES R FAVOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS-A 860470 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS-A 860471 DOES R FAVOR QUOTAS TO ADMIT BLACKS TO COLLEGES-A 860472 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY QUOTAS TO ADMIT BLACKS TO COLLEGES-A 860473 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L8 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860474 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L9 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860475 DOES R FAVOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS-B 860476 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS-B 860477 DOES R FAVOR QUOTAS TO ADMIT BLACKS TO COLLEGES-B 860478 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY QUOTAS TO ADMIT BLACKS TO COLLEGES-B 860479 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L10 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860480 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.L11 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER R'S OPINION ON PRAYER IN SCHOOL 860481 R'S OPINION ON PRAYER IN SCHOOL 860482 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY PRAYER IN SCHOOL 860483 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FORM #6 R'S OPINION ON DESEGREGATION 860484 DOES R HAVE OPINION ON BLACKS AND WHITES ATTENDING THE SAME SCHOOL 860485 R'S OPINION ON BLACKS AND WHITES ATTENDING THE SAME SCHOOL POSITION ON GOVT GUARANTEED JOB/LIVING SCALE 860486 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE-R POSITION ON COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE 860487 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-R R'S POSITION ON ABORTION 860488 R'S POSITION ON ABORTION R'S OPINION ON SOUTH AFRICA 860489 DOES R HAVE AN OPINION ON RECENT EVENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA 860490 DOES R THINK THE U.S. SHOULD APPLY ECONOMIC PRESSURE ON SOUTH AFRICA 860491 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY U.S. ECONOMIC PRESSURE ON SOUTH AFRICA 860492 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M7 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860493 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M7A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER R'S OPINION ON RECENT TAX LAW CHANGES 860494 DOES R HAVE AN OPINION ON THE RECENT TAX LAW CHANGES 860495 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE THE RECENT TAX LAW CHANGES 860496 DOES R FAVOR/OPPOSE STRONGLY RECENT TAX LAW CHANGES 860497 DOES R THINK THE PRESIDENT/CONGRESS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TAX CHANGES R LIKES 860498 DOES R THINK THE DEMOCRATS/REPUBLICANS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THINGS R LIKES IN GENERAL 860499 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M8 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860500 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M8A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860501 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M8B/E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860502 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M8C/F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860503 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.M8D/G PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860504 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FORM #7 SHOULD GOVT INSURE RACIAL FAIRNESS 860505 DOES R HAVE AN OPINION ON WHETHER GOVERNMENT SHOULD INSURE FAIR TREATMENT OF BLACKS IN JOBS 860506 R'S OPINION ON WHETHER GOVERNMENT SHOULD INSURE FAIR TREATMENT OF BLACKS IN JOBS R'S OPINION ON THE BIBLE 860507 R'S OPINION ON THE BIBLE R'S OPINIONS ON SUCCESS 860508 PEOPLE SHOULD BLAME SELVES NOT SYSTEM FOR ECONOMIC POSITION 860509 HARD WORK DOES NOT GUARANTEE SUCCESS 860510 PEOPLE CAN GET WHAT THEY WANT IF THEY WORK HARD 860511 PEOPLE WHO DON'T DO WELL WORK AS HARD AS THOSE WHO DO 860512 IF A PERSON WORKS HARD HE/SHE WILL SUCCEED 860513 EVEN IF THEY WORK HARD PEOPLE OFTEN CANNOT REACH GOAL 860514 COMMUNITIES CAN SOLVE OWN PROBLEMS BETTER THAN GOVERNMENT 860515 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: R'S RACE #1 R'S OPINION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GROUPS/PROGRAMS 860516 DOES R THINK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REDUCES WHITES CHANCES IN JOBS AND EDUCATION 860517 DOES R AGREE/DISAGREE STRONGLY THAT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS REDUCE WHITES CHANCES IN JOBS AND EDUCATION 860518 DOES R THINK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS HELP BLACKS IN JOBS AND EDUCATION 860519 DOES R AGREE/DISAGREE STRONGLY THAT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS HELP BLACKS IN JOBS AND EDUCATION R'S OPINION ON IMPORT PROBLEM 860520 DOES R HAVE AN OPINION ON HIGH IMPORT PROBLEM IN U.S. 860521 R'S OPINION ON LIMITING IMPORTS GOVERNMENT'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS/WORLD POSITION 860522 R'S OPINION ON WHETHER IT IS GOVERNMENT'S JOB TO INSURE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR BLACKS AND WHITES 860523 DOES R THINK THE UNITED STATES' WORLD POSITION HAS GROWN STRONGER/WEAKER/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR WHO COULD KEEP U.S. OUT OF WAR 860524 DOES R THINK THAT REPUBLICANS/DEMOCRATS COULD BETTER KEEP THE U.S. OUT OF WAR IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS R'S POSITION ON MORALITY IN SOCIETY 860525 NEWER LIFESTYLES CONTRIBUTE TO BREAKDOWN OF SOCIETY 860526 WE SHOULD ADJUST MORAL BEHAVIOR TO CHANGES IN WORLD 860527 THERE WOULD BE FEWER PROBLEMS IF MORE EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON TRADITIONAL FAMILY TIES 860528 THERE IS TOO MUCH SEXUAL FREEDOM TODAY 860529 IT IS NOT A PROBLEM IF PEOPLE THINK/ACT DIFFERENTLY 860530 WE SHOULD BE MORE TOLERANT OF PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT MORAL STANDARDS 860531 DIVORCE AND LIVING TOGETHER ARE SIGNS OF MORAL DECAY 860532 SOCIETY SHOULD BE MORE ACCEPTING OF DIFFERENCES IN PEOPLE 860533 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FORM #8 R'S OPINION ON U.S. WORLD POSITION 860534 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT THE U.S. GETTING INTO A CONVENTIONAL WAR 860535 DOES R THINK THE U.S. SHOULD BE ISOLATIONIST POSITIONS ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 860536 DOES R CONSIDER SELF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/MODERATE 860537 DOES R CONSIDER SELF A STRONG OR NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 860538 DOES R CONSIDER SELF MORE LIKE A LIBERAL/A CONSERVATIVE 860539 SUMMARY: TO WHAT DEGREE IS R LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 860540 HOW DOES R FEEL THE COUNTRY IS DOING 860541 DOES R SEE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES R'S FEELINGS ABOUT REAGAN 860542 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R ANGRY 860543 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R HOPEFUL 860544 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R AFRAID 860545 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R PROUD IMPORTANCE OF RELIGION TO R 860546 IS RELIGION IMPORTANT TO R 860547 DOES RELIGION PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO R R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS GOVERNMENT 860548 HOW MUCH OF THE TIME DOES R FEEL HE/SHE CAN TRUST GOVERNMENT 860549 PUBLIC OFFICIALS DO NOT CARE ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE ME QUALITIES DESCRIBING REAGAN 860550 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INTELLIGENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860551 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860552 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860553 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860554 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860555 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DECENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860556 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 860557 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY BETWEEN RACES 860558 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: R'S RACE #2 860559 DOES R THINK CIVIL RIGHTS IS BEING PUSHED TOO FAST 860560 IF R IS NOT BLACK-DISCRIMINATION IN ADMISSIONS IF QUALIFICATION ARE EQUAL OR LESS 860561 IF R IS BLACK-DISCRIMINATION IN ADMISSIONS IF QUALIFICATIONS ARE EQUAL 860562 HAS THERE BEEN REAL CHANGE FOR BLACKS IN THE PAST FEW YEARS 860563 IF R IS NOT BLACK-DISCRIMINATION IN JOBS/PROMOTIONS 860564 IF R IS BLACK-DISCRIMINAION IN JOBS/PROMOTIONS 860565 DOES R THINK MOST BLACKS COULD GET ALONG WITHOUT WELFARE 860566 DOES R THINK BLACKS HAVE GOTTEN LESS THAN THEY DESERVE 860567 DOES R THINK GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS PAY LESS ATTENTION TO BLACKS 860568 DOES R THINK BLACKS SHOULD OVERCOME PREJUDICE ON THEIR OWN 860569 IF R IS NOT BLACK-WOULD R OR FAMILY FACE DISCRIMINATION IN APPLYING TO SCHOOL 860570 IF R IS BLACK-WOULD R OR FAMILY FACE DISCRIMINATION IN APPLYING TO SCHOOL 860571 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R5A/S5A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860572 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R5B/S5B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860573 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R5C/S5C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860574 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R5D/S5D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860575 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R6 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860576 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.S6 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860577 DOES R THINK POWERFUL WHITES ACT TO KEEP BLACKS DOWN 860578 DOES R THINK THE DIFFERENCES ARE BROUGHT ABOUT BY GOD 860579 DOES R THINK BLACKS SHOULD TRY HARDER TO DO WELL 860580 DOES R THINK SLAVERY/DISCRIMINATION MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR BLACKS 860581 DOES R THINK BLACKS TEACH THEIR CHILDREN DIFFERENT SKILLS/VALUES 860582 DOES R THINK BLACKS COME FROM A LESS ABLE RACE 860583 IF R IS NOT BLACK-WOULD R (OR R'S FAMILY) NOT GET A JOB/PROMOTION DUE TO REVERSE DISCRIMINATION 860584 IF R IS BLACK-WOULD R (OR R'S FAMILY) GET A JOB/ PROMOTION DUE TO DISCRIMINATION 860585 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7A/Q.S7A PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860586 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7B/Q.S7B PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860587 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7C/Q.S7C PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860588 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7D/Q.S7D PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860589 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7E/Q.S7E PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860590 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R7F/Q.S7F PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860591 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.R8 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER 860592 CODER CHECKPOINT - WAS Q.S8 PROBED BY INTERVIEWER PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT R 860593 R'S DATE OF BIRTH-MONTH 860594 R'S DATE OF BIRTH-YEAR 860595 R'S RECODED AGE R'S MARITAL STATUS 860596 R'S MARITAL STATUS 860597 IS R LIVING WITH SOMEONE AS A COUPLE 860598 SUMMARY: MARITAL STATUS R'S EDUCATION 860599 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY R 860600 DOES R HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 860601 R'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 860602 SUMMARY: R'S EDUCATION 860603 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: SPOUSE HEAD'S EDUCATION 860604 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY HEAD 860605 DOES HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 860606 HEAD'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 860607 SUMMARY: HEAD'S EDUCATION SPOUSE'S/PARTNER'S EDUCATION 860608 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY SPOUSE/PARTNER 860609 DOES SPOUSE/PARTNER HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 860610 SPOUSE'S/PARTNER'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 860611 SUMMARY: SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION SPOUSE'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 860612 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - DOES R HAVE SPOUSE 860613 SPOUSE: EMPLOYMENT STATUS R'S OCCUPATION SECTION 860614 R'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 860615 SUMMARY: R'S WORKING STATUS 860616 HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY-R UNEMPLOYED 860617 WHEN DID R RETIRE 860618 HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY-R DISABLED 860619 IS R (HOMEMAKER/STUDENT) WORKING NOW 860620 HAS R (HOMEMAKER/STUDENT) WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MONTHS OCCUPATION - R WORKING/TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 860621 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860622 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860623 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860624 IS R SELF-EMPLOYED 860625 DID R WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860626 WHAT PROPORTION OF R'S CO-WORKERS ARE BLACK 860627 ABOUT HOW MANY OF R'S CO-WORKERS ARE BLACK 860628 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKS 860629 IS R SATISFIED WITH NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 860630 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS R 860631 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - IS R WORKING NOW 860632 WAS R OUT OF WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 860633 HAS R HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OCCUPATON - R UNEMPLOYED 860634 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860635 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860636 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860637 ON R'S LAST REGULAR JOB, WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 860638 DID R WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860639 WHAT PROPORTION OF R'S CO-WORKERS WERE BLACK 860640 ABOUT HOW MANY OF R'S CO-WORKERS WERE BLACK 860641 DID R WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 860642 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED 860643 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 860644 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - R RETIRED OR DISABLED 860645 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860646 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860647 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860648 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED LAST JOB 860649 DID R WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860650 HAS R WORKED WITHIN THE PAST SIX MONTHS 860651 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED WHEN R WAS WORKING 860652 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 860653 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - R HOMEMAKER OR STUDENT 860654 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860655 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860656 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860657 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED LAST JOB 860658 DID R WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860659 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED WHEN R WAS WORKING 860660 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 860661 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB R'S OCCUPATIONAL DATA -- STACKED 860662 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: R'S RELATION TO HEAD 860663 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860664 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 CODE 860665 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860666 R SELF EMPLOYED 860667 DID R WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860668 WHAT PROPORTION OF R'S CO-WORKERS ARE BLACK 860669 ABOUT HOW MANY OF R'S CO-WORKERS ARE BLACK 860670 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKS 860671 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS R 860672 DID R WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 860673 (IF UNEMPLOYED) IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 860674 (IF NOT WORKING NOW) HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY HEAD OF FAMILY'S OCCUPATION SECTION 860675 HEAD: EMPLOYMENT STATUS 860676 SUMMARY: HEAD'S WORKING STATUS 860677 HAS HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY-HEAD UNEMPLOYED 860678 WHEN DID HEAD RETIRE 860679 HAS HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY-HEAD DISABLED 860680 IS HEAD (HOMEMAKER/STUDENT) WORKING FOR PAY 860681 HAS HEAD (HOMEMAKER/STUDENT) WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MONTHS OCCUPATION-HEAD/PARTNER WORKING/TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 860682 HEAD/PARTNER: PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860683 HEAD/PARTNER: PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860684 HEAD/PARTNER: PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860685 IS HEAD/PARTNER SELF-EMPLOYED 860686 IS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED BY A FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860687 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD/PARTNER WORKS 860688 IS HEAD/PARTNER SATISFIED WITH NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 860689 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS HEAD/PARTNER 860690 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS HEAD/PARTNER WORKING NOW 860691 WAS HEAD/PARTNER OUT OF WORK WITHIN LAST SIX MONTHS 860692 HAS HEAD/PARTNER HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OCCUPATION - HEAD/PARTNER UNEMPLOYED 860693 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860694 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860695 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860696 ON LAST REGULAR JOB, WAS HEAD/PARTNER SELF-EMPLOYED 860697 WAS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED BY A FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860698 WAS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 860699 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD/PARTNER WORKED 860700 IS HEAD/PARTNER LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 860701 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD/PARTNER ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - HEAD/PARTNER RETIRED OR DISABLED 860702 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860703 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860704 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860705 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS HEAD/PARTNER SELF-EMPLOYED 860706 WAS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED BY A FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860707 WAS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 860708 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD/PARTNER WORKED 860709 IS HEAD/PARTNER LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 860710 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD/PARTNER ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - HEAD/PARTNER HOMEMAKER OR STUDENT 860711 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860712 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 860713 HEAD/PARTNER: LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860714 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS HEAD/PARTNER SELF-EMPLOYED 860715 WAS HEAD/PARTNER EMPLOYED BY A FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860716 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD/PARTNER WORKED 860717 IS HEAD/PARTNER LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 860718 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD/PARTNER ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB HEAD'S OCCUPATIONAL DATA -- STACKED 860719 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860720 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 CODE 860721 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 860722 HEAD SELF EMPLOYED 860723 DID HEAD WORK FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 860724 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD WORKS 860725 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS HEAD 860726 HAS HEAD HAD A JOB IN THE PAST SIX MONTHS 860727 (IF UNEMPLOYED) IS HEAD PRESENTLY LOOKING FOR WORK 860728 (IF NOT WORKING NOW) HAS HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY LABOR UNION POSITION 860729 DOES ANYONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO A LABOR UNION 860730 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS R HEAD OF FAMILY 860731 WHO BELONGS TO LABOR UNION R'S FAMILY INCOME AND SOCIAL CLASS 860732 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS R ONLY FAMILY MEMBER 14 OR OLDER 860733 FAMILY HOUSEHOLD INCOME BEFORE TAXES 860734 R'S INCOME BEFORE TAXES IF R IS ONLY FAMILY MEMBER 14 OR OLDER 860735 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO A SOCIAL CLASS 860736 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 860737 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE AND DENOMINATION 860738 HOW OFTEN DOES R ATTEND CHURCH/SYNAGOGUE R'S ETHNIC IDENTITY 860739 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER HIS MAIN ETHNIC GROUP (OTHER THAN AMERICAN) - FIRST MENTION 860740 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER HIS MAIN ETHNIC GROUP (OTHER THAN AMERICAN) - SECOND MENTION 860741 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: # GROUPS MENTIONED 860742 WHICH GROUP DOES R MOST CLOSELY IDENTIFY WITH (OF THOSE MENTIONED) PERSONAL INFORMATION: R'S PARENTS 860743 WERE R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY 860744 R'S FATHER'S MAIN OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860745 DID R'S MOTHER HAVE A JOB 860746 R'S MOTHER'S MAIN OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 860747 R'S BIRTHPLACE PERSONAL INFORMATION: R'S COMMUNITY 860748 WHERE DID R GROW UP 860749 WHICH COMMUNITY TYPE DID R GROW UP IN 860750 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE 860751 WHERE DID R LIVE BEFORE THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE-WITHIN THE U.S.A. 860752 WHERE DID R LIVE BEFORE THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE- FOREIGN COUNTRY 860753 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS HOUSE/APARTMENT 860754 DOES R/R'S FAMILY OWN OR RENT R'S HOME 860755 R'S SEX 860756 R'S RACE 860757 IS R OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 860758 R'S RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF FAMILY CONDITIONS OF INTERVIEW 860759 OTHERS PRESENT AT INTERVIEW 860760 R'S COOPERATION 860761 R'S LEVEL OF INFORMATION ABOUT POLITICS/PUBLIC AFFAIRS 860762 R'S INTELLIGENCE 860763 WAS R SUSPICIOUS BEFORE INTERVIEW 860764 R'S INTEREST IN INTERVIEW 860765 R'S SINCERITY 860766 DID R REPORT INCOME CORRECTLY 860767 ESTIMATE OF R'S INCOME 860768 WAS INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH VOTE VALIDATION 860770 VOTER VALIDATION ID 860771 PRIMARY AREA OF 1986 INTERVIEW 860772 OFFICE IN WHICH VOTING RECORDS WERE CHECKED 860773 DOES R HAVE A REGISTRATION RECORD IN THIS OFFICE 860774 WHERE WAS THE REGISTRATION RECORD FOUND 860775 MONTH OF PURGE/APPLICATION 860776 DAY OF THE PURGE/APPLICATION 860777 YEAR OF PURGE/APPLICATION 860778 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT-PURGE/APPLICATION DATE 860779 DOES R'S NAME ON COVERSHEET LABEL MATCH THE NAME ON THE REGISTRATION RECORD 860780 MONTH OF BIRTH ON REGISTRATION RECORD 860781 YEAR OF BIRTH ON REGISTRATION RECORD 860782 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SELF REPORT BIRTHDATE AND BIRTHDATE ON REGISTRATION RECORD 860783 DOES R'S ADDRESS ON COVERSHEET LABEL MATCH THE ADDRESS ON REGISTRATION RECORD 860784 DOES THE PRECINCT LISTED ON THE REGISTRATION RECORD MATCH EXACTLY THE PRECINCT LISTED ON COVERSHEET LABEL 860785 WHICH SOURCES OF REGISTRATION RECORDS ARE IN THIS OFFICE 860786 WHICH SOURCES OF RECORDS WERE NOT ACCESSIBLE FOR CHECKING 860787 ARE REGISTRATION RECORDS UPDATED WITH VOTE INFORMATION 860788 DOES THE REGISTRATION RECORD INDICATE THAT R VOTED 860789 DO VOTE RECORDS INDICATE THAT R VOTED 860790 WHICH VOTE RECORD INDICATED THAT R VOTED 860791 WERE ALL VOTE RECORDS ACCESSIBLE FOR CHECKING 860792 WHICH VOTE RECORDS WERE NOT AVAILABLE 860793 IS R'S ADDRESS NEEDED TO LOCATE (HIM/HER) IN REGISTRATION FILE 860794 WERE ALL REGISTRATION RECORDS AVAILABLE TO INTERVIEWER/SUPERVISOR 860795 IS R'S NAME LISTED IN DIRECTORY AT ADDRESS ON COVERSHEET LABEL 860796 EASE OF ACCESS RATING CODE FROM ELECTION ADMINISTRATION SURVEY THUMBNAIL 860797 R SELF REPORTED VOTE 860798 WHETHER A CHECK WAS MADE FOR R'S REGISTRATION /VOTING RECORD 860799 REGISTRATION RECORD FOUND:SUMMARY 860800 AVAILABILITY OF VOTING RECORDS 860801 RECORD OF R VOTING 860802 SUMMARY:ASSIGNMENT OF R TO VOTE/NON-VOTE